Abstract
Objectives
Increasingly, access to technology is a necessity if one is to participate fully in all life domains. Technology is critical to enable people with and without disabilities to live autonomous, self-determined lives. This article provides a synthesis of recent information concerning technology that might promote the autonomy of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, focusing on technology emerging from the field of applied cognitive technologies.
Methods
To explore these issues, we provided a synthesis of the major theoretical perspectives pertaining to autonomy and self-determination, emphasizing the notion of autonomy-as-volition, and selected exemplary research findings that illustrate how technology can promote autonomy.
Results
There is clear evidence that people with intellectual and developmental disabilities can be supported to be more autonomous across multiple domains using applied cognitive technologies.
Conclusion
In today’s ever increasingly technical world, access to usable technology is not simply a convenience, it is a necessity. If people with IDD are to be supported to live, learn, work, and play in their communities, they need to have access to cognitively accessible technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, L., Hewitt, A., Pettingell, S., Lulinski, A., Taylor, M., & Reagan, J. (2018) Family and individual needs for disability supports (v.2) Community Report 2017. Research and Training Center on Community Living, Institute on Community Integration, University of Minnesota.
Ausderau, K., St. John, B., Romaniak, H., & Hladik, E. (2019). Understanding definitions of health for individuals with intellectual disability (ID) using photovoice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.73S1-PO7030.
Bach, M. (2017). Changing perspectives on intellectual and developmental disabilities. In M. L. Wehmeyer, I. Brown, M. Percy, K. A. Shogren, & W. L. A. Fung (Eds.), A comprehensive guide to intellectual and developmental disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 35–45). Paul H. Brookes.
Braddock, D., Hoehl, J., Tanis, S., Ablowitz, E., & Haffer, L. (2013). The rights of people with cognitive disabilities to technology and information access. Inclusion, 1(2), 95–102.
Buehler, E., Easley, W., Poole, A., & Hurst, A (2016). W4A '16: Proceedings of the 13th Web for All Conference, April 2016 Article No.: 27 Pages 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2899475.2899481.
Buntinx, W. H. E. (2013). Understanding disability: a strengths-based approach. In M. L. Wehmeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 7–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cannella-Malone, H. I., Schmidt, E. K., & Bumpus, E. C. (2018). Assessing preference using eye gaze technology for individuals with significant intellectual and physical disabilities. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2, 300–309.
Cavkaytar, A., Acungil, A. T., & Tormis, G. (2017). Effectiveness of teaching café waitering to adults with intellectual disability through audio-visual technologies. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 77–90.
Chadwick, D. D. (2019). Online risk for people with intellectual disabilities. Tizard Learning Disability Review, 24(4), 180–187.
Chang, C.-J., Chang, M.-L., & Shih, C.-H. (2016). Encouraging overweight students with intellectual disability to actively perform walking activity using an air mouse combined with preferred stimulation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 55, 37–43.
Cihak, D. F., McMahon, D., Smith, C. C., Wright, R., & Gibbons, M. M. (2015). Teaching individuals with intellectual disability to email across multiple device platforms. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 645–656.
Damianidou, D., Foggett, J., Arthur-Kelly, M., Lyons, G., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018). Effectiveness of technology types in employment-related outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: an extension meta-analysis. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(3), 262–272.
Damianidou, D., Arthur-Kelly, M., Lyons, G., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2019a). Technology use to support employment-related outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disability: an updated meta-analysis. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(4), 220–230.
Damianidou, D., Foggett, J., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2019b). Features of employment-related technology for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a thematic analysis. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 32(5), 1149–1162.
Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., Holloway, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2010). Evaluating a cognitively accessible GPS-based transportation assistance PDA to enable independent bus travel for people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(6), 454–463.
Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., King, L. R., Brown, B., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2015). An interface to support independent use of Facebook by people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 30–41.
Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., Herold, R. G., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018). GeoTalk: A GPS enabled portable speech output device for people with intellectual disability. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 2(3), 253–261.
Davies, D., Stock, S., Davies, C., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018a). A cloud-supported app for providing self-directed, localized job interest assessment and analysis for people with intellectual disability. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disabilities, 2, 199–205.
Davies, D., Stock, S., Davies, C., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2018b). A cognitively accessible digital storytelling tool for people with intellectual and other cognitive disabilities. Global Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 5(2), 1–6.
Goh, A. E., & Bambera, L. M. (2013). Video self-modeling: a job skills intervention with individuals with intellectual disability in employment settings. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(1), 103–119.
Guerra, N., Neumeier, W. H., Breslin, L., Geer, B., Thirumalai, M., Ervin, D. A., & Rimmer, J. H. (2019). Feedback and strategies from people with intellectual disability completing a personalized online weight loss intervention: a qualitative analysis. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 57(6), 527–544.
Kelley, K. R., Test, D. W., & Cooke, N. L. (2013). Effects of picture prompts delivered by a video iPod on pedestrian navigation. Exceptional Children, 79, 459–474.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Zimbaro, C., & Chiariello, V. (2017). Using smartphones to help people with intellectual and sensory disabilities perform daily activities. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 282. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00282.
Lancioni, G.E., Singh, N.N., O’Reilly, M.F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., & Carrella, L. (2020a). Everyday technology to support leisure and daily activities in people with intellectual and other disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. Advance of Print. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2020.1737590.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Chiariello, V., Grillo, G., & Turi, C. (2020b). A tablet-based program to enable people with intellectual and other disabilities to access leisure activities and video calls. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 15(1), 14–20.
Lussier-Desrochers, D., Normand, C. L., Romero-Torres, A., Lachapelle, Y., Godin-Tremblay, V., Dupont, M.-E., Roux, J., Pepin-Beauchesne, L., & Bilodeau, P. (2017). Bridging the digital divide for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2017-1-1.
