Abstract
Institutional isomorphism emerged in the 1960s and 1970s to show how institutions in different countries develop similarities through imitation. Countries such as Japan, Singapore, and Hong Kong gained massive success by copying successful initiatives from all over the world. Similarly, anti-corruption agencies such as the Singapore Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau and the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption become global models for combating corruption. Donors such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank, suggest many developing countries create agencies like those to combat corruption. Bangladesh is one of the countries that chose those models and formed an anti-corruption commission (ACC) based on isomorphic pressure from international donors. The aim of this paper is to identify the problems of this isomorphic approach to combating corruption in Bangladesh through the ACC. Based on elite interviews with key informants and document analysis, this paper argues that despite the ACC is an excellent initiative, following the global isomorphism of the ACA model has proved somewhat frustrating. Findings suggest that the ineffectiveness of the ACC is mainly related to failures involving both structure and agency as well as problems within the ACC. Results indicate that these failures have created a ‘toothless tiger’ ACA in Bangladesh.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Notes
Mr. IK is an imaginary name.
Khalifa in Islam is a believer in or follower of Islam as well as very benevolent.
References
Ali, S.M. 2010. Understanding Bangladesh. USA: Columbia University Press.
Aminuzzaman, S. 1994. Structural Adjustment Program and its’ impact on Bangladesh public administration. Philippine Journal of Public Administration 38 (3): 275–293.
Aminuzzaman, S., & Khair, S. 2014. National Integrity System assessment Bangladesh 2014. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh. http://www.ti-bangladesh.org. Accessed 23 Dec 2016.
Aminuzzaman, S., Akram, S. M., & Islam, S. 2016. Assessment of the Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Agency. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh. https://www.ti-bangladesh.org/beta3/images/2016/fr_ccs_acc_16_en.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2017.
Andrews, M. 2013. The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2008. Annual report 2007–2008. Dhaka: Author.
Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2015. Annual report 2014. Dhaka: Author. http://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/15a43b3d_17da_450e_aab7_7dbf622d8eab/acc_annual_report_-_2014.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.
Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2016. Annual report 2015. Dhaka: Author. http://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/a671f463_cdfe_493f_bb72_e8fb917e7ac0/acc_annual_report_2016.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.
Begum, T., and N.H. Sakib. 2010. Combating corruption in Bangladesh: role of the Anti Corruption Commission. In Political management in Bangladesh, ed. A.M.A. Hasanuzzaman and A. Shamsul, 249–270. Dhaka: AH Development Publishing House.
Branduse, D.-M. 2016. Anti-corruption agencies, multiple principals, and the institutional framework. (Doctoral Thesis, Binghamton University, New York), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from http://usyd.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link.
Brown, A., and M. Bruerton. 2017. Sufficient, stable and secure? An exploratory comparative analysis of integrity agency financial resourcing. Crime, Law and Social Change 68 (3): 341–358.
Carlsnaes, W. 1992. The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 245–270.
Clemens, B.W., and T.J. Douglas. 2005. Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research 58 (9): 1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.04.002.
Colignon, R., and C. Usui. 2001. The resilience of Japan’s iron triangle. Asian Survey 41 (5): 865–895.
Creswell, J.W. 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
De Sousa, L. 2010. Anti-corruption agencies: between empowerment and irrelevance. Crime, Law and Social Change 53 (1): 5–22.
DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.
DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 2000. The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Economics meets sociology in strategic management, 143–166. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Doig, A., D. Watt, and R. Williams. 2006. Hands-on or hands-off? Anti-corruption agencies in action, donor expectations, and a good enough reality. Public Administration and Development 26 (2): 163–172.
Doty, R.L. 1997. Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.
Fligstein, N. 2000. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. In Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, ed. J. Baum and F. Dobbin, 55–78. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the structuration theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graycar, A., and T. Prenzler. 2013. Understanding and preventing corruption. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C.R. Hinings. 2002. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80.
Guillén, M. 2014. Isomorphism, impermeability, and institutional diversity. Clarendon lectures in management studies, Saïd Business School. Oxford: The University of Oxford Press. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeQf_hR8ooQ. Accessed 19 July 2017.
Halperin, S., and O. Heath. 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 929–964.
Haunschild, P.R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 564–592.
Haveman, H.A. 1993. Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 593–627.
Heilbrunn, J.R. 2004. Anti-corruption commissions: Panacea or real medicine to fight corruption? In The many faces of corruption: tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level, ed. J.E. Campos and S. Pradhan. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.
Heimann, F., Dell, G., & Bathory, G. 2013. United Nations Convention Against Corruption: Progress report. Berlin: Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/un_convention_against_corruption_progress_report_2013. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.
Hindess, B. 2005. Investigating international anti-corruption. Third World Quarterly 26 (8): 1389–1398.
Hobson, J.M., and M. Ramesh. 2002. Globalisation makes of states what states make of it: between agency and structure in the state/globalisation debate. New Political Economy 7 (1): 5–22.
Howe, S.W., and Y. Haigh. 2016. Anti-corruption watchdog accountability: the limitations of judicial review’s ability to guard the guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12185.
Jamali, D. 2010. MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4): 617–640.
Johnston, M. 1999. A brief history of anticorruption agencies. In The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies, ed. A. Schedler, L.J. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, 217–226. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Khan, M. H. 1998. The role of civil society and patron-client networks in the analysis of corruption. In OECD/UNDP (Ed.), Corruption and integrity improvement initiatives in developing countries (pp. 111–127). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Management Development and Governance Division.
Khan, M.M. 2003. State of Governance in Bangladesh. The Round Table 92 (370): 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0035853032000111116.
Khan, M.M., and M.S. Islam. 2014. Democracy and good governance in Bangladesh: are they compatible? Millennial Asia 5 (1): 23–40.
Khan, Z. I. 2014, December 23. Padma claimants being robbed by government staff. Dhaka Tribune. http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/dec/23/padma-claimants-being-robbed-government-staff. Accessed 8 Sep 2016.
Kostova, T., and K. Roth. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. The Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 215–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293.
Kostova, T., K. Roth, and M.T. Dacin. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 994–1006.
Krause, P. 2013. Of institutions and butterflies: Is isomorphism in developing countries necessarily a bad thing?. London, UK: The Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8353.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2017.
Mashreque, S. 2012. Paradox of rural development in Bangladesh: a focus on poverty alleviation and triangular policy manipulation. Humanomics 28 (3): 187–199.
Meagher, P. 2005. Anti-corruption agencies: rhetoric versus reality. The Journal of Policy Reform 8 (1): 69–103.
Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
Mizruchi, M.S., and L.C. Fein. 1999. The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 653–683.
Moon, M.J., and P. Ingraham. 1998. Shaping administrative reform and governance: an examination of the political nexus triads in three Asian countries. Governance 11 (1): 77–100.
O’Neill, K., J. Balsiger, and S.D. VanDeveer. 2004. Actors, norms, and impact: recent international cooperation theory and the influence of the agent-structure debate. Annual Review Political Science 7: 149–175.
Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 145–179.
Parnini, S.N. 2011. Governance reforms and Anti-Corruption Commission in Bangladesh. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences 11 (1): 50–70.
Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik. 2003. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford Business Books.
Pfiffner, J.P. 1987. Political appointees and career executives: the democracy-bureaucracy nexus in the third century. Public Administration Review 47 (1): 57–65.
Pope, J. 2000. Confronting corruption: The elements of a National Integrity System. Berlin: Transparency International.
Pritchett, L., and F. de Weijer. 2011. Fragile states: stuck in a capability trap?. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Quah, J.S. 1999. Comparing anti-corruption measures in Asian countries: lessons to be learnt. Asian Review of Public Administration 11 (2): 71–90.
Sakib, N.H. 2013. Anti Corruption Commission and political government: an evaluation of Awami League regime (2009–2012). Asian Studies, Jahangirnagar University Journal of Government and Politics 32 (1): 79–87.
Sakib, N.H. 2019. One size does not fit all: an analysis of the corruption preventative approach of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Political Science 27 (2): 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1642773.
The Daily Star (Star). 2011, April 16. Make corruption prevention a social movement. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-181740. Accessed 17 Oct 2016.
United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2004. Support for development of the USAID/Bangladesh anti-corruption strategy. Washington, DC: Author. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan047854.pdf, Accessed 13 May 2017.
Wendt, A.E. 1987. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International organization 41 (3): 335–370.
Wight, C. 2003. The agent-structure problem and institutional racism. Political Studies 51 (4): 706–721.
Verbruggen, S., J. Christiaens, and K. Milis. 2011. Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (1): 5–32.
Venard, B. 2009. Organizational isomorphism and corruption: an empirical research in Russia. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1): 59–76.
Venard, B., and M. Hanafi. 2008. Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (2): 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9519-9
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Professor Rodney Smith for his comments and suggestions. This research would not have been possible without him. The author also thanks two anonymous reviewers whose comments and insight was invaluable in re-shaping this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by The University of Sydney (University of Sydney International Postgraduate Research Scholarship).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author reported no potential conflict of interest.
Appendix: Interviewee Codes (Anonymized)
Appendix: Interviewee Codes (Anonymized)
Interviews of this study were conducted under the University of Sydney Project No 2015/577, which was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 August 2015.
Code | Organisation/profession/department | Date interviewed |
---|---|---|
IvACC2 | Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, Government of Bangladesh (GoB) | 21.10.2015 |
IvACC3 | Mid-Range Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 26.10.2015 |
IvACC5 | Junior Officer of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 27.10.2015 |
IvACC6 | Mid-Range Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 02.11.2015 |
IvACC7 | Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 02.11.2015 |
IvGoB8 | Former Cabinet Secretary, GOB | 13.11.2015 |
IvCSNGO10 | Prominent Civil Society Member, Organizer, and Academics | 22.11.2015 |
IvAca12 | Corruption Expert and Professor of Political Science | 05.12.2015 |
IvAca15 | Professor of Public Administration and Governance Expert | 07.12.2015 |
IvACC18 | Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 22.12.2015 |
IvCSAcaNGO22 | Prominent NGO Leader and Civil Society Member | 07.01.2016 |
IvGoBCS25 | Civil Society Member, Former Senior Official of GOB | 24.01.2016 |
IvJour26 | Prominent News Correspondent on Corruption and Governance Issues on a private TV News Channel | 28.01.2016 |
IvACC27 | Former Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 29.01.2016 |
IvCBOLaw28 | President of Corruption Prevention Committees (CPCs) and Public Prosecutor of ACC, GoB | 06.02.2016 |
IvACC29 | Mid-Range Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 08.02.2016 |
IvACC30 | Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 23.02.2016 |
IvCSAcaAvt31 | Prominent Activist, Civil Society Member, and Professor of Economics | 02.03.2016 |
IvPol32 | Politician and Standing Committee Member of Bangladesh Nationalist Party | 23.03.2016 |
IvJour33 | Staff Correspondent, Cover News on ACC, From a Daily Newspaper | 28.03.2016 |
IvACC39 | Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB | 04.05.2016 |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sakib, N.H. Institutional Isomorphism of Anti-corruption Agency: The Case of Anti-corruption Commission in Bangladesh. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. 5, 222–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00143-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00143-4