Abstract
The impact of trauma exposure on sleep may depend on the interaction between biological vulnerability of the individual and environmental factors. We recently established a mouse model of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) utilizing a novel conditioning stimulus (CS) with which to re-expose mice during sleep. The current study assessed the effect of re-exposure to the CS during sleep in genetically ‘anxious’ male mice (n = 11) relative to ‘non-anxious’ mice (n = 12). Mice were instrumented with EEG, EMG and EKG electrodes and given seven days of adaptation prior to a 24-h baseline sleep recording. Mice were fear conditioned over three series with five cycles of paired 3 % carbon dioxide (CO2; CS) predicting 0.5 mA footshocks. Mice were then re-exposed to either the CS or to air (control) during sleep and the impact on the sleep–wake cycle was assessed. Anxious mice had increased spontaneous awakenings during baseline sleep study and exhibited a robust learned bradycardic response (−90 ± 11 bpm) that habituated across series, whereas non-anxious mice exhibited a mild-to-moderate initial learned bradycardic response (−44 ± 16 bpm) that sensitized across series. Subsequent re-exposure to the CS during sleep produced a 50 % increase (P < 0.05) in awakenings from NREM sleep in anxious mice, whereas awakenings in non-anxious mice were unaffected. Thus, genetic background impacts the magnitude and pattern of fear-learning responses, and re-exposure to a learned CS during sleep in an ‘anxious’ phenotype lowers the threshold to increased awakenings from NREM sleep.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41105-015-0036-4/MediaObjects/41105_2015_36_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41105-015-0036-4/MediaObjects/41105_2015_36_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41105-015-0036-4/MediaObjects/41105_2015_36_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41105-015-0036-4/MediaObjects/41105_2015_36_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41105-015-0036-4/MediaObjects/41105_2015_36_Fig5_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yehuda R, Flory JD, Southwick S, Charney DS. Developing an agenda for translational studies of resilience and vulnerability following trauma exposure. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1071:379–96.
Feder A, Nestler EJ, Charney DS. Psychobiology and molecular genetics of resilience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:446–57.
Sanford LD, Tang X, Ross RJ, Morrison AR. Influence of shock training and explicit fear-conditioned cues on sleep architecture in mice: strain comparison. Behav Genet. 2003;33:43–58.
Germain A, Buysse DJ, Nofzinger E. Sleep-specific mechanisms underlying posttraumatic stress disorder: integrative review and neurobiological hypotheses. Sleep Med Rev. 2008;12:185–95.
Ross RJ, Ball WA, Sanford LD, Morrison AR, Dinges DF, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep changes during the adaptation night in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 1999;45:938–41.
Sanford LD, Yang L, Tang X. Influence of contextual fear on sleep in mice: a strain comparison. Sleep. 2003;26:527–40.
Hellman K, Abel T. Fear conditioning increases NREM sleep. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121:310–23.
Siegmund A, Wotjak CT. A mouse model of posttraumatic stress disorder that distinguishes between conditioned and sensitised fear. J Psychiatr Res. 2007;41:848–60.
McDowell AL, Filippone AB, Balbir A, Germain A, O’Donnell CP. Mild transient hypercapnia as a novel fear conditioning stimulus allowing re-exposure during sleep. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e67435.
Lad HV, Liu L, Paya-Cano JL, Parsons MJ, Kember R, et al. Behavioural battery testing: evaluation and behavioural outcomes in 8 inbred mouse strains. Physiol Behav. 2010;99:301–16.
O’Leary TP, Gunn RK, Brown RE. What are we measuring when we test strain differences in anxiety in mice? Behav Genet. 2013;43:34–50.
Flint MS, Tinkle SS. C57BL/6 mice are resistant to acute restraint modulation of cutaneous hypersensitivity. Toxicol Sci Off J Soc Toxicol. 2001;62:250–6.
Rubin AE, Polotsky VY, Balbir A, Krishnan JA, Schwartz AR, et al. Differences in sleep-induced hypoxia between A/J and DBA/2 J mouse strains. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:1520–7.
Benington JH, Kodali SK, Heller HC. Scoring transitions to REM sleep in rats based on the EEG phenomena of pre-REM sleep: an improved analysis of sleep structure. Sleep. 1994;17:28–36.
Arwas S, Rolnick A, Lubow RE. Conditioned taste aversion in humans using motion-induced sickness as the US. Behav Res Ther. 1989;27:295–301.
Quirk GJ, Pare D, Richardson R, Herry C, Monfils MH, et al. Erasing fear memories with extinction training. J neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2010;30:14993–7.
Veasey SC, Valladares O, Fenik P, Kapfhamer D, Sanford L, et al. An automated system for recording and analysis of sleep in mice. Sleep. 2000;23:1025–40.
Lad HV, Liu L, Paya-Cano JL, Parsons MJ, Kember R, et al. Behavioural battery testing: evaluation and behavioural outcomes in 8 inbred mouse strains. Physiol Behav. 2010;99:301–16.
O’Leary TP, Gunn RK, Brown RE. What are we measuring when we test strain differences in anxiety in mice? Behav Genet. 2013;43:34–50.
Veasey SC, Yeou-Jey H, Thayer P, Fenik P. Murine Multiple Sleep Latency Test: phenotyping sleep propensity in mice. Sleep. 2004;27:388–93.
Franken P, Malafosse A, Tafti M. Genetic determinants of sleep regulation in inbred mice. Sleep. 1999;22:155–69.
Campen MJ, Tagaito Y, Jenkins TP, Smith PL, Schwartz AR, et al. Phenotypic differences in the hemodynamic response during REM sleep in six strains of inbred mice. Physiol Genomics. 2002;11:227–34.
Uechi M, Asai K, Sato N, Vatner SF. Voltage-dependent calcium channel promoter restores baroreflex sensitivity in conscious dogs with heart failure. Circulation. 1998;98:1342–7.
Kornmeier J, Spitzer M, Sosic-Vasic Z. Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90656.
Aziz W, Wang W, Kesaf S, Mohamed AA, Fukazawa Y, et al. Distinct kinetics of synaptic structural plasticity, memory formation, and memory decay in massed and spaced learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E194–202.
Storey JD, Robertson DA, Beattie JE, Reid IC, Mitchell SN, et al. Behavioural and neurochemical responses evoked by repeated exposure to an elevated open platform. Behav Brain Res. 2006;166:220–9.
Philbert J, Pichat P, Beeske S, Decobert M, Belzung C, et al. Acute inescapable stress exposure induces long-term sleep disturbances and avoidance behavior: a mouse model of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Behav Brain Res. 2011;221:149–54.
Narayanan RT, Seidenbecher T, Kluge C, Bergado J, Stork O, et al. Dissociated theta phase synchronization in amygdalo- hippocampal circuits during various stages of fear memory. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25:1823–31.
Franken P, Malafosse A, Tafti M. Genetic variation in EEG activity during sleep in inbred mice. Am J Physiol. 1998;275:R1127–37.
Velluti RA, Pedemonte M. In vivo approach to the cellular mechanisms for sensory processing in sleep and wakefulness. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2002;22:501–16.
Daszuta A, Barrit MC, Faudon M, Gambarelli F. Comparison of brain serotoninergic systems in C57BL and BALBc mice during development. Journal de physiologie. 1981;77:315–8.
Daszuta A, Barrit MC. Endogenous serotonin (5-HT) and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) levels in large regions and in discrete brain areas of C57BL and BALBc mice at three times of the day. Brain Res Bull. 1982;8:477–82.
Nattie E. Julius H. Comroe, Jr., distinguished lecture: central chemoreception: then… and now. J Appl Physiol. 2011;110:1–8.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the funding for this study DM102174 and to acknowledge the technical training and assistance of Lia Romano.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McDowell, A.L., McKeon, A.B., Germain, A. et al. Genetic variability in fear learning and awakenings to re-exposure of a novel conditioning stimulus during sleep. Sleep Biol. Rhythms 14, 165–175 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-015-0036-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41105-015-0036-4