Chinese Political Science Review

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 172–194 | Cite as

The Legitimation of Media Regulation in China

  • Yik Chan Chin
Original Article


This paper explores media regulation in China and argues that the country’s broadcasting regulatory strategies of becoming more legal–rational and law based have been affected by two forces: the Chinese Party-state’s attempt to recast the foundation of its political legitimacy, and the legitimizing power of legal rationality per se. The legitimization of media-regulatory efforts have primarily centered on procedural justice of the rule of law in the following ways: enacting stable new broadcasting laws (stability); instituting public consultation in rule making (procedural inclusiveness); strengthening law enforcement (enforcement); and placing checks on administrative power (restriction of state power). The advantages of this procedural legitimization are that it provides predictability by restricting arbitrariness in the exercise of administrative power and providing some opportunity for public participation, while limiting regulatory authority. On the other hand, Chinese media regulation still requires mechanisms to secure its operational transparency, accountability and deliberation to avoid being cast as a legitimizing ritual. This paper also argues that procedural legality and justice is a necessary, but insufficient condition for obtaining the media regulator’s legal–rational legitimacy, and given the status of the country’s constitution and its weaknesses in political participation, accountability and transparency in national law making, the content of the media regulation itself must also manifest the social and political values of protecting citizen and media rights.


Media regulation Chinese media Rule by law Legitimacy Administrative law 


  1. Anderson, Gary L. 1998. Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal 35 (4): 571–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Article 14 of the Administrative Reconsideration Law of PRC. 2011. Available at: Accessed 5 August 2015.
  3. Baldwin, Robert, and Martin Cave. 1999. Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bendix, Reinhard. 1962. Max weber: An intellectual portrait. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  5. Benton, Lauren. 2002. Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Black, Julia. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. LSE Law, Soceity and Economy Working Papers 2/2008. LSE.Google Scholar
  7. CCP. 2004. CCP’s Opinion on further strengthening internet administration work. Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  8. Chen, Feng. 1997. Eudaemonic legitimacy in post-Mao China. Polity XXIX (3): 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dong, Yuyu. 1998. The rule of law road to political system reform. In Political China (Zhengzhi zhongguo,政治中国), eds. Dong Yuyu and Shi Binhai, Contemporary China Press (Jinri Zhongguo Chubanshe, 今日中国出版社), p. 57.Google Scholar
  10. Galligan, Denis. 2006. Law in modern society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gilley, Bruce and Heike Holbig. 2009. The debate on party legitimacy in China: a mixed quantitative/qualitative analysis. Journal of contemporary China. 18 (59):339–358.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, Leslie. 1993. The end of communist power. Cambridge: Polity Press, p. 13, 39.Google Scholar
  13. Holmes, Leslie. 1997. Post-communism: An introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Horsley, Jamie. 2016. China promotes open government as it seeks to reinvent its governance mode. Available at: Accessed on 7 March 2016.
  15. Holbig, Heike. 2011. Reclaiming legitimacy in postrevolutionary China: bring ideology and governance back in. In Political legitimacy in Asia: new leadership challenges, eds. John Kane, Hui-chieh Loy, and Haig Patapan, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, Zhengrong and Xuan Du. 2002. Governmental policies regulating the broadcasting media: From a comparative study. In Globalization and the Mass Media: Clash, convergence and interaction (Quanqiu hua yu dazhong chuanmei: Chongtu, ronghe yu hudong, eds.Yin, Hong and Li, Bin, 全球化与大众传媒:冲突,融合与互动). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press (北京: 清华大学出版社).Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, R., and C. Welzel. 2005. Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keane, Michael. 2001. Broadcasting policy, creative compliance and the myth of civil society in China. Media. Culture & Society 23 (6):783–798.Google Scholar
  19. Keman, Hans. 2014. Democratic performance of parties and legitimacy in Europe. West European Politics 37: 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kwon, Soyoung. 2005. Survival of the North Korean regime and changing legitimation modes. The Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies Working Paper Series. Paper No. 07-05.Google Scholar
  21. Lester, Ross. 2004. Rethinking Government Approvals: The New Administrative Licensing Law. China Law & Practice. Available at: Accessed 24 July 2015.
