Abstract
An efficient traffic noise prediction model is a decision-making tool for creating a peaceful environment. Despite the escalating concerns regarding traffic noise in India, limited research focuses on traffic noise prediction to address the unique road traffic scenarios prevalent in the country. Therefore, in the present study, suitability evaluation of the most extensively used prediction models, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Calculation of Road Traffic Noise (CRTN), is carried out. Subsequently, a robust regression model tailored for accurate traffic noise prediction is formulated. However, to modify and enhance the applicability of the model, a novel reference energy mean emission level equation is developed for each vehicle category predominantly plying on Indian roadways. The FHWA approach yielded mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) values of 2.5 and 2.6, respectively. In contrast, the CRTN approach exhibited higher errors with MAE and RMSE values of 3.4 and 3.6, respectively. In addition, assessing all other performance metrics demonstrates the better applicability and efficiency of the modified FHWA model with optimum accuracy. The number of heavy vehicles, average traffic speed, and traffic flow were observed to be the vital factors influencing traffic noise generation. Furthermore, using the proposed model results, a regression model for different time durations that can be extensively used in mid-sized Indian cities is established. This research contributes significantly to the field, providing valuable insights for town planners, highway engineers, and authorities to formulate effective noise mitigation strategies in urban planning.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data from current study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Thakre C, Laxmi V, Vijay R et al (2020) Traffic noise prediction model of an Indian road: an increased scenario of vehicles and honking. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09923-6
Mishra A, Das S, Singh D, Maurya AK (2021) Effect of COVID-19 lockdown on noise pollution levels in an Indian city: a case study of Kanpur. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:46007–46019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13872-z
Ky NM, Lap BQ, Hung NTQ et al (2021) Investigation and assessment of road traffic noise: a case study in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-021-05210-3
Aumond P, Can A, Mallet V et al (2021) Global sensitivity analysis for road traffic noise modelling. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107899
Montes González D, Barrigón Morillas JM, Rey-Gozalo G (2023) Effects of noise on pedestrians in urban environments where road traffic is the main source of sound. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159406
Attal E, Dubus B, Leblois T, Cretin B (2021) An optimal dimensioning method of a green wall structure for noise pollution reduction. Build Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107362
Upadhyay S, Parida M, Kumar B, Kumar P (2023) Development of urban traffic noise model for a mid-sized city: a case study of Kanpur. Mapan J Metrol Soc India. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12647-023-00693-3
Padilla-Ortiz AL, Machuca-Tzili FA, Ibarra-Zarate D (2023) Smartphones, a tool for noise monitoring and noise mapping: an overview. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04240-6
Basner M, McGuire S (2018) WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and effects on sleep. Int J Environ Res Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030519
Yankoty LI, Gamache P, Plante C et al (2021) Long-term residential exposure to environmental/transportation noise and the incidence of myocardial infarction. Int J Hyg Environ Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113666
Begou P, Kassomenos P, Kelessis A (2020) Effects of road traffic noise on the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases: the case of Thessaloniki, Greece. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134477
Steele C (2001) Critical review of some traffic noise prediction models. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(00)00030-X
Amoatey P, Omidvarbona H, Baawain MS et al (2020) Exposure assessment to road traffic noise levels and health effects in an arid urban area. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09785-y
Lee EY, Jerrett M, Ross Z et al (2014) Assessment of traffic-related noise in three cities in the United States. Environ Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.03.005
Okokon EO, Yli-Tuomi T, Turunen AW et al (2018) Traffic noise, noise annoyance and psychotropic medication use. Environ Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.06.034
Shukla AK, Jain SS, Parida M, Srivastava JB (2009) Performance of FHWA model for predicting traffic noise: a case study of metropolitan city Lucknow (India). Transport. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-4142.2009.24.234-240
Abdur-Rouf K, Shaaban K (2022) Development of prediction models of transportation noise for roundabouts and signalized intersections. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103174
Quiñones-Bolaños EE, Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M (2016) A traffic noise model for road intersections in the city of Cartagena de Indias, Colombia. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.007
Hamad K, Ali Khalil M, Shanableh A (2017) Modeling roadway traffic noise in a hot climate using artificial neural networks. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.014
Kalaiselvi R, Ramachandraiah A (2016) Honking noise corrections for traffic noise prediction models in heterogeneous traffic conditions like India. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.04.003
Can A, Aumond P (2018) Estimation of road traffic noise emissions: the influence of speed and acceleration. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.002
