Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Movie Frame Rate on Viewer Preference: An Eye Tracking Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Augmented Human Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The film industry has begun to increase the frame rate of movies in order to enhance viewer's perception of visual smoothness. This decision is causing controversy, and it is exacerbated by the development of high frame rate technology for television. To address this issue, we investigated if higher (60 frames per second or fps) versus conventional lower frame rates (24 fps) influence viewing behaviour and preference. Observers (N = 30) were eye-tracked while they viewed pairs of identical movie clips that differed only in their frame rate. Results showed that individuals looked more frequently at the videos they preferred; however, many could not discriminate between the high and low rate clips. However, those individuals who could reliably discriminate between the two frames rates preferred the lower 24 fps clips. Our results provide empirical support to those who argue that the viewing quality of films at higher frame rates is compromised on 2D displays.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Watson AB (2013) High frame rates and human vision: a view through the window of visibility. SMPTE Motion Imaging J 122(2):18–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ebiri B (2019) Motion smoothing is ruining cinema. Vulture. https://www.vulture.com/2019/07/motion-smoothing-is-ruining-cinema.html

  3. Kuroki Y, Nishi T, Kobayashi S, Oyaizu H, Yoshimura S (2007) A psychophysical study of improvements in motion-image quality by using high frame rates. J Soc Inf Disp 15(1):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mackin A, Zhang F, Bull DR (2018) A study of high frame rate video formats. IEEE Trans Multimed 21(6):1499–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gulliver SR, Ghinea G (2004) Stars in their eyes: what eye-tracking reveals about multimedia perceptual quality. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 34(4):472–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackin A, Noland KC, Bull DR (2017) High frame rates and the visibility of motion artifacts. SMPTE Motion Imaging J 126(5):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilcox LM, Allison RS, Helliker J, Dunk B, Anthony RC (2015) Evidence that viewers prefer higher frame-rate film. ACM Trans Appl Percept (TAP) 12(4):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Allison RS, Wilcox LM, Anthony RC, Helliker J, Dunk B (2016) Expert viewers’ preferences for higher frame rate 3D film. J Imaging Sci Technol 60(6):60402–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duchowski AT (2002) A breadth-first survey of eye-tracking applications. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 34(4):455–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duchowski AT (2007) Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (1998) Eye movements during scene viewing: an overview. In: Underwood G (ed) Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 269–293

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Henderson JM, Hollingworth A (1999) High-level scene perception. Annu Rev Psychol 50(1):243–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gulliver SR, Ghinea G (2007) The perceptual and attentive impact of delay and jitter in multimedia delivery. IEEE Trans Broadcast 53(2):449–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen K, Lorenz DA (2011) Image sequence interpolation based on optical flow, segmentation, and optimal control. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(3):1020–1030

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Hilman K, Park HW, Kim Y (2000) Using motion-compensated frame-rate conversion for the correction of 3: 2 pulldown artifacts in video sequences. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 10(6):869–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chisholm JD (2014) Individual differences in oculomotor control: the case of action video game players. University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Daniil Vasilyev for creating the stimuli.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Farid Pazhoohi & Alan Kingstone

Authors
  1. Farid Pazhoohi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Kingstone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farid Pazhoohi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pazhoohi, F., Kingstone, A. The Effect of Movie Frame Rate on Viewer Preference: An Eye Tracking Study. Augment Hum Res 6, 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-020-00040-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41133-020-00040-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation