Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of the effect of roadside barrier type on lateral offsets in urban highways

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since one of the most crucial elements in crashes is related to human factors, driver behavior significantly impacts road safety. Driver behavior is influenced by many factors, including driving characteristics, experience, and the road environment. In this study, the effect of combining different elements including shoulder width (left shoulder width up to 0.6 m and more than 0.6 m as well as right shoulder width up to 1 m and more than 1 m), type and height of barriers (guardrail with a height 0.7 m, New Jersey with a height of 1.1 m, and retaining walls with heights of 5 and 10 m) on driver behavior on urban highways (in both upgrade and downgrade scenarios) was investigated. For this purpose, 20 urban highway segments were selected for filming and speed recording using the laser gun camera. The results revealed that New Jerseys on the left shoulders had caused driver workload and concentration more than guardrails. An average of 5% reduction in speed and a 25% increase in the lateral offset of the barriers were recorded to reduce the driver's workload. A 10-m retaining wall has caused more driver workload and concentration on the right shoulder than the curbs. An average of 8% reduction in speed and a 36% increase in the lateral offset of the barriers were recorded to reduce the driver's workload. It was also concluded that increasing the shoulder width can reduce the driver's workload. Finally, the movement methods model was predicted by using the nonlinear regression model for different car wheel positions from lateral lanes to various road barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimitropoulos I, Kanellaidis G (1998) Highway geometric design: the issue of driving behavior variability. In: International symposium on highway geometric design practices. Transportation research board, Boston (p. 41)

  2. Lamm R, Psarianos B, Mailaender T (1999) Highway design and traffic safety engineering handbook

  3. Abdel-Aty MA, Abdelwahab HT (2004) Predicting injury severity levels in traffic crashes: a modeling comparison. J Transp Eng 130(2):204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Messer CJ (1980) Methodology for evaluating geometric design consistency. Transportation research board, Washington, DC, pp 7–14

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christodoulou CG, Georgiopoulos M (2001) Applications of neural networks in electromagnetics. Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA, US, ISBN:978-0-89006-880-9

  6. Bonneson JA (2000) Superelevation distribution methods and transition designs, vol 439. Transportation research board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_439.pdf

  7. Chin HC, Quddus MA (2003) Applying the random effect negative binomial model to examine traffic accident occurrence at signalized intersections. Accid Anal Prev 35(2):253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cafiso S, Di Graziano A, La Cava G (2005) Actual driving data analysis for design consistency evaluation. Transp Res Rec 1912(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Syed L, Hassan Y (2005) Role of uneven vehicle weight distribution in curve driving. In: Proceedings of 6th transportation specialty conference for the Canadian society for civil engineering, Toronto, Ont (pp. 2–4)‏

  10. Shinar D, Ronen A (2007) Validation of a single screen simulation for speed perception and production. Adv Transp Studies Int J 5:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  11. Misaghi P, Hassan Y (2005) Modeling operating speed and speed differential on two-lane rural roads. J Transp Eng 131(6):408–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Janssen WH, De Ridder S, Brouwer RFT, Thomson R, Fagerlind H, Lanner G, Dupre G, Bisson O, Garcia JM, Figaredo A, Papi J, Wink W (2006) Roadside infrastructure for safer European roads: D02 Summary of driver behaviour and driver interactions with roadside infrastructure

  13. Martens MH, Compte S, Kaptein NA (1997) The effects of road design on speed behaviour: a literature review. TNO Human Factors Research Institute

  14. Theeuwes J, Godthelp H (1995) Self-explaining roads. Saf Sci 19(2–3):217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moradi M, Abdi Kordani A, Zarei M (2021) New geometric design approach to reduce vehicle’s speed in accident-prone downgrade highways using dynamic vehicle modeling. J Transp Eng A Syst 147(1):04020149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manual HC (2016) A guide for multimodal mobility analysis (HCM). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naderi JR, Kweon BS, Maghelal P (2006) Simulating impacts of curb-side trees on driver performance and perceptions. In: proceedings of the 85th annual meeting transportation research board. Washington

  18. American association of state highway and transportation officials (2011) A Policy on geometric design of highways and streets. Washington. D.C. ISBN: 978-1-56051-508-1

  19. Bamzai R, Lee Y, Li Z (2011) Safety impacts of highway shoulder attributes in Illinois, (11–078). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, ISSN: 0197-9191

  20. Ben-Bassat T, Shinar D (2011) Effect of shoulder width, guardrail and roadway geometry on driver perception and behavior. Accid Anal Prev 43(6):2142–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mecheri S, Rosey F, Lobjois R (2017) The effects of lane width, shoulder width, and road cross-sectional reallocation on drivers’ behavioral adaptations. Accid Anal Prev 104:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pokorny P, Jensen JK, Gross F, Pitera K (2020) Safety effects of traffic lane and shoulder widths on two-lane undivided rural roads A matched case-control study from Norway. Accid Anal Prev 144:105614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oh C, Kim T, Lee J, Choi S, Joo S (2012) A method for determining variable message sign (VMS) Locations for safe exiting at freeway off-ramp based on driving simulation experiments (No. 12–0374). Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, US

  24. Bates DM, Watts DG (1988) Nonlinear regression analysis and its applications, vol 2. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Transportation officials (2011) Task force for roadside safety. Roadside design guide. AASHTO

  26. Godley ST, Triggs TJ, Fildes BN (2004) Perceptual lane width, wide perceptual road centre markings and driving speeds. Ergonomics 47(3):237–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dewar RE, Olson PL (2002) Human factors in traffic safety. Lawyers & Judges Publishing Company. Inc., Tucson, Arizona, p 719

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bella F (2013) Driver perception of roadside configurations on two-lane rural roads: effects on speed and lateral placement. Accid Anal Prev 50:251–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Javad Hosseini

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Highway and Transportation, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

    Ali Abdi Kordani

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran

    Mohammad Zarei & Niousha Saremi

Authors
  1. Javad Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Abdi Kordani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Zarei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Niousha Saremi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Zarei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, J., Abdi Kordani, A., Zarei, M. et al. Evaluation of the effect of roadside barrier type on lateral offsets in urban highways. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00623-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00623-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation