Learning and learners in early childhood curricula: Australia, Japan and China
Conceptions of learning and learners underpin and lend legitimacy to curriculum decisions. This study engages with the national early childhood curriculum documents of three countries, Australia, Japan and China in order to understand their conceptions of learning and learners. The lens through which we explore learning and learners is one that privileges curriculum as an important document in which the concepts of learning and learners are understood. The purpose of this cross-national comparison is twofold: it analyses learning and learners in each curriculum document to consider ways in which the concepts are constituted; and it compares the three curricula with regard to their expressions of the concepts in order to identify how national and global contexts influence early childhood curricula. Concept analysis provides an approach with which to explore learning and learners, and consequently a useful way of understanding them across the three documents. While findings highlight some similar articulations of the concepts, significant differences are detected. It is argued that the documents produce distinctive national and global versions of learning and learners. The study is expected to become a catalyst for national and international discussions of key curriculum terms.
KeywordsLearning, learners Early childhood curriculum Cross-national comparison Australia Japan China
- Beckley, P. (2012). Learning in early childhood: A whole child approach from birth to 8. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Carr, M., & Lee, W. (2012). Learning stories: Constructing learner identities in early education. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR). (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. ACT: Council of Australian Governments: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
- Duhn, I. (2012). Globalizing childhood: assembling the bicultural child in the New Zealand early childhood curriculum, Te Whariki. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies, 1(1), 82–104.Google Scholar
- Gupta, A. (2014). Diverse early childhood education policies and practices: Voices and images from five countries in Asia. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Katz, L. (2008). Another look at what young children should be learning. Exchange, 180, 53–56.Google Scholar
- Kervin, L. (2016). Powerful and playful literacy learning with digital technologies. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 39(1), 64–73.Google Scholar
- Law, W. (2013). Globalization, national identity and citizenship education: China’s search for modernization and a modern Chinese citizenry. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(4), 596–627.Google Scholar
- McLachlan, C., Fleer, M., & Edwards, S. (2012). Early childhood curriculum: Planning, assessment and implementation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2008). Course of study for kindergarten. Kisaburo Tokai.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education in China. (2001). Guidelines for kindergarten education. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.Google Scholar
- Mori, M., Nezu, A., Samizo, C., Naito, T., & Ishizuka, M. (2008). The meaning of play and learning for 0–3 year old children in Japan. In P. Samuelsson & M. Fleer (Eds.), Play and learning in early childhood setting: International perspectives (pp. 111–135). London: Springer.Google Scholar
- National Institute for Educational Policy Research (2016). Preschool education and care. http://www.nier.go.jp/English/educationjapan/pdf/201109ECEC.pdf. Accessed on 3 March 2016.
- Petriwskyj, A. (2014). Early years national curriculum documents: revisiting inclusive education. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(1), 22–28.Google Scholar
- Raban, B. (2011). A new era in early years learning. Research Developments, 26(3), 9–11.Google Scholar
- Scahill, J. (2013). A Japanese education. Quadrant, 57(11), 94–97.Google Scholar
- Sutterby, J. A. (2012). Early education in a global Context. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald Book Serials and Monographs.Google Scholar
- Tobin, J., Hayashi, A., & Zhang, J. (2011). Approaches to promoting creativity in Chinese, Japanese and US preschools. In J. Sefton-Green, P. Thomson, K. Jones, & L. Bresler (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 150–158). Oxon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
- United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2005). General comment No. 7, Implementing child’s rights in early education. http://www.refworld.org/docid/460bc5a62.html. Accessed 1 March 2016.
- Waite-Stupiansky, S., & Cohen, L. E. (2013). Learning across the early childhood curriculum. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
- Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2005). Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Wandschneider, S., & Crosbie, S. (2013). Play, think, link, learn: building language skills in the early years of education. Educating Young Children: Learning & Teaching in the Early Childhood Years, 19(1), 25–26.Google Scholar
- Woodhead, M. (2006). Changing perspectives on early childhood: Theory, research and policy. Background paper presented at the Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2007 Strong Foundations: Early Childhood Care and Education. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001474/147499e.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2016.