Skip to main content
Log in

The Case for Considering Renter Insecurity as an Indicator of Federal Fair Housing Progress

  • Published:
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More than 50 years after the Fair Housing Act was passed in the USA, equitable outcomes in housing remain elusive. Much research on fair housing has focused on access to housing in the renting or buying process and residential segregation patterns. However, analyses typically overlook how families and individuals can maintain stability once they actually secure housing, particularly for renters. Therefore, this research considers renter insecurity, defined by unaffordability, overcrowding, poor physical conditions, and forced moves, as an essential component to understanding and evaluating fair housing. Using this perspective, inequities in housing insecurity are measured among federal fair housing protected classes. Analyses confirm that households historically impacted by discrimination (e.g., Black, female, disabled, and non-native born) experience disproportionately severe and frequent manifestations of housing insecurity. Consequently, it is not enough to ensure equal access to housing without simultaneously requiring equity in long-term housing outcomes. The research concludes with a discussion of the role of social work practice in advancing fair housing, with a particular emphasis on bridging work between individuals and communities and the implications for policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

Data can be made available upon request.

Code Availability

Stata code can be made available upon request.

Notes

  1. Although some states and localities have opted to add a wider range of protections for fair housing, including but not limited to sexual orientation, military status, source of income, and marital status (The Policy Surveillance Program, 2017), this paper will focus on the federal categories that apply consistently to all areas across the United States.

  2. The head of household is the first household member listed on the survey questionnaire who is an owner or renter of the sample unit and is 15 years or older.

  3. The American Housing Survey defines moderately inadequate housing as a unit with three or four maintenance defects, a lack of complete kitchen facilities, an antiquated heating supply, or more than two prolonged toilet breakdowns. It defines severely inadequate housing as lacking running water, a proper bathroom, has prolonged heat outages, no electricity, exposed wiring, or more than five maintenance defects (Eggers & Moumen, 2013; Wheelock & Eggers, 2015).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank her dissertation committee: Tatjana Meschede (chair), Grant Ritter, Jennifer Molinsky, and Lindsay Rosenfeld for their valuable and continuous feedback on this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giselle Routhier.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Routhier, G. The Case for Considering Renter Insecurity as an Indicator of Federal Fair Housing Progress. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work 6, 287–297 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-021-00181-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-021-00181-1

Keywords

Navigation