The agro-food industry, public health, and environmental protection: investigating the Porter hypothesis in food regulation

  • Eric Giraud-Héraud
  • Jean-Pierre Ponssard
  • Bernard Sinclair Desgagné
  • Louis-Georges Soler
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s41130-016-0011-8

Cite this article as:
Giraud-Héraud, E., Ponssard, JP., Desgagné, B.S. et al. Rev Agric Food Environ Stud (2016) 97: 127. doi:10.1007/s41130-016-0011-8
  • 92 Downloads

Abstract

Sustainable food concerns have pushed public authorities to act by means of regulations, standards and other devices, and businesses to innovate in their products and production processes. We argue that the Porter hypothesis—which asserts that properly designed and implemented environmental regulation might be good for society as well as the targeted firms—might well be verified in this context. After reviewing and illustrating the working principles and main criticisms of this hypothesis, we provide a more in-depth discussion of nutritional issues. While the literature generally points to organizational imperfections and market failures to validate the Porter hypothesis, we submit and model another rationale for the agro-food industry, a rationale that is based on consumer behavior.

Keywords

Sustainable food Regulation Innovation Consumer behavior Porter hypothesis 

JEL classification

L13 L51 Q55 Q58 

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Giraud-Héraud
    • 1
  • Jean-Pierre Ponssard
    • 2
  • Bernard Sinclair Desgagné
    • 3
  • Louis-Georges Soler
    • 1
  1. 1.INRA, UR1303 ALISS, F-94205 IVRY-SUR-SEINE, France et GREThA, UMR5113 CNRSUniversité de BordeauxPessacFrance
  2. 2.Ecole PolytechniquePalaiseauFrance
  3. 3.HECMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations