Insights into the Gas Adsorption Mechanisms in Metal–Organic Frameworks from Classical Molecular Simulations

Topics in Current Chemistry volume 378, Article number: 14 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Classical molecular simulations can provide significant insights into the gas adsorption mechanisms and binding sites in various metal–organic frameworks (MOFs). These simulations involve assessing the interactions between the MOF and an adsorbate molecule by calculating the potential energy of the MOF–adsorbate system using a functional form that generally includes nonbonded interaction terms, such as the repulsion/dispersion and permanent electrostatic energies. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) is the most widely used classical method that is carried out to simulate gas adsorption and separation in MOFs and identify the favorable adsorbate binding sites. In this review, we provide an overview of the GCMC methods that are normally utilized to perform these simulations. We also describe how a typical force field is developed for the MOF, which is required to compute the classical potential energy of the system. Furthermore, we highlight some of the common analysis techniques that have been used to determine the locations of the preferential binding sites in these materials. We also review some of the early classical molecular simulation studies that have contributed to our working understanding of the gas adsorption mechanisms in MOFs. Finally, we show that the implementation of classical polarization for simulations in MOFs can be necessary for the accurate modeling of an adsorbate in these materials, particularly those that contain open-metal sites. In general, molecular simulations can provide a great complement to experimental studies by helping to rationalize the favorable MOF–adsorbate interactions and the mechanism of gas adsorption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [42] within the guidelines provided by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry

Fig. 3

Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society

Fig. 4

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [100] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2011 American Chemical Society

Fig. 5

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [19] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society

Fig. 6

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [19] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society

Fig. 7

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [42] within the guidelines provided by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry

Fig. 8

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [64] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society

Fig. 9

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [64] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society

Fig. 10

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [115] within the guidelines provided by the American Institute of Physics. Copyright 2012 American Institute of Physics

Fig. 11

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [42] within the guidelines provided by the Royal Society of Chemistry. Copyright 2017 Royal Society of Chemistry

Fig. 12

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [119] within the guidelines provided by Elsevier. Copyright 2001 Elsevier

Fig. 13

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [121] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2003 American Chemical Society

Fig. 14

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [121] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2003 American Chemical Society

Fig. 15

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [123] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society

Fig. 16

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [123] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society

Fig. 17

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [73] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society

Fig. 18

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [73] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society

Fig. 19

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [136] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society

Fig. 20

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [136] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society

Fig. 21

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [140] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society

Fig. 22

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [140] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society

Fig. 23

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [56] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society

Fig. 24

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [145] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society

Fig. 25

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [57] within the guidelines provided by the American Institute of Physics. Copyright 2012 American Institute of Physics

Fig. 26

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [64] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society

Fig. 27

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [108] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society

Fig. 28

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [152] within the guidelines provided by Wiley-VCH (Germany). Copyright 2015 Wiley-VCH (Germany)

Fig. 29

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [169] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2014 American Chemical Society

Fig. 30

This figure was reproduced from Ref. [170] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2016 American Chemical Society

Fig. 31

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [182] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society

Fig. 32

These figures were reproduced from Ref. [182] within the guidelines provided by the American Chemical Society. Copyright 2017 American Chemical Society

References

  1. 1.

    Furukawa H, Cordova KE, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2013) The chemistry and applications of metal–organic frameworks. Science 341:1230444

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yu J, Xie L-H, Li J-R, Ma Y, Seminario JM, Balbuena PB (2017) \({\text{ CO }}_2\) capture and separations using MOFs: computational and experimental studies. Chem Rev 117:9674–9754

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Suh MP, Park HJ, Prasad TK, Lim D-W (2012) Hydrogen storage in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:782–835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Makal TA, Li J-R, Lu W, Zhou H-C (2012) Methane storage in advanced porous materials. Chem Soc Rev 41:7761–7779

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sumida K, Rogow DL, Mason JA, McDonald TM, Bloch ED, Herm ZR, Bae T-H, Long JR (2012) Carbon dioxide capture in metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev 112:724–781

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Peterson VK, Liu Y, Brown CM, Kepert CJ (2006) Neutron powder diffraction study of \({\text{ D }}_2\) sorption in \({\text{ Cu }}_3\)(1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate)\(_2\). J Am Chem Soc 128:15578–15579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rosi NL, Eckert J, Eddaoudi M, Vodak DT, Kim J, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2003) Hydrogen storage in microporous metal–organic frameworks. Science 300:1127–1129

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Samsonenko DG, Kim H, Sun Y, Kim G-H, Lee H-S, Kim K (2007) Microporous magnesium and manganese formates for acetylene storage and separation. Chem Asian J 2:484–488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Elsaidi SK, Mohamed MH, Schaef HT, Kumar A, Lusi M, Pham T, Forrest KA, Space B, Xu W, Halder GJ, Liu J, Zaworotko MJ, Thallapally PK (2015) Hydrophobic pillared square grids for selective removal of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) from simulated flue gas. Chem Commun 51:15530–15533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang Q, Liu D, Zhong C, Li J-R (2013) Development of computational methodologies for metal–organic frameworks and their application in gas separations. Chem Rev 113:8261–8323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Odoh SO, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG, Gagliardi L (2015) Quantum–chemical characterization of the properties and reactivities of metal–organic frameworks. Chem Rev 115:6051–6111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Sagara T, Klassen J, Ganz E (2004) Computational study of hydrogen binding by metal–organic framework-5. J Chem Phys 121:12543–12547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li H, Eddaoudi M, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (1999) Design and synthesis of an exceptionally stable and highly porous metal–organic framework. Nature 402:276

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Frenkel D, Smit B (2002) Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1989) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Snurr RQ, Yazaydın AÖ, Dubbeldam D, Frost H (2010) Metal–organic frameworks: design and application. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 313–339

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Babarao R, Jiang J (2008) Molecular screening of metal–organic frameworks for \({\text{ CO }}_2\) storage. Langmuir 24:6270–6278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jiang J (2009) Charged \(soc\) metal–organic framework for high-efficacy \({\text{ H }}_2\) adsorption and syngas purification: atomistic simulation study. AIChE J 55:2422–2432

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Babarao R, Eddaoudi M, Jiang JW (2010) Highly porous ionic rht metal–organic framework for \({\text{ H }}_2\) and \({\text{ CO }}_2\) storage and separation: a molecular simulation study. Langmuir 26:11196–11203

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Panagiotopoulos AZ (1987) Direct determination of phase coexistence properties of fluids by Monte Carlo simulation in a new ensemble. Mol Phys 61:813–826

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Greathouse JA, Allendorf MD (2006) The interaction of water with MOF-5 simulated by molecular dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 128:10678–10679

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dubbeldam D, Walton KS, Ellis DE, Snurr RQ (2007) Exceptional negative thermal expansion in isoreticular metal-organic frameworks. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:4496–4499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Salles F, Ghoufi A, Maurin G, Bell RG, Mellot-Draznieks C, Férey G (2008) Molecular dynamics simulations of breathing MOFs: structural transformations of MIL-53(Cr) upon thermal activation and \({\text{ CO }}_2\) Adsorption. Angew Chem Int Ed 47:8487–8491

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dubbeldam D, Krishna R, Snurr RQ (2009) Method for analyzing structural changes of flexible metal–organic frameworks induced by adsorbates. J Phys Chem C 113:19317–19327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Belof JL, Stern AC, Space B (2009) A predictive model of hydrogen sorption for metal–organic materials. J Phys Chem C 113:9316–9320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Boublík T (2006) The BACK equation of state for hydrogen and related compounds. Fluid Phase Equilib 240:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peng D-Y, Robinson DB (1976) A new two-constant equation of state. Ind Eng Chem Fundam 15:59–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jones JE (1924) On the determination of molecular fields. II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A 106:463–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) DREIDING: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J Phys Chem 94:8897–8909

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Rappé AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS, Goddard WA, Skiff WM (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114:10024–10035

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118:11225–11236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lorentz HA (1881) Ueber die Anwendung des Satzes vom Virial in der kinetischen Theorie der Gase. Ann Phys 248:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Waldman M, Hagler A (1993) New combining rules for rare gas van der Waals parameters. J Comput Chem 14:1077–1084

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cioce CR, McLaughlin K, Belof JL, Space B (2013) A polarizable and transferable PHAST \({\text{ N }}_2\) potential for use in materials simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 9:5550–5557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Siperstein F, Myers A, Talu O (2002) Long range corrections for computer simulations of adsorption. Mol Phys 100:2025–2030

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ewald PP (1921) Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann Phys 369:253–287

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wells BA, Chaffee AL (2015) Ewald summation for molecular simulations. J Chem Theory Comput 11:3684–3695

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wolf D, Keblinski P, Phillpot SR, Eggebrecht J (1999) Exact method for the simulation of Coulombic systems by spherically truncated, pairwise \(r^{-1}\) summation. J Chem Phys 110:8254–8282

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fennell CJ, Gezelter JD (2006) Is the Ewald summation still necessary? Pairwise alternatives to the accepted standard for long-range electrostatics. J Chem Phys 124:234104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Guo Z, Wu H, Srinivas G, Zhou Y, Xiang S, Chen Z, Yang Y, Zhou W, O’Keeffe M, Chen B (2011) A metal-organic framework with optimized open metal sites and pore spaces for high methane storage at room temperature. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:3178–3181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Franz DM, Guo Z, Chen B, Space B (2017) Predictive models of gas sorption in a metal-organic framework with open-metal sites and small pore sizes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:18587–18602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mulliken RS (1955) Electronic population analysis on LCAO-MO molecular wave functions. I. J Chem Phys 23:1833–1840

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Singh UC, Kollman PA (1984) An approach to computing electrostatic charges for molecules. J Comput Chem 5:129–145

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Besler BH, Merz KM Jr, Kollman PA (1990) Atomic charges derived from semiempirical methods. J Comput Chem 11:431–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chirlian LE, Francl MM (1987) Atomic charges derived from electrostatic potentials: a detailed study. J Comput Chem 8:894–905

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Breneman CM, Wiberg KB (1990) Determining atom-centered monopoles from molecular electrostatic potentials. The need for high sampling density in formamide conformational analysis. J Comput Chem 11:361–373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell W, Kollman PA (1993) A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 97:10269–10280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rappé AK, Goddard WA (1991) Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem 95:3358–3363

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ramachandran S, Lenz TG, Skiff WM, Rappé AK (1996) Toward an understanding of zeolite Y as a cracking catalyst with the use of periodic charge equilibration. J Phys Chem 100:5898–5907

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Campañá C, Mussard B, Woo TK (2009) Electrostatic potential derived atomic charges for periodic systems using a modified error functional. J Chem Theory Comput 5:2866–2878

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Manz TA, Sholl DS (2010) Chemically meaningful atomic charges that reproduce the electrostatic potential in periodic and nonperiodic materials. J Chem Theory Comput 6:2455–2468

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chen D-L, Stern AC, Space B, Johnson JK (2010) Atomic charges derived from electrostatic potentials for molecular and periodic systems. J Phys Chem A 114:10225–10233

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wilmer CE, Kim KC, Snurr RQ (2012) An extended charge equilibration method. J Phys Chem Lett 3:2506–2511

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Watanabe T, Manz TA, Sholl DS (2011) Accurate treatment of electrostatics during molecular adsorption in nanoporous crystals without assigning point charges to framework atoms. J Phys Chem C 115:4824–4836

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Belof JL, Stern AC, Eddaoudi M, Space B (2007) On the mechanism of hydrogen storage in a metal–organic framework material. J Am Chem Soc 129:15202–15210

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cirera J, Sung JC, Howland PB, Paesani F (2012) The effects of electronic polarization on water adsorption in metal–organic frameworks: \({\text{ H }}_2\text{ O }\) in MIL-53(Cr). J Chem Phys 137:054704

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Witman M, Ling S, Gladysiak A, Stylianou KC, Smit B, Slater B, Haranczyk M (2017) Rational design of a low-cost, high-performance metal-organic framework for hydrogen storage and carbon capture. J Phys Chem C 121:1171–1181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Becker TM, Dubbeldam D, Lin L-C, Vlugt TJ (2016) Investigating polarization effects of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) adsorption in MgMOF-74. J Comput Sci 15:86–94 (International Computational Science and Engineering Conference 2015 (ICSEC15))

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Applequist J, Carl JR, Fung K-K (1972) Atom dipole interaction model for molecular polarizability. Application to polyatomic molecules and determination of atom polarizabilities. J Am Chem Soc 94:2952–2960

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Thole B (1981) Molecular polarizabilities calculated with a modified dipole interaction. Chem Phys 59:341–350

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Bode KA, Applequist J (1996) A new optimization of atom polarizabilities in halomethanes, aldehydes, ketones, and amides by way of the atom dipole interaction model. J Phys Chem 100:17820–17824

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    McLaughlin K, Cioce CR, Pham T, Belof JL, Space B (2013) Efficient calculation of many-body induced electrostatics in molecular systems. J Chem Phys 139:184112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Forrest KA, Pham T, McLaughlin K, Belof JL, Stern AC, Zaworotko MJ, Space B (2012) Simulation of the mechanism of gas sorption in a metal–organic framework with open metal sites: molecular hydrogen in PCN-61. J Phys Chem C 116:15538–15549

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Dinh T-L, Huber GA (2005) An efficient algorithm for polarizable interactions: a uniformly distributed one-dimensional case. J Math Modell Algorithms 4:111–128

    Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Palmo K, Krimm S (2004) Theoretical basis and accuracy of a non-iterative polarization protocol in molecular mechanics energy function calculations. Chem Phys Lett 395:133–137

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    van Duijnen PT, Swart M (1998) Molecular and atomic polarizabilities: Thole’s model revisited. J Phys Chem A 102:2399–2407

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stern AC, Belof JL, Eddaoudi M, Space B (2012) Understanding hydrogen sorption in a polar metal–organic framework with constricted channels. J Chem Phys 136:034705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Banerjee R, Orcajo G, Eckert J, Space B (2015) Understanding the \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption trends in the M-MOF-74 Series (M = Mg, Ni Co, Zn). J Phys Chem C 119:1078–1090

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Shannon RD (1993) Dielectric polarizabilities of ions in oxides and fluorides. J Appl Phys 73:348–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Feynman RP, Hibbs AR (1965) Quantum mechanics and path integrals. McGraw-Hill, New York, p 281

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Cai J, Xing Y, Zhao X (2012) Quantum sieving: feasibility and challenges for the separation of hydrogen isotopes in nanoporous materials. RSC Adv 2:8579–8586

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Garberoglio G, Skoulidas AI, Johnson JK (2005) Adsorption of gases in metal organic materials: comparison of simulations and experiments. J Phys Chem B 109:13094–13103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Liu J, Culp JT, Natesakhawat S, Bockrath BC, Zande B, Sankar SG, Garberoglio G, Johnson JK (2007) Experimental and theoretical studies of gas adsorption in \({\text{ Cu }}_3\)(BTC)\(_2\): an effective activation procedure. J Phys Chem C 111:9305–9313

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Liu J, Lee JY, Pan L, Obermyer RT, Simizu S, Zande B, Li J, Sankar SG, Johnson JK (2008) Adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen in a new metal-organic framework material: [Zn(bdc)(ted)\(_{0.5}\)]. J Phys Chem C 112:2911–2917

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Liu J, Rankin RB, Johnson JK (2009) The importance of charge–quadrupole interactions for \({\text{ H }}_2\) adsorption and diffusion in CuBTC. Mol Simul 35:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Myers AL (2002) Thermodynamics of adsorption in porous materials. AIChE J 48:145–160

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Talu O, Myers AL (2001) Reference potentials for adsorption of helium, argon, methane, and krypton in high-silica zeolites. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 187–188:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Talu O, Myers AL (2001) Molecular simulation of adsorption: Gibbs dividing surface and comparison with experiment. AIChE J 47:1160–1168

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Builes S, Sandler SI, Xiong R (2013) Isosteric heats of gas and liquid adsorption. Langmuir 29:10416–10422

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Yang RT (1997) Gas separation by adsorption processes. Chemical engineering. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Li B, Zhang Y, Krishna R, Yao K, Han Y, Wu Z, Ma D, Shi Z, Pham T, Space B, Liu J, Thallapally PK, Liu J, Chrzanowski M, Ma S (2014) Introduction of \(\pi \)-complexation into porous aromatic framework for highly selective adsorption of ethylene over ethane. J Am Chem Soc 136:8654–8660

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Czepirski L, JagieŁŁo J (1989) Virial-type thermal equation of gas-solid adsorption. Chem Eng Sci 44:797–801

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Dincă M, Dailly A, Liu Y, Brown CM, Neumann DA, Long JR (2006) Hydrogen storage in a microporous metal–organic framework with exposed \({\text{ Mn }}^{2+}\) coordination sites. J Am Chem Soc 128:16876–16883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Pan H, Ritter JA, Balbuena PB (1998) Examination of the approximations used in determining the isosteric heat of adsorption from the Clausius–Clapeyron equation. Langmuir 14:6323–6327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Bhatt PM, Belmabkhout Y, Cadiau A, Adil K, Shekhah O, Shkurenko A, Barbour LJ, Eddaoudi M (2016) A fine-tuned fluorinated MOF addresses the needs for trace \({\text{ CO }}_2\) removal and air capture using physisorption. J Am Chem Soc 138:9301–9307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Nicholson D, Parsonage NG (1982) Computer simulation and the statistical mechanics of adsorption. Academic Press, London, p 97

    Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Chen K-J, Kumar A, Zaworotko MJ, Space B (2016) Theoretical investigations of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) and \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption in robust molecular porous materials. Langmuir 32:11492–11505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Myers AL, Prausnitz JM (1965) Thermodynamics of mixed-gas adsorption. AIChE J 11:121–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Belmabkhout Y, Pirngruber G, Jolimaitre E, Methivier A (2007) A complete experimental approach for synthesis gas separation studies using static gravimetric and column breakthrough experiments. Adsorption 13:341–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Gupta A, Chempath S, Sanborn MJ, Clark LA, Snurr RQ (2003) Object-oriented programming paradigms for molecular modeling. Mol Simul 29:29–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Belof JL, Space B (2012) Massively parallel Monte Carlo (MPMC). GitHub. https://github.com/mpmccode/mpmc

  94. 94.

    Martin MG (2013) mcccs towhee: a tool for Monte Carlo molecular simulation. Mol Simul 39:1212–1222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Ellis DE, Snurr RQ (2016) RASPA: molecular simulation software for adsorption and diffusion in flexible nanoporous materials. Mol Simul 42:81–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Franz DM (2017) Monte Carlo—molecular dynamics (MCMD). GitHub. https://github.com/khavernathy/mcmd

  97. 97.

    Yang Q, Zhong C (2006) Electrostatic-field-induced enhancement of gas mixture separation in metal–organic frameworks: a computational study. ChemPhysChem 7:1417–1421

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Yang Q, Zhong C (2006) Molecular simulation of carbon dioxide/methane/hydrogen mixture adsorption in metal–organic frameworks. J Phys Chem B 110:17776–17783

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Tassel PRV, Davis HT, McCormick AV (1991) Monte Carlo calculations of adsorbate placement and thermodynamics in a micropore: Xe in NaA. Mol Phys 73:1107–1125

    Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Lucena Sa MP, Mileo PGM, Silvino PFG, Cavalcante CL (2011) Unusual adsorption site behavior in PCN-14 metal–organic framework predicted from Monte Carlo simulation. J Am Chem Soc 133:19282–19285

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Peng Y, Krungleviciute V, Eryazici I, Hupp JT, Farha OK, Yildirim T (2013) Methane storage in metal–organic frameworks: current records, surprise findings, and challenges. J Am Chem Soc 135:11887–11894

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Ma S, Sun D, Simmons JM, Collier CD, Yuan D, Zhou H-C (2008) Metal–organic framework from an anthracene derivative containing nanoscopic cages exhibiting high methane uptake. J Am Chem Soc 130:1012–1016

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Nouar F, Eubank JF, Bousquet T, Wojtas L, Zaworotko MJ, Eddaoudi M (2008) Supermolecular building blocks (SBBs) for the design and synthesis of highly porous metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 130:1833–1835

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Zhao D, Yuan D, Sun D, Zhou H-C (2009) Stabilization of metal–organic frameworks with high surface areas by the incorporation of mesocavities with microwindows. J Am Chem Soc 131:9186–9188

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Yuan D, Zhao D, Sun D, Zhou H-C (2010) An isoreticular series of metal–organic frameworks with dendritic hexacarboxylate ligands and exceptionally high gas-uptake capacity. Angew Chem Int Ed 49:5357–5361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Franz DM, Space B (2017) Experimental and theoretical investigations of the gas adsorption sites in rht-metal–organic frameworks. CrystEngComm 19:4646–4665

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Mohamed MH, Elsaidi SK, Wojtas L, Pham T, Forrest KA, Tudor B, Space B, Zaworotko MJ (2012) Highly selective \({\text{ CO }}_2\) uptake in uninodal 6-connected “mmo” nets based upon \({\text{ MO }}_4^{2-}\) (M = Cr, Mo) pillars. J Am Chem Soc 134:19556–19559

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Nugent P, Belmabkhout Y, Luebke R, Eddaoudi M, Zaworotko MJ, Space B (2013) Understanding hydrogen sorption in a metal–organic framework with open-metal sites and amide functional groups. J Phys Chem C 117:9340–9354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, McLaughlin K, Tudor B, Nugent P, Hogan A, Mullen A, Cioce CR, Zaworotko MJ, Space B (2013) Theoretical investigations of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) and \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption in an interpenetrated square-pillared metal–organic material. J Phys Chem C 117:9970–9982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Mohamed MH, Elsaidi SK, Pham T, Forrest KA, Tudor B, Wojtas L, Space B, Zaworotko MJ (2013) Pillar substitution modulates \({\text{ CO }}_2\) affinity in “mmo” topology networks. Chem Commun 49:9809–9811

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Hogan A, McLaughlin K, Belof JL, Eckert J, Space B (2014) Simulations of hydrogen sorption in rht-MOF-1: identifying the binding sites through explicit polarization and quantum rotation calculations. J Mater Chem A 2:2088–2100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Eckert J, Georgiev PA, Mullen A, Luebke R, Cairns AJ, Belmabkhout Y, Eubank JF, McLaughlin K, Lohstroh W, Eddaoudi M, Space B (2014) Investigating the gas sorption mechanism in an rht-metal–organic framework through computational studies. J Phys Chem C 118:439–456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, McDonald K, Space B (2014) Modeling PCN-61 and PCN-66: isostructural rht-metal–organic frameworks with distinct \({\text{ CO }}_2\) sorption mechanisms. Cryst Growth Des 14:5599–5607

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Matanović I, Belof JL, Space B, Sillar K, Sauer J, Eckert J, Bačić Z (2012) Hydrogen adsorbed in a metal organic framework-5: coupled translation-rotation eigenstates from quantum five-dimensional calculations. J Chem Phys 137:014701

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Belof JL, Stern AC, Space B (2008) An accurate and transferable intermolecular diatomic hydrogen potential for condensed phase simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4:1332–1337

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Yildirim T, Hartman MR (2005) Direct observation of hydrogen adsorption sites and nanocage formation in metal–organic frameworks. Phys Rev Lett 95:215504

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Sillar K, Hofmann A, Sauer J (2009) Ab initio study of hydrogen adsorption in MOF-5. J Am Chem Soc 131:4143–4150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Kawakami T, Takamizawa S, Kitagawa Y, Maruta T, Mori W, Yamaguchi K (2001) Theoretical studies of spin arrangement of adsorbed organic radicals in metal–organic nanoporous cavity. Polyhedron 20:1197–1206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Li H, Eddaoudi M, Groy TL, Yaghi OM (1998) Establishing microporosity in open metal-organic frameworks: gas sorption isotherms for Zn(BDC) (BDC = 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylate). J Am Chem Soc 120:8571–8572

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Vishnyakov A, Ravikovitch PI, Neimark AV, Bülow M, Wang QM (2003) Nanopore structure and sorption properties of Cu-BTC metal–organic framework. Nano Lett 3:713–718

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Chui SS-Y, Lo SM-F, Charmant JPH, Orpen AG, Williams ID (1999) A chemically functionalizable nanoporous material [\({\text{ Cu }}_3 {\text{(TMA) }}_2 ({\text{ H }}_2\text{ O })_3]_n\). Science 283:1148–1150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Düren T, Sarkisov L, Yaghi OM, Snurr RQ (2004) Design of new materials for methane storage. Langmuir 20:2683–2689

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Eddaoudi M, Kim J, Rosi N, Vodak D, Wachter J, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2002) Systematic design of pore size and functionality in isoreticular MOFs and their application in methane storage. Science 295:469–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Martin MG, Siepmann JI (1998) Transferable potentials for phase equilibria. 1. United-atom description of \(n\)-alkanes. J Phys Chem B 102:2569–2577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Slone RV, Benkstein KD, Bélanger S, Hupp JT, Guzei IA, Rheingold AL (1998) Luminescent transition-metal-containing cyclophanes (“molecular squares”): covalent self-assembly, host-guest studies and preliminary nanoporous materials applications. Coord Chem Rev 171:221–243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Chen C-Y, Li H-X, Davis ME (1993) Studies on mesoporous materials: I. Synthesis and characterization of MCM-41. Microporous Mater 2:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Düren T, Snurr RQ (2004) Assessment of isoreticular metal-organic frameworks for adsorption separations: a molecular simulation study of methane/\(n\)-butane mixtures. J Chem Phys B 108:15703–15708

    Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Eddaoudi M, Li H, Yaghi OM (2000) Highly porous and stable metal–organic frameworks: structure design and sorption properties. J Am Chem Soc 122:1391–1397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Dybtsev DN, Chun H, Yoon SH, Kim D, Kim K (2004) Microporous manganese formate: a simple metal–organic porous material with high framework stability and highly selective gas sorption properties. J Am Chem Soc 126:32–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Pan L, Sander MB, Huang X, Li J, Smith M, Bittner E, Bockrath B, Johnson JK (2004) Microporous metal organic materials: promising candidates as sorbents for hydrogen storage. J Am Chem Soc 126:1308–1309

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Buch V (1994) Path integral simulations of mixed para-\({\text{ D }}_2\) and ortho-\({\text{ D }}_2\) clusters: the orientational effects. J Chem Phys 100:7610–7629

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Darkrim F, Levesque D (1998) Monte Carlo simulations of hydrogen adsorption in single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Chem Phys 109:4981–4984

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Rowsell JLC, Millward AR, Park KS, Yaghi OM (2004) Hydrogen sorption in functionalized metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 126:5666–5667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    DOE Targets for Onboard Hydrogen Storage Systems for Light-Duty Vehicles. 2012. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/01/f19/fcto_myrdd_table_onboard_h2_storage_systems_doe_targets_ldv.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019

  136. 136.

