A Comparison Between the Monetary, Resource and Energy Costs of the Conventional Industrial Supply Path and the “Simpler Way” Path for the Supply of Eggs

Abstract

Global sustainability requires large-scale reductions in rich world per capita resource use rates. Globalised, industrialised and commercialised supply paths involve high resource, energy, dollar and other costs. However, “The Simpler Way” involving small-scale integrated localised settlements and economies can enable enormous reductions in these costs. Most transport, packaging and marketing costs can be eliminated, and various outputs such as animal manures, kitchen scraps, garden biomass, household grey and black water can be transformed from costly “waste” disposal problems into direct inputs to other functions such as methane digesters, composting, and fish and animal feeds. Thus, there are also savings on the cost of inputs of fertilizer and water, etc. In addition the industrial supply path tends to have many negative “co-products”, most obviously pollution effects, whereas the local path avoids these while providing important positive co-products and social benefits. This study uses input–output analysis of one product, eggs, to illustrate how big the difference between the two paths can be. The implications for sustainable development are profound. If the findings of this study are sound and generalizable the Simpler Way would enable very large reductions in resource and ecological impacts for sustainability to be achieved, but only if extremely radical changes are made in economic, political and cultural systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. ABS (2016a) Australian national accounts, input-output tables (product details), 2013–2014. ABS catalogue no. 5215.0.55.001. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

  2. ABS (2016b) Australian national accounts: input-output tables, 2013–2014. catalogue no. 5209.0. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

  3. AgriFutures (2017) Eggs (chicken), 25.4. http://www.agrifutures.com.au/farm-diversity/eggs-chicken/

  4. Australian Wheat Board (2018) https://www.awb.com.au

  5. Backyard Chicken Coops (2018) What is grit and why is it important? https://www.backyardchickencoops.com.au/what-is-grit-and-why-is-it-important

  6. BREE (2013) Australian energy statistics. Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  7. Citifarm (2018) https://www.citifarm.com.au/a/Chickens/Feeding-Tips-for-Chickens

  8. Department of Primary Industry (2018) Buying feed at th right price. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/animals-and-livestock/nutrition/costs-and-nutritive-value/price

  9. Deže J, Ranogajec L, Crnčan A, Kristić J (2010) Break-even analysis (BEA) in egg production. POLJOPRIVREDA 16(2):47–50

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doorstop Organics (2018) https://www.doorsteporganics.com.au/grown-organically

  11. Foodwise (2018) Fast facts on food waste. http://www.foodwise.com.au/foodwaste/food-waste-fast-facts/

  12. Grinde B et al (2017) The quality of life in intentional communities, Social Indictors Research

  13. Hammond G, Jones C (2011) Inventory of carbon and energy, version 2. Sustainable Energy Research Team, University of Bath, Bath

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lockyer J (2017) Community, commons, and de-growth at dancing rabbit ecovillage. Political Ecol 24:519–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pelletier N (2017) Lifecycle assessment of Canadian egg products, with differentiation by housing system type. J Clean Prod 152:167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pelletier N, Ibarburu M, Xin H (2013) A carbon footprint analysis of egg production and processing supply chains in the Midwestern United States. J Clean Prod 54:108–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Poultry Hub (2018) Chicken (egg) layer industry. http://www.poultryhub.org/production/industry-structure-and-organisations/egg-industry/

  18. Safeedpari P, Rafiee S, Akram A (2013) Fossil-based fuels and electricity energy inputs effect on egg production in poultry farms of Iran. J Livest Sci 4:1–61

    Google Scholar 

  19. St-Onge E (2015) Senegal transforming 14,000 villages into eco-villages!, Collective Evolution, June 17. https://www.collective-evolution.com/2015/06/17/senegal-transforming-14000-villages-into-ecovillages/

  20. Trainer T (2019) Remaking settlements for sustainability; the simpler way. J Political Ecol 26:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. TSW (2017) The simpler way. thesimplerway.info/TSWMain.htm

  22. van Asselt ED, van Bussel LGJ, van Horne P, van der Voet H, van der Heijden GWAM, van der Fels-Klerx HJ (2015) Assessing the sustainability of egg production systems in the Netherlands. Poult Sci 94(8):1742–1750. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Woolworths Catalogue (2018) https://www.woolworths.com.au/Shop/Browse/dairy-eggs-fridge/eggs-butter-margarine/eggs

  24. World Wildlife Fund (2016) The living planet report. World Wildlife Fund and London Zoological Society, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Trainer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No human or animal ethical issues are raised by this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trainer, T., Malik, A. & Lenzen, M. A Comparison Between the Monetary, Resource and Energy Costs of the Conventional Industrial Supply Path and the “Simpler Way” Path for the Supply of Eggs. Biophys Econ Resour Qual 4, 9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-019-0057-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sustainability
  • Production costs
  • Alternative economics
  • Local economies