Abstract
Among various decision techniques, multi-objective programming model is a proper approach to solve the supplier selection problem. Notice that the multi-objective programming problem often consists of conflicting goals that cannot be achieved simultaneously, we present an approach to obtain the marginal evaluation of each objective and to aggregate these marginal evaluations into the global evaluation. Moreover, due to the limited historical data of prospective suppliers and most companies are reluctant to share proprietary information. Therefore, the decision makers often rely on vague information in their supplier selections. S-curve membership function is more flexible and robust than linear membership function when describing the vagueness. Thus, the compromise satisfactory level of multiple goals in the supplier selection problem can be represented by the modified S-curve membership function. Based on the global evaluation obtained, we can formulate a fuzzy compromise programming model based on the modified S-curve membership function. Lastly, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the efficiency of our method by comparing it with the weighted max–min method and the weighted additive method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmady N, Azadi M, Sadeghi SAH, Saen RF (2013) A novel fuzzy data envelopment analysis model with double frontiers for supplier selection. Int J Logist Res Appl 16(2):87–98
Aliabadi DE, Kaazemi A, Pourghannad B (2013) A two-level GA to solve an integrated multi-item supplier selection model. Appl Math Comput 219(14):7600–7615
Amid A, Ghodsypour SH, O’Brien C (2009) A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 121 (2): 323–332
Amid A, Ghodsypour SH, O’Brien C (2011) A weighted max-min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):139–145
Atanassov K (1994) Operators over interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 64:159–174
Awasthi A, Chauhan SS, Goyal SK, Proth JM (2009) Supplier selection problem for a single manufacturing unit under stochastic demand. Int J Prod Econ 117(1):229–233
Chen CB (2011) Reverse auction with buyer-supplier negotiation using bi-level distributed programming. Eur J Oper Res 211(3):601–611
Chen SM, Hong JA (2014) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision making based on ranking interval type-2 fuzzy sets and the TOPSIS method. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 44(12):1665–1673
Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15
Dargi A, Anjomshoae A, Galankashi MR, Memari A, Tap MBM (2014) Supplier selection: a fuzzy-ANP approach. Procedia Comput Sci 31:691–700
De Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 1(1):75–89
Deng XHY, Deng Y, Mahadevan S (2014) Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers. Expert Syst Appl 41(1):156–167
Díaz-Madroñero M, Peidro D, Vasant P (2010) Vendor selection problem by using an interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach with modified S-curve membership functions. Comput Math Appl 60(4):1038–1048
Elahi B, Hosseini SM, Makui A (2011) A fuzzy compromise programming solution for supplier selection in quantity discounts situation. Int J Ind Eng Prod Res 22(1):107–114
Fahmi A, Kahraman C, Bilen Ü (2016) ELECTRE I method using hesitant linguistic term sets: an application to supplier selection. Int J Comput Intell Syst 9(1):153–167
Famuyiwa O, Monplaisir L, Nepal B (2008) An integrated fuzzy goal programming based frame work for selecting suppliers in strategic alliance formation. Int J Prod Econ 113(2):862–875
Gupta H, Barua MK (2017) Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod 152:242–258
Hosseini S, Barker K (2016) A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ 180:68–87
Hsu CW, Kuo TC, Chen SH, Hu AH (2013) Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 56:164–172
Huang CC, Liang WY, Tseng TL, Chen PH (2016) The rough set based approach to generic routing problems: case of reverse logistics supplier selection. J Intell Manuf 27(4):781–795
Jadidi OMID., Zolfaghari S, Cavalieri S (2014) A new normalized goal programming model for multi-objective problems: a case of supplier selection and order allocation. Int J Prod Econ 148:158–165
Jadidi O, Cavalieri S, Zolfaghari S (2015) An improved multi-choice goal programming approach for supplier selection problems. Appl Math Model 39(14):4213–4222
Jolai F, Yazdian SA, Shahanaghi K, Khojasteh MA (2011) Integrating fuzzy TOPSIS and multi-period goal programming for purchasing multiple products from multiple suppliers. J Purch Supply Manag 17(1):42–53
Junior FRL, Osiro L, Carpinetti LCR (2014) A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 21:194–209
Kannan D, Khodaverdi R, Olfat L, Jafarian A, Diabat A (2013) Integrated fuzzy multi criteria decision making method and multi-objective programming approach for supplier selection and order allocation in a green supply chain. J Clean Prod 47:355–367
Kar AK (2015) A hybrid group decision support system for supplier selection using analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy set theory and neural network. J Comput Sci 6:23–33
Lee LW, Chen SM (2008) Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Kunming, China, vol 6, pp 3260–3265
Li L, Lai KK (2000) A fuzzy approach to the multiobjective transportation problem. Comput Oper Res 27(1):43–57
Liao HC, Xu ZS, Zeng XJ (2014) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Inf Sci 271(1):125–142
Lin RH (2009) An integrated FANP-MOLP for supplier evaluation and order allocation. Appl Math Model 33(6):2730–2736
Mahdiloo M, Saen RF, Lee KH (2015) Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 168:279–289
