Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-attribute decision-making with q-rung picture fuzzy information

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

q-rung picture fuzzy sets can handle complex fuzzy and impression information by changing a parameter q based on the different hesitation degree and yield a flexible framework that captures imprecise information involving different views (typically but not exclusively: yes, abstention, no, and rejection). The Einstein operators perform well for the aggregation of data in various other frameworks of uncertain information. By combining these concepts, in this article we expand the field of application of the Einstein operators to the q-rung picture fuzzy environment. Thus, we develop novel concepts of q-rung picture fuzzy aggregation operators under Einstein operators and discuss their application in multi-attribute decision-making. First, we propose Einstein operational laws for q-rung picture fuzzy numbers. We then introduce the q-rung picture fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging, q-rung picture fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted averaging, generalized q-rung picture fuzzy Einstein weighted averaging and generalized q-rung picture fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted averaging operators. We develop an algorithm to solve complex decision-making problems using these operators. Finally, to show the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method, we discuss two multi-attribute decision-making problems (1) selection of a suitable business location (2) selection of a supplier. To demonstrate the superiority and advantage of our proposed method, a comparison with existing methods is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Akram M, Dudek WA, Dar JM (2019) Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multi-criteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34(11):3000–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Dudek WA, Ilyas F (2019) Group decision making based on Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method. Int J Intell Syst 34(7):1455–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Garg H, Ilyas F (2020) Multi-criteria group decision making based on ELECTRE I method in Pythagorean fuzzy information. Soft Comput 24(5):3425–3453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Garg H, Zahid K (2020) Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 17(2020):147–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Shahzadi G (2020) A hybrid decision making model under \(q\)-rung orthopair fuzzy Yager aggregation operators. Granul Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-020-00229-z

  • Alcantud JCR, Khameneh AZ, Kilicman A (2020) Aggregation of infinite chains of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to choices with temporal intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 514:106–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf S, Abdullah S (2019) Spherical aggregation operators and their application in multi-attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 34(3):493–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf S, Abdullah S, Mahmood T (2020) Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 11:2731–2749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (2020) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM (1996) A fuzzy reasoning approach for rule-based systems based on fuzzy logics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 26(5):769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Chen SW (2014) Fuzzy forecasting based on two-factors second-order fuzzy-trend logical relationship groups and the probabilities of trends of fuzzy logical relationships. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(3):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Chu YC (2020) Multi-attribute decision making based on U-quadratic distribution of intervals and the transformed matrix in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Inf Sci 537:30–45

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Huang CM (2003) Generating weighted fuzzy rules from relational database systems for estimating null values using genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 11(4):495–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Niou SJ (2011) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Expert Syst Appl 38(4):3865–3872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Jong WT (1997) Fuzzy query translation for relational database systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27(4):714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuong BC (2014) Picture fuzzy sets. J Comp Sci Cybern 30(4):409

    Google Scholar 

  • Deschrijver G, Cornelis C, Kerre EE (2004) On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 12(1):45–61

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Deschrijver G, Kerre EE (2002) A generalization of operators on intuitionistic fuzzy sets using triangular norms and conorms. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets 8(1):19–27

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du WS (2018) Minkowski-type distance measures for generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 33(4):802–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Fujita H, Ali MI, Yager RR, Liu X (2018) Another view on generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets and related multiattribute decision making methods. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 27(3):474–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Xu Z, Fujita H, Liang M (2020) Enhancing PROMETHEE method with intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. Int J Intell Syst 35(7):1071–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng F, Zheng Y, Alcantud JCR, Wang Q (2020) Minkowski weighted score functions of intuitionistic fuzzy values. Mathematics 8(7):1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2016) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2017) Some picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their applications to multi-criteria decision making. Arab J Sci Eng 42(12):5275–5290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Chen SM (2020) Multi-attribute group decision making based on neutrality aggregation operators of \(q\)-rung orthopair fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 517:427–447

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H, Gwak J, Mahmood T, Ali Z (2020) Power aggregation operators and VIKOR methods for complex \(q\)-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their applications. Mathematics 8:538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundogdu FK, Kahraman C (2019) Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(1):337–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Grover N, Pedrycz W (2018) Multi-attribute group decision making based on extended TOPSIS method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Appl Soft Comput 69:554–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He J, Wang X, Zhang R, Li L (2019) Some \(q\)-rung picture fuzzy Dombi Hamy Mean operators with their application to project assessment. Mathematics 7(5):468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Senapati T, Pal M, Yager RR (2019) Picture fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators: Application to MADM process. Appl Soft Comput 74:99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Abdullah S, Ashraf S (2019) Picture fuzzy aggregation information based on Einstein operations and their application in decision making. Math Sci 13(3):213–229

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Zhang R, Wang J, Shang X, Bai K (2018) A novel approach to multi-attribute group decision making with \(q\)-rung picture linguistic information. Symmetry 10(5):172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Kim HS, Feng F, Alcantud JCR (2018) Centroid transformations of intuitionistic fuzzy values based on aggregation operators. Mathematics 6(11):215

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Shahzadi G, Akram M (2020) Specific types of \(q\)-rung picture fuzzy Yager aggregation operators for decision making. Int J Comput Intell Syst 13(1):1072–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood T, Ullah K, Khan G, Jan N (2019) An approach toward decision making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets. Neural Comput Appl 31(11):7041–7053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoj TV, Leena J, Soney RB (1998) Knowledge representation using fuzzy Petri nets-revisited. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 10(4):666–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Selvachandran G (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev 52(3):1873–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Yang Y (2016) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):444–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani D, Garg H (2018) Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision making. Expert Syst 35(6):e12325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahzadi G, Akram M, Al-Kenani AN (2020) Decision making approach under Pythagorean fuzzy Yager weighted operators. Mathematics 8(1):70

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Liu X (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(5):923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G (2017) Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(2):713–724

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Cai X (2013) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation: Theory and applications. Springer Science and Business Media

  • Yager RR, (June 2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In 2013 Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS). IEEE:57-61

  • Yager RR (2016) Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 25(5):1222–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Xu Z, Ni M, Liu S (2010) Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(1):1–30

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Wei G (2013) Some intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple-attribute decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 37:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Akram.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akram, M., Shahzadi, G. & Alcantud, J.C.R. Multi-attribute decision-making with q-rung picture fuzzy information. Granul. Comput. 7, 197–215 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00260-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-021-00260-8

Keywords

Navigation