Skip to main content
Log in

Eco-friendly warm mix asphalt mixtures incorporating electric arc furnace steel slag as substitute to conventional aggregates

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of steel slag in the creation of warm mix asphalt (WMA) mixtures has been established in the current study as an environmentally friendly approach to generating the asphalt mixtures used in pavement engineering. This article assesses the influence of WMA additives (Sasobit and Zycotherm) on performance properties of asphalt mixtures produced with electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag as a substitute for conventional aggregates. Conventional (penetration, softening point, and ductility), viscosity, and Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) tests were performed to investigate the influence of WMA additives on asphalt binder. Subsequently, Marshall mix design, wheel tracking, indirect tensile strength, Marshall stability ratio, and ultrasonic pulse velocity tests were performed on asphalt mixtures. The laboratory tests on asphalt binders indicate that addition of WMA additives to asphalt binders increases pumping ability due to high viscosity and increase resistance to moisture damage based on FTIR results. Findings of asphalt mixtures show that mixtures made with EAF steel slag had greater moisture resistance and rut resistance than combinations made with conventional aggregates. In addition, Sasobit outperformed other WMA additives in terms of rutting resistance and moisture damage qualities, regardless of the kind of aggregate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ortiz O, Castells F, Sonnemann G (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23(1):28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hueting R, Reijnders L (2004) Broad sustainability contra sustainability: the proper construction of sustainability indicators. Ecol Econ 50(3–4):249–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alam S, Kumar A, Dawes L (2017) Sustainability assessment of road infrastructure using sustainability index. Infrastruct Asset Manag 5(1):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kireeva EE, et al (2017) Innovative development of the building complex on the basis of environmental and energy-efficient technologies. ed. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017, 08002

  5. Dinis-Almeida M, Afonso ML (2015) Warm mix recycled asphalt: a sustainable solution. J Clean Prod 107:310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kheradmand B, Muniandy R, Hua LT, Yunus RB, Solouki A (2012) An overview of the emerging warm mix asphalt technology. Int J Pavement Eng 15(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Görçün ÖF, Aytekin A, Korucuk S, Tirkolaee EB (2023) Evaluating and selecting sustainable logistics service providers for medical waste disposal treatment in the healthcare industry. J Clean Prod 408:137194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandolfo M, Amici J, Fagiolari L, Francia C, Bodoardo S, Bella F (2022) Designing photocured macromolecular matrices for stable potassium batteries. Sustain Mater Technol 34:e00504

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siraj MT, Debnath B, Kumar A, Bari AM, Samadhiya A, Payel SB (2023) Evaluating barriers to sustainable boiler operation in the apparel manufacturing industry: Implications for mitigating operational hazards in the emerging economies. PLoS ONE 18(4):e0284423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmitz F, Lago N, Fagiolari L, Burkhart J, Cester A, Polo A, Gatti T (2022) High open‐circuit voltage Cs2AgBiBr6 carbon‐based perovskite solar cells via green processing of ultrasonic spray‐coated carbon electrodes from waste tire sources. ChemSusChem 15(22):e202201590

  11. Pirrone N, Bella F, Hernández S (2022) Solar H2 production systems: current status and prospective applications. Green Chem 24(14):5379–5402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao J et al (2016) Self-cementitious property of steel slag powder blended with gypsum. Constr Build Mater 113:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo J, Bao Y, Wang M (2018) Steel slag in China: treatment, recycling, and management. Waste Manage 78:318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tao G et al (2019) Characteristics of steel slag filler and its influence on rheological properties of asphalt mortar. Constr Build Mater 201:439–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ameri M, Hesami S, Goli H (2013) Laboratory evaluation of warm mix asphalt mixtures containing electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag. Constr Build Mater 49:611–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Capitão S, Picado-Santos L, Martinho F (2012) Pavement engineering materials: review on the use of warm-mix asphalt. Constr Build Mater 36:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kheradmand B et al (2014) An overview of the emerging warm mix asphalt technology. Int J Pavement Eng 15(1):79–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubio MC et al (2012) Warm mix asphalt: an overview. J Clean Prod 24:76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shiva Kumar G, Suresha SN (2019) State of the art review on mix design and mechanical properties of warm mix asphalt. Road Mater Pavement Des 20(7):1501–1524

  20. Shiva Kumar G, Shankar AR, Ravi Teja BVS (2019) Laboratory evaluation of SMA mixtures made with polymer-modified bitumen and stabilizing additives. J Mater Civ Eng 31(4):04019026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shiva Kumar G, Ravi Shankar AU (2020) Evaluation of workability and mechanical properties of stone matrix asphalt mixtures made with and without stabilizing additives. Transport Infrastruct Geotechnol 7:191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Huang J, Zhang J, Li X, Qiao Y, Zhang R, Kumar GS (2022) Investigating the effects of ensemble and weight optimization approaches on neural networks’ performance to estimate the dynamic modulus of asphalt concrete. Road Mater Pavement Des, 1–21

  23. Huang J, Losa M, Leandri P, Kumar SG, Zhang J, Sun Y (2021) Potential anti-vibration pavements with damping layer: finite element (FE) modeling, validation, and parametrical studies. Constr Build Mater 281:122550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kumar GS, Jakati SS, Ramaraju HK (2023) Developing novel pothole patching mixtures utilizing iron ore waste as substitute to conventional aggregates with anti-stripping agent. Mater Today: Proc

  25. Shiva Kumar G, Gayathri Nivedha R, Venkatesha G, Ismail M, Sridhar HN, Ramaraju HK (2022) Laboratory investigation of workability and mechanical properties of concrete utilizing fly ash and iron ore tailing waste. Innovat Infrastruct Solut 7(5):302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonaquist RF (2011) Mix design practices for warm mix asphalt. Transport Res Board

  27. Diefenderfer SD, Hearon A (2008) Laboratory evaluation of a warm asphalt technology for use in Virginia. Virginia Transportation Research Council

  28. Martin AE (2014) Evaluation of the moisture susceptibility of WMA technologies. Transport Res Board

  29. Huang J, Kumar GS, Sun Y (2021) Evaluation of workability and mechanical properties of asphalt binder and mixture modified with waste toner. Constr Build Mater 276:122230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang J, Li X, Kumar GS, Deng Y, Gong M, Dong N (2021) Rheological properties of bituminous binder modified with recycled waste toner. J Clean Prod 317:128415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hurley GC, Prowell BD (2006) Evaluation of evotherm for use in warm mix asphalt. NCAT Rep 2:15–35

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kanitpong K, Charoentham N, Likitlersuang S (2012) Investigation on the effects of gradation and aggregate type to moisture damage of warm mix asphalt modified with Sasobit. Int J Pavement Eng 13(5):451–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sanchez-Alonso E et al (2011) Evaluation of compactability and mechanical properties of bituminous mixtures with warm additives. Constr Build Mater 25(5):2304–2311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shiva Kumar G, Suresha S (2017) Evaluation of properties of nonfoaming warm mix asphalt mixtures at lower working temperatures. J Mater Civ Eng 29(11):04017229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xiao F, Punith V, Putman BJ (2013) Effect of compaction temperature on rutting and moisture resistance of foamed warm-mix-asphalt mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng 25(9):1344–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmed TA et al (2013) Influence of aggregate source and warm-mix technologies on the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures. Adv Civil Eng Mater 2(1):400–417

    Google Scholar 

  37. Malladi H et al (2015) Laboratory evaluation of warm-mix asphalt mixtures for moisture and rutting susceptibility. J Mater Civ Eng 27(5):04014162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mirzababaei P (2016) Effect of zycotherm on moisture susceptibility of warm mix asphalt mixtures prepared with different aggregate types and gradations. Constr Build Mater 116:403–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ziari H, Mirzababaei P, Babagoli R (2016) Properties of bituminous mixtures modified with a nano-organosilane additive. Pet Sci Technol 34(4):386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. ASTM D4402-06 (2006) Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  41. Barnes CL, Trottier J-F (2010) Evaluating laboratory-induced asphalt concrete moisture damage using surface waves. Int J Pavement Eng 11(6):489–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430903578929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Terzi S, Karasahin M, Gokova S, Tahta M, Morova N, Uzun I (2013) Asphalt concrete stability estimation from non-destructive test methods with artificial neural -83-networks. Neural Comput Appl 23:989–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-012-1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hossain Z et al (2012) Effectiveness of water-bearing and anti-stripping additives in warm mix asphalt technology. Int J Pavement Eng 13(5):424–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pourhassan A, Gheni AA, ElGawady MA (2023) Raveling performance of conventional and rubberized chip seal under field and laboratory traffic loading. Constr Build Mater 370:130674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Goli H, Latifi M, Sadeghian M (2022) Moisture characteristics of warm mix asphalt containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) or steel slag. Mater Struct 55(2):53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. MoRTH (Ministry of Road Transport and Highway) (2013) Specifications for road and bridge works, 5th edn. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi

  47. Asphalt Institute (2001) Superpave mix design, Lexington

  48. EN 12697-22 (2003) Bituminous mixtures—tests methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 22: wheel tracking test, British Standards Institution, London, UK. www.bsigroup.com

  49. AASHTO T 283, Resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture induced damage

  50. Fakhri M, Ahmadi A (2017) Recycling of RAP and steel slag aggregates into the warm mix asphalt: a performance evaluation. Constr Build Mater 147:630–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Masoudi S, Abtahi SM, Goli A (2017) Evaluation of electric arc furnace steel slag coarse aggregate in warm mix asphalt subjected to long-term aging. Constr Build Mater 135:260–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Amelian S, Manian M, Abtahi SM, Goli A (2018) Moisture sensitivity and mechanical performance assessment of warm mix asphalt containing by-product steel slag. J Clean Prod 176:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Georgiou P, Loizos A (2021) Characterization of sustainable asphalt mixtures containing high reclaimed asphalt and steel slag. Materials 14(17):4938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang Y, Bahia HU (2021) Effects of recycling agents (RAs) on rutting resistance and moisture susceptibility of mixtures with high RAP/RAS content. Constr Build Mater 270:121369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Goli H, Hesami S, Ameri M (2017) Laboratory evaluation of damage behavior of warm mix asphalt containing steel slag aggregates. J Mater Civ Eng 29(6):04017009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge JSW Steel Ltd. for providing EAF slag samples and KPL International Ltd., and Zydex Industries for providing WMA additive samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Shiva Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical statement

The author declare that they have not submitted the manuscript to any other journal for simultaneous consideration. The work is original and not published elsewhere.

Informed consent

For this type of study, consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shiva Kumar, G., Rahul, M.S., Jakati, S.S. et al. Eco-friendly warm mix asphalt mixtures incorporating electric arc furnace steel slag as substitute to conventional aggregates. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 233 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01203-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-023-01203-9

Keywords

Navigation