Mahmoudi A, Sadi-Nezhad S, Makui A (2015) An extended fuzzy PROMETHEE based on fuzzy rule based system for supplier selection problem. Indian J Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i31/84225
Manerba D, Mansini R, Perboli G (2017) A stochastic programming approach for the capacitated supplier selection problem with total quantity discount and activation costs. Cirrelt 13:1–27
Memon MS, Lee YH, Mari SI (2015) Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory. Expert Syst Appl 42(21):7951–7959
Moghaddam KS (2015) Fuzzy multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation in reverse logistics systems under supply and demand uncertainty. Expert Syst Appl 42(15):6237–6254
Nazari-Shirkouhi S, Shakouri H, Javadi B, Keramati A (2013) Supplier selection and order allocation problem using a two-phase fuzzy multi-objective linear programming. Appl Math Model 37(22):9308–9323
Özgen D, Semih ÖS, Gülsün B, Tuzkaya UR, Tuzkaya G (2008) A two-phase possibilistic linear programming methodology for multi-objective supplier evaluation and order allocation problems. Inf Sci 178(2):485–500
Pang B, Bai S (2013) An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process. J Intell Manuf 24(1):163–174
Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2011) Granular computing and intelligent systems: design with information granules of higher order and higher type. Springer, Heidelberg
Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015a) Information granularity, big data, and computational intelligence. Springer, Heidelberg
Pedrycz W, Chen SM (2015b) Granular computing and decision-making: interactive and iterative approaches. Springer, Heidelberg
Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F (2012) Hesitant fuzzy linguistic terms sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20:109–119
Saaty TL (1988) Multicriteria decision making: the analytic hierarchy process. RWS, Pittsburgh
Senvar O, Tuzkaya G, Kahraman C (2014) Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy PROMETHEE method. In: Supply chain management under fuzziness. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 21–34
Shaw K, Shankar R, Yadav SS, Thakur LS (2013) Global supplier selection considering sustainability and carbon footprint issue: AHP multi-objective fuzzy linear programming approach. Int J Oper Res 17(2):215–247
Sivrikaya BT, Kaya A, Dursun M, Çebi F (2015) Fuzzy AHP-goal programming approach for a supplier selection problem. Res Logist Prod 5(3):271–285
Torra V (2010) Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(6):529–539
Vasant P, Nagarajan R, Yaacob S (2002) Decision making using modified S-curve membership function in fuzzy linear programming problem. J Inf Commun Technol 1(2):1–16
Wang JY, Zhao RQ, Tang WS (2008) Fuzzy programming models for vendor selection problem in a supply chain. Tsinghua Sci Technol 13(1):106–111
Ware NR, Singh SP, Banwet DK (2014) A mixed-integer non-linear program to model dynamic supplier selection problem. Expert Syst Appl 41(2):671–678
Woo HS, Saghiri S (2011) Order assignment considering buyer, third-party logistics provider, and suppliers. Int J Prod Econ 130(2):144–152
Wu C, Barnes D (2016) Partner selection in green supply chains using PSO—a practical approach. Prod Plan Control 27(13):1041–1061
Wu DD, Zhang YD, Wu DX, Olson DL (2010a) Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: a possibility approach. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):774–787
Wu DD, Zhang Y, Wu D, Olson DL (2010b) Fuzzy multi-objective programming for supplier selection and risk modeling: a possibility approach. Eur J Oper Res 200(3):774–787
Wu Y, Chen K, Zeng B, Xu H, Yang Y (2016) Supplier selection in nuclear power industry with extended VIKOR method under linguistic information. Appl Soft Comput 48:444–457
Xia MM, Xu ZS (2011) Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int J Approx Reason 52(3):395–407
Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187
Xu ZS (2010) A method based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Inf Sci 180(1):181–190
Xu ZS (2014) Hesitant fuzzy sets theory. Springer, Berlin
Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2010) Recent advances in intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 9(4):359–381
Xu X, Ding Y (2014) Supplier selection in manufacturing innovation chain-oriented public procurement based on improved PSO method. J Ind Eng Manag 7(1):276–293
Xu ZS, Wang H (2016) Managing multi-granularity linguistic information in qualitative group decision making: an overview. Granul Comput 1(1):21–35
Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf Sci 181(11):2128–2138
You XY, You JX, Liu HC, Zhen L (2015) Group multi-criteria supplier selection using an extended VIKOR method with interval 2-tuple linguistic information. Expert Syst Appl 42(4):1906–1916
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control l8(3):338–353
Zhong L, Yao L (2017) An ELECTRE I-based multi-criteria group decision making method with interval type-2 fuzzy numbers and its application to supplier selection. Appl Soft Comput 57:556–576
Zimmermann HJ (1978) Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1(1):45–55
Zimmermann HJ (1996) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic, Boston
Acknowledgements
The work was supported in part by the China National Natural Science Foundation (nos. 71771155, 71571123).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, S., Xu, Z. & Gao, J. A fuzzy compromise programming model based on the modified S-curve membership functions for supplier selection. Granul. Comput. 3, 275–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-017-0066-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-017-0066-1