Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Soil Erosion Assessment by RUSLE, Google Earth Engine, and Geospatial Techniques over Rel River Watershed, Gujarat, India

  • Research
  • Published:
Water Conservation Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of soil erosion holds paramount significance in sustainable land management and environmental conservation. In this context, the integration of advanced technologies such as the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), Google Earth Engine (GEE), and geospatial techniques presents a formidable approach for evaluating soil erosion dynamics. This integrated methodology proves particularly valuable when applied to the Rel River watershed, where factors such as terrain, land use, and precipitation patterns intricately influence erosion processes. The collective use of two methods, the quantitative method focused on RUSLE to assess soil under various circumstances of erosion and sediment yield, whereas the qualitative approach focused on spectral indices of soil erosion in GEE to generate degradation map. This study was aimed at evaluating soil erosion and land degradation across the Rel River watershed in the western region of Gujarat, India. Soil loss has been estimated using soil loss models, i.e., RUSLE and geoinformation datasets, which were extracted from GEE. The degraded area was prepared using GEE and mapped using geographical information system (GIS). The results demonstrate that estimated value for erosion due to rainfall is 37 to 40 MJ mm h−1 ha−1 year−1, soil erodibility is 0.01 to 0.05 ton h MJ−1 mm−1, topographic variables lies in a range from 0 to 20, and crop management factor is 0.001 to 1. The findings also demonstrate that the total annual soil loss for flood events in 2017 is 35.36 t/ha/year, which is categorized into the severe zone of degradation. According to the soil degradation map created using GEE, the majority of the study region falls into the low and medium degradation zones, while the northeastern part and river fall into the high degradation zone. The findings will be helpful in implementing soil management and conservation techniques to arrest soil erosion in the Rel River watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

There is no associated data with this manuscript. Raw data will be made available as per request.

Abbreviations

BI:

Brightness index

C factor:

Cover factor

CHG:

Climate Hazard Group

CHRIPS:

Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data

CI:

Color index

CN:

Curve number

DEM:

Digital elevation model

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization

FCC:

False color composite

FI:

Form index

GDP:

Gross domestic product

GEE:

Google Earth Engine

GHG:

Greenhouse gases

GIS:

Geographical information system

ENVI:

Environment for visualizing images

ESA:

European Space Agency

IPCC:

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

JPL:

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

K factor:

Soil erodibility factor

LP DAAC:

Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Centre

LS factor:

Slope length and slope steepness (topographic factor)

MODIS:

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer

NASA:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NDVI:

Normalized difference vegetation index

NIR:

Near infrared

OLI:

Operational Land Imager

P factor:

Support practice factor

R factor:

Rainfall erosivity factor

RGB:

Red green blue

RS:

Remote sensing

RUSLE:

Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation

SRTM:

Shuttle Radar Topography Mission

SWDC:

State Water Data Centre

UCSB:

University of California Santa Barbara

USDA:

United States Development of Agriculture

USGS:

United States Geological Survey

References

  1. Alewell C, Borrelli P, Meusburger K, Panagos P (2019) Using the USLE: chances, challenges and limitations of soil erosion modelling. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 7:203–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2019.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alexakis DD, Hadjimitsis DG, Agapiou A (2013) Integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and precipitation data for the assessment of soil erosion rate in the catchment area of “Yialias” in Cyprus. Atmos Res 131:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amundson R, Berhe AA, Hopmans JW, Olson C, Sztein AE, Sparks DL (2015) Soil and human security in the 21st century. Science 1979:348. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ayalew DA, Deumlich D, Šarapatka B, Doktor D (2020) Quantifying the sensitivity of NDVI-based C factor estimation and potential soil erosion prediction using spaceborne earth observation data. Remote Sens 12:1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bachaoui B, Bachaoui EM, Maimouni S, Lhissou R, El Harti A, El Ghmari A (2014) The use of spectral and geomorphometric data for water erosion mapping in El Ksiba region in the central High Atlas Mountains of Morocco. Applied Geomatics 6:159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-014-0130-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bannari A, Asalhi H, Teillet PM (2005) Transformed difference vegetation index (TDVI) for vegetation cover mapping. In: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, pp 3053–3055. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2002.1026867

