Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multi-criteria group decision-making based on an integrated PROMETHEE approach with 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy sets

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

The preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) technique is a comprehensive and efficient multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. This research study is devoted to establishing an improved version of the PROMETHEE approach based on 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy sets (2TLFFS) to address the MCDM problems when decision-makers use linguistic variables to convey their judgments about alternatives. The membership and non-membership functions of 2TLFFS are used to evaluate the weight of each criterion and the evaluation of each alternative for each criterion. We propose a new pairwise deviation formula using the score function, which is then employed to develop preference functions. To get the preferences for the alternatives, we take Gaussian and usual preference functions and use them to create a preference index matrix. The PROMETHEE I method is used to determine the partial order of alternatives by evaluating the positive outranking flow and negative outranking flow of alternatives. Furthermore, the PROMETHEE II approach obtains the total ranking of the alternatives by calculating the net outranking flow. Moreover, a flowchart is used to demonstrate the method proposed by the 2TLFF-PROMETHEE. Using a numerical example, specifically the choice of an appropriate bank manager, we establish the practical implications and realism of the proposed method. The results of the proposed work are then compared with those of the existing approach to more accurately reflect the capacity and effectiveness of the proposed work. Finally, we conclude that the 2TLFF-PROMETHEE technique established within a 2TFFS framework is highly effective and reliable in addressing MCGDM issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No data were used to support this study.

Change history

  • 22 January 2023

    The original online version of this article was revised to remove the unnecessary text from the end of Abstract.

References

  • Abedi M, Torabi SA, Norouzi GH, Hamzeh M, Elyasi GR (2012) PROMETHEE II: a knowledge-driven method for copper exploration. Comput Geosci 46:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acampora G (2022) Vitiello A Improving quantum genetic optimization through granular computing. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00348-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Bibi R, Al-Shamiri MA (2022) A decision-making framework based on 2-Tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy Hamy mean operators. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1501880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Shumaiza S, Alcantud JCR (2020) An m-polar fuzzy PROMETHEE approach for AHP-assisted group decision-making. Math Comput Appl 25(2):26

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Khan A, Ahmad U (2022) Extended MULTIMOORA method based on 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets for multi-attribute group decision-making. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00330-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ramzan N, Feng F (2022) Extending COPRAS method with linguistic Fermatean fuzzy sets and Hamy mean operators. J Math. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8239263

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Sattar A, Saeid AB (2022) Competition graphs with complex intuitionistic fuzzy information. Granul Comput 7:25–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Shahzadi G, Alcantud JCR (2022) Multi-attribute decision-making with q-rung picture fuzzy information. Granul Comput 7(1):197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Sultan M, Alcantud JCR, Ali Al-Shamiri MM (2022) Extended fuzzy N-Soft PROMETHEE method and its application in robot butler selection. Math Biosci Eng 20(2):1774–1800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Niaz Z, Feng F (2022) Extended CODAS method for multi-attribute group decision-making based on 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00332-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Noreen U, Pamucar D (2022) Extended PROMETHEE approach with 2-tuple linguistic m-polar fuzzy sets for selection of elliptical cardio machine. Expert Syst. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral TM, Costa AP (2014) Improving decision-making and management of hospital resources: an application of the PROMETHEE II method in an Emergency Department. Oper Res Health Care 3(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P (1985) Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: (The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Manage Sci 31(6):647–656

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brans JP, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur J Oper Res 24(2):228–238

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chabaane D, Kheffache D (2022) Multi-criteria decision-making based on novel fuzzy generalized divergence and knowledge measures. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00352-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY (2019) A novel PROMETHEE-based method using a Pythagorean fuzzy combinative distance-based precedence approach to multiple criteria decision making. Appl Soft Comput 82:105560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CT, Hung WZ, Cheng HL (2011) Applying linguistic PROMETHEE method in investment portfolio decision-making. Int J Electron Bus 9(2):139

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen YH, Wang TC, Wu CY (2011) Strategic decisions using the fuzzy PROMETHEE for IS outsourcing. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):13216–13222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dammak F, Baccour L, Alimi AM (2020) Intuitionistic Fuzzy PROMETHEE II Technique for Multi-criteria Decision Making Problems Based on Distance and Similarity measures. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), pp 1–8

  • Deng X, Wang J, Wei G, Lu M (2018) Models for multiple attribute decision making with some 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy Hamy mean operators. Mathematics 6(11):236

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Espinilla M, Halouani N, Chabchoub H (2015) Pure linguistic PROMETHEE I and II methods for heterogeneous MCGDM problems. Int J Comput Intell 8(2):250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Xu Z, Fujita H, Liang M (2020) Enhancing PROMETHEE method with intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Int J Intell Syst 35(7):1071–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Zheng Y, Sun B, Akram M (2022) Novel score function of generlized orthopair fuzzy membership grades with application to multi attibute decision making. Granul Comput 7:95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Shahzadi G, Akram M (2020) Decision-making analysis based on Fermatean fuzzy Yager aggregation operators with application in COVID-19 testing facility. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7279027

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Goumas M, Lygerou V (2000) An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. Eur J Oper Res 123(3):606–613

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Celik E, Gumus AT, Guneri AF (2018) A fuzzy logic based PROMETHEE method for material selection problems. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 7(1):68–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Linguistic decision analysis: steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets Syst 115(1):67–82

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Martínez L (2000) A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(6):746–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He T, Zhang S, Wei G, Wang R, Wu J, Wei C (2020) CODAS method for 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to financial management performance assessment. Technol Econ Dev 26(4):920–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In: Multiple attribute decision making, Berlin Springer, pp 58-191

  • Kirişci M, Demir I, Şimşek N (2022) Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE multi-criteria group decision-making and most suitable biomedical material selection. Artif Intell Med 127:102278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishankumar R, Ravichandran KS, Saeid AB (2017) A new extension to PROMETHEE under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for solving supplier selection problem with linguistic preferences. Appl Soft Comput 60:564–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krylovas A, Zavadskas EK, Kosareva N, Dadelo S (2014) New KEMIRA method for determining criteria priority and weights in solving MCDM problem. Int J Inf Technol 13(06):1119–1133

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Chen SM (2017) Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2514–2530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Jin F (2012) Methods for aggregating intuitionistic uncertain linguistic variables and their application to group decision making. Inf Sci Lett 205:58–71

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Liu Y, Chen X (2019) Fermatean fuzzy linguistic set and its application in multicriteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34(5):878–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z (2014) Multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 27(4):1703–1717

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Cheng S (2020) An improved MABAC group decision-making method using regret theory and likelihood in probability multi-valued neutrosophic sets. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 19(05):1353–1387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla MU, Giri BC, Biswas P (2021) Extended PROMETHEE method with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for medical diagnosis problems. Soft Comput 25(6):4503–4512

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Montajabiha M (2016) An extended PROMETHE II multi-criteria group decision making technique based on intuitionistic fuzzy logic for sustainable energy planning. Group Decis Negotiation 25(2):221–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin DU, Uzun B, Musa MS, Sentürk N, Nurçin FV, Ozsahin I (2017) Evaluating nuclear medicine imaging devices using fuzzy PROMETHEE method. Procedia Comput Sci 120:699–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani P, Jain D (2017) Intuitionistic fuzzy promethee technique for multi-criteria decision making problems based on entropy measure. Int Conf Adv, pp 290-301

  • Roy B (1990) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. In: Readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–183

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2020) Fermatean fuzzy sets. J Ambient Intell Humaniz 11(2):663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Some new operations over Fermatean fuzzy numbers and application of Fermatean fuzzy WPM in multiple criteria decision making. Informatica 2:391–412

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Senapati T, Yager RR (2019) Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Eng Appl Artif Intell 85:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Gupta A (2020) Best criteria selection based PROMETHEE II to aid decision-making under 2-tuple linguistic framework: case-study of the most energy efficient region worldwide. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 19(1):44–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Gupta A, Mehra A (2015) An AHP-PROMETHEE II method for 2-tuple linguistic multicriteria group decision making. In 2015 4th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (ICRITO)(Trends and Future Directions) pp 1–6

  • Teng F, Liu P, Zhang L, Zhao J (2019) Multiple attribute decision-making methods with unbalanced linguistic variables based on Maclaurin symmetric mean operators. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 18(01):105–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei GW (2019) 2-tuple intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 16(4):159–174

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades complex numbers and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Jen CT, Hung K (2012) A novel intuitionistic fuzzy PROMETHEE II approach for military affair outsourcing decision analysis. In: International conference on business and information, Sapporo pp 3–5

  • Zadeh LA (1975) The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoningI. Inf Sci Lett 8(3):199–249

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) LA Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Peng Y, Li W (2013) Revised PROMETHEE II for improving efficiency in emergency response. Procedia Comput Sci 17:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou LP, Wan SP, Dong JY (2022) A Fermatean fuzzy ELECTRE method for multi-criteria group decision-making. Informatica 33(1):181–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, New Campus, Lahore, Pakistan

    Muhammad Akram & Rabia Bibi

Authors
  1. Muhammad Akram
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rabia Bibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Akram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, M., Bibi, R. Multi-criteria group decision-making based on an integrated PROMETHEE approach with 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy sets. Granul. Comput. 8, 917–941 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00359-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-022-00359-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation