The King–Devick test as a predictor of cognitive effects after chronic partial sleep restriction: a pilot study

Abstract

The King–Devick test (K–D) is sensitive to the effects of acute sleep deprivation. It remains unclear whether the K–D is sensitive to the effects of chronic partial sleep restriction (SR). K–D performance was compared in a college student sample at baseline and after a week of SR. Subjects also completed measures of attention, processing speed, working memory, vocabulary and verbal reasoning. Subjects performed worse relative to their baselines on the K–D than previous test–retest reliability literature indicates, and worse on tests of attention, processing speed and working memory. Verbal reasoning and vocabulary were unaffected. An association between K–D performance and sleep duration during SR trended toward significance. These results provide initial support for the sensitivity of the K–D to SR.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to an administrative error, subjects were discontinued on the first trial of the Stroop after completing the first 100 items. As 97% of subjects completed the first 100 items, this error produced ceiling effects on the task. As a result, performance on the first trial was excluded from the analyses.

References

  1. 1.

    National Sleep Foundation. 2002 sleep in America poll. Washington, D.C.: National Sleep Foundation; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Banks S, Dinges DF. Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction. J Clin Sleep Med. 2007;3(5):519–28.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Durmer JS, Dinges DF. Neurocognitive consequences of sleep deprivation. Semin Neurol. 2005;25(1):117–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lund HG, Reider BD, Whiting AB, Prichard JR. Sleep patterns and predictors of disturbed sleep in a large population of college students. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(2):124–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Galetta KM, Brandes LE, Maki K, Dziemianowicz MS, Laudano E, Allen M, Lawler K, Sennett B, Wiebe D, Devick S, Messner LV, Galetta SL, Balcer LJ. The King–Devick test and sports-related concussion: study of a rapid visual screening tool in a collegiate cohort. J Neurol Sci. 2011;309:34–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Davies EC, Henderson S, Balcer LJ, Galetta SL. Residency training: the King–Devick test and sleep deprivation study in pre-and post-call neurology residents. Neurology. 2012;78(17):103–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bocca ML, Denise P. Total sleep deprivation effect on disengagement of spatial attention as assessed by saccadic eye movements. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(4):894–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Russo M, Thomas M, Thorne D, Sing H, Redmond D, Rowland L, Johnson D, Hall S, Krichmar J, Balkin T. Oculomotor impairment during chronic partial sleep deprivation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(4):723–36.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Van Dongen HP, Maislin G, Mullington JM, Dinges DF. The cumulative cost of additional wakefulness: dose–response effects on neurobehavioral functions and sleep physiology from chronic sleep restriction and total sleep deprivation. Sleep. 2003;26(2):117–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Galetta MS, Galetta KM, McCrossin J, Wilson JA, Moster S, Galetta SL, Balcer LJ, Dorshimer GW, Master CL. Saccades and memory: baseline associations of the King–Devick and SCAT2 SAC tests in professional ice hockey players. J Neurol Sci. 2013;328(1):28–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Schretlen D, Brandt J, Bobholz JH. Validation of the brief test of attention in patients with Huntington’s disease and amnesia. Clin Neuropsychol. 1996;10:90–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mathôt S, Schreij D, Theeuwes J. OpenSesame: an open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(2):314–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klee SH, Garfinkel BD. The computerized continuous performance task: a new measure of inattention. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1983;11(4):487–95.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Golden CJ. Stroop color and word test: a manual for clinical and experimental uses. Chicago: Stoelting Company; 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jensen AR, Rohwer WD. The Stroop color-word test: a review. Acta Psychol. 1966;25:36–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schretlen DJ, Winicki JM, Meyer SM, Testa SM, Pearlson GD, Gordon B. Development, psychometric properties, and validation of the Hopkins Adult Reading Test (HART). Clin Neuropsychol. 2009;23(6):926–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale–fourth edition. San Antonio: Pearson; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989;28(2):193–213.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Monk TH, Reynolds CF, Kupfer DJ, Buysse DJ, Coble PA, Hayes AJ, Machen MA, Petrie SR, Ritenour AM. The Pittsburgh sleep diary. J Sleep Res. 1994;3(2):111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lim J, Dinges DF. A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(3):375.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gosselin N, Lassonde M, Petit D, Leclerc S, Mongrain V, Collie A, Montplaisir J. Sleep following sport-related concussions. Sleep Med. 2009;10(1):35–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Suhr JA, Gunstad J. Further exploration of the effect of “diagnosis threat” on cognitive performance in individuals with mild head injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2005;11(1):23–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cassady JC, Johnson RE. Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2002;27(2):270–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lieberman HR, Tharion WJ, Shukitt-Hale B, Speckman KL, Tulley R. Effects of caffeine, sleep loss, and stress on cognitive performance and mood during US Navy SEAL training. Psychopharmacology. 2002;164(3):250–61.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mendl M. Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function. Appl Animal Behav Sci. 1999;65(3):221–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schwid SR, Tyler CM, Scheid EA, Weinstein A, Goodman AD, McDermott MP. Cognitive fatigue during a test requiring sustained attention: a pilot study. Multiple Scler. 2003;9(5):503–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ackerman PL, Kanfer R. Test length and cognitive fatigue: an empirical examination of effects on performance and test-taker reactions. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009;15(2):163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Edwards S, Brice C, Craig C, Penri-Jones R. Effects of caffeine, practice, and mode of presentation on Stroop task performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996;54(2):309–15.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pilcher JJ, Ginter DR, Sadowsky B. Sleep quality versus sleep quantity: relationships between sleep and measures of health, well-being and sleepiness in college students. J Psychosom Res. 1997;42(6):583–96.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Richard Aslin, PhD and Rajeev Raizada, PhD, both of whom contributed to the editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John P. K. Bernstein.

Ethics declarations

Research involving human participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

John Bernstein and John Langfitt declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernstein, J.P.K., Langfitt, J. The King–Devick test as a predictor of cognitive effects after chronic partial sleep restriction: a pilot study. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 15, 67–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-016-0081-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Sleep
  • Assessment
  • Cognition
  • Attention