  7. Bogena H, Diekkrüger B, Klingel K, Jantos K, Thein J (2003) Analysing and modelling solute and sediment transport in the catchment of the Wahnbach River. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 28:227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-7065(03)00032-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaplot V (2014) Impact of spatial input data resolution on hydrological and erosion modeling: recommendations from a global assessment. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 67–69:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2013.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chatterjee S, Krishna AP, Sharma AP (2014) Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India. Environ Earth Sci 71:357–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-013-2439-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chowdhuri I, Pal SC, Saha A, Chakrabortty R, Roy P (2021) Evaluation of different DEMs for gully erosion susceptibility mapping using in-situ field measurement and validation. Eco Inform 65:101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox C, Madramootoo C (1998) Application of geographic information systems in watershed management planning in St. Lucia Comput Electron Agric 20:229–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1699(98)00021-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Desale T, Metaferia G, Shifaw E, Abebe S, Molla W, Asmare M (2023) Identification and prioritization of sub-watersheds to soil erosion and sediment yield susceptibility using RUSLE, Remote Sensing, and GIS (Case Study: Abbay—Awash Basin in Wollo Area, Ethiopia). Water Conserv Sci Eng 8:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-023-00179-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El Jazouli A, Barakat A, Ghafiri A, El Moutaki S, Ettaqy A, Khellouk R (2017) Soil erosion modeled with USLE, GIS, and remote sensing: a case study of Ikkour watershed in Middle Atlas (Morocco). Geosci Lett 4:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0091-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. FAO (2019) The state of food and agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction, Rome Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

  15. Ghosh A, Rakshit S, Tikle S, Das S, Chatterjee U, Pande CB, Alataway A, Al-Othman AA, Dewidar AZ, Mattar MA (2022) Integration of GIS and remote sensing with RUSLE model for estimation of soil erosion. Land (Basel) 12:116. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta N, Banerjee A, Gupta SK (2021) Spatio-temporal trend analysis of climatic variables over Jharkhand, India. Earth Syst Environ 5:71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00204-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta SK, Gupta N, Singh VP (2021) Variable-sized cluster analysis for 3D pattern characterization of trends in precipitation and change-point detection. J Hydrol Eng 26. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002010

  18. Halder B, Barman S, Banik P, Das P, Bandyopadhyay J, Tangang F, Shahid S, Pande CB, Al-Ramadan B, Yaseen ZM (2023) Large-scale flood hazard monitoring and impact assessment on landscape: representative case study in India. Sustainability 15:11413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IPCC, 2019: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems

  20. Jodhani K, Bansal P, Jain P (2021) Shoreline change and rate analysis of Gulf of Khambhat using satellite images. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference: Innovative Advancement in Engineering & Technology (IAET) 2020 pp 151–170

  21. Jodhani KH, Patel D, Madhavan N (2023) A review on analysis of flood modelling using different numerical models. Mater Today Proc 80:3867–3876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.07.405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kourgialas NN, Koubouris GC, Karatzas GP, Metzidakis I (2016) Assessing water erosion in Mediterranean tree crops using GIS techniques and field measurements: the effect of climate change. Nat Hazards 83:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2354-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kulimushi LC, Choudhari P, Maniragaba A, Elbeltagi A, Mugabowindekwe M, Rwanyiziri G, ... Singh SK (2021) Erosion risk assessment through prioritization of sub-watersheds in Nyabarongo river catchment, Rwanda. Environ Challenges 5:100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100260

  24. Kulimushi LC, Choudhari P, Mubalama LK, Banswe GT (2021) GIS and remote sensing-based assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE model in South-Kivu province, eastern, Democratic Republic of Congo. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 12:961–987. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1906759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kulimushi LC, Maniragaba A, Choudhari P, Elbeltagi A, Uwemeye J, Rushema E, Singh SK (2021) Evaluation of soil erosion and sediment yield spatio-temporal pattern during 1990–2019. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 12(1):2676–2707. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1973118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar N, Singh SK (2021) Soil erosion assessment using earth observation data in a trans-boundary river basin. Nat Hazards 107(1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04571-6

  27. Kumar N, Singh SK, Dubey AK, Ray RL, Mustak S, Rawat KS (2022) Prediction of soil erosion risk using earth observation data under recent emission scenarios of CMIP6. Geocarto Int 37(24):7041–7064. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2021.1973116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lenhart T, Fohrer N, Frede H-G (2003) Effects of land use changes on the nutrient balance in mesoscale catchments. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 28:1301–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2003.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang Y, Lal R, Guo S, Liu R, Hu Y (2018) Impacts of simulated erosion and soil amendments on greenhouse gas fluxes and maize yield in Miamian soil of central Ohio. Sci Rep 8:520. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-18922-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Maimouni S, El-Harti A, Bannari A, Bachaoui E-M (2012) Water erosion risk mapping using derived parameters from digital elevation model and remotely sensed data. Geo-spatial Inform Sci 15:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2012.715855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Maliqi E, Singh SK (2019) quantitative estimation of soil erosion using open-access earth observation data sets and erosion potential model. Water Conserv Sci Eng 4:187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maliqi E, Kumar N, Latifi L, Singh SK (2023) Soil erosion estimation using an empirical model, hypsometric integral and geo-information science–A case study. Ecol Eng Environ Technol (EEET) 24(4):62–72. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/161957

  33. Memon N, Patel DP, Bhatt N, Patel SB (2020) Integrated framework for flood relief package (FRP) allocation in semiarid region: a case of Rel River flood, Gujarat, India. Nat Hazards 100:279–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03812-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nekhay O, Arriaza M, Boerboom L (2009) Evaluation of soil erosion risk using analytic network process and GIS: a case study from Spanish mountain olive plantations. J Environ Manag 90:3091–3104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nguyen N-M, Bahramloo R, Sadeghian J, Sepehri M, Nazaripouya H, Nguyen Dinh V, Ghahramani A, Talebi A, Elkhrachy I, Pande CB, Meshram SG (2023) Ranking sub-watersheds for flood hazard mapping: a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Water (Basel) 15:2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15112128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nigam GK, Sahu RK, Sinha MK, Deng X, Singh RB, Kumar P (2017) Field assessment of surface runoff, sediment yield and soil erosion in the opencast mines in Chirimiri area, Chhattisgarh, India. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 101:137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Orieschnig CA, Belaud G, Venot J-P, Massuel S, Ogilvie A (2021) Input imagery, classifiers, and cloud computing: insights from multi-temporal LULC mapping in the Cambodian Mekong Delta. Eur J Remote Sens 54:398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2021.1948356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Perović V, Životić L, Kadović R, Đorđević A, Jaramaz D, Mrvić V, Todorović M (2013) Spatial modelling of soil erosion potential in a mountainous watershed of South-eastern Serbia. Environ Earth Sci 68:115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1720-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rawat KS, Singh SK (2018) Appraisal of soil conservation capacity using NDVI model-based C factor of RUSLE model for a semi arid ungauged watershed: a case study. Water Conserv Sci Eng 3:47–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-018-0042-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rehman MA, Mat Desa S, Abd Rahman N, Mohd MSF, Aminuddin NAS, Mohd Taib A, A. Karim O, Awang S, Wan Mohtar WHM (2022) Correlation between soil erodibility and light penetrometer blows: a case study in Sungai Langat, Malaysia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 128:103262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103262

  41. Rejani R, Rao KV, Osman M, Srinivasa Rao C, Reddy KS, Chary GR, Pushpanjali SJ (2016) Spatial and temporal estimation of soil loss for the sustainable management of a wet semi-arid watershed cluster. Environ Monit Assess 188:143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5143-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Saha A, Ghosh M, Pal SC (2020) Understanding the morphology and development of a rill-gully: an empirical study of Khoai Badland. West Bengal, India, pp 147–161

    Google Scholar 

  43. Saha A, Pal SC, Arabameri A, Chowdhuri I, Rezaie F, Chakrabortty R, Roy P, Shit M (2021) Optimization modelling to establish false measures implemented with ex-situ plant species to control gully erosion in a monsoon-dominated region with novel in-situ measurements. J Environ Manag 287:112284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Saha A, Pal SC, Chowdhuri I, Islam ARMT, Chakrabortty R, Roy P (2022) Threats of soil erosion under CMIP6 SSPs scenarios: an integrated data mining techniques and geospatial approaches. Geocarto Int 37:17307–17339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2127925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saha A, Pal SC, Chowdhuri I, Islam ARMT, Chakrabortty R, Roy P (2022) Application of neural network model-based framework approach to identify gully erosion potential hotspot zones in sub-tropical environment. Geocarto Int 37:14758–14784. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2022.2091042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sartori M, Philippidis G, Ferrari E, Borrelli P, Lugato E, Montanarella L, Panagos P (2019) A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion. Land Use Policy 86:299–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shinde S, Pande CB, Barai VN, Gorantiwar SD, Atre AA (2023) Flood impact and damage assessment based on the Sentitnel-1 SAR data using google earth engine. In: Climate change impacts on natural resources, ecosystems and agricultural systems. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham, pp 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19059-9_20

  48. Singh VK, Pandey HK, Singh SK (2023) Groundwater storage change estimation using GRACE data and google earth engine: a basin scale study. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 129:103297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Singh VK, Pandey HK, Singh SK, Soni P (2023) Groundwater analysis using gravity recovery, climate experiment and google earth engine: Bundelkhand region, India. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 130:103401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2023.103401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Smith MO, Adams JB, Sabol DE (1994) Mapping sparse vegetation canopies. Euro Courses, pp 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-33173-7_12

  51. Somprasong K, Assawadithalerd M (2021) Integrated spatial approaches for long-term monitoring of cadmium contamination caused by rainfall erosion: a case study of overland sediment in Mae Sot, Thailand. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 121:102961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2020.102961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Su H, Nagarajan S, Dong J (2017) Physical and economic processes of ecosystem services flows. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 101:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2017.10.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. VidyaU K, ChaitanyaB P, Rajesh J, Atre AA, Gorantiwar SD, Kadam SA, Gavit B (2021) Surface water dynamics analysis based on sentinel imagery and Google Earth Engine platform: a case study of Jayakwadi dam. Sustain Water Resour Manag 7:44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-021-00527-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang KL, Shu AP, Xu XL, Yang QK, Yu B (2008) Soil erodibility and its estimation for agricultural soils in China. J Arid Environ 72:1002–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2007.11.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang H, Yang Q, Li R, Liu Q, Moore D, He P, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V (2013) Extension of a GIS procedure for calculating the RUSLE equation LS factor. Comput Geosci 52:177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of Pandit Deendayal Energy University and Nirma University. The author Sudhir Kumar Singh expresses sincere thanks to the Coordinator of KBCAOS and DST-FIST for providing infrastructural facilities to the Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Dhruvesh Patel (DP), Keval H. Jodhani (KHJ), N. Madhavan (NM), and Sudhir Kumar Singh (SKS); methodology: DP, KHJ, NM, and SKS; formal analysis: DP, KHJ, and SKS; investigation: DP, KHJ, and SKS; data curation: KHJ and DP; visualization: KHJ and DP; writing—original draft preparation: DP, KHJ, NM, and SKS; writing, review, and editing: DP, KHJ, NM, and SKS. All authors have read and agreed to publish the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhruvesh Patel.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

We follow the ethical guidelines and no ethical approval was required in this work.

Consent to Participate

All the authors agree to participate.

Consent for Publication

We all are agree to publish the content.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jodhani, K.H., Patel, D., Madhavan, N. et al. Soil Erosion Assessment by RUSLE, Google Earth Engine, and Geospatial Techniques over Rel River Watershed, Gujarat, India. Water Conserv Sci Eng 8, 49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-023-00223-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-023-00223-x

Keywords

Navigation