Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility study of utilisation of ferrochrome slag as fine aggregate and rice husk ash as cement replacement for developing sustainable concrete

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilisation of ferrochrome slag as partial substitution of the fine aggregates and incorporation of rice husk ash (RHA) in place of cement has been carried out in this study to generate a sustainable concrete. For this, workability, compressive strength (CS), split tensile strength (STS), flexural strength (FS), rebound number (RN), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), water absorption (WA), density and volume of voids (VV) of 12 numbers of concrete mixes made with 0%, 10%, and 20% ferrochrome slag fine aggregates (FSA) and 0%, 10%, 15% and 20% RHA have been investigated. The outcomes of this investigation depicts that all the mixes designed in this study incorporating (FSFA) and RHA has satisfied the workability requirements of concrete to be used for normal construction work. Furthermore, a substantial reduction in CS has been noted in the early days of the mixes made with higher quantity of RHA and FSFA; however, improvement in strength parameters has been seen in later days. The results of STS, FS, RN and UPV of mixes follow a similar trend to the CS for all mixes examined in the current investigation. Overall, the outcomes of this study conclude that the concrete characteristics considered for of this work are not significantly influenced with the inclusion of FSFA in place of natural sand. However, the reduction in concrete behaviour has been detected with the use of higher RHA (%). Further, the present study recommends for the utilisation of 10%–15% RHA and 10% FSFA in concrete for various applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FSFA:

Ferrochrome slag fine aggregates

RHA:

Rice husk ash

NFA:

Natural fine aggregates

NCA:

Natural coarse aggregates

CS:

Compressive strength

STS:

Split tensile strength

FS:

Flexural strength

OPC:

Ordinary Portland cement

BIS:

Bureau of Indian Standards

RN:

Rebound number

UPV:

Ultrasonic pulse velocity

WA:

Water absorption

VV:

Volume of voids

References:

  1. Tiwari A, Singh S, Nagar R (2016) Feasibility assessment for partial replacement of fine aggregate to attain cleaner production perspective in concrete: a review. J Clean Prod 135:490–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patra RK, Mukharjee BB (2017) Fresh and hardened properties of concrete incorporating ground granulated blast furnace slag—a review. AdvConcrConstr 4:283–303

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prusty JK, Patro SK, Basarkar SS (2016) Concrete using agro-waste as fine aggregate for sustainable built environment—a review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5:312–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh N, Mithulraj M, Arya S (2018) Influence of coal bottom ash as fine aggregates replacement on various properties of concretes: a review. ResourConservRecycl 138:257–271

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghannam S, Najm H, Vasconez R (2016) Experimental study of concrete made with granite and iron powders as partial replacement of sand. Sustain Mater Technol 9:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dash MK, Patro SK, Rath AK (2016) Sustainable use of industrial-waste as partial replacement of fine aggregate for preparation of concrete—a review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5:484–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Albayati A, Wang Y, Wang Y, Haynes J (2018) A sustainable pavement concrete using warm mix asphalt and hydrated lime treated recycled concrete aggregates. Sustain Mater Technol 18:e00081

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shaikh FUA, Hosan A (2019) Effect of nano silica on compressive strength and microstructures of high volume blast furnace slag and high volume blast furnace slag-fly ash blended pastes. Sustain Mater Technol 20:e00111

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elibol C, Sengul O (2016) Effects of activator properties and ferrochrome slag aggregates on the properties of alkali-activated blast furnace slag mortars. Arab J SciEng 41:1561–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Özcan A, Karakoç MB (2019) The resistance of blast furnace slag- and ferrochrome slag-based geopolymer concrete against acid attack. Int J CivEng 17:1571–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutt W, Nixon PJ (1979) Use of waste materials in the construction industry. MatériauxConstr 12:255–306

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma K, Kumar A (2020) Utilization of industrial waste—based geopolymers as a soil stabilizer—a review. InnovInfrastructSolut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00350-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ali TKM, Hilal N, Faraj RH, Al-Hadithi AI (2020) Properties of eco-friendly pervious concrete containing polystyrene aggregates reinforced with waste PET fibers. InnovInfrastructSolut. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00323-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zelić J (2005) Properties of concrete pavements prepared with ferrochromium slag as concrete aggregate. CemConcr Res 35:2340–2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prusty JK, Patro SK, Mohanty T (2018) Structural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams made with ferrochrome slag as coarse aggregate. KSCE J CivEng 22:696–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Panda CR, Mishra KK, Panda KC, Nayak BBD, Nayak BBD (2013) Environmental and technical assessment of ferrochrome slag as concrete aggregate material. Constr Build Mater 49:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Acharya PK, Patro SK (2016) Utilization of ferrochrome wastes such as ferrochrome ash and ferrochrome slag in concrete manufacturing. Waste Manag Res 34:764–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sathwik SR, Sanjith J, Sudhakar GN (2016) Development of high strength concrete using ferrochrome slag aggregate as replacement to coarse aggregate. Am J Eng Res 5:2320–2847

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dash MK, Patro SK (2018) Effects of water cooled ferrochrome slag as fine aggregate on the properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 177:457–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karakoç MB, Türkmen I, Maraş MM, Kantarci F, Demirboʇa R, UʇurToprak M (2014) Mechanical properties and setting time of ferrochrome slag based geopolymer paste and mortar. Constr Build Mater 72:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karakoç MB, Türkmen I, Maraş MM, Kantarci F, Demirboʇa R (2016) Sulfate resistance of ferrochrome slag based geopolymer concrete. Ceram Int 42:1254–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yaragal SC, Chethan Kumar B, Jitin C (2020) Durability studies on ferrochrome slag as coarse aggregate in sustainable alkali activated slag/fly ash based concretes. Sustain Mater Technol 23:e00137

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas BS (2018) Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material—a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 82:3913–3923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khan R, Jabbar A, Ahmad I, Khan W, Khan AN, Mirza J (2012) Reduction in environmental problems using rice-husk ash in concrete. Constr Build Mater 30:360–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Antiohos SK, Papadakis VG, Tsimas S (2014) Rice husk ash (RHA) effectiveness in cement and concrete as a function of reactive silica and fineness. CemConcr Res 61–62:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fapohunda C, Akinbile B, Shittu A (2017) Structure and properties of mortar and concrete with rice husk ash as partial replacement of ordinary Portland cement—a review. Int J Sustain Built Environ 6:675–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jaya RP, Bakar BHA, Johari MAM, Ibrahim MHW (2011) Strength and permeability properties of concrete containing rice husk ash with different grinding time. Cent Eur J Eng 1:103–112

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ponmalar V, Abraham RA (2015) Study on effect of natural and ground rice-husk ash concrete. KSCE J CivEng 19:1560–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fadele O, Otieno M (2019) Sustainable use of supplementary cementitious materials from agricultural wastes—a review. Sustain Constr Mater Technol 1:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Celik F, Canakci H (2015) An investigation of rheological properties of cement-based grout mixed with rice husk ash (RHA). Constr Build Mater 91:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Salas A, Delvasto S, de Gutierrez RM, Lange D (2009) Comparison of two processes for treating rice husk ash for use in high performance concrete. CemConcr Res 39:773–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Madandoust R, Ranjbar MM, Moghadam HA, Mousavi SY (2011) Mechanical properties and durability assessment of rice husk ash concrete. BiosystEng 110:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gastaldini ALG, Isaia GC, Gomes NS, Sperb JEK (2007) Chloride penetration and carbonation in concrete with rice husk ash and chemical activators. CemConcr Compos 29:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ganesan K, Rajagopal K, Thangavel K (2008) Rice husk ash blended cement: assessment of optimal level of replacement for strength and permeability properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 22:1675–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Saraswathy V, Song HW (2007) Corrosion performance of rice husk ash blended concrete. Constr Build Mater 21:1779–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Padhi RS, Patra RK, Mukharjee BB, Dey T (2018) Influence of incorporation of rice husk ash and coarse recycled concrete aggregates on properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 173:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chao-Lung H, Le A-T, Chun-Tsun C (2011) Effect of rice husk ash on the strength and durability characteristics of concrete. Constr Build Mater 25:3768–3772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chindaprasirt P, Kanchanda P, Sathonsaowaphak A, Cao HT (2007) Sulfate resistance of blended cements containing fly ash and rice husk ash. Constr Build Mater 21:1356–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. IS: 383 (2016) Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete—specification (third revision). Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  40. IS 2386 (Part I): 1963 (1963) Methods of test for aggregates for concrete: part I particle size and shape. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  41. IS 2386 (Part III): 1963 (1963) Methods of test for aggregates for concrete: part III specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and buckling. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  42. IS:2386 (Part IV): 1963 (1963) Methods of test for aggregates for concrete part IV mechanical properties. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  43. IS 4031 (Part 2): 1999 (1999) Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement part 2 determination of fineness by blaine air permeability method. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  44. IS 4031 (Part 4): 1988 (1988) Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement: part 4 determination of consistency of standard cement paste. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  45. IS 4031 (Part 5): 1988 (1988) Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement part 5 determination of initial and final setting times. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  46. IS 4031 (Part 6) : 1988 (1988) Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement: part 6 determination of compressive strength of hydraulic cement other than Masonary cement. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  47. IS 4031 (Part 11): 1988 (1988) Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement: part 11 determination of density. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  48. IS 10262: 2019 (2019) Concrete mix proportioning—guidelines. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  49. IS 7320: 1974 (1974) Specification for concrete slump test apparatus. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  50. IS 10500: 2012 (2012) Drinking water—specification. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  51. IS 516: 1959 (1959) Methods of tests for strength of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  52. IS 5816: 1999 (1999) Splitting tensile strength of concrete—method of test. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  53. ASTM C642-06 (2006) Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. Am. Soc. Test. Mater., West Conshohocken

  54. IS 13311 (Part1): 1992 (1992) Non-destructive testing of concrete—methods of test part 1 ultrasonic pulse velocity. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  55. IS 13311 (PART 2): 1992 (1992) Non-destructive testing of concrete—methods of test. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  56. Kou S-CCC, Poon C-SSS (2008) Mechanical properties of 5-year-old concrete prepared with recycled aggregates obtained from three different sources. Mag Concr Res 60:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. American Concrete Institute (2011) ACI Committee 318: building code requirements for structural concrete.

  58. C.E.-I. du Beton (1993) CEB-FIP model code 1990. Bull. d’Information

  59. IS 456 : 2000 (2000) Plain and reinforced concrete—code of practice. Bur. Indian Stand., Dehli

  60. EHE (1998) Spanish code for structural concrete EHE. Real Decreto 2661/1998, Madrid; [inSpanish] 704

  61. GB: 50010-2002. Chinese standard (2002) Code for design of concrete structures. China Build. Press, Beijing (In Chinese)

  62. NBR 6118 (2003) Design of concrete structures—procedure. Brazilian association Tech. Stand., Riode Janeiro

  63. Hueste MBD, Chompreda P, Trejo D, Cline DBH, Keating PB (2004) Mechanical properties of high-strength concrete for prestressed members. ACI Struct J 101:457–465

    Google Scholar 

  64. Xiao J, Li J, Zhang C (2005) Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. CemConcr Res 35:1187–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kumar Patra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, S., Patra, R.K. & Mukharjee, B.B. Feasibility study of utilisation of ferrochrome slag as fine aggregate and rice husk ash as cement replacement for developing sustainable concrete. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00461-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-021-00461-9

Keywords

Navigation