Advertisement

Some induced aggregation operators based on interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers

  • Khaista Rahman
  • Saleem Abdullah
  • Asad Ali
Original Paper

Abstract

Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy set is one of the successful extensions of the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set for handling the uncertainties in the data. Under this environment, in this paper, induced interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator and induced interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy hybrid averaging aggregation operator have been introduced a long with their desirable properties namely, idempotency, boundedness and monotonicity. The main advantage of using the proposed methods and operators is that these operators and methods give a complete view of the problem to the decision makers. These methods provide more general, more accurate and precise results as compared to the existing methods. Therefore, these methods play a vital role in real world problems. Finally, the proposed operators have been applied to decision making problems to show the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the new approach. At the end of application, we have considered an example for the section of a television from different televisions.

Keywords

I-IVPFOWA aggregation operator I-IVPFHA aggregation operator Decision making 

References

  1. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov K, Gargov G (1989) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 31:343–349MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen SM (1996) A fuzzy reasoning approach for rule-based systems based on fuzzy logics. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 26(5):769–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SM, Chang TH (2001) Finding multiple possible critical paths using fuzzy PERT. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 31(6):930–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen SM, Chiou CH (2015) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, PSO techniques and evidential reasoning methodology. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):1905–1916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen SM, Chung NY (2006) Forecasting enrollments of students using fuzzy time series and genetic algorithms. Int J Inf Manag Sci 17(3):1–17zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen SM, Han WH (2018) A new multiattribute decision making method based on multiplication operations of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf Sci 429:421–432MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen SM, Huang ZC (2017a) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf Sci 381:341–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen SM, Huang ZC (2017b) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and particle swarm optimization techniques. Inf Sci 397–398:206–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen SM, Kao PY (2013) TAIEX forecasting based on fuzzy time series, particle swarm optimization techniques and support vector machines. Inf Sci 247:62–71MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen SM, Li TS (2013) Evaluating students’ answer scripts based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 235:308–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen SM, Tsai WH (2016) Multiple-attribute decision making based on novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators. Inf Sci 367–368:1045–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen SM, Lee SH, Lee CH (2001) A new method for generating fuzzy rules from numerical data for handling classification problems. Appl Artif Intell 15(7):645–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen SM, Lee LW, Liu HC, Yang SW (2012a) Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values. Expert Syst Appl 39(12):10343–10351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen SM, Yang MW, Yang SW, Sheu TW, Liau CJ (2012b) Multictiteria fuzzy decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Expert Syst Appl 39(15):12085–12091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garg H (2016a) A novel accuracy function under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment for solving multicriteria decision making problem. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 31(1):529–540CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Garg H (2016b) A new generalized Pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garg H (2017) Generalized Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm for multicriteria decision-making process. Int J Intell Syst 32(6):597–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Horng YJ, Chen SM, Chang YC, Lee CH (2005) A new method for fuzzy information retrieval based on fuzzy hierarchical clustering and fuzzy inference techniques. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13(2):216–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu P (2017) Multiple-attribute group decision making method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy power Heronian aggregation operators. Comput Ind Eng 108:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu P, Li H (2017) Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy power Bonferroni aggregation operators and their application to group decision making. Cognit Comput 9(4):494–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu P, Liu J, Chen SM (2017a) Group decision making based on Heronian aggregation operators of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. IEEE Trans Cybern 47(9):2514–2530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu P, Chen SM, Liu J (2017b) Some intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multi-attribute group decision making. Inf Sci 411:98–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu P, Liu J, Merigo JM (2018a) Partitioned Heronian means based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers for dealing with multi-attribute group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 62:395–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu P, Liu J, Chen SM (2018b) Multiattribute group decision making based on intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic information. Inf Sci 430–431:599–619MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2011) Granular computing and intelligent systems: design with information granules of high order and high type. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015a) Information granularity, big data, and computational intelligence. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015b) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peng X, Yang Y (2015a) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peng X, Yang Y (2015b) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):444–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Shakeel M, Khan MSA, Ullah M (2017) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to group decision making problem. Cogent Math 4:1–19MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rahman K, Ali A, Khan MAS (2018) Some interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy weighted averaging aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Punjab Univ J Math 50(2):113–129Google Scholar
  33. Su Z, Xia GP, Chen MY (2011) Some induced intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators applied to multi-attribute group decision making. Int J Gen Syst 40(8):805–835MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan CQ, Chen XH (2010) Intuitionistic fuzzy choquet integral operator for multi-criteria decision making. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang CY, Chen SM (2017a) Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf Sci 397–398:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang CY, Chen SM (2017b) An improved multiattribute decision making method based on new score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy values and linear programming methodology. Inf Sci 411:176–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu Z (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 180:726–736MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: Proceeding Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, pp 57–61Google Scholar
  39. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yager RR, Abbasov MA (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsHazara University MansehraDhodialPakistan
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsAbdul Wali Khan University MardanMardanPakistan

Personalised recommendations