Abstract
Mudflows are a class of non-Newtonian flows which can occur naturally in mountainous regions and have also been reported in the Mediterranean region. Even though their occurrence is not frequent, they can cause significant damage to infrastructure. While different approaches for the simulation of mudflows exist, the most common is to include the shear stresses caused by the increased sediment content as an additional friction term in the depth-averaged momentum conservation equation. However, the formulation of the additional term is not a straightforward task, and several models are proposed in the literature which contain empirical and ad-hoc components. In the present work, we compare two commercially available mudflow models, FLO-2D and the recently released HEC-RAS non-Newtonian flow module, by applying them to the Boudava stream in western Greece—a region where such phenomena, which are attributed to intense water loads present in the soil mass due to continuous unprecedented rainfall values antecedent to the event, have occurred in the past. Firstly, we derive theoretical relationships that relate the mudflow parameters of the two models. Subsequently, we run different scenarios and compare the results in terms of flow depth and velocity at critical cross sections as well as the overall flood extent maps. Our results suggest that the HEC-RAS implementation of the additional shear stress model is directly comparable to that of FLO-2D in terms of both physical coherence and numerical application. The proposed methodology provides useful insights to engineers aiming at applying mudflow models in their relative studies. The latter can subsequently be utilized by decision makers to prevent human and economic losses from such phenomena while allowing further steps to be made towards environmental integration.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Aggelidis C, Apostolidis E (1987) Geotechnical identification report of the soil movements at CH. 38+000 of the national road Ioannina-Trikala. Greek Public Power Corporation, Athens
Ali N, Hassan Riead MM, Bilal M, Yang Y, Khan A, Ali F, Karim S, Zhou C, Wenjie Y, Sher F, Iqbal HMN (2021) Adsorptive remediation of environmental pollutants using magnetic hybrid materials as platform adsorbents. Chemosphere 284:131279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131279
Alonso R, Santillana M, Dawson C (2008) On the diffusive wave approximation of the shallow water equations. Eur J Appl Math 19:575–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956792508007675
Arattano M, Marchi L (2008) Systems and sensors for debris-flow monitoring and warning. Sensors (Basel) 8(4):2436–2452
Armento MC, Genevois R, Tecca PR (2008) Comparison of numerical models of two debris flows in the Cortina d’ Ampezzo area, Dolomites, Italy. Landslides 5(1):143–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-007-0111-2
Balzano A (1998) Evaluation of methods for numerical simulation of wetting and drying in shallow water flow models. Coast Eng 34(1):83–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(98)00015-5
Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear, Proc. of the Royal Society of London, Series A, V. 249:235–297.
Casulli V (2009) A high-resolution wetting and drying algorithm for free-surface hydrodynamics. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 60(4):391–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1896
Cesca M, D’Agostino V (2008) Comparison between FLO-2D and RAMMS in debris-flow modelling: a case study in the Dolomites. WIT Trans Eng Sci 60:197–206. https://doi.org/10.2495/DEB080201
Chien N, Ma H (1958) Properties of slurry flow. J Sediment Res 3(3).
Choi JH, Chae BG, Liu KF, Wu YH (2016) Numerical analysis of debris flow hazards from case study. In: Aversa S, Cascini L, Picarelli L, Scavia C (eds) Landslides and engineered slopes. Experience, theory and practice. CRC, London
Chou H-T, Lee C-F, Lo C-M (2017) The formation and evolution of a coastal alluvial fan in eastern Taiwan caused by rainfall-induced landslides. Landslides 14(1):109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0678-6
Dai J et al. (1980) An experimental study of slurry transport in pipes. Proc Int Symposium on River Sedimentation 195–204.
D’Agostino V, Tecca P (2006) Some considerations on the application of the FLO-2D model for debris flow hazard assessment. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 90:159–170. https://doi.org/10.2495/DEB060161
De Blasio FV (2011) Non-Newtonian fluids, mudflows, and debris flows: a rheological approach. In: de Blasio FV (ed) Introduction to the physics of landslides: lecture notes on the dynamics of mass wasting. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1122-8_4. Accessed 30 May 2023
de Scally F, Owens I (2004) Morphometric controls and geomorphic responses on fans in the Southern Alps, New Zealand. Earth Surf Proc Land 29:311–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1022
Dimitriadis P, Tegos A, Oikonomou A, Pagana V, Koukouvinos A, Mamassis N, Koutsoyiannis D, Efstratiadis A (2016) Comparative evaluation of 1D and quasi-2D hydraulic models based on benchmark and real-world applications for uncertainty assessment in flood mapping. J Hydrol 534:478–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.020
Dimitriadis P, Koutsoyiannis D, Iliopoulou T, Papanicolaou P (2021) A global-scale investigation of stochastic similarities in marginal distribution and dependence structure of key hydrological-cycle Processes. Hydrology 8(2):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology8020059
Dysarz T (2018) Application of Python scripting techniques for control and automation of HEC-RAS simulations. Water 10(10):1382. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101382
Egashira S, Ashida K, Yajima H, Takahama J (1989) Constitutive equation of debris flow. Annuals DPRI 32B(2):487–501
Fei X J (1981) Bingham yield stress of sediment water mixtures with hyperconcentration. J Sediment Res 3, Beijing China, 19-28 .
Gibson S, Moura LZ, Ackerman C, Ortman N, Amorim R, Floyd I, Eom M, Creech C, Sánchez A (2022) Prototype scale evaluation of non-Newtonian algorithms in HEC-RAS: Mud and debris flow case studies of Santa Barbara and Brumadinho. Geosciences 12(3):134. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12030134
HEC (2021) HEC-RAS documentation. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/confluence/rasdocs. Accessed 17 Aug 2021
HEC (2022) HEC-RAS mud and debris flow. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/confluence/rasdocs/rasmuddebris. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
HEC (2023) Mixture dynamic viscosity. https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/confluence/rasdocs/rasmuddebris/non-newtonian-user-s-manual/user-inputs-and-model-parameters/mixture-dynamic-viscosity. Accessed 30 May 2023
Hungr O (1995) A model for the runout analysis of rapid flow slides, debris flows, and avalanches. Can Geotech J 32:610–623. https://doi.org/10.1139/t95-063
Hutter K, Svendsen B, Rickenmann D (1994) Debris flow modeling: a review. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 8(1):1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01175749
Iida K (1938) The mud flow that occurred near the explosion crater of Mt. Bandai on May 9 and 15, 1938 band Some physical properties of volcanic mud. University of Tokyo is Bull Earthq Res Ins 16:658–681.
Jackson LE, Kostaschuk RA, MacDonald GM (1987) Identification of debris flow hazard on alluvial fans in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: Costa JE, Wieczorek GF (eds) Debris flows/avalanches. Geological Society of America, Boulder. https://doi.org/10.1130/REG7-p115. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
Jeong S, Lee K (2019) Analysis of the impact force of debris flows on a check dam by using a coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method. Comput Geotech. 116:103214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103214
Leon AS, Goodell C (2016) Controlling HEC-RAS using MATLAB. Environ Model Softw 84:339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.026
Kang Z, Zhang S (1980) A preliminary analysis of the characteristics of debris flow. Proc Int Symposium on River Sedimentation. Beijing, China 213-220.
O’Brien JS (2015) FLO-2D software reference documents. Simulating mudflows. FLO-2D Software, Inc., Nutrioso
O’Brien JS, Julien PY (1988) Laboratory analysis of mudflow properties. J Hydraul Eng 114(8):877–887. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1988)114:8(877)
O’Brien JS, Julien PY, Fullerton WT (1993) Two-dimensional water flood and mudflow simulation. J Hydraul Eng 119(2):244–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1993)119:2(244)
Pasuto A, Marchi L, Tecca P (1993) Flow processes on alluvial fans in the Eastern Italian Alps. Z Geomorphol 37:447–458. https://doi.org/10.1127/zfg/37/1993/447
Pudasaini SP (2012) A general two-phase debris flow model. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002186
Qian Y et al. (1980) Basic characteristics of flow with hyperconcentration of sediment." Proc, Int. Symposium on River Sedimentation, Beijing, China, 1:175–184.
Rasheed T, Kausar F, Rizwan K, Adeel M, Sher F, Alwadai N, Alshammari FH (2022) Two dimensional MXenes as emerging paradigm for adsorptive removal of toxic metallic pollutants from wastewater. Chemosphere 287:132319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132319
Rosli MI, Che Ros F, Razak KA, Ambran S, Kamaruddin SA, Nor Anuar A, Marto A, Tobita T, Ono Y (2021) Modelling debris flow runout: a case study on the Mesilau Watershed, Kundasang. Sabah Water 13(19):2667. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13192667
Rowbotham D, Scally FD, Louis J (2005) The identification of debris torrent basins using morphometric measures derived within a GIS. Geogr Ann Ser B 87(4):527–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3676.2005.00276.x
Siqueira V, Sorribas M, Bravo J, Collischonn W, Lisboa A, Trinidad G (2016) Real-time updating of HEC-RAS model for streamflow forecasting using an optimization algorithm. RBRH 21:855–870. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011616086
Stolle J, Goseberg N, Nistor I, Petriu E (2019) Debris impact forces on flexible structures in extreme hydrodynamic conditions. J Fluids Struct 84:391–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.11.009
Turnbull B, Bowman ET, McElwaine JN (2015) Debris flows: Experiments and modelling. C R Phys 16(1):86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2014.11.006
Wei S-C, Liu K-F (2019) Automatic debris flow detection using geophones. Landslides. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01258-9
Welsh A, Davies T (2011) Identification of alluvial fans susceptible to debris-flow hazards. Landslides 8:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0238-4
Wilford D, Sakals M, Innes J, Sidle R, Bergerud WA (2004) Recognition of debris flow, debris flood and flood hazard through watershed morphometrics. Landslides 1:61–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0002-0
Yu B, Ma Y, Wu Y (2013) Case study of a giant debris flow in the Wenjia Gully, Sichuan Province. China Nat Hazards 65(1):835–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0395-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The manuscript was not submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Mohamed Ksibi.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Dimas, P., Pouliasis, G., Dimitriadis, P. et al. Comparison of mudflow simulation models in an ephemeral mountainous stream in Western Greece using HEC-RAS and FLO-2D. Euro-Mediterr J Environ Integr 8, 919–933 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00409-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41207-023-00409-8