Advertisement

Granular Computing

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 209–218 | Cite as

Evacuation strategy of emergent event in metro station based on the ELECTRE method

  • Yanlan Mei
  • Kefan Xie
Original Paper

Abstract

Metro station is crowded during rush hours and the structure is usually complex. Hence, the determination of an optimal evacuation strategy is the key for improving the evacuation process efficiency when an emergency event happens. A group decision-making model based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (TIFNs) theory is developed for selecting an evacuation strategy in metro station. In this model, a group of experts elicit their preferences about the different evacuation strategies using TIFNs for multiple criteria. The Elimination Et Choice Translation Reality (ELECTRE) method is used to sort the different emergency evacuation strategies proposed for the metro station, and it should be adapted to manage TIFNs above all. The TIFN-ELECTRE model is proposed and applied to select the best emergency evacuation strategy of metro station. Finally, a numerical example with respect to the emergency evacuation strategy of Wuhan Guanggu Square station is carried out.

Keywords

ELECTRE Metro station Emergent event Emergency evacuation Evacuation strategies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by National Social Science Foundation of China (Project No. 15AGL021).

References

  1. Abdelghany A, Abdelghany K, Mahmassani H et al (2014) Modeling framework for optimal evacuation of large-scale crowded pedestrian facilities. Eur J Oper Res 237(3):1105–1118MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Adelizadeh M, Rezaii N, Sohrabi HM (2017) Presenting strategies for promoting security and safety in high-rise building against fire (In the Greater Tehran). Int J Comput Appl 166(2):33–39Google Scholar
  3. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen SM, Hong JA (2014) Fuzzy multiple criterias group decision making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(12):1665–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Yang R, Liu Y (2014) Strategy study on mass evacuation with LBS information. In: International conference on web-age information management. Springer, pp 141–150Google Scholar
  6. Chen SM, Cheng SH, Lan TC (2016) Multicriteria decision making based on the TOPSIS method and similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy values. Inf Sci 367:279–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devi K, Yadav SP (2013) A multicriteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for plant location selection with ELECTRE method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 66(9):1219–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dong JY, Lin LL, Wang F et al (2016) Generalized Choquet integral operator of triangular Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-criteria group decision making. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 24(05):647–683CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Hu YL, Wang FY, Liu XW (2014) ACP-based research on evacuation strategies for high-rise building fire. Zidonghua Xuebao Acta Autom Sin 40(2):185–196Google Scholar
  10. Kuo T (2017) A modified TOPSIS with a different ranking index. Eur J Oper Res 260(1):152–160MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Lee LW, Chen SM (2008) Fuzzy multiple criterias group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Proc Int Conf Mach Learn Cybern 6:3260–3265Google Scholar
  12. Li DF (2010) A ratio ranking method of triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and its application to MADM problems. Comput Math Appl 60:1557–1570MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin P, Lo SM, Huang HC et al (2008) On the use of multi-stage time-varying quickest time approach for optimization of evacuation planning. Fire Safe J 43(4):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu M, Zhang F, Ma Y et al (2016) Evacuation path optimization based on quantum ant colony algorithm. Adv Eng Inf 30(3):259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lovell DJ, Daganzo CF (2000) Access control on networks with unique origin–destination paths. Transp Res B Methodol 34(3):185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meng R, Qiu X, Zhang L et al (2015) Parallel emergency management oriented computation experimental frame. Syst Eng Theory Pract 35(10):2459–2466Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen MH, Ho TV, Zucker JD (2013) Integration of smoke effect and blind evacuation strategy (SEBES) within fire evacuation simulation. Simul Model Pract Theory 36:44–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Noh D, Koo J, Kim BI (2016) An efficient partially dedicated strategy for evacuation of a heterogeneous population. Simul Model Pract Theory 62:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pamučar D, Ćirović G (2015) The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Syst Appl 42(6):3016–3028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2011) Granular computing and intelligent systems: design with information granules of high order and high type. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015a) Information granularity, big data, and computational intelligence. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015b) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pereira LA, Burgarelli D, Duczmal LH et al (2017) Emergency evacuation models based on cellular automata with route changes and group fields. Phys A 473:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. So SK, Daganzo CF (2010) Managing evacuation routes. Transp Res B Methodol 44(4):514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song X, Zhang Z, Peng G et al (2017) Effect of authority figures for pedestrian evacuation at metro stations. Phys A 465:599–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang CY, Chen SM (2017) Multiple criteria decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method. Inf Sci 397:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang YJ, Hsuan Shih Lee (2007) Generalizing TOPSIS for fuzzy multiple-criteria group decision-making. Comput Math Appl 53:1762–1772MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang F, He SX, Xiang LJ (2014) Optimal strategy for high-rise building evacuation with stairs under emergency. China Saf Sci J 24(7):88–92Google Scholar
  29. Wang JQ, Nie RR, Zhang HY et al (2015) New operators on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application in system fault analysis. Inf Sci 251:79–95MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu JH, Weng WG, Ni SJ (2013) Simulation study on urban evacuation with different route choice strategies. J Syst Simul 25(1):122–126 (Chinese) Google Scholar
  31. Xu ZS (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 180(5):726–736MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Yeh CT (2017) Existence of interval, triangular, and trapezoidal approximations of fuzzy numbers under a general condition. Fuzzy Sets Syst 310:1–13MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang L, Liu M, Wu X et al (2016) Simulation-based route planning for pedestrian evacuation in metro stations: a case study. Autom Constr 71:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations