Abstract
In this paper, a new calibration constraint, using known standard deviation of the auxiliary variable was proposed for obtaining calibration estimators for the population means. Also, the condition for assessing the efficiency of the proposed estimators with the existing estimators was derived. The proposed estimators were compared with existing estimators using the biases and mean square errors based empirical and simulation studies. The results of the empirical study showed that the mean square errors of the proposed estimators were less than the existing estimators indicating that the proposed estimators are more efficient compared to the existing estimators considered in this study. Also, from the simulation study, the results showed that increase in the sample size, increases the performance of the proposed estimators over the existing estimators.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adubi SA, Babatunde OT, Ude OI (2022) Modified ratio estimators for population means with two auxiliary parameters using calibration weights. Asian J Prob Stat 20(4):169–183
Alam S, Shabbir J (2020) Calibration estimation of mean by using double use of auxiliary information. Commun Stat Simu Comput. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2020.1749660
Alam S, Singh S, Shabbir J (2019. New methodology of calibration in stratified random sampling. Surv Res Methods Section, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2019.1688813
Alam S, Singh S, Shabbir J (2020) Calibrated estimators using non-linear calibration constraints. J Stat Comput Simul 90(3):489–514
Ashok KJ, Mahamood U, Garib NS (2023). New calibration estimation procedure in the presence of unit non response. Ain Shams Eng J 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2022.101910
Audu A, Singh R, Khare S (2021) Developing calibration estimators for population mean using robust measures of dispersion under stratified random sampling. Stat Trans 22(2):125–142
Babatunde OT, Oladugba AV, Ude IO, Adubi AS (2023) Calibration estimation of population mean in stratified sampling using standard deviation. Qual Quant. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-017371
Clement EP (2015) Improving the efficiency of ratio estimators by calibration weightings. Nigerian Stast Assoc Proc (September 2015), pp 481–493
Clement EP (2020) On the estimation of variance of calibration regression estimators with multiple auxiliary information. Asian J Prob Stat 10(1):25–35
Clement EP, Enang EI (2015) Calibration approach alternative ratio estimator for population mean in stratified sampling. Int J Stat Econ, pp 83–93
Deville JC, Särndal CE (1992) Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 87(418):376–382
Enang EI, Clement EP (2019) An efficient class of calibration ratio estimators of domain mean in survey sampling. Commun Math Stat. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40304-018-00174-z
Eyo EE, Enang IE (2022) Calibration ratio estimators of population mean using median of auxiliary variable. J Model Simul Mater 5(1):21–30
Farrell PJ, Singh S (2005) Model-assisted higher order calibration of estimators of variance. Aust N Z J Stat 47(3):375–383
Garg N, Pachori M (2019) Use of median in calibration estimation of the finite population mean in stratified sampling. Int J Comput Sci Eng 7(5):667–671
Iseh MJ, Bassey KJ (2021) Calibration estimator for population mean in small sample size with nonresponse. Eur J Stat Prob 9(1):32–42
Iseh MJ, Bassey MO (2022) Calibration estimators for population mean with subsampling the nonrespondents under stratified sampling. Sci J Appl Math Stat 10(4):45–56
Kim JK, Park M (2010) Calibration estimation in survey sampling. Int Stat Rev 78(1):21–39
Kott PS (2006) Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse and coverage errors. Surv Methodol 32(2):133–142
Koyuncu N, Kadilar C (2013) Calibration estimator using different distance measures in stratified random sampling. Int J Mod Eng Res 3(1):415–419
Koyuncu N, Kadilar C (2016) Calibration weighting in stratified random sampling. Commun Stat Simul Comput ation 45:2267–2275
Montanari GE, Ranalli MG (2005) Nonparametric model calibration estimation in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 100(472):1429–1442
Murthy MN (1967) Sampling theory and methods, 1st edn. Statistical Publishing Society, Calcutta
Ozgul N (2019) New calibration estimator based on two auxiliary variables in stratified sampling. Commun Stat Theory Methods 48(6):1481–1492
Ozgul N (2020) New improved calibration estimator based on two auxiliary variables in stratified two-phase sampling. J Stat Comput Simul. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2020.1844702
Rai PK, Singh A, Qasim M (2021) Calibration-based estimators using different distance measures under two auxiliary variables: aA comparative study. J Mod Appl Stat Methods 19(1): 356 https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1619481600
Rao D, Khan MGM, Khan S (2012) Mathematical programming on multivariate calibration estimation in stratified sampling. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 72:78–82
Rueda M, Martínez S, Martínez H, Arcos A (2007) Estimation of the distribution function with calibration methods. J Stat Plan Inference 137:435–448
Sarndal CE (2007) The calibration approach in survey theory and practice. Component Stat Canada 33(2):99–119
Shahzad U, Ahmad I, Garcia-Luengo, Kumar A (2023a) Estimation of coeficient of variation using calibrated estimators in double startified random sampling. Mathematica 11:252
Shahzad U, Ahmad I, Alshahrani IM, Iftikhar S (2023b) Calibration-based mean estimators under stratified median ranked set sampling. Mathematics 11:1825
Singh S (2003) Advanced sampling theory with applications. How Michael ‘Selected’Amy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
Singh S, Arnab R (2011) On calibration of design weights. Metron 69(2):185–205
Singh HP, Tailor R (2003) Use of known correlation coefficient in estimating the finite population mean. Stat Trans 6:555–560
Singh HP, Tailor R, Tailor R, Kakran M (2004) An improved estimator of population mean using power transformation. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 58:223–230
Sisodia BVS, Dwivedi VK (1981) A modified ratio estimator using coefficient of variation of auxiliary variable. J Indian Soc Agric Stat 33:13–18
Subramani J, Kumarapandiyan GG (2012) Modified ratio estimators for population mean using function of quartiles of auxiliary variable. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manage Sci 2(2):19–23
Taylor P, Théberge A, Theberge A (1999) Eextensions of calibration estimators in survey sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 94(446):37–41
Wu C, Sitter RR (2001) A model-calibration approach to using complete auxiliary information from survey data. J Am Stat Assoc 96(453):185–193
Yan Z, Tian B (2010) Ratio method to the mean estimation using coefficient of skewness of auxiliary variable. Commun Comput Inf Sci 106(2):103–110
Zaman T, Bulut H (2023) Robust calibration for estimating the population mean using stratified random sampling. Sci Iran. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.59408.6224
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oladugba, A.V., Adubi, A.S., Okafor, F.C. et al. Calibrated Estimators for Population Means Using Standard Deviation of the Auxiliary Variable. J Indian Soc Probab Stat 24, 565–579 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-023-00167-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41096-023-00167-4