Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Application of Multi-Index Decision Analysis to Management Scenarios Considering Climate Change Prediction in the Zayandeh Rud River Basin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Water Conservation Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the multidimensionality of water resources management policies and prioritization of water demands, engineering software have attracted researchers and planners. The Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) program (Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis Model) is one of the specialized software that uses the Water Algorithm Equation and is used for water resources planning and management at the watershed level. In order to forecast future water resources, runoff for the years to come by 2100 was first simulated using WEAP along a new climate prediction model (CMIP5) and a rainfall-runoff model. Then, the amount of drinking water and industry needs and net irrigation requirement were calculated by 2100. Results showed that by applying the climate prediction model and considering the effect of human factors on water resources and applying adaptive correction scenarios for the years to come, allocation of water resources in the Zayandeh Rud area was used to predict the status of water resources for planning. Considering the WEAP model for optimal water allocation, it can be admitted that agricultural demand can be met with 60% confidence and drinking water and the industry requirements can be met with 83% confidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adebola AO, Ibrahim AH, Wigeti WH, Yaro NA (2018) Drainage basin morphology and terrain analysis of the lower Benue River Basin, Nigeria. SCI World J 13(1):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Altieri MA, Nicholls CI (2017) The adaptation and mitigation potential of traditional agriculture in a changing climate. Clim Chang 140:33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0909-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Zubari WK, El-Sadek AA, Al-Aradi MJ, Al-Mahal HA (2018) Impacts of climate change on the municipal water management system in the Kingdom of Bahrain: vulnerability assessment and adaptation options. CLIM Risk Manage 20:95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2018.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amacha N, Karam F, Jerdi M, Frank P, Viala E (2017) Assessment of the efficiency of a pilot constructed wetland on the remediation of water quality: case study of Litani River, Lebanon. Environ Pollut CLIM Change 1:119

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amin A, Iqbal J, Asghar A, Ribbe L (2018) Analysis of current and future water demands in the upper Indus Basin under IPCC climate and socio-economic scenarios using a hydro-economic WEAP model. Water 10:537. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amjath-Babu TS, Sharma B, Brouwer R, Rasul G, Wahid SM, Neupane N, Bhattarai U, Sieber S (2019) Integrated modelling of the impacts of hydropower projects on the water-food-energy nexus in a transboundary Himalayan river basin. Appl Energy 239:494–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anand J, Gosain AK, Khosa R, Srinivasan R (2018) Regional scale hydrologic modeling for prediction of water balance, analysis of trends in streamflow and variations in streamflow: the case study of the Ganga River basin. J Hydrol Reg Stud 16:32–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashofteh PS, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA (2017) Development of adaptive strategies for irrigation water demand management under climate change. J Irrig Drain Eng 143:04016077–04016077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Azari A, Asadi M (2017) Investigating the capabilities of the NSGA-II multi-objective algorithm in automatic calibration of the WEAP model for simulating Jareh Dam and network system. J Appl Res Water Wastewater 4:305–313. https://doi.org/10.22126/arww.2017.775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Basco-Carrera L, van Beek E, Jonoski A, Benítez-Ávila C, Guntoro FXPJ (2017) Collaborative modelling for informed decision making and inclusive water development. Wat Res Manag 31:2611–2625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1647-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Das B, Singh A, Panda SN, Yasuda H (2015) Optimal land and water resources allocation policies for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Land Use Policy 42:527–537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dehghan Z, Delbari M, Mohammad RPO (2015) Planning water resources allocation under various managerial scenarios in Gorganroud Basin. Wat Soil Sci 25:117–132 http://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=506270