    Walton KS, Millward AR, Dubbeldam D, Frost H, Low JJ, Yaghi OM, Snurr RQ (2008) Understanding inflections and steps in carbon dioxide adsorption isotherms in metal–organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 130:406–407

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Millward AR, Yaghi OM (2005) Metal–organic frameworks with exceptionally high capacity for storage of carbon dioxide at room temperature. J Am Chem Soc 127:17998–17999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Rouquerol J, Rouquerol F, Llewellyn P, Maurin G, Sing KSW (2013) Adsorption by powders and porous solids: principles, methodology and applications. Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Chae HK, Siberio-Perez DY, Kim J, Go Y, Eddaoudi M, Matzger AJ, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2004) A route to high surface area, porosity and inclusion of large molecules in crystals. Nature 427:523

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Yang Q, Zhong C, Chen J-F (2008) Computational study of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) storage in metal–organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 112:1562–1569

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Yang Q, Xue C, Zhong C, Chen J-F (2007) Molecular simulation of separation of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) from flue gases in CU-BTC metal–organic framework. AIChE J 53:2832–2840

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Rowsell JLC, Yaghi OM (2006) Effects of functionalization, catenation, and variation of the metal oxide and organic linking units on the low-pressure hydrogen adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 128:1304–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Ma S, Sun D, Ambrogio M, Fillinger JA, Parkin S, Zhou H-C (2007) Framework-catenation isomerism in metal–organic frameworks and its impact on hydrogen uptake. J Am Chem Soc 129:1858–1859

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Liu Y, Eubank JF, Cairns AJ, Eckert J, Kravtsov VC, Luebke R, Eddaoudi M (2007) Assembly of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based on indium-trimer building blocks: a porous MOF with soc topology and high hydrogen storage. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:3278–3283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Hogan A, Tudor B, McLaughlin K, Belof JL, Eckert J, Space B (2015) Understanding hydrogen sorption in In- soc-MOF: a charged metal–organic framework with open-metal sites, narrow channels, and counterions. Cryst Growth Des 15:1460–1471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Millange F, Serre C, Férey G (2002) Synthesis, structure determination and properties of MIL-53as and MIL-53ht: the first \({\text{ Cr }}^{III}\) hybrid inorganic–organic microporous solids: \({\text{ Cr }}^{III} \text{(OH) } \cdot {\text{ O }}_2 \text{ C }{-}{\text{ C }}_6 {\text{ H }}_4{-}\text{ CO2 } \cdot {\text{ HO }}_2 \text{ C }{-} {\text{ C }}_6 {\text{ H }}_4{-} {\text{ CO }}_2 {\text{ H }}_x\). Chem Commun 1:822–823

    Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Serre C, Millange F, Thouvenot C, Noguès M, Marsolier G, Louër D, Férey G (2002) Very large breathing effect in the first nanoporous chromium(III)-based solids: MIL-53 or \({\text{ Cr }}^{III} \text{(OH) } \cdot {\text{ O }}_2 \text{ C }{-} {\text{ C }}_6 {\text{ H }}_4 - {\text{ CO }}_2 \cdot {\text{ HO }}_2 \text{ C }{-} {\text{ C }}_6 {\text{ H }}_4 - {\text{ CO }}_2 {\text{ H }}_x \cdot {\text{ H }}_2 {\text{ O }}_y\). J Am Chem Soc 124:13519–13526

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Park K, Lin W, Paesani F (2012) A refined MS-EVB model for proton transport in aqueous environments. J Phys Chem B 116:343–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Abascal JLF, Vega C (2005) A general purpose model for the condensed phases of water: TIP4P/2005. J Chem Phys 123:234505

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Fanourgakis GS, Xantheas SS (2008) Development of transferable interaction potentials for water. V. Extension of the flexible, polarizable, Thole-type model potential (TTM3-F, v. 3.0) to describe the vibrational spectra of water clusters and liquid water. J Chem Phys 128:074506

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182–7190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Gao W-Y, Ma S, Space B (2015) Theoretical insights into the tuning of metal binding sites of paddlewheels in rht-metal–organic frameworks. ChemPhysChem 16:3170–3179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Franz D, Forrest KA, Pham T, Space B (2016) Accurate \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption modeling in the rht-MOF NOTT-112 using explicit polarization. Cryst Growth Des 16:6024–6032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Forrest KA, Pham T, Space B (2017) Investigating gas sorption in an rht-metal–organic framework with 1,2,3-triazole groups. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:29204–29221

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Franz DM, Dyott ZE, Forrest KA, Hogan A, Pham T, Space B (2018) Simulations of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and small hydrocarbon sorption in a nitrogen-rich rht-metal–organic framework. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:1761–1777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Suepaul S, Forrest KA, Pham T, Space B (2018) Investigating the effects of linker extension on \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption in the rht-metal–organic framework NU-111 by molecular simulations. Cryst Growth Des 18:7599–7610

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Brown CM, Liu Y, Yildirim T, Peterson VK, Kepert CJ (2009) Hydrogen adsorption in HKUST-1: a combined inelastic neutron scattering and first-principles study. Nanotechnology 20:204025

