Skip to main content
Log in

Risk analysis-driven design in tunnelling: the state-of-the-art, learnt from past experiences, and horizon for future development

  • Review
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Risk management became an integral part of most underground construction projects during the late 1990s, also considering the increasing requests in term of safety, and environmental and socio-economic sustainability coming from citizens, owners, lenders, and insurers. The application of risk management procedures, today widely applied, ensures that design’s team efforts can be concentrated in critical areas, focusing the project team’s attention on actions and resources where there is a major risk exposure, or where the greatest time/cost savings can be made through appropriate engineering solutions. Risk Management not solely is intended as a tool for risk avoidance and mitigation, but also as a means to value creation, ameliorating the overall project. Some authors introduced in the last year the concept of risk analysis-driven design. Early risks identification ensures a proactive project improvement, where problems are reduced as they are identified, as differentiated from the traditional approach to construction, which waits until critical problems develop and then implements responses. The present paper gives a thorough overview of the references and experiences in the current practices, what is missing or weak, the developments—possible and necessary—that might have a key role in implementing Risk Management effectively, particularly considering the design phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. British Tunnelling Society (BTS) (2003) Joint code of practice for risk management of tunnel works in the UK

  2. Chiriotti E, Grasso P, Xu S (2003) Analyses of tunnelling risks: state-of-the-art and examples. Gallerie, n. 69

  3. Chiriotti E, Grasso P, Gaj F, Giacomin G (2004) Risk control for mechanized tunnelling in urban areas. In: Proceedings of IX national geotechnical congress, Aveiro, Portugal

  4. Clayton CRI (2001) Managing geotechnical risk. Improving productivity in UK building and construction. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. European Commission (2016). Solvency II directive https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/insurance-and-pensions/risk-management-and-supervision-insurance-companies-solvency-2_en

  6. Einstein HH, Indermitte CA, Descoeudres D, Grasso P, Mahtab MA, Xu S (1998b) Creating the basis for risk assessment in tunnelling. The decision aids for tunnelling, DAT. In: Conference on reducing risk in tunnel design and construction, Basel

  7. Einstein HH, Xu S, Grasso P, Mahtab MA (1998a) Decision aids in tunnelling. World Tunnelling

  8. Flyvbjerg B (2014) What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview. Project Manag J 45(2):6–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grasso P, Mahtab AM, Kalamaras GS, Einstein HH (2002) On the development of a risk management plan for tunneling. In: Proceedings world tunnel congress ITA 2002, Sydney

  10. Grasso P, Mahtab MA, Kalamaras G, Einstein HH (2002) On the development of a Risk Management Plan for Tunnelling. In: Proceedings world tunnel congress and 31st ITA assembly, Sydney

  11. Grasso P, Xu S, Pescara M, Russo G, Repetto L (2006) A methodology for the geotechnical design of long high-speed rail tunnels under the conditions of uncertainty. In: ITA-sponsored 2006 China international symposium on high speed railway tunnels, Beijing

  12. Guglielmetti V, Grasso P, Mathab A (2007) Mechanized tunnelling in urban areas: design methodology and construction control. Taylor & Francis, Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Hartmut R (2011) Developments in the tunneling industry following introduction of the tunneling code of practice. In: IMIA Annual Conference, Amsterdam

  14. ITIG Int. Tunnelling Insurance Group (2006, 2012) Code of practice for risk management of tunnel works

  15. Merrow E (2011) Industrial megaprojects: concepts, strategies & practices for success. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Taleb NN (2001-2005). Fooled by randomness: the hidden role of chance in life and in the markets, 2nd edn. Cahners Business Information, Inc

  17. Taleb NN (2007-2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable, 2nd ed. Random House & Penguin

  18. Xu S, Mahtab A, Grasso P (1996). The use of some decision making tools in tunnelling. Gallerie e grandi opere sotterranee, n° 49 (in Italian and English)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piergiorgio Grasso.

Additional information

This paper was selected from GeoMEast 2017—Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasso, P., Soldo, L. Risk analysis-driven design in tunnelling: the state-of-the-art, learnt from past experiences, and horizon for future development. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2, 49 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0087-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0087-2

Keywords

Navigation