Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comprehensive mechanical earth modeling using well data

  • State-of-the-art paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanical earth model is a numerical representation of the stress state, pore pressure and rock mechanical properties. While the different parameters in the MEM are interconnected in various ways, they fundamentally stem from the same basic set of log measurements. This paper demonstrates a scientific workflow to build a comprehensive well-centric MEM for a well in a carbonate reservoir in Persian Gulf and calibrate it via utilizing the existing data including LOT, MDT, drilling incidents, etc., to minimize the uncertainties related to data limitations. Finally, the calibrated MEM was used for sensitivity analysis of various wellbore trajectories and mud weight/pressure window for planning future wells and safe drilling in this underdevelopment field. Poroelastic modeling along with rigorous calibration indicates strike slip toward normal faulting stress regime. Also, shear wave anisotropy analysis results in N40E orientation for the maximum horizontal stress. The optimum mud weight for safe drilling was found to be 120 pcf for Gachsaran Formation, 105 pcf for all the formations from Asmari to Kazhdumi limestone and 85 pcf for all the formations from Yamama to total depth. On this basis, it is recommended to put the casing shoes at the base of Gachsaran, Kazhdumi limestone and final depth. The results recommend planning the future wells horizontally in the NE–SW direction for formations having SS stress regime and wells near vertically in formations having NF stress regime. Besides, the drilling safe mud window resulting from Mogi–Coulomb failure criterion is broader, while the Mohr–Coulomb is more limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang L, Cao P, Radha K (2010) Evaluation of rock strength criteria for wellbore stability analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(8):1304–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Karakus M, Perez S (2014) Acoustic emission analysis for rock–bit interactions in impregnated diamond core drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 68:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khosravanian R, Aadnoy BS (2016) Optimization of casing string placement in the presence of geological uncertainty in oil wells: offshore oilfield case studies. J Petrol Sci Eng 142:141–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boutt D, Cook B, Williams J (2011) A coupled fluid–solid model for problems in geomechanics: application to sand production. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 35(9):997–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sayers CM, Schutjens PMTM (2007) Introduction to geomechanics. Lead Edge 26(5):582–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman HE, Connolly P (2007) Reconciling subsurface uncertainty with the appropriate well design using the mechanical earth model (MEM) approach. Lead Edge 26:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang H, Sweatman R, Engelman B, Deeg W, Whitfill D, Soliman M, Towler BF (2008) Best practice in understanding and managing lost circulation challenges. J SPE Drill Complet 23(2):168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Plumb R, Edwards S, Pidcock G, Lee D, Stacey B (2000) The mechanical earth model concept and its application to high-risk well construction projects. In: IADC/SPE 59128 drilling conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

  9. Elyasi A, Goshtasbi K, Naeimipour A (2013) Numerical assessment of the mechanical stability in vertical, directional and horizontal wellbores. Int J Min Sci Technol 23:937–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou D, Zheng P, He P, Peng J (2016) Hydraulic fracture propagation direction during volume fracturing in unconventional reservoirs. J Petrol Sci Eng 141:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halliburton (2016) Reduce non-productive time (NPT). http://www.halliburton.com/en-US/ps/solutions/deepwater/challenges-solutions/reduce-non-productive-time.page?node-id=hgjyd452&Topic=DeepwaterWestAfrica. Checked on 11/18/2016

  12. Schlumberger (2016) Real-time drilling geomechanics. http://www.slb.com/~/media/Files/dcs/product_sheets/geomechanics/geomechanics_rt_ps.pdf. Checked on 11/18/2016

  13. Wiprut D, Zoback M (2000) Constraining the stress tensor in the Visund field, Norwegian North Sea: application to wellbore stability and sand production. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:317–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang C, Zoback MD, Khaksar A (2006) Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks. J Pet Sci Eng 51(3–4):223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang J, Lang J, Standifird W (2009) Stress, porosity, and failure-dependent compressional and shear velocity ratio and its application to wellbore stability. J Pet Sci Eng 69(3/4):193–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Charlez PS, Onaisi A (2001) Wellbore stability: one of the most important engineering challenges when drilling smart wells in interactive drilling for fast track oilfield development. In: Lecourtier J (ed) TECHNIP, pp 77–102

  17. Maleki S, Gholami R, Rasouli V, Moradzadeh A, Ghvami R, Sadeghzadeh F (2014) Comparison of different failure criteria in prediction of safe mud weigh window in drilling practice. Earth Sci 136:36–58

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rajabi M, Tingay M, Heidbach O, Hillis R, Reynolds S (2017) The present-day stress field of Australia. Earth Sci Rev 168:165–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chardac O, Murray D, Carnegie A, Marsden R (2005) A proposed data acquisition program for successful geomechanics projects, SPE 93182

  20. Ali AHA, Brown T, Delgado R, Lee D, Plumb D, Smirnov N, Marsden R, Prado-Velarde E, Ramsey L, Spooner D (2003) Watching rocks change-mechanical earth modeling. Oilfield Rev 15(1):22–39

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fjaer E, Holt RM, Horsrud P, Raaen AM, Risnes R (2008) Petroleum related rock mechanics, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ameen MS, Smart BGD, Somerville JMC, Hammilton S, Naji NA (2009) Predicting rock mechanical properties of carbonates from wireline logs (a case study: Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia). Mar Pet Geol 26(4):430–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Z (2001) Dynamic versus static elastic properties of reservoir rocks. In: Wang Z, Nur A (eds) Seismic and acoustic velocities in reservoir rocks, vol 3, pp 531–539 ibUnstructured>

  24. Militzer H, Stoll R (1973) Einige Beitraege der Geophysik zur primaerdatenerfassung im Bergbau. Neue Bergbautechnik, Leipzig 3(1):21–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gholami R, Moradzadeh A, Rasouli V, Hanachi J (2014) Practical application of failure criteria in determining safe mud weight windows in drilling operations. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang J (2011) Pore pressure prediction from well logs: methods, modifications, and new approaches. Earth Sci Rev 108:50–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eaton BA (1975) The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. Society of Petroleum 748 Engineers of AIME, paper SPE 5544

  28. Hottmann C, Johnson R (1965) Estimation of formation pressures from log-derived shale properties. J Petrol Technol 17(6):717–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Matthews W, Kelly J (1967) How to predict formation pressure and fracture gradient. Oil Gas J 65(8):92–106

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gardner GHF, Gardner LW, Gregory AR (1974) Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps. Geophysics 39:770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bowers GL (1995) Pore pressure estimation from velocity data: accounting for overpressure mechanisms besides under compaction. SPE Drill Complet 10(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zang A, Stephansson O (2010) Stress field of the earth’s crust. Springer, Amsterdam

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Ostadhassan M, Zeng Z, Zamiran S (2012) Geomechanical modeling of an anisotropic formation-Bakken case study. In: 46th US Rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association

  34. Kidambi T, Kumar GS (2016) Mechanical Earth Modeling for a vertical well drilled in a naturally fractured tight carbonate gas reservoir in the Persian Gulf. J Petrol Sci Eng 141:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author expresses his gratitude to National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) for sharing their practical data with me during the course of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mining Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

    Alireza Noohnejad & Kaveh Ahangari

  2. Department of Mining Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

    Kamran Goshtasbi

Authors
  1. Alireza Noohnejad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kaveh Ahangari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kamran Goshtasbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaveh Ahangari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noohnejad, A., Ahangari, K. & Goshtasbi, K. Comprehensive mechanical earth modeling using well data. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 6, 9 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00369-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00369-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation