Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigating the use of no-dig technologies for underground utilities in developing countries

  • Case studies
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Major cities in most of the developing countries are becoming increasingly crowded. Conventional open-trench methods are expensive and lead to traffic disruption. The domestic government is looking at alternative approaches to install and rehabilitate aging underground utilities. The purpose of this study is to investigate the level of awareness and utilization of no-dig (i.e., trenchless technology) methods, the potential of their future growth, and their impact on social costs in a developing country. A survey was first conducted to investigate the use of trenchless technology methods in new construction and rehabilitation of infrastructure projects. The pertaining impact on social costs was then examined. Survey data were analyzed, and the potential of future growth of using trenchless technology methods was investigated. It has been found that “horizontal directional drilling” is the prevalent trenchless method used, while “robotic spot repair” is the least utilized one among all the methods used for new construction or rehabilitation of underground utilities. The results also revealed that using trenchless construction has a maximum impact on the “travel/traffic delay” type of social costs. The “horizontal directional drilling” method has the highest potential of future growth in new construction, while the “lining of pipe” was ranked first among rehabilitation methods. The data analysis results have also revealed that a critical social implication of using trenchless construction methods is their limited disruptions to the society when installing or rehabilitating underground utilities. Such social disruptions include road closures, traffic delays, and detours resulting in noise and loss of access to homes/businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Export.gov: United Arab Emirates Country Commercial Guide (2017). https://www.export.gov/article?id=United-Arab-Emirates-Construction. Accessed 24 July 2017

  2. Lookup.ae (2017) UAE construction spending. https://lookup.ae/news/9081/uae-construction-spending-up-63-in-2017-to-805-billion. Accessed 1 Nov 2017

  3. BIE: Expo 2020 Dubai (2017) Paris: Bureau International des Expositions. http://www.bie-paris.org/site/en/2020-dubai. Accessed 23 Oct 2017

  4. Gulf Business (2017). http://gulfbusiness.com/dewa-launches-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-power-project/. Accessed 24 July 2017

  5. Jamil M, Ahmad F, Jeon YJ (2016) Renewable energy technologies adopted by the UAE: prospects and challenges—a comprehensive overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1181–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arabian Business (2016). http://www.arabianbusiness.com/dubai-scores-89-on-happiness-index-for-government-services-633287.html. Accessed 24 July 2017

  7. Zayed T, Mahmoud M (2013) Data acquisition and factors impacting productivity of Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD). J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 33:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan X, Ariaratnam ST, Dong S, Zeng C (2018) Horizontal directional drilling: state-of-the-art review of theory and applications. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 72:162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zaneldin EK (2007) Trenchless construction: an emerging technology in United Arab Emirates. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 22:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ariaratnam ST, Lueke JS, Allouche EN (1999) Utilization of trenchless construction methods by Canadian municipalities. J Constr Eng Manag 125(2):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Balasubramaniam BK (2004) Twenty years of micro-tunnelling in Singapore. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 19(4–5):360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rogers CDF (2014) The evolution of international trenchless technology research coordination and dissemination. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 39:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zayed T, Salman Alaa, Basha Ismail (2011) The impact on environment of underground infrastructure utility work. Struct Infrastruct Eng 7(3):199–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802445310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Willis H, Schrieber R (2013) Aging power delivery infrastructures. 2nd ed. In: Power engineering (willis). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. Accessed 23 Dec 2019

  15. Shahata K, Zayed T (2012) Data acquisition and analysis for water main rehabilitation techniques. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(11):1054–1066. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.502179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bergeson W (2014) Review of long drive microtunnelling technology for use on large scale projects. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 39:66–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ammar MA, Moselhi O, Zayed TM (2012) Decision support model for selection of rehabilitation methods of water mains. Struct Infrastruct Eng 8(9):847–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2010.497539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ariaratnam ST, Lueke JS, Michael JK (2014) Current trends in pipe bursting for renewal of underground infrastructure systems in North America. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 39:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simicevic J, Sterling RL (2001) Guidelines for pipe bursting, US Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Research and Development Center, Trenchless Technology Center Report, Ruston, LA

  20. Bennett D, Ariaratnam ST, Wallin K (2011) Pipe bursting good practices. NASTT, Liverpool, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rameil M (2007) Handbook of pipe bursting pratice: [pipe bursting terms and application range; host pipe and new pipe materials; planning and design guidelines; pipe bursting equipment and accessories; jobsite reports]. Vulkan-Ve, Essen

  22. Shahata K, Zayed T (2013) Simulation-based life cycle cost modeling and maintenance plan for water mains. Struct Infrastruct Eng 9(5):403–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.552509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tomczak E, Zielinska A (2017) Example of sewerage system rehabilitation using trenchless technology. Ecol Chem Eng 24(3):405–416

    Google Scholar 

  24. Carlin M, Ariaratnam ST (2018) Comparative analysis of horizontal directional drilling pipeline practices in China vs. United States. J Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 72:174–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerasimova V (2016) Underground engineering and trenchless technologies at the defense of environment. Proc Eng 165:1395–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Matthews JC, Allouche EN, Sterling RL (2015) Social cost impact assessment of pipeline infrastructure projects. J Environ Impact Assess Rev 50:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Çelik T, Kamali S, Arayici Y (2017) Social cost in construction projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev 64:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Apeldoorn S (2013) Trenchless versus traditional - comparing costs: SASTT. IMIESA 38:55–57

    Google Scholar 

  29. Harris F, McCaffer R, Edum-Fotwe F (2013) Modern construction management. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tanwani R (2012) Social costs of traditional construction methods. https://gundacorp.com/social-costs-of-traditional-construction-methods/. Accessed 4 Feb 2020

  31. Rahman S, Vanier DJ, Newton LA (2005) MIIP report: social cost considerations for municipal infrastructure management. NRC Publications Archive, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  32. Allouche EN, Ariaratnam ST, Abourizk SM (2000) Multi-dimensional utility model for selection of a trenchless construction method. In: Construction congress VI: building together for a better tomorrow in an increasingly complex world. ASCE, Reston, VA, pp 543–553

  33. Field BC (1997) Environmental economics: an introduction, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. McKim RA (1997) Bidding strategies for conventional and trenchless technologies considering social costs. Can J Civil Eng 24(40):819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang R (2011) Autos, transit and bicycles: comparing the costs in large Chinese cities. Transp Policy 18(1):139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yuan Q-M, Cui D-J, Jiang W (2013) Study on evaluation methods of the social cost of green building projects. In: Jun W, Yanbin L, Jinfeng W, Fouad RH (eds) Advances in industrial engineering, information and water resources. WIT Press, Southampton

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zaneldin E, Ahmed W, El-Ariss B (2019) Video-based e-learning for an undergraduate engineering course. E-Learn Digit Media 16(6):475–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019870938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Waris M, Liew MS, Khamidi MF, Idrus A (2014) Criteria for the selection of sustainable onsite construction equipment. Int J Sustain Built Environ 3(1):96–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. GMI Blogger: United Arab Emirates Population Statistics (2018). https://www.globalmediainsight.com/blog/uae-populationstatistics/#population_by_cities. Accessed 4 Feb 2020

  40. Holt G (2014) Asking questions, analysing answers: relative importance revisited. J Constr Innov 14(1):2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zaneldin EK (2018) Investigating the types, causes and severity of claims in construction projects in the UAE. Int J Constr Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1484863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bolarinawa O (2015) Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J 22(4):195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAEU, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Essam Zaneldin

  2. Architectural Engineering, UAEU, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Omar Al Khatib

  3. Engineering Requirements Unit, UAEU, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE

    Waleed Ahmed

Authors
  1. Essam Zaneldin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Omar Al Khatib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Waleed Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Essam Zaneldin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zaneldin, E., Al Khatib, O. & Ahmed, W. Investigating the use of no-dig technologies for underground utilities in developing countries. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0265-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-0265-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation