Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trends of Modern Terrorism in the Metro Systems of the World

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal for Security Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of anti-terrorist protection of metro systems in recent decades has significantly worsened. This is due to the general growth of the terrorist threat in the world. According to the Global Terrorism Database of the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), a number of terrorist attacks have been committed in metro systems of various countries of the world, including Britain, Russia, USA, Japan and France. For effective measures to counteract such attacks, it is necessary to clearly know the trends of modern terrorism, particularly on the basis of systematization and analysis of statistical data on the terrorist attacks committed in the metro systems with the subsequent formation of a matrix of trends, which in this case was carried out by the authors of the article. The main statistical analysis method is the factor analysis. The proposed matrix helps to assess terrorist threats for metro systems and can be used to develop measures to ensure their security. The Matrix of Trends of Modern Terrorism in the Metro Systems’ main trends are identified: frequency of attacks; object of attacks; tool of attacks; method of attacks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkakati N, Maurer D, Bowser A, Stattel A (2010) Explosives detection technologies to protect passenger rail. Report to Congressional Committees, GAO-10-898. U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington

  • Borrion H, Tripathi K, Chen P, Moon S (2014) Threat detection: a framework for security architects and designers of metropolitan rail systems. Urban Plan Transp Res 2(1):173–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyelle J-L, O’Neill C, El-Koursi E, Hamelin F, Sartori N, Khoudour L (2014) Improving the resilience of metro vehicle and passengers for an effective emergency response to terrorist attacks. Saf Sci 62:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Cillis F, De Maggio MC, Pragliola C, Setola R (2013) Analysis of criminal and terrorist related episodes in railway infrastructure scenarios. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 10(2):1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikanova TA (2010) To the issue of preventing terrorism on transport. Bull Acad RF Prosec Gen Off 3(17):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards FL, Goodrich DC, Griffith J (2016) Emergency management training for transportation agencies. Mineta Transportation Institute Report 12-70. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, California

  • Evans R et al (2006) Crime and safety at London’s suburban railway stations. Report Transport Committee for to London Assembly

  • Global Terrorism Database (2016) National consortium for the study of terrorism and responses to terrorism. http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd. Accessed 15 May 2018

  • Jenkins B (2001) Protecting public surface transportation against terrorism and serious crime: an executive overview. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins B (2004) Terrorism and the security of public surface transportation. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone B (2011) New strategies to protect America: terrorism and mass transit after London and Madrid. Center for American Progress, Washington. https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/kf/TRANSIT_SECURITY.PDF. Accessed 15 May 2018

  • Larcher M, Forsberg R, Björnstig U, Holgersson A, Solomos G (2015) Effectiveness of finite-element modeling of damage and injuries for explosions inside trains. J Transp Saf Secur 8(1):83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievin BA, Nedorchuk BL (2015) Prospects of high technologies in the remote diagnosis of the track. J Inf Technol Appl 5(1):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievin BA, Bugaev AS, Ivashov SI, Razevig VV (2013) Distantly piloted aircrafts and the track security. World Transp Transp 11(2):152–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockey D, MacKenzie R, Redhead J, Wise D, Harris T, Weaver A, Hines K, Davies G (2005) London bombings July 2005: immediate pre-hospital medical response. Resuscitation 66(2):ix–xii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsika E, O’Neill C, Battista U, Khosravi M, Laporte A, Munoz E (2016) Development of risk assessment specifications for analysing terrorist attacks vulnerability on metro and light rail systems. Transp Res Proc 14:1345–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metrobits (2017) World metro database (Online). http://mic-ro.com/metro/table.html

  • Muratov VP (2015) The security service of Moscow Metro daily reveals to 200 dangerous subjects. http://www.mskagency.ru/materials/2517870. Accessed 15 May 2018

  • Nehorayoff A, Benjamin A, Smith D (2016) Aum Shinrikyo’s nuclear and chemical weapons development efforts. J Strateg Secur 9(1):35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill C, Robinson A, Ingleton S (2012) Mitigating the effects of firebombs and blast attacks on metro systems. Proc Soc Behav Sci 48:3518–3527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill C, Robinson AM, Santiago A (2013) Metro vehicle blast testing: mitigating the effects of terrorist attacks on metro vehicles. In: 10th World congress on railway research. Sydney, Australia

  • Ortiz DS, Weatherford BA, Greenberg MD, Ecola L (2008) Improving the safety and security of freight and passenger rail in Pennsylvania. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polunsky SM (2017) Homeland security and Texas’ high-speed rail. J Transp Secur 10:73–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setola R, PorcellinisS De, Sforna M (2009) Critical infrastructure dependency assessment using the input–output inoperability model. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot 2:170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setola R, Sforza A, Vittorini V, Pragliola C (2015) Railway infrastructure security. Topics in safety, risk, reliability and quality, book series (TSRQ, volume 27). Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsov AV (2018) Safety control and protection of metro systems against unauthorized interference and actions (terrorist attacks). Thesis degree of PhD, Moscow State University of Railway Engineering, Moscow

  • Shvetsov AV, Shvetsova SV (2017a) Research of a problem of terrorist attacks in the Metro (Subway, U-Bahn, Underground, MRT, Rapid Transit, Metrorail). Eur J Secur Res 2(2):131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsov AV, Shvetsova SV (2017b) Protection of high-speed trains against bomb-carrying unmanned aerial vehicles. J Transp Secur 10(3–4):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsov A, Shvetsova S, Kozyrev VA et al (2017a) The “car-bomb” as a terrorist tool at metro stations, railway terminals and airports. J Transp Secur 10(1–2):31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shvetsov AV, Sharov SV, Shvetsova SV (2017b) Method of protection of pedestrian zones against the terrorist attacks made by means of cars including off-road vehicles and trucks. Eur J Secur Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-017-0018-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Soehnchen A, Barcanescu M (2014) Risk assessment tool for public transport. Transport Research Arena, 2014, Paris

  • SPMSS (2017) Saint-Petersburg Metro Security Service. Official website of the Saint-Petersburg Metro. http://www.metro.spb.ru/transpsft.html. Accessed 15 May 2018

  • Starita S, Scaparra MP (2017) Passenger railway network protection: a model with variable post-disruption demand service. J Oper Res Soc. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41274-017-0255-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Loukaitou-Sideris A, Liggett R, Fink C, Wachs M, Cavanagh E, Cherry C, Haas PJ (2005) Designing and operating safe and secure transit systems: assessing current practices in the United States and abroad. Mineta Transportation Institute Report 04-05. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, California

  • Tripathi K, Borrion H (2016) Safe, secure or punctual? A simulator study of train driver response to reports of explosives on a metro train. Secur J 29(1):87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSA (2017) Transportation Security Administration. Official website of the Department of Homeland Security. https://www.tsa.gov. Accessed 15 May 2018

  • Wilson J, Jackson B, Eisman M, Steinberg P, Riley J (2007) Securing America’s passenger-rail systems. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolmeh A, Baykal-Gursoy M (2018) Urban rail patrolling: a game theoretic approach. J Transp Secur 1:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-018-0187-z

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexey V. Shvetsov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shvetsov, A.V., Sharov, V.A., Kozyrev, V.A. et al. Trends of Modern Terrorism in the Metro Systems of the World. Eur J Secur Res 4, 149–156 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0037-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41125-018-0037-9

Keywords

Navigation