    Google Scholar 

  13. Digna RF, Mohamed YA, van der Zaag P, Uhlenbrook S (2018) Impact of water resources development on water availability for hydropower production and irrigated agriculture of the Eastern Nile Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag 144:05018007–05018007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dubinsky J, Karunanithi AT (2017) Consumptive water use analysis of upper Rio Grande Basin in Southern Colorado. Environ Sci Technol 51:4452–4460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elsawah S, Pierce SA, Hamilton SH, van Delden H, Haase D (2017) An overview of the system dynamics process for integrated modelling of socio-ecological systems: lessons on good modelling practice from five case studies. Environ Model Softw 93:127–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fisher JB, Melton F, Middleton E, Hain C, Anderson M (2017) The future of evapotranspiration: global requirements for ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management and water resources. Water Resour Res 53:2618–2626. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR020175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Green PA, Vörösmarty CJ, Harrison I, Farrell T, Sáenz L (2015) Freshwater ecosystem services supporting humans: pivoting from water crisis to water solutions. Glob Environ Chang 34:108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hellegers P, Immerzeel W, Droogers P (2013) Economic concepts to address future water supply–demand imbalances in Iran, Morocco and Saudi Arabia. J Hydrol 502:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Javadinejad S (2016) Vulnerability of water resources under climate change and human impacts: scenario analysis in the Zayandeh rud river basin. PhD Thesis, University of Birmingham, UK

  20. Keraga AS, Kiflie Z, Engida AN (2017) Spatial and temporal water quality dynamics of Awash River using multivariate statistical techniques. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 11:565–577. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2017.2353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerzner H, Kerzner HR (2017) Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling, 1st edn. John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, ISBN-10: 1119165350, p 848

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khatib M, Obando JY, Murimi S (2018) Effects of irrigation management practices on water allocation among farmers in Kiladeda sub-catchment, Tanzania. In: Ondieki CM, Kitheka JU (eds) Hydrology and best practices for managing water resources in arid and semi-arid lands. IGI Global, Hershey, ISBN-10: 1522527206, pp 70–86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Kishiwa P, Nobert J, Kongo V, Ndomba P (2018) Assessment of impacts of climate change on surface water availability using coupled SWAT and WEAP models: case of upper Pangani River Basin, Tanzania. Proc IAHS 378:23–27. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-378-23-2018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Koohiyan AF, Yakhleshi ME, Shafaeianfard D (2014) Determination of top options in utilization of water resources using WEAP model and multi attribute decision-making analysis (case study: Zaryngol basin). J Watershed Manage Res 5:29–45 http://www.sid.ir/En/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=416191

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kotir JH, Smith C, Brown G, Marshall N, Johnstone R (2016) A system dynamics simulation model for sustainable water resources management and agricultural development in the Volta River Basin, Ghana. Sci Total Environ 573:444–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuhn A, Britz W, Willy DK, van Oel P (2016) Simulating the viability of water institutions under volatile rainfall conditions—the case of the Lake Naivasha Basin. Environ Model Softw 75:373–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar P, Masago Y, Mishra BK, Fukushi K (2018) Evaluating future stress due to combined effect of climate change and rapid urbanization for Pasig-Marikina River, Manila. Groundwater Sustain Dev 6:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2018.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li X, Zhao Y, Shi C, Sha J, Wang ZL (2015) Application of Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model for water resources management strategy estimation in coastal Binhai New Area, China. Ocean Coast Manag 106:97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Maknoon R, Kazem M, Hasanzadeh M (2012) Inter-basin water transfer projects and climate change: the role of allocation protocols in economic efficiency of the project. Case study: Dez to Qomrood inter-basin water transmission project (Iran). J Water Resour Prot 4:750–758. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2012.49085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mansouri S, Ouerdachi L, Remaoun M (2017) Inter-region planning and analysis of water resources by using WEAP model Seybouse (Annaba) and coastal east of Constantine (El-Taref). J Water Land Dev 33:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/jwld-2017-0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Metobwa OGM, Mourad KA, Ribbe L (2018) Water demand simulation using WEAP 21: a case study of the Mara River Basin, Kenya. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag 3:9–18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20180301.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MYCE (2016) Water resources and water demands for urban and rural society with considering of integrated watershed management in Gavkhooni, Siyahkooh and Rig-zarin catchments, chapter one to seven, Tehran, Iran. Moshaver Yekom Consulting Engineers

  33. Paparrizos S, Maris F (2017) Hydrological simulation of Sperchios River basin in Central Greece using the MIKE SHE model and geographic information systems. Appl Water Sci 7:591–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0271-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Percival RV, Schroeder CH, Miller AS, Leape JP (2017) Environmental Regulation: Law, Science and Policy, 1st edn. Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, New York, ISBN-10: 1454882115, p 1456

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pham BQ, Yub PS, Yang TC, Tseng HW (2015) Assessment of climate change impacts on hydrological processes and water resources by Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) model: case study in THAC mo catchment, VIETNAM. Proceedings of the 37th IAHR World Congress, Aug. 13–18, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp 4312–4321. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318671823_ASSESSMENT_OF_CLIMATE_CHANGE_IMPACTS_ON_HYDROLOGICAL_PROCESSES_AND_WATER_RESOURCES_BY_WATER_EVALUATION_AND_PLANNING_WEAP_MODEL_CASE_STUDY_IN_THAC_MO_CATCHMENT_VIETNAM

  36. Playán E, Salvador R, Bonet L, Camacho E, Intrigliolo DS (2018) Assessing telemetry and remote control systems for water users associations in Spain. Agric Wat Manag 202:89–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Teasley RL, Patino-Gomez C (2010) Groundwater banking in the Rio Grande basin. J Wat Resour Plann Manag 137:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Simonovic SP (2015) Water resources systems analysis through case studies: data and models for decision making. Can Water Resour J 40:232–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07011784.2014.998290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Singh, M., 2018. Development of integrated water resources management plan for a basin using Water Evaluation and Planning (WEAP) Model. Diss. IIT, Kharagpur

  40. Slaughter AR, Mantel SK (2018) Water quality modelling of an impacted semi-arid catchment using flow data from the WEAP model. Proceed IAHS 377:25–33. https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-377-25-2018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Suryadi Y, Chrysanti A, Nurnadiati F, Adityawan MB, Kuntoro AA (2018) Study on water resources allocation for kertajati, Jatitujuh and Ligung sub-districts to support the development of west java international airport (BIJB) and kertajati aerocity area. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure and Built Environment, (IBE’ 18). https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814703010

  42. Tejero R, Gomez-Ortiz D, Heydt GG, Toledo FM, Martínez CMC (2017) Electrical resistivity imaging of the shallow structures of an intraplate basin: the Guadiana Basin (SW Spain). J Appl Geophys 139:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Thiam DR, Muchapondwa E, Kirsten J, Bourblanc M (2015) Implications of water policy reforms for agricultural productivity in South Africa: scenario analysis based on the Olifants river basin. Water Resour Econ 9:60–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tian Y, Zheng Y, Wu B, Wu X, Liu J (2015) Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction in arid and semi-arid regions with intensive agriculture. Environ Model Softw 63:170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Tizro AT, Voudouris K, Mattas C, Kamali M, Rabanifar M (2018) Evaluation of irrigation efficiency effect on groundwater level variation by Modflow and WEAP models: a case study from Tuyserkan Plain, Hamedan, Iran. In: Mattas K, Baourakis G, Zopounidis C (eds) Sustainable agriculture and food security: aspects of euro-Mediteranean business cooperation. Springer, Cham, pp 121–141

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  46. Vaghefi SA, Mousavi SJ, Abbaspour KC, Srinivasan R, Arnold JR (2015) Integration of hydrologic and water allocation models in basin-scale water resources management considering crop pattern and climate change: Karkheh River Basin in Iran. Reg Environ Chang 15:475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0573-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang XJ, Zhang JY, Shamsuddin S, Oyang RL, Guan TS (2017) Impacts of climate variability and changes on domestic water use in the Yellow River Basin of China. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 22:595–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9689-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu B, Zheng Y, Wu X, Tian Y, Han F (2015) Optimizing water resources management in large river basins with integrated surface water-groundwater modeling: a surrogate-based approach. Water Resour Res 51:2153–2173. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yaykiran S, Cuceloglu G, Ekdal A (2019) Estimation of water budget components of the Sakarya River Basin by using the WEAP-PGM model. Water 11(2):271

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaveh Ostad-Ali-Askari.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Javadinejad, S., Ostad-Ali-Askari, K. & Eslamian, S. Application of Multi-Index Decision Analysis to Management Scenarios Considering Climate Change Prediction in the Zayandeh Rud River Basin. Water Conserv Sci Eng 4, 53–70 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00068-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-019-00068-3

Keywords

Navigation