Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nationalist Populism and Social Work

  • Published:
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article outlines how the current rise in right-wing populism poses a threat to social work’s humanist positioning within western democracy and what strategies are needed to restore faith in the liberal democratic institutions that are committed to human rights and a polity that provides for all its citizens despite their diversity and often opposing interests. Using the example of the rise of ethnic-nationalist populism in the twentieth century in Europe, we forget at our peril how easily human rights can be both compromised and undermined. Today’s social works can learn from social work’s role in supporting the ethnic practices of Nazi Germany and be forewarned. The article highlights how a culture of hyper-productivity, anti-humanist populism, and authoritarian welfare can erode the human rights framework underpinning social work. By focussing on contemporary social work’s more progressive stance with its commitment to anti-oppressive practice, its linkages with civil society and community activism, and its commitment to carve out a prominent political space for advancing a human rights agenda, we hope to learn lessons from the past and act collectively to protect and return confidence to a universal human rights agenda for a progressive social work practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. A point in case is Alice Salomon’s step down from the committee of the Confederation of German Women’s Associations (Bund Deutscher Frauenvereine) in 1920 due to anti-Semitic propaganda during the election of the confederation’s chairperson in that year and her loss to a less qualified candidate.

  2. The World Values Survey, Wave 3 and Wave 5, cited by Foe and Mounk (2016; 2017) suggests that between 1995 and 2010, support for authoritarian solutions grew from below 20% to around 35% among upper income US citizen. Whereas more than 75% of Australians born in the 1930s believe that it is essential to live in a democracy, less than 40% of Australians born in the 1980s believe for that to be the case (Foe and Mounk 2017).

References

  • Altman, D. (2017). Discontents: identity, politics and institutions in a time of populism. The Conversation (Vol. 2017). Australia: The Conversation Media Group.

  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, G. (1983). Racism and sexism in Nazi Germany: motherhood, compulsory sterilization, and the State. Signs, 8(3), 400–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briskman, L. (2016). Reflections of an activist social worker: challenging human rights violations. In C. Noble, H. Strauss, & B. Littlechild (Eds.), Global social work: crossing borders, blurring boundaries. Sydney: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, J. (2006). Hearing ordinary voices: cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital story telling. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 20(2), 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, R. (2017). Social media and Charlie Gard: populism versus public services? LSW Blogs (Vol. 2017). London: London School of Economics.

  • de Cleen, B. (2017). Populism and nationalism. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ostiguy, & E. Ochoa (Eds.), Handbook of populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. In J. Dewey (Ed.), The later works (Vol. 2, pp. 235–372). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich, P.-J. (2017). Social networks and populism in the EU. In Policy paper. Berlin: Jacques Delors Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominelli, L. (2002). Anit-oppressive social work theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzi, L. (2015). Social work, exclusionary populism and xenophobia in Italy. International Social Work, 58(4), 595–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical socila work pracice: making a difference. Britstol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The democratic disconnect: the danger of deconsolidation. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillich, S. (2012). Zur Normalitaet sozialer Ausgrenzung. 15 Anmerkungen. In S. Gillich & R. Keicher (Eds.), Buerger oder Bettler. Soziale Rechte von Menschen in Wohnungsnot im europaeischen Jahr gegen Armut und soziale Ausgrenzung (pp. 269–288). Wiesbaden: VS Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., & Webb, S. A. (2013). The new politics of social work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F., & Deleuze, G. (1972). Continuum. London and New York: Anti-Oedipus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumpinger, M. (2008). Volkspflege. Sozialarbeit im Nationalsozialismus Soziales_Kapitel, 1(1).

  • Ham, P. (2017). So you want to rule like an autocrat; six-step guide to putting your country first. In G. R. 57 (Ed.), South Bank Campus. Griffith, QLD: Griffith University.

