Public Perceptions of International Leadership in China and the United States
Many fear that with Trump taking the helm, the United States will scale back its international leadership role in global governance, leaving a void that is too big for any single country to fill. Others are hopeful that emerging powers such as China will be able to step in and provide international leadership to solve global governance challenges, from climate change to nuclear nonproliferation. In this study, we explore the Chinese and American publics’ perceptions and views on international leadership in the Trump era. Results from two parallel surveys conducted in China and the United States shed light on how ordinary citizens in these two countries conceptualize international leadership and how their views contrast with conventional wisdom and with each other. Given the increasingly larger role played by public opinion in the foreign policies of both democratic and authoritarian countries, the findings of this study will have important policy implications.
KeywordsInternational leadership Public opinion China United States Global governance
Funding was provided by University of British Columbia's Hampton Research Grant (Grant no. F14-01146).
- Angang, Hu. 2011. China in 2020: A new type of superpower. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Brainard, Lael, and David Lipton. 2008. Can America still lead in the global economy?. Brookings Institution, Working Paper 26.Google Scholar
- Keefe, John. 2002. Anatomy of the EP-3 Incident. Alexandria: Center for Naval Analyses.Google Scholar
- Kellerman, Barbara. 2008. Followership: How followers are creating change and changing leaders. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Lake, David A. 1993. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly 37 (4): 459–489.Google Scholar
- Lantis, Jeffrey S. 2005. Leadership Matters: International Treaty Ratification in Canada and the United States. American Review of Canadian Studies 35 (3): 383–421.Google Scholar
- Layne, Christopher. 2012. This time it's real: the end of unipolarity and the Pax Americana. International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 202–213.Google Scholar
- Li, Xiaojun, Weiyi Shi, and Boliang Zhu. 2017. The Face of Internet Recruitment: Evaluating the Labor Markets of Online Crowdsourcing Platforms in China. 21st Century China Center Research Paper No. 2017-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002066. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.
- Li, Xiaojun, and Ka Zeng. 2017. Individual Preferences for FDI in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from China. Forthcoming in Journal of Experimental Political Science.Google Scholar
- Lucarelli, Sonia. 2014. The EU’s Leadership in the Global Governance: Perceptions from Others. In Communicating Europe in the Times of Crisis: External Perceptions of the European Union, ed. N. Chaban, and M. Holland. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Morello, Carol, and John Wagner. 2017. As the U.S. leaves Paris climate accord, some see shifts in global leadership. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/as-the-us-leaves-paris-climate-accord-some-see-shifts-in-global-leadership/2017/06/01/4c916554-4634-11e7-a196-a1bb629f64cb_story.html?utm_term=.e96ab9604c0a. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.
- Northouse, Peter G. 2010. Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Shirk, Susan L. 2007. China: Fragile Superpower. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shirk, Susan L. 2014. The Domestic Context of Chinese Foreign Security Policies. In The Oxford Handbook of the International Relations of Asia, eds. S. Pekkanen, J. Ravenhill, and R. Foot, 391–410. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Subramanian, Arvind. 2011. The inevitable superpower: Why China’s dominance is a sure thing. Foreign Affairs 90 (5): 66–78.Google Scholar
- Tomz, Michael, Jessica Weeks, and Keren Yarhi-Milo. 2017. How and why does public opinion affect foreign policy in democracies. Working paper. Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Vu, Truong-Minh. 2017. International Leadership as a Process: the Case of China in Southeast Asia. Revista Brasileira de Politica Internacional 60 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
- Zakaria, Fareed. 2017. United States Resigned as Leader of the Free World. CNN. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/06/02/zakaria_united_states_resigned_as_leader_of_the_free_world_when_trump_left_paris_climate_agreement.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2017.