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Yan Y, Telepeni I, Yang S, Lin X, Kockelmann W, Dailly A, Blake AJ, Lewis W, Walker GS, Allan DR, Barnett SA, Champness NR, Schröder M (2010) Metal–organic polyhedral frameworks: high \({\text{ H }}_2\) adsorption capacities and neutron powder diffraction studies. J Am Chem Soc 132:4092–4094

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Mullen AL, Pham T, Forrest KA, Cioce CR, McLaughlin K, Space B (2013) A polarizable and transferable PHAST \({\text{ CO }}_2\) potential for materials simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 9:5421–5429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Potoff JJ, Siepmann JI (2001) Vapor–liquid equilibria of mixtures containing alkanes, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen. AIChE J 47:1676–1682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Zheng B, Bai J, Duan J, Wojtas L, Zaworotko MJ (2011) Enhanced \({\text{ CO }}_2\) binding affinity of a high-uptake rht-type metal–organic framework decorated with acylamide groups. J Am Chem Soc 133:748–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Wu H, Simmons JM, Srinivas G, Zhou W, Yildirim T (2010) Adsorption sites and binding nature of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) in prototypical metal–organic frameworks: a combined neutron diffraction and first-principles study. J Phys Chem Lett 1:1946–1951

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Rosi NL, Kim J, Eddaoudi M, Chen B, O’Keeffe M, Yaghi OM (2005) Rod packings and metal–organic frameworks constructed from rod-shaped secondary building units. J Am Chem Soc 127:1504–1518

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Dietzel PDC, Morita Y, Blom R, Fjellvåg H (2005) An in situ high-temperature single-crystal investigation of a dehydrated metal–organic framework compound and field-induced magnetization of one-dimensional metal-oxygen chains. Angew Chem Int Ed 44:6354–6358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Dietzel PDC, Panella B, Hirscher M, Blom R, Fjellvåg H (2006) Hydrogen adsorption in a nickel based coordination polymer with open metal sites in the cylindrical cavities of the desolvated framework. Chem Commun 1:959–961

  166. 166.

    Dietzel PDC, Blom R, Fjellvåg H (2008) Base-induced formation of two magnesium metal–organic framework compounds with a bifunctional tetratopic ligand. Eur J Inorg Chem 2008:3624–3632

    Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Marcz M, Johnsen RE, Dietzel PD, Fjellvag H (2012) The iron member of the CPO-27 coordination polymer series: synthesis, characterization, and intriguing redox properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 157:62–74

    Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Sanz R, Martinez F, Orcajo G, Wojtas L, Briones D (2013) Synthesis of a honeycomb-like Cu-based metal–organic framework and its carbon dioxide adsorption behaviour. Dalton Trans 42:2392–2398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, McLaughlin K, Eckert J, Space B (2014) Capturing the \({\text{ H }}_2\)-metal interaction in Mg-MOF-74 using classical polarization. J Phys Chem C 118:22683–22690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Eckert J, Space B (2016) Dramatic effect of the electrostatic parameters on \({\text{ H }}_2\) sorption in an M-MOF-74 analogue. Cryst Growth Des 16:867–874

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Zhou W, Wu H, Yildirim T (2008) Enhanced \({\text{ H }}_2\) adsorption in isostructural metal–organic frameworks with open metal sites: strong dependence of the binding strength on metal ions. J Am Chem Soc 130:15268–15269

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Valenzano L, Civalleri B, Chavan S, Palomino GT, Areán CO, Bordiga S (2010) Computational and experimental studies on the adsorption of CO, \({\text{ N }}_2\), and \({\text{ CO }}_2\) on Mg-MOF-74. J Phys Chem C 114:11185–11191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Valenzano L, Civalleri B, Sillar K, Sauer J (2011) Heats of adsorption of CO and \({\text{ CO }}_2\) in metal-organic frameworks: quantum mechanical study of CPO-27-M (M = Mg, Ni, Zn). J Phys Chem C 115:21777–21784

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Dzubak AL, Lin L-C, Kim J, Swisher JA, Poloni R, Maximoff SN, Smit B, Gagliardi L (2012) Ab initio carbon capture in open-site metal–organic frameworks. Nat Chem 4:810–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Lin L-C, Lee K, Gagliardi L, Neaton JB, Smit B (2014) Force-field development from electronic structure calculations with periodic boundary conditions: applications to gaseous adsorption and transport in metal-organic frameworks. J Chem Theory Comput 10:1477–1488

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Sillar K, Sauer J (2012) Ab initio prediction of adsorption isotherms for small molecules in metal–organic frameworks: the effect of lateral interactions for methane/CPO-27-Mg. J Am Chem Soc 134:18354–18365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Bloch ED, Hudson MR, Mason JA, Chavan S, Crocellá V, Howe JD, Lee K, Dzubak AL, Queen WL, Zadrozny JM, Geier SJ, Lin L-C, Gagliardi L, Smit B, Neaton JB, Bordiga S, Brown CM, Long JR (2014) Reversible CO binding enables tunable \({\text{ CO/H }}_2\) and \({\text{ CO/N }}_2\) separations in metal–organic frameworks with exposed divalent metal cations. J Am Chem Soc 136:10752–10761

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Dietzel PDC, Georgiev PA, Eckert J, Blom R, Strassle T, Unruh T (2010) Interaction of hydrogen with accessible metal sites in the metal–organic frameworks \({\text{ M }}_2\)(dhtp) (CPO-27-M; M = Ni Co, Mg). Chem Commun 46:4962–4964

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Sumida K, Brown CM, Herm ZR, Chavan S, Bordiga S, Long JR (2011) Hydrogen storage properties and neutron scattering studies of \({\text{ Mg }}_2\)(dobdc)-a metal–organic framework with open \({\text{ Mg }}^{2+}\) adsorption sites. Chem Commun 47:1157–1159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Liu Y, Kabbour H, Brown CM, Neumann DA, Ahn CC (2008) Increasing the density of adsorbed hydrogen with coordinatively unsaturated metal centers in metal–organic frameworks. Langmuir 24:4772–4777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Rosnes MH, Opitz M, Frontzek M, Lohstroh W, Embs JP, Georgiev PA, Dietzel PDC (2015) Intriguing differences in hydrogen adsorption in CPO-27 materials induced by metal substitution. J Mater Chem A 3:4827–4839

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Becker TM, Heinen J, Dubbeldam D, Lin L-C, Vlugt TJH (2017) Polarizable force fields for \({\text{ CO }}_2\) and \({\text{ CH }}_4\) adsorption in M-MOF-74. J Phys Chem C 121:4659–4673

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Becker TM, Lin L-C, Dubbeldam D, Vlugt TJH (2018) Polarizable force field for \({\text{ CO }}_2\) in M-MOF-74 derived from quantum mechanics. J Phys Chem C 122:24488–24498

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Becker TM, Luna-Triguero A, Vicent-Luna JM, Lin L-C, Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Vlugt TJH (2018) Potential of polarizable force fields for predicting the separation performance of small hydrocarbons in M-MOF-74. Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:28848–28859

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Lachet V, Boutin A, Tavitian B, Fuchs AH (1998) Computational study of \(p\)-Xylene/\(m\)-xylene mixtures adsorbed in NaY zeolite. J Phys Chem B 102:9224–9233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Dietzel PDC, Besikiotis V, Blom R (2009) Application of metal-organic frameworks with coordinatively unsaturated metal sites in storage and separation of methane and carbon dioxide. J Mater Chem 19:7362–7370

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Herm ZR, Swisher JA, Smit B, Krishna R, Long JR (2011) Metal–organic frameworks as adsorbents for hydrogen purification and precombustion carbon dioxide capture. J Am Chem Soc 133:5664–5667

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Yu D, Yazaydın AÖ, Lane JR, Dietzel PDC, Snurr RQ (2013) A combined experimental and quantum chemical study of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) adsorption in the metal–organic framework CPO-27 with different metals. Chem Sci 4:3544–3556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Queen WL, Hudson MR, Bloch ED, Mason JA, Gonzalez MI, Lee JS, Gygi D, Howe JD, Lee K, Darwish TA, James M, Peterson VK, Teat SJ, Smit B, Neaton JB, Long JR, Brown CM (2014) Comprehensive study of carbon dioxide adsorption in the metal–organic frameworks \({\text{ M }}_2\)(dobdc) (M = Mg, Mn, Fe Co, Ni, Cu, Zn). Chem Sci 5:4569–4581

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Mercado R, Vlaisavljevich B, Lin L-C, Lee K, Lee Y, Mason JA, Xiao DJ, Gonzalez MI, Kapelewski MT, Neaton JB, Smit B (2016) Force field development from periodic density functional theory calculations for gas separation applications using metal-organic frameworks. J Phys Chem C 120:12590–12604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Skoulidas AI, Sholl DS (2005) Self-diffusion and transport diffusion of light gases in metal–organic framework materials assessed using molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 109:15760–15768

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Liu B, Yang Q, Xue C, Zhong C, Chen B, Smit B (2008) Enhanced adsorption selectivity of hydrogen/methane mixtures in metal–organic frameworks with interpenetration: a molecular simulation study. J Phys Chem C 112:9854–9860

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Pham T, Forrest KA, Tudor B, Elsaidi SK, Mohamed MH, McLaughlin K, Cioce CR, Zaworotko MJ, Space B (2014) Theoretical investigations of \({\text{ CO }}_2\) and \({\text{ CH }}_4\) sorption in an interpenetrated diamondoid metal–organic material. Langmuir 30:6454–6462

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Scott HS, Shivanna M, Bajpai A, Madden DG, Chen K-J, Pham T, Forrest KA, Hogan A, Space B, Perry JJ IV, Zaworotko MJ (2017) Highly selective separation of \({\text{ C }}_2 {\text{ H }}_2\) from \({\text{ CO }}_2\) by a new dichromate-based hybrid ultramicroporous material. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:33395–33400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    McLaughlin K, Cioce CR, Belof JL, Space B (2012) A molecular \({\text{ H }}_2\) potential for heterogeneous simulations including polarization and many-body van der Waals interactions. J Chem Phys 136:194302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the National Science Foundation (Award No. DMR-1607989), including support from the Major Research Instrumentation Program (Award No. CHE-1531590). B.S. also acknowledges support from an American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund Grant (ACS PRF 56673-ND6).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CHE205, Tampa, Fl, 33620-5250, USA

    Tony Pham & Brian Space

Authors
  1. Tony Pham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Space
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Pham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection “Metal–Organic Framework: From Design to Applications”; edited by Xian-He Bu, Michael J. Zaworotko, and Zhenjie Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pham, T., Space, B. Insights into the Gas Adsorption Mechanisms in Metal–Organic Frameworks from Classical Molecular Simulations. Top Curr Chem (Z) 378, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41061-019-0276-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Metal–organic frameworks
  • Molecular simulation
  • Grand canonical Monte Carlo
  • Potential energy function
  • Adsorption site
  • Classical polarization