  22. Levi, Margaret, and Audrey Sacks. 2009. Legitimizing beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance 3: 311–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murphy, Kristina. 2005. Regulating more effectively: The relationship between procedural justice, legitimacy, and tax non-compliance. Journal of Law and Society 32: 562–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1981. Political man: The social bases of politics, 64. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Liu, Shijun. 2017 Popular support is the biggest politic—The legitimate foundation of the ruling Chinese Communist Party (Minxin shi zuida de zhengzhì——zhongguo gongchandang zhizheng de hefa xing jichu, 民心是最大的政治——中国共产党执政的合法性基础), Guangmíng ribao (光明日报). 23 January. P.07.Google Scholar
  26. Matheson, Craig. 1987. Weber and the classification of forms of legitimacy. The British Journal of Sociology. 38 (2): 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, Bronwen, and Karen Yeung. 2007. An introduction to law and regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Majone, Giandomentico. 2003. Regulatory Legitimacy in Giandomentico Majone (ed.) Regulating Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 284–301.Google Scholar
  29. Nathan, Andrew. 2003. Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy 14: 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ocko, Jonathan, and David Gilmartin. 2009. State, sovereignty, and the people: A comparison of the “Rule of Law” in China and India. The Journal of Asian Studies 68 (1): 55–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peerenboom, Randall. 2001. Let one hundred flowers bloom, one hundred schools contend: Debating rule of Law in China. University of California School of Law. Research Paper No. 02-14.Google Scholar
  32. Peerenboom, Randall. 2004. Varieties of rule of law: An introduction and provisional conclusion. In. Asian Discourses of Rule of Law, ed Randall Peerenboom, Routledge, Curzon, pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
  33. Peerenboom, Randall. 2014. Fly high the banner of socialist rule of Law with Chinese characteristics! What Does the 4th Plenum Decision Mean for Legal Reforms in China? Available at SSRN: or Accessed 11 March 2015.
  34. Peerenboom, Randall. 2015. Rule of law political legitimacy and civil disobedience in China: A reply. Hague J Rule of Law 7: 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roskin, Michael G. 2009. Countries and Concepts: Politics, geography, culture. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  36. Pan, Philip P. 2008. Out of Mao’s Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul of a New China. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  37. SARFT. 2001. The Administration Order No. 5 of State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. (国家广播电影电视总局令(第 5 号)). Available at: Accessed 24 July 2015.
  38. SARFT. 2005. Decision on Abolishing Some Regulatory Documents (关于废止部分法规性文件的决定). Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  39. SARFT. 2007. Decision on Abolishing Some Broadcasting Regulatory Documents (关于废止部分广播影视规章的决定). Available at: Accessed 31 July 2015.
  40. SARFT. 2010a. Notice on Work Plan of Strengthening Rule of Law Government (广电总局关于印发加强法治政府建设工作规划的通知). Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  41. SARFT. 2010b. SARFT’s Notice on publication of effective radio, film and television department rules and normative documents. (广电总局关于公布继续有效的广播影视部门规章和规范性文件目录的通知). Available at: Accessed 29 July 2015.
  42. SARFT. 2010c. Decision on abolishing some broadcasting department rules and normative documents. (关于废止部分广播影视部门规章和规范性文件的决定). Available at: Accessed 31 July 2015.
  43. SARFT. 2015. SAPPRFT has introduced a series of regulatory documents leading legislative reform forward this year. (新闻出版广电总局今年已出台一系列法规性文件 以立法引领改革前进). Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  44. SARFT and MII. 2007. The Administrative Provisions on Internet Audio-Visual Program Service (《互联网视听节目服务管理规定》). Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  45. State Council. 2004. The implementation outline of comprehensively promote administration according to law. (《全面推进依法行政实施纲要》). Available at: Accessed 8 March 2016.
  46. State Council. 2010. State Council’s Opinion on Construction of Rule of Law Government. (国务院关于加强法治政府建设的意见). Available at: Accessed 31 July, 2015.
  47. Shi, Lei. 2008. Expand the scope of citizens’ right to bring an administrative suit. (Kuoda gongmin tiqi xingzheng susong de quanli fanwei, 扩大公民提起行政诉讼的权利范围). Legal System and Society (法制与社会) 8: 34–36.Google Scholar
  48. Sun, Ivan, Yuning Wu, Rong Hu, and Ashley Farmer. 2017. Procedural justice, legitimacy, and public cooperation with police: Does western wisdom hold in China? Journal of Research in China and Delinquency. 54 (4): 454–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Decision. 2004. The CCP Central Committee decision concerning some major questions in comprehensively promoting governing the country according to law. (中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定). Available at: (Chinese Version), (English translation). Accessed 9 March 2015.
  50. Tian, Congming. 2006. The inevitability of administration according to law. Decision Making 3: 27–31.Google Scholar
  51. Tong, Gang. 2014. Conclusion speech at the 2014 national radio, film and TV legal work training class. (在2014年全国广播影视法制工作骨干培训班上的总结讲话). Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  52. Tyler, Tom. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, Keren. 2014. A written constitution without functioning constitutionalism—analysis of Xi Jinping’s 2012 Speech on Chinese Constitution. Coalition for Peace and Ethics. Working Papers, No. 2/21.Google Scholar
  54. Wang, Sixin. 2017. Few opinions about the film promotion law (Dianying chanye cujin fa de ji dian kanfa, < <电影产业促进法 ≫ 的几点看法). Accessed 4th March 2017.
  55. Wei, Fang. 2014. Supervision of law enforcement should be a mainline for Journalism and Publishing legal work—Interview with the SARPPFT deputy head Yan Xiaohong (Zhifa jiandu ying cheng xinwen chuban fazhì gongzuo zhuxian——fang guojia xinwen chuban guangdian zongju fu juzhang, guojia banquan ju fu juzhang yanxiaohong,执法监督应成新闻出版法制工作主线——访国家新闻出版广电总局副局长、国家版权局副局长阎晓宏). Available at: Accessed 1st Feb 2018.
  56. Weimer, M. 2010. Applying precaution in EU authorisation of genetically modified products—Challenges and suggestions for reform. European Law Journal 16 (5): 624–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xi, Jinping. 2012. Speech at a congress marking the 30th anniversary of the current version of the constitution. (习近平在首都各界纪念现行宪法公布施行30周年大会上的讲话) Available at: Accessed 11 March 2015.
  58. Xi, Jinping. 2014. Explanation on the CCP Central Committee Decision Concerning Some Major Questions in Comprehensively Promoting Governing the Country According to Law. (关于《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》的说明). Available at: Accessed 11 March 2015.
  59. Xiao, Yang. 2007. The proposing, formation and development of governing according to law strategies. (肖扬:依法治国基本方略的提出、形成和发展). Available at: Accessed 8 August 2014.
  60. Xinhuanet. 2016a. State Council’s general office issued opinions on comprehensively promoting open government affairs work. (中共中央办公厅 国务院办公厅印发《关于全面推进政务公开工作的意见》). Available at: Accessed 7 March 2016.
  61. Xinhuanet. 2016b. Head of SAPPRFT’s law and regulation department answers press about administrative provisions on online publishing service. (总局政策法制司负责人就《网络出版服务管理规定》答记者问). Available at: Accessed 7 March 2016.
  62. Yang, Fengchun. 2002. The Introduction of Chinese Government (Zhongguo zhengfu gaiyao, 中国政府概要). Beijing: Beijing University Press (北京: 北京大学出版社).Google Scholar
  63. Yang, Dali L. 2004. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market transition and the politics of governance in China. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
  64. Yang, Ziyun. 2008. From “blocking order” to understand the administration according to law. (从“封杀令”看依法行政) China Reform(中国改革). 5: 71–73.Google Scholar
  65. Yang, Guangbin. 2017. Several important issues on the theory of legitimacy (Guanyu hefa xìng lilun de ji ge zhongda wenti,关于合法性理论的几个重大问题), Guāngmíng rìbao (《光明日报》), 23rd January, p. 07.Google Scholar
  66. Yeung, Karen. 2009. Presentational management and the pursuit of regulatory legitimacy: A comparative study of competition and consumer agencies in the UK and Australia. Public Administration 87 (2): 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng, Jinghan. 2014. The debate on regime legitimacy in China: Bridging the wide gulf between Western and Chinese Scholarship. Journal of Contemporary China. 23 (88): 612–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang, L. 2006. Discussion of the applicability of normative documents. China Court. Available at: Accessed 5 August 2015.
  69. Zhang, Luping. 2012. On legality and validity of Administrative Decisions (Xingzheng juece zhong de hefa xìng ji youxiao xìng fenxi, 行政决策中的合法性及有效性分析). Journal of Henan Police College (Henan jingcha xueyuan xuebao, 河南警察学院学报). 21(5): 96–100.Google Scholar
  70. Zhao, Dingxin. 2001. The power of Tiananmen: State-Society relations and the 1989 Beijing student movement. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhao, Shi. 2004. Circular about the meeting of heads of national broadcasting and film bureaus. Decision Making 8: 15–27.Google Scholar
  72. Zhao, Shi. 2006. Strengthening administration according to law, serving harmonious development and compressively advancing radio, film and television legal work. Available at: Accessed 27 July 2015.
  73. Zhao, Suisheng. 2016. The ideological campaign in Xi’s China: Rebuilding regime legitimacy. Asia Survey 56 (6): 1168–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhu, Hong. 2004. Strengthening rule of law at broadcasting sector, improving broadcasting media’s reform and development. Decision Making 2: 34–39.Google Scholar
  75. Zhu, Boping. 2012. Clear understanding of the ruling legitimacy of the party (Qingxing renshi dang de zhizheng hefa xìn,清醒认识党的执政合法性), CPCNEWS(中国共产党新闻网). Available: Accessed 12 February 2017.
  76. Zhou, Lian. 2015. Government transformation: A revolution “touching the soul” (Zhengfu zhuanxíng: Yi chang “chuji linghun” de geming, 政府转型:·一场“触及灵魂” 的革命), BKUBR (Beida shangye pinglun, 北大商业评论), 5: 82–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fudan University and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Room HS317, School of Film and TV Arts, Humanities and Social Science Building (HS), South CampusXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool UniversitySuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations