Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Engaging first-graders in language arts through ‘arts-flow activities’

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Curriculum Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how an elementary curriculum can be impacted by flow theory and current pedagogical perceptions of arts integration. Specifically, the purpose of this study was to explore how ‘aesthetic flow activities’ affect first-graders’ engagement in the language arts learning process. These activities were used to compare with current curriculum activities, all designed to conform to the same academic goals. The sample consisted of 80 children in four first-grade classrooms, two of which functioned as the experimental groups and the other two as the control groups. Data collecting process The data were collected through participant observation. In addition, the children filled in a five-scale smileyometer, so that they could register their level of satisfaction in participating. From the analysis of the data there were indications that ‘aesthetic flow activities’ can raise pupils’ engagement. The indicators of pupils’ engagement which were measured were the verbal participation of the children in the sample, their multimodal/arts involvement in the taught subject, their creative responses to the taught subject, their multifaceted/holistic activation during the lesson and their satisfaction at participating in the lesson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anvari, S., Trainor, L., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. (2002). Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(2), 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: the crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basom, M. R., & Frase, L. (2004). Creating optimal work environments: exploring teacher flow experiences. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 12(2), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, S. M., & Owen, S.V. (2002). Using art processes to enhance academic self-regulation. In R. J. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 64-66). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.

  • Butzlaff, R. (2000). Can music be used for teach reading? Journal of aesthetic education, 34(3–4), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catterall, J. S. (1998). Involvement in the arts and success in secondary school. Americans for the Arts Monographs, 1(9), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. L., & Vitale, J. L. (2014). Art that is heard and music that is seen: cultivating student engagement through interactive art strategies. What Works? Research into Practice, Ontario Association of Deans of Education. Research Monograph, #53, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coller, B. D., Shernoff, D. J., & Strati, A. D. (2011). Measuring engagement as students learn dynamics systems and control with a video game. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(3), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal for the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. (2000). Aesthetic experiences in the school curriculum: assessing the value of Rosenblatt's transactional theory. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Schneider, B. (2000). Becoming adult: how teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culpan, A. (2010). Promoting creativity through arts education. Learning Matters, 15(1), 35–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deasy, R. J. (Ed.) (2002). Critical links: learning in the arts and student academic and social development. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deasy, R. J. (Ed.) (2003). Creating quality integrated and interdisciplinary arts programs: a report of the arts education National Forum. Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dislen, G. (2013). The reasons of lack of motivation from the students’ and teachers’ voice. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 1(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1999). Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement? Clearing House, 72(3), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In P. Atkinson, A. Coffey, S. Delamont, J. Lofland, & L. Lofland (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 356–357). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2009). Arts and cultural education at school in Europe. Brussels.

  • Fredricks, A. J., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2014). Why theatre matters: urban youth, engagement, and a pedagogy of the real. Toronto, Buffalo, London: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garces-Bacsal, R. M., Cohen, L., & Tan, L. S. (2011). Soul behind the skill, heart behind the technique experiences of flow among artistically talented students in Singapore. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 55(3), 194–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, E. (2014). The Need to Address Noncognitive Skills in the Education Policy Agenda. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute http://www.epi.org/publication/the-need-to-address-noncognitive-skills-in-the-education-policy-agenda/#epi-toc-14. Accessed 3 November 2015.

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: the theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Η. (1999). Intelligence reframed. Multiple intelligences for the twenty-first century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelineau, R. P. (2012). Integrating the arts across the elementary school curriculum (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R., & Poskitt, J. (2010). Student engagement in the middle years of schooling (years 7–10): A literature review. Wellington: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (2001). Variations on a blue guitar: the Lincoln Center institute lectures on aesthetic education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gromko, J. E. (2005). The effect of music instruction on phonemic awareness in beginning readers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46(1), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellenic Pedagogical Institute–Hellenic Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs (2003). Ministerial Decisions 21072a/C2 and 21072b/C2. In Cross- curricular thematic framework and curricula [available in Greek]. Official Government Gazette 303 v. A’ and 304 v. B′ (pp. 3745–3770). Athens: National Printing Office.

  • Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2013). Studio thinking 2: the real benefits of visual arts education (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, R., & Webb-Dempsey, J. (2002). Promising signs of positive effects: lessons from the multi-arts studies. In R. Deasy (Ed.), Critical links: learning in the arts and student academic and social development (pp. 98–100). Washington, DC: Arts Education Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, A., & Lau, S. (2006). Drama education: a touch of the creative mind and communicative-expressive ability of elementary children in Hong Kong. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 34–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huotilainen, M. (2010). Building blocks of fetal cognition: emotion and language. Infant and Child Development, 19, 94–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iser, W. (1978). The act of reading: a theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. L. (2007). Aesthetic experience and early language and literacy development. Early Child Development and Care, 177(3), 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karantzola, E., Kurdi, K., Spanelli, T., & Tsiagkani, T. (2012). Glossa A’ Dimotikou: grammata, lekseis, istories. [Language 1st class of primary school: letters, words, stories]. Athens: OEDB.

  • Kelner, L. B., & Flynn, R. M. (2006). A dramatic approach to reading comprehension: strategies and activities for classroom teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, M. (2004). Methods of teaching Educational Psychology. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, S. C. (2011). The effects of academic literacy instruction on engagement and conceptual understanding of biology in ninth grade students. Aurora, IL: Aurora University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, N., & Littlewood, W. (1997). Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse? System, 25(3), 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P. (2007). Making meaning many ways: an exploratory look at integrating the arts with classroom curriculum. Art Education, 60(4), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markovic, S. (2011). Components of aesthetic experience: aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. I-Perception, 3, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2007). The psychology of humor: an integrative approach. USA: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K., Bray, M. A., Kehle, T. J., Theodore, L. A., & Gelbar, N. W. (2011). Promoting happiness and life satisfaction in school children. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 26, 177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. P. (2007). The holistic curriculum. Toronto: OISE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, S. (2003). Assessment of high school students’ creative thinking skills: a comparison of dance and nondance classes. Research in Dance Education, 4(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE) (1999). All our futures: creativity, culture and education. London: DfEE/DCMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (2004). Happiness and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M. (1990). Aesthetic literacy: the psychological context. Journal of aesthetic education, 24(1), 135–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, M. (2004). Aesthetic teaching. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(2), 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: a clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, D. C. (2001). “doing school”: how we are creating a generation of stressed out, materialistic, and miseducated students. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. C., MacFarlane, S. J., & Casey, C. (2002). Endurability, engagement and expectations: Measuring children’s fun. In Proceedings of interaction design and children (pp. 189–198). Eindhoven: Shaker Publishing.

  • Rooney, R. (2004). Arts – based teaching an§d learning. Review of the literature. Washington DC: WESTAT Rockville, Maryland. Retrieved from https://www.kennedy-center.org/education/vsa/resources/VSAarts_Lit_Rev5-28.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2006.

  • Rosenblatt, L. (1986). The aesthetic transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J., & Zembylas, M. (2007). Arts integration in the curriculum: a review of research and implications for teaching and learning. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., & Albers, P. (2010). Multimodal literacies: an introduction. In P. Albers & J. Sanders (Eds.), Literacies, the arts, and multimodality (pp. 1–25). Urbana, IL: National council of teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. A. (2010). Flow in education. In E. Bakker, P. P. Peterson, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 605–611). London: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., & Anderson, B. (2014). Enacting flow and student engagement in the college classroom. In A. Parks-Sheiner (Ed.), The handbook of positive psychological interventions (pp. 194–212). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow in schools: cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In R. Gilman, E. S. Huebner, & M. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 131–145). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. L., & Singer, D. G. (2013). Historical overview of research on imagination in children. In M. Taylor (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of imagination (pp. 11–27). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. A. (2000). Phases in aesthetic learning. In R. A. Smith (Ed.), Readings in discipline-based art education (pp. 295–303). Reston, UA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithrim, K., & Upitis, R. (2005). Learning through the arts: lessons of engagement. Canadian Journal of Education, 289(1/2), 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulou-Zormpala, M. (2012). Aesthetic teaching: seeking a balance between teaching arts and teaching through the arts. Arts Education Policy Review, 113(4), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulou-Zormpala, M. (2016). Seeking a higher level of arts integration across the curriculum. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulou-Zormpala, M., & Argyriadi, A. (2015). Identifying the features of “aesthetic flow experience activities” in the kindergarten and the first years of primary school education. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(3), 227–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suttie, J. (2012). Can schools help students find flow? http://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_schools_help_students_find_flow. Accessed 17 November 2015.

  • Swafford, J., & Akrofi, A. (2005). Reading from efferent and aesthetic stances makes books come alive. Talking Points (Special issue special issue on the influence of louise rosenblatt on whole language theory and practice), 17(1), 23–27.

  • Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1). Retrieved from http://cie.asu.edu/.

  • Tough, P. (2012). How children succeed: grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upitis, R. (2011). Engaging students through the arts. The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat, Monograph #33. Toronto, ON: Government of Ontario. https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/WW_Engaging_Arts.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2015.

  • Van der Sluis, F., Van Dijk, E. M. A. G., & Perloy, L. M. (2012). Measuring fun and enjoyment of children in a museum: evaluating the smileyometer. In A. J. Spink, F. Wco, O. E. Krips, L. W. S. Loijens, L. P. J. J. Noldus, & P. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Proceedings of measuring behavior, Utrecht, Netherlands (pp. 86–89). Netherlands: Noldus information technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E., McFadden, L., Tabone, C., & Finkelstein, M. (2011). Contribution of drama based strategies. Youth Theater Journal, 25(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandell, B., Dougherty, R. F., Ben-Shachar, M., & Deutsch, G. K. (2008). Training in the arts, reading, and brain imaging. In C. Asbury & C. Rich (Eds.), Learning, arts and the brain: the Dana consortium report on arts and cognition (pp. 51–60). New York/Washington DC: The Dana Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, C., & Consoli, J. (2009). Flow theory and student engagement. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 2(1), 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm, J. D. (2008). “You gotta be the book’’: teaching engaged and reflective reading with adolescents. New York: Teachers College Press.

  • Willms, J. D., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic and intellectual engagement. First national report. Toronto, ON: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmot, H. (2011). A new direction. Change school case study. Creative teaching and learning. London: A new direction discover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, E., Goldstein, T., & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2013). Art for Art’s Sake? The impact of arts education: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wonglorsaichon, B., Wongwanich, S., & Wiratchai, N. (2014). The influence of students school engagement on learning achievement: a structural equation modeling analysis. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1748–1755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: meaning – making and children’s drawings. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Music Recording

  • Dalaras, G. (2004). Organic march of Smyrna. [Recorded by Nea Ionia Estudiantina]. On Smyrna [CD]. Athens: MINOS-EMI.

  • Ortega, M. (2002). Broken hearts. On Inception [CD]. California: Aural Seduction Audio Productions.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Preschool Education, Laboratory of Music and Psychomotor Education, University of Crete, 74100, Rethymnon, Greece

    Agathi Argyriadi & Marina Sotiropoulou-Zormpala

  2. 19 Zagorion St., 10445, Athens, Greece

    Agathi Argyriadi

  3. 4 Kefallinias St., Kifissia, 14563, Athens, Greece

    Marina Sotiropoulou-Zormpala

Authors
  1. Agathi Argyriadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marina Sotiropoulou-Zormpala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agathi Argyriadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Argyriadi, A., Sotiropoulou-Zormpala, M. Engaging first-graders in language arts through ‘arts-flow activities’. Curric Perspect 37, 25–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-016-0005-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-016-0005-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation