Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional Isomorphism of Anti-corruption Agency: The Case of Anti-corruption Commission in Bangladesh

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chinese Political Science Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Institutional isomorphism emerged in the 1960s and 1970s to show how institutions in different countries develop similarities through imitation. Countries such as Japan, Singapore, and Hong Kong gained massive success by copying successful initiatives from all over the world. Similarly, anti-corruption agencies such as the Singapore Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau and the Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption become global models for combating corruption. Donors such as World Bank, Asian Development Bank, suggest many developing countries create agencies like those to combat corruption. Bangladesh is one of the countries that chose those models and formed an anti-corruption commission (ACC) based on isomorphic pressure from international donors. The aim of this paper is to identify the problems of this isomorphic approach to combating corruption in Bangladesh through the ACC. Based on elite interviews with key informants and document analysis, this paper argues that despite the ACC is an excellent initiative, following the global isomorphism of the ACA model has proved somewhat frustrating. Findings suggest that the ineffectiveness of the ACC is mainly related to failures involving both structure and agency as well as problems within the ACC. Results indicate that these failures have created a ‘toothless tiger’ ACA in Bangladesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Andrews (2013, p. 44)

Fig. 2

Source: ACC (2015, p. 24)

Fig. 3

Source: Aminuzzaman et al. (2016, p. 6)

Fig. 4

Source: Author

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Notes

  1. Mr. IK is an imaginary name.

  2. Khalifa in Islam is a believer in or follower of Islam as well as very benevolent.

References

  • Ali, S.M. 2010. Understanding Bangladesh. USA: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman, S. 1994. Structural Adjustment Program and its’ impact on Bangladesh public administration. Philippine Journal of Public Administration 38 (3): 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aminuzzaman, S., & Khair, S. 2014. National Integrity System assessment Bangladesh 2014. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh. http://www.ti-bangladesh.org. Accessed 23 Dec 2016.

  • Aminuzzaman, S., Akram, S. M., & Islam, S. 2016. Assessment of the Bangladesh Anti-Corruption Agency. Dhaka: Transparency International Bangladesh. https://www.ti-bangladesh.org/beta3/images/2016/fr_ccs_acc_16_en.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2017.

  • Andrews, M. 2013. The limits of institutional reform in development: Changing rules for realistic solutions. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2008. Annual report 2007–2008. Dhaka: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2015. Annual report 2014. Dhaka: Author. http://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/15a43b3d_17da_450e_aab7_7dbf622d8eab/acc_annual_report_-_2014.pdf. Accessed 13 Dec 2017.

  • Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC). 2016. Annual report 2015. Dhaka: Author. http://acc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/acc.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/a671f463_cdfe_493f_bb72_e8fb917e7ac0/acc_annual_report_2016.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

  • Begum, T., and N.H. Sakib. 2010. Combating corruption in Bangladesh: role of the Anti Corruption Commission. In Political management in Bangladesh, ed. A.M.A. Hasanuzzaman and A. Shamsul, 249–270. Dhaka: AH Development Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branduse, D.-M. 2016. Anti-corruption agencies, multiple principals, and the institutional framework. (Doctoral Thesis, Binghamton University, New York), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. Retrieved from http://usyd.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link.

  • Brown, A., and M. Bruerton. 2017. Sufficient, stable and secure? An exploratory comparative analysis of integrity agency financial resourcing. Crime, Law and Social Change 68 (3): 341–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsnaes, W. 1992. The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis. International Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 245–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, B.W., and T.J. Douglas. 2005. Understanding strategic responses to institutional pressures. Journal of Business Research 58 (9): 1205–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colignon, R., and C. Usui. 2001. The resilience of Japan’s iron triangle. Asian Survey 41 (5): 865–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. 2012. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sousa, L. 2010. Anti-corruption agencies: between empowerment and irrelevance. Crime, Law and Social Change 53 (1): 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P.J., and W.W. Powell. 2000. The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Economics meets sociology in strategic management, 143–166. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, A., D. Watt, and R. Williams. 2006. Hands-on or hands-off? Anti-corruption agencies in action, donor expectations, and a good enough reality. Public Administration and Development 26 (2): 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, R.L. 1997. Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. 2000. The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979. In Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management, ed. J. Baum and F. Dobbin, 55–78. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the structuration theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A., and T. Prenzler. 2013. Understanding and preventing corruption. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., R. Suddaby, and C.R. Hinings. 2002. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 58–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén, M. 2014. Isomorphism, impermeability, and institutional diversity. Clarendon lectures in management studies, Saïd Business School. Oxford: The University of Oxford Press. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeQf_hR8ooQ. Accessed 19 July 2017.

  • Halperin, S., and O. Heath. 2012. Political research: methods and practical skills. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M.T., and J. Freeman. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 929–964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haunschild, P.R. 1993. Interorganizational imitation: the impact of interlocks on corporate acquisition activity. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 564–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H.A. 1993. Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (4): 593–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrunn, J.R. 2004. Anti-corruption commissions: Panacea or real medicine to fight corruption? In The many faces of corruption: tracking vulnerabilities at the sector level, ed. J.E. Campos and S. Pradhan. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimann, F., Dell, G., & Bathory, G. 2013. United Nations Convention Against Corruption: Progress report. Berlin: Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/un_convention_against_corruption_progress_report_2013. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.

  • Hindess, B. 2005. Investigating international anti-corruption. Third World Quarterly 26 (8): 1389–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J.M., and M. Ramesh. 2002. Globalisation makes of states what states make of it: between agency and structure in the state/globalisation debate. New Political Economy 7 (1): 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, S.W., and Y. Haigh. 2016. Anti-corruption watchdog accountability: the limitations of judicial review’s ability to guard the guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (3): 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D. 2010. MNCs and international accountability standards through an institutional lens: Evidence of symbolic conformity or decoupling. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4): 617–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. 1999. A brief history of anticorruption agencies. In The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies, ed. A. Schedler, L.J. Diamond, and M.F. Plattner, 217–226. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. H. 1998. The role of civil society and patron-client networks in the analysis of corruption. In OECD/UNDP (Ed.), Corruption and integrity improvement initiatives in developing countries (pp. 111–127). New York: United Nations Development Programme, Management Development and Governance Division.

  • Khan, M.M. 2003. State of Governance in Bangladesh. The Round Table 92 (370): 391–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/0035853032000111116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M.M., and M.S. Islam. 2014. Democracy and good governance in Bangladesh: are they compatible? Millennial Asia 5 (1): 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Z. I. 2014, December 23. Padma claimants being robbed by government staff. Dhaka Tribune. http://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/2014/dec/23/padma-claimants-being-robbed-government-staff. Accessed 8 Sep 2016.

  • Kostova, T., and K. Roth. 2002. Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. The Academy of Management Journal 45 (1): 215–233. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T., K. Roth, and M.T. Dacin. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review 33 (4): 994–1006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, P. 2013. Of institutions and butterflies: Is isomorphism in developing countries necessarily a bad thing?. London, UK: The Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/8353.pdf. Accessed 23 Sep 2017.

  • Mashreque, S. 2012. Paradox of rural development in Bangladesh: a focus on poverty alleviation and triangular policy manipulation. Humanomics 28 (3): 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meagher, P. 2005. Anti-corruption agencies: rhetoric versus reality. The Journal of Policy Reform 8 (1): 69–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizruchi, M.S., and L.C. Fein. 1999. The social construction of organizational knowledge: a study of the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 653–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M.J., and P. Ingraham. 1998. Shaping administrative reform and governance: an examination of the political nexus triads in three Asian countries. Governance 11 (1): 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, K., J. Balsiger, and S.D. VanDeveer. 2004. Actors, norms, and impact: recent international cooperation theory and the influence of the agent-structure debate. Annual Review Political Science 7: 149–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parnini, S.N. 2011. Governance reforms and Anti-Corruption Commission in Bangladesh. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences 11 (1): 50–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., and G.R. Salancik. 2003. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Stanford, California: Stanford Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfiffner, J.P. 1987. Political appointees and career executives: the democracy-bureaucracy nexus in the third century. Public Administration Review 47 (1): 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, J. 2000. Confronting corruption: The elements of a National Integrity System. Berlin: Transparency International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L., and F. de Weijer. 2011. Fragile states: stuck in a capability trap?. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, J.S. 1999. Comparing anti-corruption measures in Asian countries: lessons to be learnt. Asian Review of Public Administration 11 (2): 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakib, N.H. 2013. Anti Corruption Commission and political government: an evaluation of Awami League regime (2009–2012). Asian Studies, Jahangirnagar University Journal of Government and Politics 32 (1): 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakib, N.H. 2019. One size does not fit all: an analysis of the corruption preventative approach of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) in Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Political Science 27 (2): 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1642773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Daily Star (Star). 2011, April 16. Make corruption prevention a social movement. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-181740. Accessed 17 Oct 2016.

  • United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 2004. Support for development of the USAID/Bangladesh anti-corruption strategy. Washington, DC: Author. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan047854.pdf, Accessed 13 May 2017.

  • Wendt, A.E. 1987. The agent-structure problem in international relations theory. International organization 41 (3): 335–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wight, C. 2003. The agent-structure problem and institutional racism. Political Studies 51 (4): 706–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, S., J. Christiaens, and K. Milis. 2011. Can resource dependence and coercive isomorphism explain nonprofit organizations’ compliance with reporting standards? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 40 (1): 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B. 2009. Organizational isomorphism and corruption: an empirical research in Russia. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1): 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venard, B., and M. Hanafi. 2008. Organizational isomorphism and corruption in financial institutions: Empirical research in emerging countries. Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (2): 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9519-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Professor Rodney Smith for his comments and suggestions. This research would not have been possible without him. The author also thanks two anonymous reviewers whose comments and insight was invaluable in re-shaping this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by The University of Sydney (University of Sydney International Postgraduate Research Scholarship).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nurul Huda Sakib.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author reported no potential conflict of interest.

Appendix: Interviewee Codes (Anonymized)

Appendix: Interviewee Codes (Anonymized)

Interviews of this study were conducted under the University of Sydney Project No 2015/577, which was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 August 2015.

Code

Organisation/profession/department

Date interviewed

IvACC2

Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, Government of Bangladesh (GoB)

21.10.2015

IvACC3

Mid-Range Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

26.10.2015

IvACC5

Junior Officer of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

27.10.2015

IvACC6

Mid-Range Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

02.11.2015

IvACC7

Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

02.11.2015

IvGoB8

Former Cabinet Secretary, GOB

13.11.2015

IvCSNGO10

Prominent Civil Society Member, Organizer, and Academics

22.11.2015

IvAca12

Corruption Expert and Professor of Political Science

05.12.2015

IvAca15

Professor of Public Administration and Governance Expert

07.12.2015

IvACC18

Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

22.12.2015

IvCSAcaNGO22

Prominent NGO Leader and Civil Society Member

07.01.2016

IvGoBCS25

Civil Society Member, Former Senior Official of GOB

24.01.2016

IvJour26

Prominent News Correspondent on Corruption and Governance Issues on a private TV News Channel

28.01.2016

IvACC27

Former Senior Official of Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

29.01.2016

IvCBOLaw28

President of Corruption Prevention Committees (CPCs) and Public Prosecutor of ACC, GoB

06.02.2016

IvACC29

Mid-Range Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

08.02.2016

IvACC30

Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

23.02.2016

IvCSAcaAvt31

Prominent Activist, Civil Society Member, and Professor of Economics

02.03.2016

IvPol32

Politician and Standing Committee Member of Bangladesh Nationalist Party

23.03.2016

IvJour33

Staff Correspondent, Cover News on ACC, From a Daily Newspaper

28.03.2016

IvACC39

Senior Official, Anti-Corruption Commission, GoB

04.05.2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakib, N.H. Institutional Isomorphism of Anti-corruption Agency: The Case of Anti-corruption Commission in Bangladesh. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. 5, 222–252 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00143-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00143-4

Keywords

Navigation