The Curriculum Analysis of Senior Education in Physical Education (CASE-PE) study


The importance of senior secondary school physical education (PE) is underscored by the assessment of learning outcomes being linked to future access to higher education, employment and further training. Yet within the broad spectrum of PE studies, the investigation of senior secondary school PE has been limited. This article serves the purpose of exploring the key concepts and themes from senior secondary PE syllabi across Australian states and territories. The Leximancer text-mining software was applied as an innovative tool for the exploratory conceptual and thematic analyses within the Curriculum Analysis of Senior Education in Physical Education (CASE-PE) study. A number of similar themes emerged within the CASE-PE study from across the state and territory senior physical education syllabi, including skills, physical, learning, assessment, study, use, performance and training. A number of themes were unique to each state and territory and major concepts had differing levels of relevance. This article provides insights into an under-theorised and -explored part of the Australian curriculum and PE literature. We conclude there is a need for greater uniformity in senior secondary PE curricula and its underpinnings in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10


  1. ACT Board of Senior Secondary Studies (ACT BSS). (2016). ACT Senior Secondary Curriculum. Retrieved June 8, 2016 from:

  2. Arnold, P. J. (1979). Meaning in movement, sport, and physical education. Heinemann.

  3. Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation (ACHPER). (2009). The ACHPER National Statement on the curriculum future of Health and Physical Education in Australia. Retrieved November 28, 2016 from:

  4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). The shape of the Australian curriculum version 2.0. Sydney: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2011). Why have an Australian curriculum? Retrieved November 28, 2016 from:

  6. Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). The shape of the Australian curriculum: health and physical education.

  7. Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2014). Health and Physical Education Curriculum. Retrieved June 19, 2016, from:

  8. Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2016). Health and Physical Education Curriculum. Retrieved November 12, 2016 from:

  9. Australian Institute for Training and School Leadership. (2011). National Professional Standards for Teachers. Retrieved March 25, 2011, from:

  10. Beamish, W., Bryer, F., & Davies, M. (2006). Teacher reflections on co-teaching a unit of work. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 2(2), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bowes, M., & Bruce, J. (2011). Curriculum liquefaction (shifting sands) in senior school physical education in New Zealand: Critical pedagogical approaches and dilemmas. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(3–4), 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, T. D. (2013). A vision lost?(Re) articulating an Arnoldian conception of education ‘in’movement in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 21-37.

  13. Brown, T. D., & Penney, D. (2013). Learning ‘in’, ‘through’ and ‘about’ movement in senior physical education? The new Victorian Certificate of education physical education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Curriculum Corporation. (1994). Health and physical education—A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Melbourne: Curriculum Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cothran, D. J., Kulinna, P. H., & Garrahy, D. A. (2003). “this is kind of giving a secret away...”: Students’ perspectives on effective class management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(4), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cothran, D. J., McCaughtry, N., Kulinna, P. H., & Martin, J. (2006). Top-down public health curricular change: The experience of physical education teachers in the United States. Journal of In-Service Education, 32(4), 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crawford, D. (2009). The future of sport in Australia. Retrieved 29 November, 2016 from:

  18. Crofts, K., & Bisman, J. (2010). Interrogating accountability: An illustration of the use of Leximancer software for qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2), 180–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Curtain, R. (2001). An entitlement to post-compulsory education international practice and policy implications for Australia. National Centre for Vocational Education and Research (NCVER), Leabrook, South Australia.

  20. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2011). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

  21. Fisher, R., & Miller, D. (2008). Responding to student expectations: A partnership approach to course evaluation. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Green, K. (2001). Examinations in Physical Education: a sociological perspective on a ‘new orthodoxy’. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grimbeek, P., Bartlett, B., & Kit-Ken, L. (2004). Using Leximancer to Identify Themes and Patterns in the Talk of Three High-distinction Students [online]. In Bartlett, B., Bryer, F & Roebuck, D (Eds). Educating: Weaving Research into Practice: Volume 2. Nathan, Qld: Griffith University, School of Cognition, Language and Special Education, 122-128.

  24. Grimbeek, P., Bryer, F., Davies, M., & Bartlett, B. (2005). Themes and patterns in 3 years of abstracts from the international conference on cognition, language, and special education research: identified by Leximancer analysis. Stimulating the “action”as participants in participatory research Brisbane. Australia: Griffith University, School of Cognition, Language, and Special Education, 101–113.

  25. Haynes, J. E., Miller, J. A., & Varea, V. (2016). Preservice generalist teachers enlightened approach to teaching physical education through teacher biography. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Horsley, J. (2010). How high ability students perceived the practice of influential teachers. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 2009(19), 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hyndman, B. (2014). Exploring the differences in teaching perspectives between Australian pre-service and graduate physical education teachers. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 4(4), 438–444.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hyndman, B. P. (2017). Perceived Social-Ecological Barriers of Generalist Pre-Service Teachers towards Teaching Physical Education: Findings from the GET-PE study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, In Press.

  29. Hyndman, B. P., & Pill, S. (2016). The Influences on Teaching Perspectives of Australian Physical Education Teacher Education Students: The First-Year Influences on Teaching Perspectives Exploratory (FIT-PE) Study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(5). doi:10.14221/ajte.2016v41n5.7.

  30. Hyndman, B., & Pill, S. (2017). What’s in a concept? A Leximancer text mining analysis of physical literacy across the international literature. European Physical Education Review. doi:10.1177/1356336X17690312.

  31. Hyndman, B., Mahony, L., Te Ava, A., Smith, S., & Nutton, G. (2016). Complementing the Australian primary school health and physical education (HPE) curriculum: Exploring children’s HPE learning experiences within varying school ground equipment contexts. Education, 3-13, 1–16. doi:10.1080/03004279.2016.1152282.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kirk, D. (1988). Physical education and curriculum study: A critical introduction. London: Croom Held.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kirk, D. (2014). A defining time for physical education futures? Exploring the legacy of Fritz Duras. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 5(2), 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lamb, P., & Lane, K. (2013). Pupil voice on being gifted and talented in physical education: ‘they think it’s just, like, a weekend sort of thing’. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 18(2), 150–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lynch, T. (2014). Australian curriculum reform II health and physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20(4), 508–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Macdonald, D. (2013). The new Australian health and physical education curriculum: A case of/for gradualism in curriculum reform? Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MacPhail, A. (2004). The social construction of higher grade physical education: the impact on teacher curriculum decision-making. Sport, Education and Society, 9(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. MacPhail, A. (2007). Teachers’ views on the construction, management and delivery ofan externally prescribedphysical education curriculum: higher grade physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 12(1), 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Northern Territory Government. (2016). Senior Physical Education curriculum. Retrieved May 26, from:

  40. NSW Educational Standards Authority (NESA). (2016). Personal Development, Health and Physical Education. Retrieved June 1, 2016 from:

  41. Penney, D., Jones, A., Newhouse, P., & Cambell, A. (2012). Developing a digital assessment in senior secondary physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17(4), 383–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Pill, S., Harvey, S., & Hyndman, B. (2017). Novel research approaches to gauge global teacher familiarity with game-based teaching in physical education: an exploratory# Twitter analysis. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 8(2). doi:10.1080/18377122.2017.1315953.

  43. Pinquart, M., Juang, L. P., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2003). Self-efficacy and successful school-to-work transition: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2016). Queensland Senior Secondary Physical Education syllabus. Retrieved June 10, 2016 from:

  45. Rooney, D., Brabant, M., Paulsen, N., Callan, V. J., & Jones, E. (2006). Researching place and social identity in organizational change: a theoretically informed Leximancer analysis of a participant historiographical study. In 56th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association: Networking Communication Research. International Communication Association.

  46. Smyth, E., & Banks, J. (2012). High stakes testing and student perspectives on teaching and learning in the Republic of Ireland. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. South Australian Certificate of Education (SACE). (2016). South Australian Certificate of Education: Physical Education syllabus. Retrieved June 12, from:

  48. Stolz, S. A., & Thorburn, M. (2015). A genealogical analysis of Peter Arnold’s conceptual account of meaning in movement, sport and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 1–14.

  49. SueSee, B., & Edwards, K. (2011). Self-identified and observed teaching styles of senior physical education teachers in Queensland schools. In Proceedings of the 27th Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Conference (ACHPER 2011) (pp. 208–219). Australian Council for Health Physical Education and Recreation (ACHPER).

  50. Tasmanian Assessment, Standards and Certification (TASC). (2016). Senior Secondary. Retrieved June 18, from:

  51. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2015). Action Now: Classroom Ready. Teachers. Retrieved May 23rd, 2016 from:

  52. Thorburn, M. (2007). Achieving conceptual and curriculum coherence in high-stakes school examinations in Physical Education. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 12(2), 163–184.

  53. Thorburn, M. (2010). Opportunities and challenges for physical education. Physical Education-picking up the Baton. Policy & Practice in Education, 17–27.

  54. Thorburn, M., & Collins, D. (2006a). The effects of an integrated curriculum model on student learning and attainment. European Physical Education Review, 12(1), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Thorburn, M., & Collins, D. (2006b). Accuracy and authenticity of oral and written assessments in high-stakes school examinations. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Trost, S. G., & van der Mars, H. (2010). Why should we not cut PE. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA). (2016). Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) Physical Education. Retrieved June 17, from:

  58. Western Australia Certificate of Education (WACE). (2016). Western Australian Certificate of Education (Physical Education). Retrieved June 17, 2016 from:

  59. Whittle, R. J., Telford, A.,& Benson, A. C. (2015). The ‘Perfect’ Senior (VCE) Secondary Physical Education Teacher: Student Perceptions of Teacher-related Factors that Influence Academic Performance. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(8).

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendon Hyndman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hyndman, B., Pill, S. The Curriculum Analysis of Senior Education in Physical Education (CASE-PE) study. Curric Perspect 37, 147–160 (2017).

Download citation


  • Physical education
  • Curriculum
  • Senior secondary
  • Schools