Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of clinical diagnostic criteria for sleep bruxism by comparison with a reference standard using masseteric electromyogram obtained with an ultraminiature electromyographic device

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sleep and Biological Rhythms Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evaluation of sleep bruxism (SB) in clinical practice is currently conducted based on clinical findings, i.e., clinical diagnostic criteria consisting of medical interview, findings of tooth wear, and symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and muscles. However, there are many unclear points about validity of the criteria. In this study, validity tests were conducted to clarify the accuracy of the clinical diagnostic criteria for SB by comparison with a reference standard using a single-channel masseteric electromyogram (EMG) obtained with ultraminiature electromyographic devices. The subjects included 30 'probable' bruxers (P-bruxers) who were clinically diagnosed as having SB and 30 non-bruxers. EMG was recorded during sleep under unrestrained and accustomed condition at each subject's home using ultraminiature cordless EMG devices. Bursts with amplitudes of more than 5%, 10%, 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) value (EMG-burst-5%, EMG-burst-10%, and EMG-burst-20%) and episodes of sleep bruxism (EMG-episode) were selected for analyses. In all conditions for burst selection, the P-bruxer group showed a significantly larger number of bursts and episodes than those in the non-bruxer group. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis criteria was 66.7% with the reference standard using EMG-burst-5%/h and 58.3% with that using EMG-episodes/h. By applying single-channel EMG as the reference standard, we were able to conduct validity tests of clinical diagnostic criteria with a larger sample. It was clarified that the level of accuracy of clinical diagnostic criteria for SB were not high despite using the combination of an interview and clinical findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bader G, Lavigne G. sleep bruxism; an overview of an oromandibular sleep movement disorder. Sleep Med Rev. 2000;4:27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carra MC, Huynh N, Fleury B, Lavigne G. Overview on sleep bruxism for sleep medicine clinicians. Sleep Med Clin. 2015;10:375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. Bruxism defined and graded: an international consensus. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:2–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018;45:837–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. International classification of sleep disorders, third edition. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, IL, 2014.

  6. Lavigne GJ, Rompré PH, Montplaisir JY. Sleep bruxism: validity of clinical research diagnostic criteria in a controlled polysomnographic study. J Dent Res. 1996;75:546–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rompré PH, Daigle-Landry D, Guitard F, Montplaisir JY, et al. Identification of a sleep bruxism subgroup with a higher risk of pain. J Dent Res. 2007;86:837–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carra MC, Huynh N, Lavigne G. Sleep bruxism: a comprehensive overview for the dental clinician interested in sleep medicine. Dent Clin North Am. 2012;56:387–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamaguchi T, Abe S, Rompré PH, Manzini C, et al. Comparison of ambulatory and polysomnographic recording of jaw muscle activity during sleep in normal subjects. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:2–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Manfredini D, Ahlberg J, Castroflorio T, Poggio CE, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of portable instrumental devices to measure sleep bruxism: a systematic literature review of polysomnographic studies. J Oral Rehabil. 2014;41:836–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dreyer P, Yachida W, Huynh N, Lavigne GJ, et al. How close can single-channel EMG data come to PSG scoring of rhythmic masticatory muscle activity? J Dent Sleep Med. 2015;2:147–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stuginski-Barbosa J, Porporatti AL, Costa YM, Svensson P, et al. Diagnostic validity of the use of a portable single-channel electromyography device for sleep bruxism. Sleep Breath. 2016;20:695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Casett E, Réus JC, Stuginski-Barbosa J, Porporatti AL, et al. Validity of different tools to assess sleep bruxism: a meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44:722–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda M, Yamaguchi T, Mikami S, Yachida W, et al. Validity of single-channel masseteric electromyography by using an ultraminiature wearable electromyographic device for diagnosis of sleep bruxism. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64:90–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stuginski-Barbosa J, Porporatti AL, Costa YM, Svensson P, et al. Agreement of the International Classification of Sleep Disorders Criteria with polysomnography for sleep bruxism diagnosis: a preliminary study. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117:61–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaguchi T, Mikami S, Okada K. Validity of a newly developed ultraminiature cordless EMG measurement system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;104:e22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mikami S, Yamaguchi T, Okada K, Gotouda A, et al. Influence of motion and posture of the head on data obtained using the newly developed ultraminiature cordless bruxism measurement system. J Prosthodont Res. 2009;53:22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanabe K, Yamaguchi T, Gotouda A, Okada K, et al. Analyses of unconstrained masseteric activity during the entire day by using an ultraminiature wearable electromyogram system. J Jpn Soc Stomatognathic Funct. 2013;19:125–36. https://doi.org/10.7144/sgf.19.125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamaguchi T, Mikami S, Saito M, Okada K, et al. A newly developed ultraminiature wearable electromyogram system useful for analyses of masseteric activity during the whole day. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dutra KM, Pereira FJ Jr, Rompré PH, Huynh N, et al. Oro-facial activities in sleep bruxism patients and in normal subjects: a controlled polygraphic and audio–video study. J Oral Rehabi. 2009;36:86–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. American Academy of Sleep Medicine. The AASM Manual for the Scoring of Sleep and Associated Events version 2.3. American Academy of Sleep Medicine, Darien, IL, 2016.

  22. Jonsgar C, Hordvik PA, Berge ME, Johansson AK, et al. Sleep bruxism in individuals with and without attrition-type tooth wear: an exploratory matched case-control electromyographic study. J Dent. 2015;43:1504–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yachida W, Arima T, Castrillon EE, Baad-Hansen L, et al. Diagnostic validity of self-reported measures of sleep bruxism using an ambulatory single-channel EMG device. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hasegawa Y, Lavigne G, Rompré P, Kato T, et al. Is there a first night effect on sleep bruxism? a sleep laboratory study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2013;15(9):1139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miettinen T, Myllymaa K, Hukkanen T, Töyräs J, et al. Home Polysomnography reveals a first-night effect in patients with low sleep bruxism activity. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018;15(14):1377–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Taishi Saito, Dr. Toshimitsu Sakuma, Dr. Sota Takahashi and Dr. Mebae Takahashi for their invaluable cooperation.

Funding

There is no funding to report for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taihiko Yamaguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare concerning the present study.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Graduate School of Dental Medicine of Hokkaido University (No. 2019-12) and Hokkaido University Hospital (No. 09-0903, No. 010-0303, No. 015-0122).

Human and animal rights statement

Human participants were involved in this study and we gave sufficient explanation to the participants and obtained written consent prior to study entry.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mikami, S., Yamaguchi, T., Saito, M. et al. Validity of clinical diagnostic criteria for sleep bruxism by comparison with a reference standard using masseteric electromyogram obtained with an ultraminiature electromyographic device. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 20, 297–308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-021-00370-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-021-00370-5

Keywords

Navigation