Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete on the length of rigid pavement slabs

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rigid pavement is one of the pavement methods used specially in high traffic zones. Up till now, Portland cement concrete (PCC) is the most commonly used material for rigid pavement. One of the problems that faces PCC is the allowable spacing for transverse joints in rigid pavements’ plain concrete slabs. As recommended by different standards and design manuals, the recommended length of slabs is about 4.5–5 m (In PCA, Thickness Design for Concrete Highway and Street Pavements. Engineering Bulletin EB109P. Skokie, IL, (1984); In ECP, Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads part 4: road material and its tests. Housing and Building National Research Center, Egypt, (2018); In FDOT, Rigid Pavement Design Manual. Pavement Management Office, Document No. 625-010-006-e, Tallahassee, Florida, (2009)), this is referred to the thermal volumetric changes in PCC. The low allowable transverse joints spacing in rigid pavement reduces the implementation rates and increases the cost. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is one of the innovative types of concrete that is eco-friendly than gain early strength in ambient temperature and can gain higher strength by heating. In this research, GPC was investigated to determine its drying shrinkage and thermal expansion behavior and therefore affect the length of concrete slabs in rigid pavement. This different type of concrete showed an acceptable performance against drying shrinkage and thermal expansion more than PCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidovits J, Cordi SA (1979) Synthesis of new high temperature geo-polymers for reinforced plastics/composites. Soc Plast Eng 79:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  2. PCA (1988) US Portland cement association. Design and control of concrete mixtures. Skokie, IL: Portland cement association

  3. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DM, Rangan BV (2004) On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Mater J 101(6):467–472

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wallah S, Rangan BV (2006) Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: long-term properties. Research Report GC 2, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

  5. Lee NP (2007) Creep and shrinkage of inorganic polymer concrete. BRANZ Study Report SR 175, BRANZ Ltd, Judgeford, New Zealand

  6. Wallah SE (2009) Drying shrinkage of heat-cured fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Modern Appl Sci 3(12):14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ridtirud C, Chindaprasirt P, Pimraksa K (2011) Factors affecting the shrinkage of fly ash geopolymers. Int J Miner Metall Mater 18(1):100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shekhovtsova J, Kovtun M, Kearsley EP (2015) Evaluation of short-and long-term properties of heat-cured alkali-activated fly ash concrete. Mag Concr Res 67(16):897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Castel A, Foster SJ, Ng T, Sanjayan JG, Gilbert RI (2016) Creep and drying shrinkage of a blended slag and low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater Struct 49(5):1619–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins FG, Sanjayan JG (1999) Workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Res 29(3):455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas RJ, Lezama D, Peethamparan S (2017) On drying shrinkage in alkali-activated concrete: improving dimensional stability by aging or heat-curing. Cem Concr Res 91:13–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. PCA (1984) US Portland cement association. Thickness design for concrete highway and street pavements. Engineering bulletin EB109P. Skokie, IL: Portland cement association

  13. ECP (2018) Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads part 4: road material and its tests. Housing and Building National Research Center, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  14. FDOT (2009) Florida Department of Transportation. Rigid Pavement Design Manual. Pavement Management Office, Document No. 625–010–006-e, Tallahassee, Florida

  15. ASTM C596 (2018) Standard test method for drying shrinkage of mortar containing hydraulic cement. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  16. ASTM C531 (2018) Standard test method for linear shrinkage and coefficient of thermal expansion of chemical-resistant mortars, grouts, monolithic surfacings, and polymer concretes. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  17. Refaei DA, Abdelrahman MK, Ibrahim IA, Eldears F, Kandil AT (2016) Improvement the quality of Egyptian kaolin for industrial applications. Int J Adv Technol 8:174

    Google Scholar 

  18. British Standards Institution BS EN 197-1 (2011) Cement: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. London, UK

  19. Egyptian Standard Specification (ESS) 4576-1 (2009) Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements, Egyptian organization for standards and quality (EOS), Cairo, Egypt

  20. Egyptian Code of Practice for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures (ECP 203-2018). Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities. Cairo, Egypt

  21. ASTM C494/C494M (2019) Standard specification for chemical admixtures for concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  22. Rangan BV (2008) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Research report GC4, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia

  23. Anuradha R, Sreevidya V, Venkatasubramani R, Rangan BV (2012) Modified guidelines for geopolymer concrete mix design using Indian standard. Asian J Civ Eng (Building and Housing) 13(3):353–364

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ferdous MW, Kayali O, Khennane A (2013) A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on FRP in Structures (APFIS 2013), Melbourne, Australia (pp. 11–13)

  25. Patankar SV, Ghugal YM, Jamkar SS (2015) Mix design of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: Matsagar V (ed) Advances in structural engineering. Springer, New Delhi, pp 1619–1634

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi C (1996) Strength, pore structure and permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars. Cem Concr Res 26(12):1789–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB (1999) Alkali activation of Australian slag cements. Cem Concr Res 29(1):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM C157/C157M (2017) Standard test method for length change of hardened hydraulic-cement mortar and concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  29. Heath AC, Roesler JR (1999) Shrinkage and thermal cracking of fast setting hydraulic cement concrete pavements in Palmdale. Pavement Research Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  30. Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK (2015) Drying shrinkage of slag blended fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Procedia Eng 125:594–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the teamwork of Housing and Building National Research Center, Egypt

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. S. Eisa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eisa, M.S., Basiouny, M.E. & Fahmy, E.A. Effect of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete on the length of rigid pavement slabs. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 91 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00465-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00465-5

Keywords

Navigation