Advertisement

The first William Selim Hanna honor lecture from failure to success: lessons from geotechnical failures

  • Sherif W. Agaiby
  • Abdelsalam M. Salem
  • Sayed M. AhmedEmail author
Technical Paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection from GeoMEast 2017 – Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology

Abstract

An engineering failure may be defined as an unforeseen, substandard, performance of an engineered element. It can materialize in the forms of a catastrophic incident or just as a slight functional shortcoming. Failures are not all evil despite our natural aversion to encounter them. In fact, they are both our greatest enemy and, ironically, our foremost educator. Our ancestors who worked as “geotechnical engineers” based their design on experiences gained from failures. This is still the case until now despite the technological advances made by humankind especially in engineering. Unfortunate incidents of failures still happen and they coach us on how to design our buildings. Structures continuously tend to become heavier, bigger, and taller. Indeed, the odds of failures increase as we cross the limits of our engineering knowledge every day. Experts commonly disagree about the nature of failures due to their extreme complexities. Comprehending the causes of failures is one of the most difficult tasks for engineers. A special branch of integrated engineering studies that comprises sophisticated analyses has been established to study failures; Forensic Engineering. In this paper, different aspects of geotechnical failures, including their common causes, are highlighted. Some well-documented geotechnical failures are briefly described and lessons learnt from these failures are revisited with an emphasis on prevention measures of possible failures.