Chen L, Cong L, Dong Y et al (2021) Investigation of influential factors of tire/pavement noise: a multilevel Bayesian analysis of full-scale track testing data. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121484
Lu X, Kang J, Zhu P et al (2019) Influence of urban road characteristics on traffic noise. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.026
To WM, Ip RCW, Lam GCK, Yau CTH (2002) A multiple regression model for urban traffic noise in Hong Kong. J Acoust Soc Am 112:551–556. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1494803
Dwivedi A, Kumar N, Singh P et al (2022) Linear regression model for noise pollution over central Delhi to highlight the alarming threat for the environment. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01594-1
Khajehvand M, Rassafi AA, Mirbaha B (2021) Modeling traffic noise level near at-grade junctions: roundabouts, T and cross intersections. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102752
Singh D, Francavilla AB, Mancini S, Guarnaccia C (2021) Application of machine learning to include honking effect in vehicular traffic noise prediction. Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136030
Umar IK, Gökçekuş H, Nourani V (2022) An intelligent soft computing technique for prediction of vehicular traffic noise. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10858-0
Ahmed AA, Pradhan B, Chakraborty S, Alamri A (2021) Developing vehicular traffic noise prediction model through ensemble machine learning algorithms with GIS. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08114-y
Mann S, Singh G (2024) Random effect generalized linear model based predictive modelling of traffic noise. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12285-4
Gündoǧdu Ö, Gökdaǧ M, Yüksel F (2005) A traffic noise prediction method based on vehicle composition using genetic algorithms. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.11.003
Ruiz-Padillo A, Ruiz DP, Torija AJ, Ramos-Ridao Á (2016) Selection of suitable alternatives to reduce the environmental impact of road traffic noise using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 61:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.003
Li F, Liao SS, Cai M (2016) A new probability statistical model for traffic noise prediction on free flow roads and control flow roads. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 49:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.10.019
Tiwari SK, Kumaraswamidhas LA, Gautam C, Garg N (2022) An auto-encoder based LSTM model for prediction of ambient noise levels. Appl Acoust 195:108849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108849
Renaud J, Karam R, Salomon M, Couturier R (2023) Deep learning and gradient boosting for urban environmental noise monitoring in smart cities. Expert Syst Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119568
Road Transport Year Book RT (2019) Road Transport Year Book. Dhanbad
Zhong M, Bagheri E, Christie J (2012) Improving group assignment and AADT estimation accuracy of short-term traffic counts using historical seasonal patterns & Bayesian statistics. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.134
Pandey G, Dubey S, Tripathi S (2011) Traffic noise assessment at National Highway 28 in India using FHWA model. Int J Veh Noise Vib 7:37–50. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJVNV.2011.039053
Mishra RK, Parida M, Rangnekar S (2010) Evaluation and analysis of traffic noise along bus rapid transit system corridor. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7:737–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326183
Soni AR, Makde K, Amrit K et al (2022) Noise prediction and environmental noise capacity for urban traffic of Mumbai. Appl Acoust 188:108516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108516
Agarwal S, Swami BL (2011) Comprehensive approach for the development of traffic noise prediction model for Jaipur city. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1320-z
Campello-Vicente H, Peral-Orts R, Campillo-Davo N, Velasco-Sanchez E (2017) The effect of electric vehicles on urban noise maps. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.018
Tsoi KH, Loo BPY, Li X, Zhang K (2023) The co-benefits of electric mobility in reducing traffic noise and chemical air pollution: insights from a transit-oriented city. Environ Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108116
Onuu MU (2000) Road traffic noise in Nigeria: measurements, analysis and evaluation of nuisance. J Sound Vib. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2832
Baaj MH, El-Fadel M, Shazbak SM, Saliby E (2001) Modeling noise at elevated highways in urban areas: a practical application. J Urban Plan Dev. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2001)127:4(169)
Pamanikabud P, Vivitjinda P (2002) Noise prediction for highways in Thailand. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00012-3
Cho DS, Mun S (2008) Development of a highway traffic noise prediction model that considers various road surface types. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.06.004
Rajakumara HN, Mahalinge Gowda RM (2009) Road traffic noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow condition. Environ Model Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-008-9138-6
Chang TY, Lin HC, Yang WT et al (2012) A modified Nordic prediction model of road traffic noise in a Taiwanese city with significant motorcycle traffic. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.016
Sheng N, Xu Z, Li M (2015) The performance of CRTN model in a Motorcycle city. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/369620
Murillo-Gómez DM, Gil-Carvajal JC, Zapata-Rodríguez V, Téllez-García JJ (2015) Assessment of the RLS 90 calculation method for predicting road traffic noise in Colombian conditions. Rev Fac Ing. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n75a17
Debnath A, Singh PK (2018) Environmental traffic noise modelling of Dhanbad township area: a mathematical based approach. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.07.023
Chen L, Liu T, Tang B et al (2021) Modelling traffic noise in a wide gradient interval using artificial neural networks. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2020.1734098
Khan J, Ketzel M, Jensen SS et al (2021) Comparison of road traffic noise prediction models: CNOSSOS-EU, Nord 2000 and TRANEX. Environ Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116240
Ibili F, Owolabi AO, Ackaah W, Massaquoi AB (2022) Statistical modelling for urban roads traffic noise levels. Sci Afr. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01131
Dhanbad District Survey Report DS (2018) District Survey Report
Agarwal S, Swami BL, Gupta AB (2009) Development of a noise prediction model under interrupted traffic flow conditions: a case study for Jaipur city. Noise Heal. https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.56211
Barry TM, Regan JA (1979) FHWA highway traffic noise prediction model United States. Office of Research and Development
Patel R, Kumar Singh P, Saw S (2022) Recent advancements in the challenges and strategies of globally used traffic noise prediction models. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20693-1
Tansatcha M, Pamanikabud P, Brown AL, Affum JK (2005) Motorway noise modelling based on perpendicular propagation analysis of traffic noise. Appl Acoust. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2005.02.002
Li MW, Xu DY, Geng J, Hong WC (2022) A hybrid approach for forecasting ship motion using CNN–GRU–AM and GCWOA. Appl Soft Comput. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.108084
Rabehi A, Guermoui M, Lalmi D (2020) Hybrid models for global solar radiation prediction: a case study. Int J Ambient Energy. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1443498
Willmott CJ (1981) On the validation of models. Phys Geogr. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213
Ministry of Environment and forest (2000) The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000. 12311:1088–1569
Mishra RK, Nair K, Kumar K, Shukla A (2021) Dynamic noise mapping of road traffic in an urban city. Arab J Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06373-9
Guarnaccia C, Bandeira J, Coelho MC et al (2018) Statistical and semi-dynamical road traffic noise models comparison with field measurements. In: AIP conference proceedings
Pascale A, Fernandes P, Guarnaccia C, Coelho MC (2021) A study on vehicle noise emission modelling: correlation with air pollutant emissions, impact of kinematic variables and critical hotspots. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147647
Acknowledgements
The authors are immensely thankful to the Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, for providing the required instrument and research facilities to carry out the present work.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting the present study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: RP; Methodology, Data collection, and Formal analysis: RP; Writing—original draft preparation: RP; Supervision: PKS; Review and Editing: SS, PKS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no related financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Appendix
Appendix
Sample calculation of hourly equivalent noise level (Leq) with hypothetical sampling location and traffic data.
Sampling Station: say XYZ
Time duration: say 6.00 PM–7.00 PM.
The linear regression model developed for the evening time period is as follows:
Sampling distance (D): 7.5 m
Reference distance (D0): 10 m
Volume and speed correction = AVS = 10 × Log10(D0 × V/S) – 25
Distance correction = AD = 10 × Log10 (D0/D)1+α
Ground cover correction = As = 0 (for hard surface)
Equivalent noise level of ith vehicle Leqi = L0 + AVS + AD + AS
Firstly, calculating Leqi for all the vehicle categories on the basis of assumed Traffic Volume (V) and Average Speed (S).
Car or Jeep:
Traffic Volume (V) of Car or Jeep = say 334
Average Speed of Car or Jeep (S) = say 38 km/h
Equivalent noise level for Car or Jeep:
Scooter or Bike (Petrol Driven):
Traffic Volume (V) of Scooter or Bike (Petrol Driven) = say 1021
Average Speed of Scooter or Bike (Petrol Driven) (S) = say 40 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for Scooter or Bike (Petrol Driven):
LCV (Light Commercial Vehicle):
Traffic Volume (V) of LCV (Light Commercial Vehicle) = say 57
Average Speed of LCV (Light Commercial Vehicle) (S) = say 25 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for LCV (Light Commercial Vehicle):
Bus:
Traffic Volume (V) of Bus = say 70
Average Speed of Bus (S) = say 22 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for Bus:
Truck:
Traffic Volume (V) of Truck = say 121
Average Speed of Truck (S) = say 22 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for Truck:
3Wheeler or Auto Rickshaw (Diesel Driven):
Traffic Volume (V) of 3Wheeler or Auto Rickshaw (Diesel Driven) = say 389
Average Speed of 3Wheeler or Auto Rickshaw (Diesel Driven) (S) = say 28 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for 3Wheeler or Auto Rickshaw (Diesel Driven):
Tractor or Trailor:
Traffic Volume (V) of Tractor or Trailor = say 26
Average Speed of Tractor or Trailor (S) = say 20 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for Tractor or Trailor:
E-Rickshaw:
Traffic Volume (V) of E-Rickshaw = say 90
Average Speed of E-Rickshaw (S) = say 15 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for E-Rickshaw:
E-Bike:
Traffic Volume (V) of E-Bike = say 21
Average Speed of E-Bike (S) = say 25 km/h
Hence, equivalent noise level for E-Bike:
Hence, the predicted noise level for evening time will be calculated using following equation.
= 77.9 dBA.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, R., Singh, P.K. & Saw, S. A modeling approach for suitability evaluation of traffic noise prediction under mixed traffic situation in mid-sized Indian cities. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 9, 183 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01493-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-024-01493-7