A Comparison of Secondary Target Location in Instructive Feedback Procedures
- 70 Downloads
Instructive feedback (IF) is an effective strategy for increasing the efficiency of targeted instruction. Although effective, the mechanisms underlying the acquisition of secondary targets via IF are unknown. In the current investigation, two forms of IF were compared to determine if indiscriminable contingencies were responsible, in part, for the acquisition of secondary targets during IF procedures. During teaching, IF stimuli were presented either before or after the praise statement for mastered tacts to two learners with autism spectrum disorders. Across both participants, IF before the praise statement resulted in faster acquisition of secondary targets that were maintained for 16–18 weeks post intervention. These results extend the IF literature by providing evidence that acquisition of secondary targets via IF may at least partially attributed to the occurrence of indiscriminable contingencies.
KeywordsInstructive feedback Autism spectrum disorder Indiscriminable contingencies
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained for all individuals in the study.
- Albarran, S. A., & Sandbank, M. P. (2018). Teaching non-target information to children with disabilities: an examination of instructive feedback literature. Journal of Behavioral Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-018-9301-3.
- Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning (5th ed.) Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan.Google Scholar
- Elliot, C. D. (2007). Differential ability scales: second edition (DAS-II). San Antonio: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Esch, B. E. (2008). Early echoic skills assessment. The verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord: AVB Press.Google Scholar
- Goldman, R., & Goldman, F. M. (2000). Fristoe test of articulation 2. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: (Vineland II), survey interview form/caregiver rating form. Livonia: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: The VB-MAPP. Concord: AVB Press.Google Scholar
- Taylor, B. A., DeQuinzio, J. A., & Stine, J. (2012). Increasing observational learning of children with autism: a preliminary analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 815–820.Google Scholar
- Tullis, C. A., Marya, V., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2018). Enhancing the efficiency of instruction via instructive feedback for a child with autism using a speech-generating device. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0096-z.
- Werts, M. G., Hoffman, E. M., & Darcy, C. (2011). Acquisition of instructive feedback: relation to target stimulus. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 134–149.Google Scholar
- Wiig, E. H., Semel, E., & Secord, W. A. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: fifth edition (CELF-5). Bloomington: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar