Arsenic removal through supercritical carbon dioxide-assisted modified magnetic starch (starch–Fe3O4) nanoparticles
Arsenic contamination in groundwater is an alarming issue in Terai region (the low-lying land at the foot of the Himalayas) of Nepal as groundwater serves as chief drinking water source; therefore, it is required to decrease arsenic below the maximum permissible limit (50 ppb). Supercritical carbon dioxide-assisted green chemical technology was used to synthesise starch-modified magnetic nanoparticles (starch-MNPs). Synthesised starch-MNPs were used to remove arsenic from water. Various techniques were used to characterise magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and starch modification on MNPs surface, viz. transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and vibrating sample magnetometer. These analyses revealed the crystalline structure of magnetite nanoparticle with size 16 nm and uniform coating of starch onto MNPs with magnetic property. Results showed the highest arsenite [As(III)] removal in a synthetic laboratory solution of 10 ppm with at pH 6 was 99% with 0.01 g starch-MNPs, while complete removal of arsenic from groundwater sample was attained within 15 min using starch-MNPs. Arsenite adsorption agreed well with pseudo-second-order kinetic model and Langmuir isotherm model. Adsorption of arsenite on starch-MNPs reached 124 mg/g of starch-MNPs at pH 6 starch-MNPs could be regenerated in NaOH solutions and could retain more than 50% arsenite removal capacity even in fifth regeneration/reuse cycle.
KeywordsMagnetic nanoparticles Arsenic Starch-modified magnetic nanoparticles Adsorption Supercritical carbon dioxide
The authors acknowledge International Foundation for Science (IFS) co-financed by the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) for funding this research under the Grant No. 5580 and TWAS Individual Research grant Ref. No. 14-187 RG/CHE/AS_I, UNESCO FR: 324028568 for equipment support.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 10.Feng L, Cao M, Ma X et al (2012) Superparamagnetic high-surface-area Fe3O4 nanoparticles as adsorbents for arsenic removal. J Hazard Mater 217:436–449Google Scholar
- 19.Saikia A, Banerjee S, Veer V (2015) Adsorption isotherm, thermodynamic and kinetic study of arsenic (III) on iron oxide coated granular activated charcoal. Int Res J Environ Sci 4:64–77Google Scholar
- 30.Al-Saad KA, Amr MA, Hadi DT et al (2012) Iron oxide nanoparticles: applicability for heavy metal removal from contaminated water. Arab J Nucl Sci Appl 45:335–346Google Scholar