Abstract
What can we, as sociologists, do with radical political criticism? The publication of the book Reprendre la terre aux machines (Reclaiming the land from the machines) by the cooperative L’Atelier Paysan (2021) offers a particular answer to this age-old question. The starting point of this “manifesto for peasant and food autonomy” is the authors’ dissatisfaction with the results of their own efforts. The aim of this paper is then to address the following question: are hedgerows, and with them all those who defend their greater consideration in agricultural policies, the “useful idiots” of the dominant agricultural model? The discussion is therefore organised in two stages. Firstly, it presents the arguments showing that hedgerows can support consensual ecologisation that marginalises a more profound transformation of the agricultural economy. Secondly, however, it then explores the limitations of this position by arguing that if greening via hedgerows is indeed marginal, it is not reduced to being a useful idiot but participates in ecologisation from the margins. The main lesson of this paper is to highlight the benefits for sociology to take seriously the political analyses of stakeholders, not only as objects of study but also as sparks to inspire the sociological imagination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
For a review, see (Meyer 2022).
For a review, see (Magnin 2021a).
See his speech in the Ministry of Agriculture’s video “Plantons des haies”, 8 April 2021.
“Les chantiers que le ministre doit boucler avant l'élection présidentielle”, Terre-Net, 30 September 2021.
At least since the massive disappearance of subsistence practices that took from hedges blackberries for jam or hazelnuts for oil (Lizet 1984).
https://www.elysee.fr/emmanuel-macron/2021/10/12/presentation-du-plan-france-2030, consulted 25 October 2022.
However, it cannot be said either that hedgerows are a gateway that, once pushed open, naturally leads to farms’ total transformation. The consequences of reclassifying hedgerows as an integral part of the farm on the rest of its components is an avenue of research that future empirical studies could address.
References
Afac-Agroforesteries, & Magnin, L. (2020). Bilan d’application de la BCAE7 en France et propositions. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from https://afac-agroforesteries.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/bilan-dapplication-de-la-BCAE7-Afac-Agfroforesteries-2020-1.pdf
Afac-Agroforesteries, & Magnin, L. (2021). Bilan d’application de la BCAE7 en France et propositions d’amélioration dans le cadre de la nouvelle PAC. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from https://afac-agroforesteries.fr/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/2021_bilan-dapplication-de-la-BCAE7-Afac-Agroforesteries_VF.pdf
Agreste. (2022). Âge des exploitants et devenir des exploitations. Recensement agricole 2020. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from https://agreste.agriculture.gouv.fr/agreste-web/download/publication/publié/Prix2210/Primeur%202022-10_RA_Age%20des%20exploitations.pdf
Ansaloni, M., & Smith, S. (2021). L’expropriation de l’agriculture française : Pouvoirs et politiques dans le capitalisme contemporain. Éditions du Croquant
Baudry, J., & Jouin, A. (2003). De la haie aux bocages. Organisation, dynamique et gestion. Editions Quae.
Boltanski, L. (2009). De la critique : Précis de sociologie de l’émancipation. Gallimard.
CGAAER. (2021). La charge de mécanisation des exploitations agricoles. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from. https://agriculture.gouv.fr/telecharger/127561
Daviron, B. (2020). Biomasse. Une histoire de richesse et de puissance. Editions Quae.
Dupré, L. (2020). Faire lutte de tout arbre. Techniques & Culture. Revue semestrielle d’anthropologie des techniques, n°74. https://doi.org/10.4000/tc.14671
Fouilleux, E., & Berlan, A. (2022). Agriculture durable. Comment la nocivité de l’agriculture industrielle est-elle dissimulée ? In A. Berlan, G. Carbou, & L. Teulières (Eds.), Greenwashing. Manuel pour dépolluer le débat public (1st ed., pp. 35–43). Seuil.
Jouin, A. (2003). Les techniques et le temps de travail pour l’entretien des haies. In J. Baudry, & A. Jouin (Eds.), De la haie aux bocages. Organisation, dynamique et gestion (1st ed., pp. 156–70). Editions Quae.
L’Atelier, P. (2021). Reprendre la terre aux machines. Manifeste pour une autonomie paysanne et alimentaire. Seuil.
Lizet, B. (1984). “Brider le buisson” : Une logique de la haie paysanne. In L. Bérard, A.-M. Brisebarre, A. Gilloire, B. Lizet, & P. Marchenay (Eds.), Rôle des savoirs et pratiques naturalistes populaires dans la gestion des écosystèmes humanisés (1st ed., pp. 75–123). CNRS, Laboratoire d’ethnobotanique et ethnozoologique, MNHN.
Magnin, L. (2018). Savoirs d’éleveur. Un traité d’expérience. Zilsel, 3(1), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.3917/zil.003.0337
Magnin, L. (2020). Le diplomate du bocage. Ethnographie d’un plaidoyer agroécologique. Terrain. Anthropologie & Sciences Humaines, 73, 44–65. https://doi.org/10.4000/terrain.20102
Magnin, L. (2021a). Compte rendu : Ansaloni (Matthieu) et Smith (Andy), L’expropriation de l’agriculture française : Pouvoirs et politiques dans le capitalisme contemporain, Vulaines-sur-Seine, Éditions du Croquant, coll. “Dynamiques socio-économiques”, 2021, 205 p. Politix, 136(4), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.136.0167
Magnin, L. (2021b). La haie requalifiée. Enquête sur un dispositif d’écologisation de la Politique agricole commune (2014–2019). Ph.D thesis, Paris: Université Paris-Est et ENS de Lyon. Retrieved November 25, 2022 from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-03267698
Meyer, M. (2022). L’Atelier Paysan: Reprendre la terre aux machines: Manifeste pour une autonomie paysanne et alimentaire [Taking back the Land from the machines: A manifesto for peasant and food autonomy]. Agriculture and Human Values, 39(3), 1161–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10323-4
Perichon, S. (2004). L’impossible reconstruction des bocages détruits. L’Espace Géographique, 33(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.3917/eg.332.0175
Perichon, S. (2005). Les représentations sociales associées au bocage. Analyse des relations agriculteurs/territoire en Haute-Bretagne. Bulletin de la Société Géographique de Liège, 46, 71–80.
Poupeau, F. (2020). Ce qu’un arbre peut véritablement cacher. Le Monde diplomatique, 22–23.
Sanson, B., & Moret, C. (2022). Cette PAC sera celle de la haie ! Pour, 243(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.3917/pour.243.0129
Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The biology of humans at our best and worst. Penguin Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Magnin, L. The hedgerow: industrial farming’s “useful idiot”?. Rev Agric Food Environ Stud 104, 77–86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-022-00186-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-022-00186-y