  • Hammer, E. (2017). Zerreissprobe Armut und Wohnen: Wohnungslosigkeit und Wohnungslosenhilfe im Kontext aktueller Entwicklungen. Sozialarbeit Oesterreich, 2, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, C. & Galston, W.Why are populists winning online? Social media reinforces their anti-establishment message. (2017, 28 April). Brookings TechTank.

  • Ife, J. (2012). Human rights and social work: towards a rights-based practice (3ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kaltwasser, C. R., Taggart, P. A., Espejo, P. O., & Ostiguy, P. (2017). The Oxford handbook of populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krastev, I. (2016). Auf dem Weg in die Mehrheitsdiktatur? In H. Geiselberger (Ed.), Die grosse Regression. Eine internationale Debatte ueber die geistige Situation unserer Zeit (pp. 117–134). Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, C. (2002). Soziale Arbeit im nationalsozialistischen Herrschaftssystem: Soziale Theorie und Praxis “von Auschwitz her denken”. In W. Thole (Ed.), Grundrisse Soziale Arbeit. Oplden: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, C. (2012). Soziale Arbeit im Nationalsozialistischen Herrschaftssystem. In W. Thole (Ed.), Grundrisse Soziale Arbeit. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag fuer Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzone, L., & Woods, D. (2015). Riding the populist web: contextualizing the five star movement (M5S) in Italy. Politics and Governance, 3(2), 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, S. (2016). The global rise of islamophobia: whose side is social work on? Social Alternatives, 35(4), 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maus, F. (2014). Sozialarbeit im Dritten Reich und sich daraus stellende Fragen fuer das Verhalten der Profession heute. Paper presented at the Berufskongress des DBSH und AS-Hochschule, Mannheim, 22 March.

  • McSwiney, J., & Cottle, D. (2017). Unintended consequences: one nation and neoliberalism in contemporary Australia. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 79, 87–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, J. W. (2014). The people must be extracted from within the people: reflections on populism. Constellations, 2(4), 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtwey, O. (2016). Die Abstiegsgesellschaft. Ueber das Aufbegehren in der regressiven Moderne. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C. (2007). Social work, collective action and social movements. In L. Dominelli (Ed.), Revitalising communities in a globalising world. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S., & Dittmer, J. (2016). Donald Trump and the white-male dissonance machine. Political Geography, 54, 76–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth K The dangerous rise of populism: global attacks on human rights values (2016). https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/global-attacks-human-rights-values. Accessed 15 Mar.

  • Schnurr, S. (1997). Sozialpaedagogen im Nationalsozialismus: Eine Fallstudie Zur Sozialpaedagogischen Bewegung im Uebergang Zum NS-Staat: Juventa.

  • Speed, E., & Mannion, R. (2017). The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: challenges for health policy. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 6(5), 249–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Democracy Network (2016) Populism and democracy: Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde?. The Conversation, November 2, retrieved from http://theconversation.com/populism-and-democracy-dr-jekyll-and-mr-hyde-67421. Accessed 10 July 2018.

  • Torres, V. (2006). The impact of ‘populism’ on social, political and economic development in the hemisphere. http://www.focal.ca/pdf/governance_Torres-FOCAL_impact%20populism%20social%20political%20economic%20development%20hemisphere_July%202006_FPP-06-06.pdf Accessed 16/11/2017 2017.

  • Waaldijk, B. (2001). Social work between oppression and emancipation. Histories of discomfort and inspiration in Europe. Social Work and Society, 9(2), online.

  • Younge, G. (2017). My travels in white America: a land of anxiety, division and pockets of pain. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/06/my-travels-in-white-america-a-land-of-anxiety-division-and-pockets-of-pain?CMP=fb_gu. Accessed 16/11/2017 2017.

  • Zabala, S. (2017). The difference between right and left wing populism. Aljazeera.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolyn Noble.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noble, C., Ottmann, G. Nationalist Populism and Social Work. J. Hum. Rights Soc. Work 3, 112–120 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-018-0066-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-018-0066-3

Keywords

Navigation