Maich, K., Rutherford, C., & Bishop, C. (2019). Phones, watches, and apps: Engaging everyday mobile assistive technology for adults with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. Exceptionality Education International, 29(1), 116–135.
McMahon, A. K., & McMahon, D. D. (2016). Exercise technology interventions and individuals with IDD. DADD Online Journal, 3(1), 42–53.
McMahon, Cihak, D. F., Gibbons, M., Fussell, L., & Mathison, S. (2013). Using a mobile app to teach individuals with intellectual disabilities to identify potential food allergens. Journal of Special Education Technology, 28(3), 21–32.
McMahon, D. D., Smith, C. C., Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., & Gibbons, M. M. (2015). Effects of digital navigation aids on adults with intellectual disabilities: comparison of paper map, Google Maps, and augmented reality. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(3), 157–165.
Mechling, L. C., & O’Brien, E. (2010). Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to use public bus transportation. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 230–241.
Mechling, L. C., & Seid, N. H. (2011). Use of a hand-held personal digital assistant (PDA) to self-prompt pedestrian travel by young adults with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(2), 220–237.
Mechling, L. C., Foster, A. M., & Ayres, K. M. (2013). Navigation between menu screens and multiple touch points on a touch screen tablet to access and complete multi-step tasks using video prompting. Inclusion, 1(2), 121–132.
Morgan, R. L., & Horrocks, E. L. (2011). Correspondence between video-based preference assessment and subsequent community job performance. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(1), 52–61.
Naslund, R., & Gardelli, A. (2013). “I know, I can, I will try”: youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disability & Society, 28, 28–40.
O’Brolchain, F. (2018). Autonomy benefits and risks of assistive technologies for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00296.
O’Brolchain, F., & Gordijn, B. (2019). Privacy challenges in smart homes for people with dementia and people with intellectual disabilities. Ethics and Information Technology, 21, 253–265.
Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Davies, D., & Stock, S. (2012). Family members’ reports of the technology use of family members with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(4), 402–414.
Schalock, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Buntinx, W., Coulter, D., Craig, E., Gomez, S., Lachapelle, Y., Luckasson, R., Reeve, A., Shogren, K., Snell, M., Spreat, S., Tasse, M., Thompson, J., Verdugo-Alonzo, M., Wehmeyer, M., & Yeager, M. (2010). Intellectual disability: definition, classification, and systems of support (11th ed.). Washington D.C: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
Soderstrom, S., Ostby, M., Bakken, H., & Ellingsen, K.E. (2019). How using assistive technology for cognitive impairments improves the participation and self-determination of young adults with intellectual developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629519882582.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Van Petegem, S. (2018). Autonomy in adolescent development: toward conceptual clarity. Abingdon: Routledge.
Stock, S., Davies, D., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2010). Design and evaluation of a computer-animated simulation approach to support vocational social skills training for students and adults with intellectual disability. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3, 43–55.
Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Lachapelle, Y. (2011). Emerging new practices in technology to support independent community access for people with intellectual and cognitive disabilities. Neurorehabilitation, 28, 1–9.
Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Herold, R. G., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2019). Technology to support transportation needs assessment, training, and pre-trip planning by people with intellectual disability. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 3(3), 319–324.
Tanis, E.S. & Fisher, K. (2019). Advancing social capital and civic engagement through inclusive technology. AAIDD Technology Interest Network Webinar. https://www.aaidd.org/education/event-details/2019/05/16/default-calendar/advancing-social-capital-and-civic-engagement-through-inclusive-technology.
Tanis, E. S., Palmer, S., Wehmeyer, M. L., Davies, D., Stock, S., Lobb, K., & Bishop, B. (2012). Self-report computer-based survey of technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 50(1), 53–68.
Tanis, E. S., Lulinski, A., Wu, J., Braddock, D., & Hemp, R. (2020). State of the states in intellectual and developmental disabilities. Boulder: University of Colorado.
Tasse, M.J., Wagner, J.B., & Kim, M. (2020). Using technology and remote support services to promote independent living of adults with intellectual disability and related developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.1270.
Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E., et al. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 135–146.
Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Hughes, C. (2010). Mind the gap! Implications of person-environment fit models of intellectual disability for students, educators, and schools. Exceptionality, 18, 168–181.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). National survey of the use of assistive technology by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 36, 44–51.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2013). Beyond pathology: disability and positive psychology. In M. L. Wehmeyer (Ed.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 3–6). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2013). Establishing the field of applied cognitive technology. Inclusion, 1(2), 91–94.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Smith, S. J., Parent, W., Davies, D. K., & Stock, S. (2006). Technology use by people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to support employment activities: a single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 81–86.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Buntinx, W. E., Lachapelle, Y., Luckasson, R., Schalock, R., Verdugo-Alonzo, M., Bradley, V., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntix, W., Coulter, D., Craig, E., Gomez, S., Lachapelle, Y., Reeve, A., Shogren, K., Snell, M., Spreat, S., Tasse, M., Thompson, J., & Yeager, M. (2008a). The intellectual disability construct and its relationship to human functioning. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46(4), 311–318.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Smith, S. J., Davies, D., & Stock, S. (2008b). The efficacy of technology use by people with intellectual disability: a single-subject design meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23(3), 21–30.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Little, T. D., & Lopez, S. J. (2017). Development of self-determination across the life course. Berlin: Springer.
WHO (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MLW organized and provided a first draft of the paper. DKD SEK and ST assisted with writing and finalizing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable; paper does not report original research.
Informed Consent
Not applicable; paper does not report original research.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wehmeyer, M.L., Davies, D.K., Stock, S.E. et al. Applied Cognitive Technologies to Support the Autonomy of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Adv Neurodev Disord 4, 389–399 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00179-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-020-00179-2