Children around the world are vulnerable to multiple and varying sources of adversity and risk, the meanings, experiences, and outcomes of which are shaped by the cultural context and the individual’s place in that context. In this paper we explore how the cultural context and intersectionality frameworks may aid in understanding which children are vulnerable and under which circumstances. Culture influences child vulnerability by providing the context in which children live in their families, communities and the larger global world. Nevertheless, within any cultural context, some children are more vulnerable than are others. Intersectionality takes into account the ways in which multiple meaningful and overlapping social group memberships combine to shape experiences of vulnerability. Taken together, cultural context and intersectional approaches enhance the potential of planning meaningful actions to improve the safety and well-being of children, families, and communities.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Andresen, S. (2014). Childhood vulnerability: Systematic, structural, and individual dimensions. Child Indicators Research, 7(4), 699–713.
Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%. Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614.
Ben-Ari, A., & Strier, R. (2010). Rethinking cultural competence: What can we learn from Levinas? British Journal of Social Work, 40, 2155–2167.
Brah, A., & Phoenix, A. (2004). Ain’t I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(3), 75–86.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by design and nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, T. H. (2012). The intersection and accumulation of racial and gender inequality: Black women’s wealth trajectories. Review of Black Political Economy, 39, 239–258.
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N. (2017). The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 497–510.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), 785–810.
Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Toward an ecological/transactional model of community violence and child maltreatment: Consequences for children’s development. Psychiatry, 56(1), 96–118.
Creek, S. J., & Dunn, J. L. (2011). Rethinking gender and violence: Agency, heterogeneity, and intersectionality. Sociology Compass, 5, 311–322.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Davis, K. (2008). Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist Theory, 9(1), 67–85.
Etherington, N., & Baker, L. (2018). From “buzzword” to best practice: Applying intersectionality to children exposed to intimate partner violence. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 19(1), 58–75.
Fontes, L. A. (2005). Child abuse and culture: Working with diverse families. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ghavami, N., Katsiaficas, D., & Rogers, L. O. (2016). Toward an intersectional approach in developmental science: The role of race, gender, sexual orientation, and immigrant status. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 50, 31–73.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
Hernandez, M., & Issacs, M. R. (Eds.). (1998). Promoting cultural competence in children's mental health services. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Josephson, J. (2002). The intersectionality of domestic violence and welfare in the lives of poor women. Journal of Poverty, 6, 1–20.
Kelly, U. A. (2009). Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research. Advances in Nursing Science, 32, 42–56.
Korbin, J. E. (1980). The cross-cultural context of child abuse and neglect. In C. H. Kempe & R. E. Helfer (Eds.), The battered child (Third ed., pp. 21–35). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Korbin, J. E. (2002). Culture and child maltreatment: Cultural competence and beyond. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(6–7), 637–644.
Krizsan, A., & Lombardo, E. (2013). The quality of gender equality policies: A discursive approach. European Journal of Women's Studies, 20, 77–92.
Lancy, D. (2008). The anthropology of childhood. Cherubs, chattel, changelings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Latting, J. K. (1990). Identifying the “isms”: Enabling social work students to confront their biases. Journal of Social Work Education, 26(1), 36–44.
Leinaweaver, J. (2014). Informal kinship-based fostering around the world: Anthropological findings. Child Development Perspectives, 8(3), 131–136.
Levine, R. A. (2017). Challenging developmental doctrines through cross-cultural research. In J. Cassaniti & U. Menon (Eds.), Universalism without uniformity: Explorations in mind and culture (pp. 23–31). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
LeVine, R. A., & New, R. (Eds.). (2008). Anthropology and child development: A cross-cultural reader. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mafigiri, D., & Walakira, E. (Eds.). (2017). Child abuse and neglect in Uganda. Dordrecht: Springer.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.
Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 631–659.
Mugumya, F., Asaba, R., Kamya, I., & Asingwire, N. (2017). Children and domestic water collection in Uganda: Exploring policy and intervention options that promote child protection. In E. Mafigiri & E. Walakira (Eds.), Child abuse and neglect in Uganda (pp. 95–112). Cham: Springer.
Murphy, Y., Hunt, V., Zajicek, A. M., Norris, A. N., & Hamilton, L. (2009). Incorporating intersectionality in social work practice, research, policy, and education. Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Nadan, Y. (2017). Rethinking ‘cultural competence’ in international social work. International Social Work, 60(1), 74–83.
Nadan, Y., Spilsbury, J. C., & Korbin, J. E. (2015). Culture and context in understanding child maltreatment: Contributions of intersectionality and neighborhood-based research. Child Abuse & Neglect, 41, 40–48.
National Association of Social Workers. (2015). NASW standards for cultural competence in social work practice. Washington, DC: Author.
Radis, B. (2018). A qualitative study exploring African-American lesbian mothers’ family experiences using both intersectionality and a risk-resilience framework (unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Pennsylvania School of social Policy & Practice, Philadelphia, PA.
Ritchie, J., & Ritchie, J. (1981). Child rearing and child abuse. The Polynesian context. In J. Korbin (Ed.), Child abuse and neglect: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 186–204). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Shi, L. (2017). Choosing daughters. Family change in rural China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Stewart, A. J., & McDermott, C. (2004). Gender in psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 519–544.
Weisner, T. S. (2002). Ecocultural understanding of children’s developmental pathways. Human Development, 45(4), 275–281.
Whiting, B. (1963). Six cultures. Studies of child rearing. New York, NY: Wiley.
Worthman, C. (2010). The ecology of human development: Evolving models for cultural psychology. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(4), 546–562.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Nadan, Y., Korbin, J. Cultural Context, Intersectionality, and Child Vulnerability. Childhood Vulnerability 1, 5–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41255-019-00003-7
- Child vulnerability
- Cultural context