Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental investigations on potential of brick-based building-derived materials for geotechnical applications

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A large quantity of solid waste, known as construction and demolition waste (CDW), are being generated by the construction activities and its associated demolition practices. Huge proportion of CDW is comprised of building-derived materials (BDM) that come from the demolition of buildings which include brick and concrete—based elements. The present study was aimed at characterization of brick-based building-derived materials (BBDM) to encourage by reusing and recycling them in practical purposes. Currently, BDM find its application as recycled aggregates, and extraction of the antecedent aggregates from virgin BDM by various physical and chemicals processes increases the cost. To address this issue, this study accentuates the use of BDM to provide significant cost reduction, which besides reduces the impact on landfills, preserves natural coarse aggregates and saves energy. BBDM were characterized through a series of physical and microscopic investigations to assess their compatibility for using in combination with local soil and even exposed to a very aggressive chemical environment like acids, salts and seawater to study their response. Grain size analysis, compaction characteristics, water absorption, abrasion and strength tests were performed on locally available sand mixed with 5, 10, 20 and 30% of BBDM by weight in a chemically aggressive environment. Aggregate impact value (AIV) of 41% and Los Angeles (LA) abrasion value of 45.8% indicate that the BBDM are resistant to impact loads and satisfy the prerequisites of a subbase material. The angle of shearing resistance (ϕ) of virgin BBDM is 46°, and it is found to decrease with exposure to the chemicals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. USEPA (2015) Lifecycle challenge competition seeks new ideas to reduce construction and demolition debris. http://www3.epa.gov/region9/waste/solid/construction. Accessed on February 02, 2017

  2. Meyer C (2004) Concrete materials and sustainable development in the USA. Struct Eng Int 14(3):203–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Victoria S (2005) Annual survey of Victorian recycling industries 2004–2005:1–28

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Ali YMM, Bo MW (2012) Geotechnical properties of recycled concrete aggregate in pavement sub-base applications. Geotech Test J 35(5):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Poon CS, Chan D (2006) Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Constr Build Mater 20:578–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The Hindu, construction waste recycling plants soon (2017) http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-telangana/work-on-recycling-plants-to-start-soon/article20007457.ece. Accessed on 9 Nov 2017

  7. Rao A, Jha KN, Misra S (2007) Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resour Conserv Recycl 50(1):71–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Melton JS (2015) recycled base aggregates in pavement applications—part III of VI (AWI051611). Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Webinar hosted by ASCE. 24 July 2015

  9. Zuquan J, Wei S, Yunsheng Z, Jinyang J, Jianzhong L (2007) Interaction between sulfate and chloride solution attack of concretes with and without fly ash. Cem Concr Res 37(8):1223–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edil TB (2015) Tire derived aggregate in geotechnical and environmental applications—part V of VI (AWI062811), Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Webinar hosted by ASCE. 24 July

  11. Lee JH, Salgado R, Bernal A, Lovell CW (1999) Shredded tires and rubber-sand as light weight backfill. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 125(2):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Suluguru AK, Kar SS, GuhaRay A, Jayatheja M (2019) Experimental investigations on building derived materials in chemically aggressive environment as a partial replacement of soil in geotechnical applications. Gotech Geol Eng 37(2):947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 (2017) Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  14. ASTM D854-14 (214) Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  15. ASTM C127-15 (2015) Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  16. ASTM D698-12e2 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  17. ASTM D3080/D3080M-11 (2011) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  18. ASTM C131/C131M-14 (2006) Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  19. Fang S, Zhang K, Zhang H, Zhang B (2015) A study of traditional blood lime mortar for restoration of ancient buildings. Cem Concr Res 76:232–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kupwade-Patil K, Allouche E (2011) Effect of alkali silica reaction (ASR) in geopolymer concrete. World of Coal Ash (WOCA) Conference, May 9–12, 2011, Devnver, CO, USA

  21. Kar A, Ray I, Halabe UB, Unnikrishnan A, Dawson-Andoh B (2014) Characterizations and estimation of alkali activated binder paste from microstructures. Int J Concrete Struct Mater 8(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mindess S, Young JF, Darwin D (2003) Concrete. Prentice Hall, Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sadrekarimi A, Olson SM (2009) Shear band formation observed in ring shear tests on sandy soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(2):366–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Suluguru AK, Jayatheja M, Kar A, GuhaRay A, Surana SR, James N (2017) Experimental studies on the microstructural, physical and chemical characteristics of building derived materials to assess their suitability in ground improvement. Constr Build Mater 156:921–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Graziani L, Quagliarini E, Bondioli F, D’Orazio M (2014) Durability of self-cleaning TiO2 coatings on fired clay brick façades: effects of UV exposure and wet & dry cycles. Build Environ 71:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar Suluguru.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author would like to thank Dr. Arkamitra Kar and Dr. Anasua Guha Ray for their continuous support. The author would like to thank the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Govt. of India for supporting the present study through the Early Career Research Award. The author is grateful to BITS-Pilani, Hyderabad campus for providing the materials and the laboratory setup required to conduct the experiments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suluguru, A.K. Experimental investigations on potential of brick-based building-derived materials for geotechnical applications. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00336-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00336-5

Keywords

Navigation