Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of risk management on business performance: case of Algerian construction organizations

  • State-of-the-art paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to present a new model, based on a systemic approach, to analyze the different relationships that may exist between the risk, its management and the performance of the construction companies. Moreover, the process approach used is based first on the classification of different risks in building sector, which are then transferred to the process defined by four main activities of risk management system (RMS), namely identification, analysis, assessment and treatment of risks. In addition, external and internal functional analyses of the RMS using the application of business techniques called APTE method were conducted to describe the process that will link the types of risks to the performance of building companies. The latter is measured according to four perspectives: financial, customers, internal business process, and learning and growth. Hypotheses put in place will be tested, empirically, using a questionnaire to be distributed to customers of our system, the CEO and employees of the construction companies. Finally, the proposed model will provide a new vision on the implementation of RM in Algerian construction companies to manage risks, not only to seize the profit but also to remain competitive and survive in an increasingly dynamic world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdou OA (1996) Managing construction risks. J Archit Eng 2(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(1996)2:1(3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed A, Kayis B, Amornsawadwatana S (2007) A review of techniques for risk management in projects. Benchmark Int J 14(1):22–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770710730919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed Zaid M, Chertouk Z (2011) Contribution performance financière et performance sociale dans les entreprises publiques algériennes. Universidad polytecnica de Valencia, pp 1–15

  4. Akintoye AS, MacLeod MJ (1997) Risk analysis and management in construction. Int J Proj Manag 15(1):31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(96)00035-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amit E, Dutta B, Kolhatkar MJ (2014) Study of risk management in construction projects. Int J Manag 5(6):976–6502

    Google Scholar 

  6. Angappa G, Zahir I, King-Lun C, Lionel F, Thanos P (2015) Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: a review for research and applications. Int J Prod Econ 161(0925–5273):153–166

    Google Scholar 

  7. Antonio B, Gaudenzi B (2013) Risk management. Events Manag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2531-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Assaf SA, Al-Hejji S (2006) Causes of delay in large construction projects. Int J Proj Manag 24(4):349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baaziz A, Khelil M (2006) Balanced scorecard et Pilotage de la performance : Cas de la Division Forage. In: Journées Scientifiques et Techniques de Sonatrach JST’7, p 11

  10. Bassioni, Price, Hassan (2005) Building a conceptual framework for measuring business performance in construction: an empirical evaluation. Constr Manag Econ 23(5):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Berkeley D, Humphreys PC, Thomas RD (1991) Project risk action management. Constr Manag Econ 9(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446199100000002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Breysse D, Chaplain M, Jabbour PF (2009) Identification des risques pour les projets de construction: revue des pratiques internationales et propositions Abstract: 19ème Congrès Français de Mécanique, pp 1–10

  13. Chan Toong K (2009) Measuring performance of the Malaysian construction industry. Constr Manag Econ 27:1231–1244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190903233137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman RJ (2001) The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management. Int Proj Manag 19:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen LE (2007) Linking knowledge management to organisational business performance in construction. Griffith University Gold Coast Campus, Southport

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cooper DF, Stephen G, Geoffrey R, Phil Walker Gopal M (2005) Project risk management guidelines. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.01.006

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Dwight R (1999) Searching for real maintenance performance measures. J Qual Maint Eng 5(3):258–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552519910282728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Farina L, Danesi E, Travaglini A, Mancini M, Trucco P (2018) Integration of constructability and project risk management. Manag Ind Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58409-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Flanagan R, Norman G (1993) Risk management and construction. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gajewska E, Ropel M (2011) Risk management practices in a construction project—a case study. Publ Libr Chalmers Univ Technol. https://doi.org/10.2469/cp.v1999.n3.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gamil Y, Rahman AI (2017) Identification of causes and effects of poor communication in construction industry: a theoretical review. Emerg Sci J 1(4):239–247. https://doi.org/10.28991/ijse-01121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grüning M (2002) Performance-measurement-systeme—Messung und Steuerung von Unternehmensleistung (illustrée). Dissertation. Springer, Berlin

  23. Hamzaoui F (2015) Management des risques dans la construction dans l’environnement algérien : Intégration de la méthodologie RBS dans l’approche par le REX. Aboubekr Belkaid, Tlemcen

    Google Scholar 

  24. ISO/CEI Guide 73 (2009) Management du risque—Vocabulaire

  25. Ittner CD, Larcker DF (1998) Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. J Acc Res 36:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jafari M, Chadegani AA, Biglari V (2011) Effective risk management and company’s performance: investment in innovations and intellectual capital using behavioral and practical approach. J Econ Int Financ 3(15):780–786. https://doi.org/10.5897/JEIF11.123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kagioglou M, Cooper R, Aouad G (2001) Performance management in construction: a conceptual framework. Constr Manag Econ 19(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1996) The balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press

  29. Kherbouche A, Megnounif A (2016) A new model for the impact of knowledge management on university performance. J Inf Knowl Manag 15(4):29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649216500416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kopecká N (2018) A literature review of financial performance measures and value relevance. Springer Proc Bus Econ. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68762-9_42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kot S, Dragon P (2015) Business risk management in international corporations. Procedia Econ Financ 27(15):102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00978-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lehtiranta L (2011) Relational risk management in construction projects: modeling the complexity. Leadersh Manag Eng 11(2):141–154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lichtenstein S (1996) Factors in the selection of a risk assessment method. Inf Manag Comput Secur 4(4):20–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/09685229610130503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lingle J, Schiemann WA (1996) From balanced scorecard to strategic gauges: is measurement worth it? Am Manag Assoc Manag Rev 85(3):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  35. Liu J, Li B, Lin B, Nguyen V (2007) Key issues and challenges of risk management and insurance in China’s construction industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 107(3):382–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570710734280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lmoussaoui H, Jamouli H (2015) A new method for Project risk identification: case study of a real construction project. Int J Enhanc Res Manag Comput Appl 4(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lyons T, Skitmore M (2004) Project risk management in the Queensland Engineering Construction Industry: a survey. Int J Proj Manag 22(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mazouni M (2008) Thèse Pour une Meilleure Approche du Management des Risques, Nancy

  39. Megnounif A, Kara Zaitri D (2010) Résumé. In: L’approche systémique et l’analyse des risques. Cas des systèmes hydrauliques de la wilaya de Tlemcen, p 10

  40. Mehdizadeh R (2012) Dynamic and multi-perspective risk management of construction projects using tailor-made Risk Breakdown Structures. PhD Thesis. Université Bordeaux 1

  41. Mohammed HK, Knapkova A (2016) The impact of total risk management on company’s performance. Proc Soc Behav Sci 220:271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Neely A, Gregory M, Platts K (2005) Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25(12):1228–1263. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. NF ISO 31000 (2010) Management du risque Principes et lignes directrices, p 33

  44. Nieto-Morote A, Ruz-Vila F (2011) A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment. Int J Proj Manag 29(2):220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nnadi EOE, Enebe EC, Ugwu OO (2018) Evaluating the awareness level of risk management amongst construction stakeholders in Nigeria. Int J Constr Eng Manag 7(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijcem.20180701.05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nudurupati S, Arshad T, Turner T (2007) Performance measurement in the construction industry: an action case investigating manufacturing methodologies. Comput Ind 58(2007):667–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2007.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Pagach D, Warr R (2011) The characteristics of firms that hire chief risk officers. J Risk Insur 78(1):185–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/23019543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Perry J, Hayes R (1985) Risk and its management in construction projects. Proc Inst Civ Eng 78(3):499–521. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1985.859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Potts K (2008) Construction cost management: learning from case studies. Taylor and Francis, Abington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Project Management Institute (2008) Guide Du Corpus Des Connaissances En Management De Projet. www.pmi.org

  51. Rad PF, Levin G (2002) The advanced project management office: a comprehensive look at function and implementation. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Renaud A, Berland N (2007) Mesure de la performance globale des entreprises. 28Ème Congrès, pp 1–23

  53. Renuka SM, Umarani C, Kamal S (2014) A review on critical risk factors in the life cycle of construction projects. J Civ Eng Res 4(2A):31–36. https://doi.org/10.5923/c.jce.201401.07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Rezakhani P (2012) Classifying key risk factors in construction. Buletinul Institutului Politehnic Din Iaşi 2(LXII):12

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rolstadas A (1998) Enterprise performance measurement. Int J Oper Prod Manag 18(9/10):989–999. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579810225577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. El Sayegh SM (2014) Project risk management practices in the UAE construction industry. Int J Proj Organ Manag 6(1/2):121. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPOM.2014.059748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Serpell A, Ferrada X, Rubio L, Arauzo S (2015) Evaluating risk management practices in construction organizations. Proc Soc Behav Sci 194:201–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shen LY, Wu GWC, Ng CSK (2001) Risk assessment for construction joint ventures in China. J Constr Eng Manag 172(1):76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Shendage N (2016) A survey on risk assessment and management in construction project. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 5(12):20927–20932

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sohrabinejad A, Rahimi M (2015) Risk determination, prioritization, and classifying in construction project case study: Gharb Tehran commercial-administrative complex. J Constr Eng 2015:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/203468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sorrill CM, Cooper D, Chapman C (1987) Risk analysis for large projects: models, methods and cases. J Oper Res Soc 38(12):1217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2582754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tah JHM, Carr V (2000) A proposal for construction project risk assessment using fuzzy logic. Constr Manag Econ 18(4):491–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190050024905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Taillandier F (2009) La notion de risque comme clef du pilotage d’un parc patrimonial immobilier. Université de Savoie. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00427702

  64. Tam VWY, Shen LY (2012) Risk management for contractors in marine projects. Organ Technol Manag Constr Int J 2007:403–410. https://doi.org/10.5592/otmcj.2012.1.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Tummala VMR, Burchett JF (1999) Applying a risk management process (RMP) to manage cost risk for an EHV transmission line project. Int J Proj Manag 17:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Violante A, Dominguez C, Paiva A (2018) Risk management in construction projects: Are small companies prepared? MOJ Civ Eng 4(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojce.2018.04.00090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ward S, Chapman C (2003) Project risk management—processes, techniques and insights. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wiguna IPA, Scott S (2005) Nature of the critical risk factors affecting project performance in Indonesian building contracts. In: 21st Annual ARCOM conference, 1(September), pp 7–9

  69. Winch GM (2002) Managing construction project, an information processing approach. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wysocki RK (2004) Project management process improvement. Artech House, Norwood

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yadav N (2017) Performance management and measurement in HR and payroll. Int J Manag 8(6):76–80

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yang C, Chuang S, Huang R (2009) Expert systems with applications manufacturing evaluation system based on AHP/ANP approach for wafer fabricating industry. Expert Syst Appl 36:11369–11371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Žaneta Ilmete O, Juris Binde O, Borzovs J, Brūna I, EDorrenberg F, Jerzy Kisielnicki I, Sloka B (2014) Scientific Committee—Editorial Board Project Management Development—practice and perspectives. In: Conference proceedings. Riga

  74. Zeng J, An M, John Smith N (2007) Application of a fuzzy based decision making methodology to construction project risk assessment. Int J Proj Manag 25(6):589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Zou PXW, Zhang G (2009) Managing risks in construction projects: life cycle and stakeholder perspectives. Int J Constr Manag 9(1):61–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2009.10773122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Zulqarnain I (2014) Risk management in civil engineering projects. Research Gate

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abla Narimene Baba Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baba Ahmed, A.N., Megnounif, A. The impact of risk management on business performance: case of Algerian construction organizations. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 102 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00354-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00354-3

Keywords

Navigation