Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Thermal comfort analysis of fired-clay brick, cement-sand block and cement stabilized earth block masonry house models

  • Practice-oriented paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fired-clay brick, cement-sand block and cement stabilized earth blocks are the most commonly used material for masonry construction in Sri Lanka. Strength, durability and cost are three major factors that influence the selection of material for wall construction. Even though Sri Lanka has a tropical climate, the benefits of insulating the external walls of the house are often not considered. Apart from thermal comfort of the internal environment, there is concern regarding increase in energy consumption. However, in recent years, as awareness of sustainable and green building concepts increased, interest in using sustainable and thermal comfort materials for house construction has increased. Because external walls play a major role in thermal insulation, there is a need to select suitable wall materials that can be energy efficient and reduce cooling load. Therefore, the present study aims to understand thermal comfort in house units constructed with commonly used wall material such as fired brick, cement-sand block and cement stabilized earth block. Temperature and humidity inside and outside house models were observed to compare the impact of masonry materials on thermal comfort. To compare the thermal comfort performance of the house models, three thermal comfort analysis models: steady-state comfort model, adaptive criteria model and deterministic models were used according to the British Standard European Norm (BS EN) 16798, CIBSE TM52 and ANSI/ASHRAE 55. Results show that house units constructed with cement stabilized earth blocks and fired-clay bricks are significantly more comfortable in terms of temperature and humidity variations. Energy-efficient house units thereby minimized energy consumption through reduction in indoor temperature. Therefore the cement stabilized earth block and fired-clay brick house model are found to be a suitable choice for construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Data can be made available on request by interested parties.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Yüksek I (2015) The evaluation of building materials in terms of energy efficiency. Period Polytech Civ Eng 59(1):45–58

    Google Scholar 

  2. Panyakaew S, Fotios S (2008) Agricultural waste materials as thermal insulation for dwellings in Thailand: preliminary results. In: PLEA 2008—25th conference on passive and low energy architecture, Dublin, pp 2017–2020

  3. Iwaro J, Mwasha A (2019) Effects of using coconut fiber–insulated masonry walls to achieve energy efficiency and thermal comfort in residential dwellings. J Archit Eng 25(1):04019001

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciravoglu A (2008) A research on embodied energy of building materials: reflections on Turkey. In: The 2005 world sustainable building conference, Tokyo

  5. CENSUS (2012) Percentage distribution of occupied housing units by principal material of walls and district. http://www.statistics.gov.lk/PopHouSat/CPH2011/Pages/Activities/Reports/KeyFinding/Key_E.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2020

  6. Sathiparan N, De Zoysa HTSM (2018) The effects of using agricultural waste as partial substitute for sand in cement blocks. J Build Eng 19:216–227

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yogananth Y, Thanushan K, Sangeeth P, Coonghe JG, Sathiparan N (2019) Comparison of strength and durability properties between Earth-cement blocks and cement–sand blocks. Innov Infrastruct Solut 4(1):50

    Google Scholar 

  8. Onyekwere N, Chinwe U (2020) Community-driven development strategy for sustainable infrastructure. J Hum Earth Future 1(2):48–59

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vangtook P, Chirarattananon S (2007) Application of radiant cooling as a passive cooling option in hot humid climate. Build Environ 42(2):543–556

    Google Scholar 

  10. CEB (2021) Sri Lanka—country commercial guide. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/sri-lanka-energy. Accessed 6 Dec 2021

  11. Arora C (2017) Refrigeration and air conditioning, 3rd edn. Mc Graw Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gil L (2015) New Cork-based materials and applications. Materials 8(2):625–637

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sassu M, Giresini L, Bonannini E, Puppio ML (2016) On the use of vibro-compressed units with bio-natural aggregate. Buildings 6(3):40

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arnaud L, Gourlay E (2012) Experimental study of parameters influencing mechanical properties of hemp concretes. Constr Build Mater 28(1):50–56

    Google Scholar 

  15. Elfordy S, Lucas F, Tancret F, Scudeller Y, Goudet L (2008) Mechanical and thermal properties of lime and hemp concrete (“hempcrete”) manufactured by a projection process. Constr Build Mater 22(10):2116–2123

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yan L, Chouw N, Jayaraman K (2014) Flax fibre and its composites—a review. Compos B Eng 56:296–317

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zakaria M, Ahmed M, Hoque MM, Islam S (2016) Scope of using jute fiber for the reinforcement of concrete material. Text Cloth Sustain 2(1):11

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baghban MH, Mahjoub R (2020) Natural kenaf fiber and lc3 binder for sustainable fiber-reinforced cementitious composite: a review. Appl Sci 10(1):357

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mutani G, Azzolino C, Macrì M, Mancuso S (2020) Straw buildings: a good compromise between environmental sustainability and energy-economic savings. Appl Sci 10(8):2858

    Google Scholar 

  20. Thanushan K, Yogananth Y, Sangeeth P, Coonghe JG, Sathiparan N (2019) Strength and durability characteristics of coconut fibre reinforced earth cement blocks. J Nat Fibers, 1–16

  21. Sathiparan N, Rupasinghe MN, Pavithra BHM (2017) Performance of coconut coir reinforced hydraulic cement mortar for surface plastering application. Constr Build Mater 142:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmadi SF, Reisi M (2020) Comparison of mechanical and durability properties of concrete and fired facing bricks. Proc Inst Civ Eng – Struct Build 173(7):512–522

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nayak C, Taware P, Jagadale U, Jadhav N, Morkhade S (2021) Effect of SiO2 and ZnO nano-composites on mechanical and chemical properties of modified concrete. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00694-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kate G, Nayak C, Thakare S (2021) Optimization of sustainable high-strength–high-volume fly ash concrete with and without steel fiber using Taguchi method and multi-regression analysis. Innov Infrastruct Solut 6:102

    Google Scholar 

  25. Parlikar A, Naik C, Nayak C (2021) An experimental study on effect of pharmaceutical industrial waste water on compressive strength of concrete. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 10(8):11068–11072

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lertsatitthanakorn C, Atthajariyakul S, Soponronnarit S (2009) Techno-economical evaluation of a rice husk ash (RHA) based sand–cement block for reducing solar conduction heat gain to a building. Constr Build Mater 23(1):364–369

    Google Scholar 

  27. Raut S, Mandavgane S, Ralegaonkar R (2014) Thermal performance assessment of recycled paper mill waste-cement bricks using the small-scale model technique. J Energy Eng 140(4):04014001

    Google Scholar 

  28. Madurwar MV, Ralegaonkar RV (2015) Controlling indoor air temperature using bagasse ash bricks. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers—engineering sustainability

  29. Rahman M, Jyoti L, Paul S, Al-Ishmam, Hossain M (2020) Mechanical and thermal performance of cement mortar incorporating super absorbent polymer (SAP). Civ Eng J 6(11):2231–2244

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zafra R, Mayo J, Villareal P, De Padua V, Castillo M, Sundo M, Madlangbayan M (2020) Structural and thermal performance assessment of shipping container as post-disaster housing in tropical climates. Civ Eng J 7(8):1437–1458

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fasogbon S, Wahaabb A, Oyewolaa M (2015) Thermal comfort characteristics of some selected building materials in the regional setting of Ile-Ife, Nigeria. J Nat Resour Dev 5:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  32. Udawattha C, Halwatura R (2018) Thermal performance and structural cooling analysis of brick, cement block, and mud concrete block. Adv Build Energy Res 12(2):150–163

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jeyasegaram S, Sathiparan N (2020) Influence of soil grading on the mechanical behavior of earth cement blocks. MRS Adv 5(54–55):2771–2782

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sajanthan K, Balagasan B, Sathiparan N (2019) Prediction of compressive strength of stabilized earth block masonry. Adv Civ Eng 2019:2072430

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sathiparan N, Anjalee WAV, Kandage KKS (2016) The scale effect on small-scale modelling of cement block masonry. Mater Struct 49(7):2935–2946

    Google Scholar 

  36. Poorveekan K, Ath KMS, Anburuvel A, Sathiparan N (2021) Investigation of the engineering properties of cementless stabilized earth blocks with alkali-activated eggshell and rice husk ash as a binder. Constr Build Mater 277:122371

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seevaratnam V, Uthayakumar D, Sathiparan N (2020) Influence of rice husk ash on characteristics of earth cement blocks. MRS Adv 5(54):2793–2805

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mayooran S, Ragavan S, Sathiparan N (2017) Comparative study on open air burnt low- and high-carbon rice husk ash as partial cement replacement in cement block production. J Build Eng 13:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  39. BS-EN-16798-1 (2019) Energy performance of buildings. Ventilation for buildings. Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment, lighting and acoustics. British Standards Institution, London

    Google Scholar 

  40. CIBSE-TM52 (2017) The limits of thermal comfort: avoiding overheating in european buildings. The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. ANSI/ASHRAE-Standard-55 (2017) Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. ASTM-C140/C140M (2017) Standard test methods for sampling and testing concrete masonry units and related units. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  43. ASTM-C109 (2020) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50 mm] cube specimens). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  44. ASTM-C1006 (2007) Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of masonry units. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  45. ASTM-C1609/C1609M (2019) Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber-reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sathiparan N, Rumeshkumar U (2018) Effect of moisture condition on mechanical behavior of low strength brick masonry. J Build Eng 17:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  47. CIBSE (2015) Guide A: environmental design. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  48. IS-SP:41 (1987) Handbook on functional requirements of buildings (other than industrial buildings) (parts 1–4). Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jamaludin N, Mohammed NI, Khamidi MF, Wahab SNA (2015) Thermal comfort of residential building in malaysia at different micro-climates. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 170:613–623

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tewari P, Mathur S, Mathur J, Kumar S, Loftness V (2019) Field study on indoor thermal comfort of office buildings using evaporative cooling in the composite climate of India. Energy Build 199:145–163

    Google Scholar 

  51. Manu S, Shukla Y, Rawal R, Thomas LE, de Dear R (2016) Field studies of thermal comfort across multiple climate zones for the subcontinent: India Model for Adaptive Comfort (IMAC). Build Environ 98:55–70

    Google Scholar 

  52. Indraganti M, Ooka R, Rijal HB (2013) Field investigation of comfort temperature in Indian office buildings: a case of Chennai and Hyderabad. Build Environ 65:195–214

    Google Scholar 

  53. Indraganti M, Boussaa D (2018) An adaptive relationship of thermal comfort for the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: the case of offices in Qatar. Energy Build 159:201–212

    Google Scholar 

  54. López-Pérez LA, Flores-Prieto JJ, Ríos-Rojas C (2019) Adaptive thermal comfort model for educational buildings in a hot-humid climate. Build Environ 150:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rijal HB, Humphreys MA, Nicol JF (2017) Towards an adaptive model for thermal comfort in Japanese offices. Build Res Inf 45(7):717–729

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rupp RF, de Dear R, Ghisi E (2018) Field study of mixed-mode office buildings in Southern Brazil using an adaptive thermal comfort framework. Energy Build 158:1475–1486

    Google Scholar 

  57. GB-18883 (2002) Indoor air quality standard. General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China

  58. Banman F, Arens E, Huizenga C, Xu T, Zhang H, Akimoto T, Miura K (1996) The impact of humidity standards on energy efficient cooling in California. Final report to the California Institute for Energy Efficiency, Center for Environmental Design Research, Berkeley

  59. Fountain M, Arens E, Xu T, Banman F, Oguru M (1999) An investigation of thermal comfort at high humidities, indoor environmental quality (IEQ). ASHRAE Trans 105:4282 (RP-860)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jing S, Li B, Tan M, Liu H (2012) Impact of relative humidity on thermal comfort in a warm environment. Indoor Built Environ 22(4):598–607

    Google Scholar 

  61. Toftum J, Jørgensen AS, Fanger PO (1998) Upper limits for indoor air humidity to avoid uncomfortably humid skin. Energy Build 28(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  62. Samuel DGL, Dharmasastha K, Nagendra SMS, Maiya MP (2017) Thermal comfort in traditional buildings composed of local and modern construction materials. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6(2):463–475

    Google Scholar 

  63. Balbis-Morejón M, Rey-Hernández JM, Amaris-Castilla C, Velasco-Gómez E, San José-Alonso JF, Rey-Martínez FJ (2020) Experimental study and analysis of thermal comfort in a university campus building in tropical climate. Sustainability 12(21):8886

    Google Scholar 

  64. Fanger P (1970) The limits of thermal comfort: avoiding overheating in european buildings. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. Elaiab F (2014) Thermal comfort investigation of multi-storey residential buildings in Mediterranean climate with reference to Darnah. University of Nottingham, Libya

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere gratitude for the support given by Concrete Lab, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jaffna.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Jaffna, Ariviyal Nager, Kilinochchi, Sri Lanka

    Navaratnarajah Sathiparan, Daniel N. Subramaniam, K. G. N. Malsara & M. S. M. Akmal

Authors
  1. Navaratnarajah Sathiparan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel N. Subramaniam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. G. N. Malsara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. S. M. Akmal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Navaratnarajah Sathiparan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sathiparan, N., Subramaniam, D.N., Malsara, K.G.N. et al. Thermal comfort analysis of fired-clay brick, cement-sand block and cement stabilized earth block masonry house models. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00744-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00744-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation