Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Central Role of Energy in the Urban Transition: Global Challenges for Sustainability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
BioPhysical Economics and Resource Quality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The urban transition, the increased ratio of urban to rural population globally and within countries, is a hallmark of the twenty-first century. Our analysis of publicly available data from the World Bank spanning several decades for ~ 195 countries shows that across and within nations over time, per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP), energy use, and CO2 emissions are lowest in predominantly rural countries (rural > urban pop.), increase rapidly across urbanizing countries (rural ≈ urban pop.), and are highest in the most urban countries (rural < urban pop.). These trends coincide with changes in employment by sector and gender. Rural economies are based largely on employment in the resource-extraction sector, which includes agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and mining. In urbanizing nations, male employment is predominantly in the industrial sector, including public utilities, while female employment is higher in service-based than resource-based economies. In the most urban nations, service economies predominate with some countries employing 90% of women and 65% of men in the service sector. Our analysis shows that per capita GDP, energy use, and CO2 emissions increase by over two orders of magnitude from low-income, resource-based rural countries to high-income, urbanized countries with predominantly service economies. Data from the U.S. over the past 200 years illuminate a socio-metabolic urban transition similar to that seen globally in recent decades across countries and through time. Our study suggests that increased energy demand and climate consequences of burning fossil fuels will continue to accompany a rapidly urbanizing planet posing major challenges for global sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Reprinted by permission from Springer Nature, America’s Most Sustainable Cities and Regions by John Day and Charles Hall, Copyright 2016

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuto M, Parnell S, Seto KC (2018) Building a global urban science. Nat Sustain 1:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed NM (2017) Failing states, collapsing systems: biophysical triggers of political violence. Springer

  • Aleklett K (2012) Peeking at peak oil Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baabou W, Grunewald N, Ouillet-Plamondon C, Gressot M, Galli A (2017) The ecological footprint of mediterranean cities: awareness creation and policy implications. Environ Sci Policy 69:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LMA (2013) The origin of scaling in cities. Science 340:1438–1441

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LM, West GB (2011) Bigger cities do more with less. Sci Am 305:52–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt LM, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kühnert C, West GB (2007) Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 7301–7306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boserup E (1965) The conditions of agricultural growth: the economics of agrarian change under population pressure Transaction Publishers, Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brelsford C, Lobo J, Hand J, Bettencourt LM (2017) Heterogeneity and scale of sustainable development in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 114(34), 8963–8968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J Royal Stat Soc Series, 149–192

  • Brown JH, Burnside WR, Davidson AD, DeLong JP, Dunn WC, Hamilton MJ, Mercado-Silva N, Nekola JC, Okie JG, Woodruff WH (2011) Energetic limits to economic growth. Bioscience 61:19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Burger JR, Burnside WR, Chang M, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, Hamilton MJ, Hammond ST, Kodric-Brown A, Mercado-Silva N (2014) Macroecology meets macroeconomics: resource scarcity and global sustainability. Ecol Eng 65:24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton E (2000) The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Stud 37:1969–2001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH, Ehrlich P, Goldemberg J, Hansen J, Lovins A, Likens G, Manabe S, May R, Mooney H, Robert K-H, Salim E, Sato G, Solomon S, Stern N, Swaminathan MS, Watson R (2012) Environment and development challenges: the Imperative to Act. The Asahi Glass Foundation, University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger JR (2018) Technological evolution: modeling humanity’s predicament. Nat Sustain 1:15–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger JR, Allen CD, Brown JH, Burnside WR, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, Hamilton MJ, Mercado-Silva N, Nekola JC, Okie JG (2012) The macroecology of sustainability. PLoS Biol 10:e1001345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger JR, Weinberger VP, Marquet PA (2017) Extra-metabolic energy use and the rise in human hyper-density. Sci Rep 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43869

  • Camargo GG, Ryan MR, Richard TL (2013) Energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from crop production using the farm energy analysis tool. Bioscience 63(4):263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello R, Camagni R (2000) Beyond optimal city size: an evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns. Urban Stud 37:1479–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canning P, Charles A, Huang S, Polenske KR, Waters A (2010) Energy Use in the US Food System

  • Center for Sustainable Systems (CSS), University of Michigan. (2016). U.S. Food System Factsheet. Pub. No. CSS01-06

  • Daly H (2005) Economics in a full world. Sci Am 293(3):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly H, Farley J (2004) Ecological economics—principles and applications. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Moerschbaecher M, Pimentel D, Hall C, Yáñez-Arancibia A (2014) Sustainability and place: how emerging mega-trends of the 21st century will affect humans and nature at the landscape level. Ecol Eng 65:33–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, Hall C, Roy E, Moerschbaecher M, D’Elia C, Pimentel D, A. Yáñez-Arancibia. (2016) America’s most sustainable cities and regions. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Day JW, D’Elia CF, Wiegman ARH, Rutherford JS, Hall CAS, Lane RR, Dismukes DE (2018) The Energy pillars of society: perverse interactions of human resource use, the economy, and environmental degradation. Biophys Econ Resour Qual 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-018-0035-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong JP, Burger O, Hamilton MJ (2013) The UN medium population projection is an unstable equilibrium. Front Ecol Environ: 65–66

  • Feng K, Hubacek K (2016) Carbon implications of China’s urbanization. Energy Ecol Environ 1(1):39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski M, Haberl H (2007) Socioecological transitions and global change: trajectories of social metabolism and land use. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fizaine F, Court V (2016) Energy expenditure, economic growth, and the minimum EROI of society. Energy Policy 95:172–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Jansson A-M, Larsson J, R. Costanza (1997) Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fragkias M, Lobo J, Strumsky D, Seto KC (2013) Does size matter? scaling of CO2 emissions and U.S. urban areas. PLoS ONE 8, e64727

  • Glaeser E (2011) The triumph of the city. Penguin, New York, 338 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CA (2017) Energy return on investment: a unifying principle for biology, economics, and sustainability. Springer, New York, 174 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CA, Day JW (2009) Revisiting the limits to growth after peak oil. Am Sci 97:230–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CA, Klitgaard KA (2017) Energy and the wealth of nations. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CAS, Klitgaard KA (2018) Energy and the wealth of nations: an introduction to biophysical economics (2nd edn). Springer

  • Hammond ST, Brown JH, Burger JR, Flanagan TP, Fristoe TS, Mercado-Silva N, Nekola JC, Okie JG (2015) Food spoilage, storage, and transport: implications for a sustainable future. BioScience 65(8):758–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P (ed) (2017) Drawdown: The most comprehensive plan ever proposed to reverse global warming. Penguin

  • Heinberg R, Crownshaw T (2018) Energy decline. biophysical economics and resource quality. 3, 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-018-0042-7

  • Heller M, Keoleian G (2000) Life-cycle based sustainability indicators for assessment of the U.S. food system. The University of Michigan Center for Sustainable Systems, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Castillo RM, Sun L, Xue J (2017b) Global carbon inequality. Energy Ecol Environ 2(6):361–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubacek K, Baiocchi G, Feng K, Patwardhan A (2017a) Poverty eradication in a carbon constrained world. Nat Commun 8(1):912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurley D, Hussey J, McKeown R, Addy C (2006) An Evaluation of Splines in Linear Regression. SAS Conference Proceedings: SAS Users Group International 31(SUGI 31 Proceedings), Paper 147

  • IEA (2009) Transport, energy, and CO2: moving towards sustainability. International Energy Agency Publications, 9, rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris, France. ISBN: 978-92-64-07316-6

  • Isman M, Archambault M, Racette P, Konga CN, Llaque RM, Lin D, Iha K, Ouellet-Plamondon CM (2018) Ecological footprint assessment for targeting climate change mitigation in cities: a case study of 15 Canadian cities according to census metropolitan areas. J Clean Prod 174:1032–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks M, Burgess R (2000) Compact cities: sustainable urban forms for developing countries (Taylor & Francis)

  • Jones CM, Kammen DM (2011) Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for US households and communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:4088–4095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Kammen DM (2014) Spatial distribution of US household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environ Sci Technol 48(2):895–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann F, Fischer-Kowalski M, Schandl H, Eisenmenger N (2008) The global sociometabolic transition. J Ind Ecol 12:637–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert JG, Hall CA, Balogh S, Gupta A, Arnold M (2014) Energy, EROI and quality of life. Energy Policy 64:153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release (2015) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States

  • Mew MC (2016) Phosphate rock costs, prices and resource interaction. Sci Tot Environ 542:1008–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore J, Kissinger M, Rees WE (2013) An urban metabolism and ecological footprint assessment of metro vancouver. J Environ Manage 124 (2013):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nekola JC, Allen CD, Brown JH, Burger JR, Davidson AD, Fristoe TS, Hamilton MJ, Hammond ST, Kodric-Brown A, Mercado-Silva N (2013) The malthusian–darwinian dynamic and the trajectory of civilization. Trends Ecol Evol 28:127–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P (2006) The environmental impact of cities. Environ Urban 18:275–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT, Odum EC (2008) A prosperous way down: principles and policies. University Press of Colorado, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira EA, Andrade JS Jr, Makse HA (2014) Large cities are less green. Sci Rep 4:4235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? a cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70:434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (1997) Is ‘sustainable city’ an oxymoron? Local Environ 2:3:303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees WE (2012). Cities as dissipative structures: global change and the vulnerability of urban civilization. Sustain Sci, Springer, New York, pp. 247–273

  • Rees WE, Wackernagel M (1996) “Urban ecological footprints: why cities cannot be sustainable (and why they are a key to sustainability)”. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16:223–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romm J (2002) The internet and the new energy economy. Resour Conser Recycl 36:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D, McGranahan G, Tacoli C (2010) Urbanization and its implications for food and farming. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:2809–2820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR (2012) Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 109(40), 16083–16088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha E, Michalak AM, Balaji V (2017) Eutrophication will increase during the 21st century as a result of precipitation changes. Science. 405–408

  • Smil V (2008) Energy in nature and society: general energetics of complex systems, MIT press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W et al (2015) The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev 2:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2011) World urbanization prospects, The 2011 revision

  • USGS (2014) Historical statistics for mineral and material commodities in the United States

  • Victor P (2010) Questioning economic growth. Nature 468(7322):370–371. https://doi.org/10.1038/468370a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilsack T, Clark CZF (2014) eds. 2014. 2012 Census of Agriculture. Geographic Area Series. United States Department of Agriculture

  • Warren-Rhodes K, Koenig A (2001) Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development. Ecol Econ 39:347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber CL, Peters GP, Guan D, Hubacek K (2008) The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change. Energy Policy 36(9):3572–3577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger VP, Quiñinao C, Marquet PA (2017) Innovation and the growth of human population. Philosophical Trans Royal Soc B 372:20160415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Pickett K (2009) The Spirit Level. Bloomsbury Press, New York, 375 p

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Human Macroecology Group at UNM for helpful discussion and Felisa Smith, Melanie Moses, Bruce Milne, and Mathew Moerschbaecher for feedback on earlier drafts. Travis Knowles enlightened us on Fee-and Dividend Policy. Partial support for JWD was from the Gulf Research Program of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Award Number 2000005991. TPF was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship by a McDonnell Foundation Complex Systems Scholar Award to the Moses Lab at UNM. Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. The views expressed in the article do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R. Burger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burger, J.R., Brown, J.H., Day, J.W. et al. The Central Role of Energy in the Urban Transition: Global Challenges for Sustainability. Biophys Econ Resour Qual 4, 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-019-0053-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41247-019-0053-z

Keywords

Navigation