Keywords

Geotechnical failures Cost of failures Causes of failures Prevention of failures 

References

  1. 1.
    Agaiby SW, Ahmed SM (2016) Learning from failures: a geotechnical perspective. In: International conference on forensic civil engineering, Nagpur, India. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3616.3602
  2. 2.
    Agaiby SW, El-Ghamrawy MK, Ahmed SM (2013) Learning from the past: the ancient Egyptians and geotechnical engineering. In: Rao VVS (ed) 4th international seminar on forensic geotechnical engineering, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, pp 38–69Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baynes FJ (2010) Sources of geotechnical risk. Quart J Eng Geol Hydrogeol Geol Soc Lond 43(3):321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bea R (2006) Reliability and human factors in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 132(5):631–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Beer EE (1965) The scale effect on the phenomenon of progressive rupture in cohesionless soils. In: 6th International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Montreal, Canada, pp 13–17Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bond A, Harris A (2008) Decoding Eurocode 7. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bowers NA (1928) St. Francis dam catastrophe—a great foundation failure. Eng News Rec 100(12):466–472Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brandl H (2004) The civil and geotechnical engineer in society—ethical and philosophical thoughts. DFI Vancouver 2004, Deep Foundations Institute, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brinded M (2000) Perception vs analysis: how to handle risk. Royal Academy of Engineering, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burland JB, Jamiolkowski M, Viggiani C (1998) Stabilising the leaning tower of Pisa. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57(1):91–99 (Springer) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burland JB, Jamiolkowski M, Viggiani C (2003) The stabilisation of the leaning tower of Pisa. Soils Found Jpn Geotech Soc 43(5):63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burland JB, Jamiolkowski M, Viggiani C (2009) Leaning tower of Pisa: behaviour after stabilization Operations. Int J Geoeng Case Hist 1(3). http://casehistories.geoengineer.org
  13. 13.
    Cerato AB, Lutenegger AJ (2007) Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 133(10):1192–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chapman TJP, Van Staveren M, Stacey TR, Hellings JE (2007) Ground risk mitigation by better geotechnical design and construction management. In: ISGSR2007 first international symposium on geotechnical safety and risk, Shanghai Tongji University, Shanghai, China, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clayton CRI (2001) Managing geotechnical risk: improving productivity in UK building and construction. Thomas Telford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corral G, Whittle AJ (2010) Re-analysis of deep excavation collapse using a generalized effective stress soil model. In: Earth retention conference 3, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 720–731Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    David E (2011) Systemic causes for failure of geotechnical works around the world. http://www.imia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/EP45-2011-Systemic-Causes-in-Geotechnical-Works.pdf. Accessed Mar 2017
  18. 18.
    Day RW (2011) Forensic geotechnical and foundation engineering, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duncan JMM (2000) Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 126(4):307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fellenius BH (1980) The analysis of results from routine pile load tests. Ground Eng 13(6):19–31Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frank R (2004) Designers’ guide to EN 1997–1 Eurocode 7: geotechnical design: general rules. Thomas Telford, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fukuoka M (1966) Damage to civil engineering structures. Soils Found Jpn Geotech Soc 6(2):45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goldsworthy JS, Jaksa MB, Kaggwa WS, Fenton GA, Griffiths DV, Poulos HG (2004) Cost of foundation failures due to limited site investigations. In: The international conference on structural and foundation failures, Singapore, pp 2–4Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goodman RE (1999) Karl Tersaghi: the engineer as artist, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). doi: 10.1061/9780784403648
  25. 25.
    Gregersen O (1981) The quick clay landslide in Rissa, Norway. Norw Geotech Inst Publ 135:1–6Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grunsky CE, Grunsky EL (1928) St. Francis Dam failure. West Constr News 3(25):314–323Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gue SS, Tan YC (2004) Prevention of failures related to geotechnical works on soft ground. In: Special lecture, Malaysian geotechnical conference, pp 16–18Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hanna WS (1936a) Exploration of soil conditions and sampling operations, In: International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp 10–11Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hanna WS (1936b) Regional soil studies for engineering purposes. In: international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp 23–24Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hanna WS (1948) Soil mechanics and soil conditions in Egypt. Géotechnique 1(2):90–97 (Thomas Telford Ltd) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hanna WS (1950) Settlement studies in Egypt. Géotechnique 2(1):33–45 (Thomas Telford Ltd) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanna WS (1953) Settlements of buildings on preconsolidated clay layers. In: 3rd International conference on soil mechanics, vol. 1, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hanna WS, Tschebotareff G (1936) Settlement observations of buildings in Egypt. In: International conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 1, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, pp 71–77Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hansen B, Christensen NH, Karafiath LL (1969) Discussion of theoretical bearing capacity of very shallow footings. J Soil Mech Found Div 95(SM6):1568–1573Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(8):1165–1186 (Elsevier) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hoek E, Palmeiri A (1998) Geotechnical risks on large civil engineering projects. In: Keynote address for theme I—International Association of Engineering Geologists Congress, Vancouver, Canada, September 21–25, 1998, p 12Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hunt RE (2005) Geotechnical engineering investigation handbook, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    ICE (1993) Site Investigation steering group—without site investigation, ground is a hazard. Institute of Civil Engineers, Thomas Telford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ishihara K (2011) Collapse of braced excavation in Singapore. In: International symposium on backward problems in geotechnical engineering and monitoring of geo-construction, Osaka, Japan, pp 35–50Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Pearson Education, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kruger J, Dunning D (1999) Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol Am Psychol Assoc 77(6):1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kulhawy FH, Hirany A (1997) What is foundation failure? Foundation engineering in the face of uncertainty: honoring Fred H. Kulhawy, pp 91–97Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lacasse S (2016) Forensic geotechnical engineering theory and practice. In: Rao VVS, Sivakumar Babu GL (eds) Forensic geotechnical engineering. Springer, India, pp 17–37Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lacasse S, Nadim F (1998) Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering. In: 4th International conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, St Louis, Missouri, March, pp 9–12Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Littlejohn GS, Mellors TW, Cole KW (1994) Without site investigation ground is a hazard. Proc Inst Civ Eng 102:72–78Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Magnus R, Teh CI, Lau JM (2005) Committee of inquiry (COI) report on the incident at the MRT circle line worksite that led to the collapse of the Nicoll Highway on 20 April 2004. Ministry of Manpower, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mays LW (2010) Water technology in ancient Egypt. In: Mays L (ed) Ancient water technologies. Springer, Netherlands, pp 53–65Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Meyerhof GG (1963) Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Can Geotech J 1(1):16–26 (NRC Research Press) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    von Moos HQ, Hardegger J, Hanna WS (1948) Selected papers on soil mechanics. Géotechnique 1(1):40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Morgenstern NR (2000) Performance in geotechnical practice. HKIE Trans 7(2):2–15Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Nazir R (2014) Managing geotechnical site investigation work—getting away from old practice. In: International research symposium on engineering and technology, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    NeSmith WM, Siegel TC (2009) Shortcomings of the Davisson offset limit applied to axial compressive load tests on cast-in-place piles. In: Contemporary topics in deep foundations, pp 568–574Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ohsaki Y (1966) Niigata earthquakes, 1964 building damage and soil condition. Soils Found Jpn Geotechn Soc 6(2):14–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ong DEL (2008) Finite element analyses in geotechnical engineering-Part 1: an indispensable tool or a mysterious black box? Jurutera, September, pp 14–18Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ong DEL, Yang DQ, Phang SK (2006) Comparison of finite element modelling of a deep excavation using SAGECRISP and PLAXIS. In: Int Conf on Deep Excavations, Singapore, pp 28–30Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Peck RB (1969a) Deep excavations and tunnelling in soft ground. In: 7th Int. Conf. on SMFE, pp 225–290Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Peck RB (1969) Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics. Geotechnique 19(2):171–187 (Thomas Telford Ltd) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peck RB (1981) Where has all the judgment gone?. Nor Geotech Inst Publ, No, p 134Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Peck RB, Bryant FG (1953) The bearing-capacity failure of the Transcona Elevator. Geotechnique 3(5):201–208 (Thomas Telford Ltd) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Petley D (2012) Global patterns of loss of life from landslides. Geol Geol Soc Am 40(10):927–930Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Petroski H (1985) To engineer is human. St. Martin’s Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Petroski H (1989) Failure as a unifying theme in design. Des Stud 10(4):214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Petroski H (1992) Engineering: history and failure. Am Sci JSTOR 80(6):523–526Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Petroski H (2012) To forgive design: understanding failure. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Poulos HG, Davis EH (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design. Wiley (John) and Sons, Limited, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Powderham AJ (2002) The observational method: learning from projects. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 155(1):59–69 (Telford) Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Reese LC, Van Impe WF (2010) Single piles and pile groups under lateral loading. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Reilly J, Brown J (2004) Management and control of cost and risk for tunneling and infrastructure projects. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 19(4):330Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rogers JD (1995) A man, a dam and a disaster: Mulholland and the St. Francis Dam. South Calif Q JSTOR 77(1/2):1–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rogers JD (2007) Impacts of the 1928 St. Francis Dam failure on geology. In: Civil engineering and America, 2007 annual meeting, association of environmental and engineering geologists, Los Angeles, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Saad F (2006) Prof. Dr William Selim Hanna (1896–1980), Egypt. Struct Eng Int 2:178–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Schrenker R (2007) Learning from failure: the teachings of Petroski. In: Tan TS, Phoon KK, Hight DW, Leroueil S (eds) Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, vol. 41 No. 5, pp 395–398Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Seed HB, Idriss IM (1967) Analysis of soil liquefaction: Niigata earthquake. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 93(3):83–108Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97(SM9):1249–1273Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Shaffner P (2011) Geologic data and risk assessment; improving geologic thinking and products. 21st century dam design—advances and adaptations. In: 31st Annual USSD conference, San Diego, CA, pp 545–569Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Sills GL, Vroman ND, Wahl RE, Schwanz NT (2008) Overview of New Orleans levee failures: lessons learned and their impact on national levee design and assessment. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 134(5):556–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Simpson B (2011) Reliability in geotechnical design-some fundamentals. In: 3rd International symposium on geotechnical safety and risk, vol. 1, pp 393–399Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Sowers GF (1993) Human factors in civil and geotechnical engineering failures. J Geotech Eng Am Soc Civil Eng 119(2):238–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Van Staveren M (2006) Uncertainty and ground conditions. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Van Staveren M (2009) Suggestions for implementing geotechnical risk management. In: Geotechnical risk and safety. CRC Press, Boca Raton. doi: 10.1201/9780203867310.ch50
  81. 81.
    Stewart RA (2000) Dam risk management. In: ISRM international symposiumGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Szechy C (1961) Foundation failures. Concrete Publications Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Taylor DW (1948) Fundamentals of soil mechanics, soil science. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ter-Stepanian G (2000) Quick clay landslides: their enigmatic features and mechanism. Bull Eng Geol Environ 59(1):47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Chapman and Hall Limited, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Tim C (2012) Geotechnical risks and their context for the whole project. In: Burland JB, Chapman T, Skinner H, Brown M (eds) ICE manual of geotechnical engineering—volume I geotechnical engineering principles, problematic soils and site investigation. ICE Publishing, London, UK, pp 59–72Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Van Tol AF, Korff M, Van Staveren M (2009) The education of geotechnical engineers should incorporate risk management. In: Proc. 17th Intl. conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, pp 2741–2744Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Trenter N (2003) Understanding and containing geotechnical risk. Proc Inst Civil Eng Civil Eng 156:42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Whittle AJ, Davies RV (2006) Nicoll Highway collapse: evaluation of geotechnical factors affecting design of excavation support system. In: International conference on deep excavations, vol. 28, Singapore, p 30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sherif W. Agaiby
    • 1
  • Abdelsalam M. Salem
    • 2
  • Sayed M. Ahmed
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Geotechnical and Heavy Civil Engineering DepartmentDar Al-Handasah “Shair and Partners”CairoEgypt
  2. 2.Geotechnical Engineering and Foundations, Faculty of EngineeringCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  3. 3.Geotechnical Engineering and FoundationsAin Shams UniversityCairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations