Topics in Current Chemistry

, 375:5 | Cite as

Chitosan-Based Matrices Prepared by Gamma Irradiation for Tissue Regeneration: Structural Properties vs. Preparation Method

  • Maria Helena CasimiroEmail author
  • Joana J. H. Lancastre
  • Alexandra P. Rodrigues
  • Susana R. Gomes
  • Gabriela Rodrigues
  • Luís M. FerreiraEmail author
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Applications of Radiation Chemistry


In the last decade, new generations of biopolymer-based materials have attracted attention, aiming its application as scaffolds for tissue engineering. These engineered three-dimensional scaffolds are designed to improve or replace damaged, missing, or otherwise compromised tissues or organs. Despite the number of promising methods that can be used to generate 3D cell-instructive matrices, the innovative nature of the present work relies on the application of ionizing radiation technology to form and modify surfaces and matrices with advantage over more conventional technologies (room temperature reaction, absence of harmful initiators or solvents, high penetration through the bulk materials, etc.), and the possibility of preparation and sterilization in one single step. The current chapter summarizes the work done by the authors in the gamma radiation processing of biocompatible and biodegradable chitosan-based matrices for skin regeneration. Particular attention is given to the correlation between the different preparation conditions and the final polymeric matrices’ properties. We therefore expect to demonstrate that instructive matrices produced and improved by radiation technology bring to the field of skin regenerative medicine a supplemental advantage over more conservative techniques.


Chitosan Gamma irradiation Porous scaffolds Skin substitute Tissue engineering 



C2TN/IST authors gratefully acknowledge the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia support through the UID/Multi/04349/2013 project. The authors also acknowledge the International Atomic Energy Agency under the Research Contract No. 18202 for financial support of this work. The authors would also like to thank the Erasmus student Reda Paitian (University of Vilnius, Lithuania) for her collaboration in the preparation and characterization of chitosan-based matrices.


  1. 1.
    Ayres CE, Jha BS, Sell SA, Bowlin GL, Simpson DG (2010) Nanotechnology in the design of soft tissue scaffolds: innovations in structure and function—advanced review. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2:20–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Brien CE (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P, Schacht E (2011) Biopolymer-based hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: a review. Biomacromolecules 12:1387–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hasirci V, Vrana E, Zorlutuna P, Ndreu A, Yilgor P, Basmanav FB, Aydin E (2006) Nanobiomaterials: a review of the existing science and technology, and new approaches. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 17:1241–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shalumona KT, Anulekhaa KH, Chennazhia KP, Tamurab H, Naira SV, Jayakumar R (2011) Fabrication of chitosan/poly(caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffold for bone and skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol 48:571–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gomes SR, Rodrigues G, Martins GG, Henriques CMR, Silva JC (2013) In vitro evaluation of crosslinked electrospun fish gelatin scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C 33:1219–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorozhkin SV (2010) Bioceramics of calcium ortophosphates. Biomaterials 31:1465–1485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liao S, Wang W, Uo M, Ohkawa S, Akasaka T, Tamura K, Cui F, Watari F (2005) A tree-layered nano-carbonated hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite membrane for guided tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 26:7564–7571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frohbergh ME, Katsman A, Botta GP, Lazarovici P, Schauer CL, Wegst UGK, Lelkes PI (2012) Electrospun hydroxyapatite-containing chitosan nanofibers crosslinked with genipin for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:9167–9178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martins A, Reis R, Neves N (2008) Electrospinning: processing technique for tissue engineering scaffolding. Int Mater Rev 53:257–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Safinia L, Datan N, Hohse M, Mantalaris A, Bismarck A (2005) Towards a methodology for the effective surface modification of porous polymer scaffolds. Biomaterials 26:7537–7547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodas ACD, Ohnuki T, Mathor MB, Lugao AB (2005) Irradiated PVAl membrane swelled with chitosan solution as dermal equivalent. Nucl Instrum Methods B 236:536–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plikk P, Odelius K, Hakkarainen M, Albertsson AC (2006) Finalizing the properties of porous scaffolds of aliphatic polyesters through radiation sterilization. Biomaterials 27:5335–5347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Odelius K, Plikk P, Albertsson AC (2008) The influence of composition of porous copolyester scaffolds on reactions induced by irradiation sterilization. Biomaterials 29:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cottam E, Hukins DWL, Lee K, Hewitt C, Jenkins MJ (2009) Effect of sterilisation by gamma irradiation on the ability of polycaprolactone (PCL) to act as a scaffold material. Med Eng Phys 31:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luyen DV, Huong DM (1996) In: Salamone JC (ed) Polymeric Materials Encyclopedia, vol 2. CRC Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Risbud MV, Hardikar AA, Bhat SV, Bhonde RR (2000) pH-sensitive freeze-dried chitosan-polyvinyl pyrrolidone hydrogels as controlled release system for antibiotic delivery. J Control Release 68:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ishihara M, Nakanishi K, Ono K, Sato M, Kikuchi M, Saito Y, Yura H, Matsui T, Hattori H, Uenoyama M, Kurita A (2002) Photocrosslinkable chitosan as a dressing for wound occlusion and accelerator in healing process. Biomaterials 23:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Reis RL, Mano JF (2005) Graft copolymerized chitosan-present status and applications. Carbohydr Polym 62:142–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Casimiro MH, Leal JP, Gil MH (2005) Characterisation of gamma irradiated chitosan/pHEMA membranes for biomedical purposes. Nucl Instrum Methods B 236:482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shi C, Zhu Y, Ran X, Wang M, Su Y, Cheng T (2006) Therapeutic potential of chitosan and its derivatives in regenerative medicine. J Surg Res 133:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Casimiro MH, Gil MH, Leal JP (2010) Suitability of gamma irradiated chitosan based membranes as matrix in drug release system. Int J Pharm 395:142–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alves NM, Mano JF (2008) Chitosan derivatives obtained by chemical modifications for biomedical and environmental applications. Int J Biol Macromol 43:401–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Luyen DV, Huong DM (1996) In: Salamone JC (ed) Polymeric materials encyclopedia chitin and derivatives. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ulański P, Rosiak J (1992) Preliminary studies on radiation-induced changes in chitosan. Radiat Phys Chem 39:53–57Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lim LY, Khor E, Koo O (1998) Gamma irradiation of chitosan. J Biomed Mater Res 43:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Casimiro MH, Leal JP, Gil MH (2005) Characterisation of gamma-irradiated chitosan/pHEMA membranes for biomedical purposes. Nucl Instrum Methods B 236:482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wiley Billmeyer FW (1984) Textbook of polymer science, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hassan CM, Peppas NA (2000) In: Dusek K (ed) Structure and applications of poly(vinyl alcohol), vol 153. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmedlen RH, Masters KS, West JL (2002) Photocrosslinkable polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels that can be modified with cell adhesion peptides for use in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23(22):4325–4332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Solaro R, Corti A, Chiellini E (2000) Biodegradation of poly(vinyl alcohol) with different molecular weights and degree of hydrolysis. Polym Adv Technol 11:873–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bolto B, Tran T, Hoang M, Xie Z (2009) Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes. Prog Polym Sci 34:969–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tamariz E, Rios-Ramírez A (2013) Biodegradation of medical purpose polymeric materials and their impact on biocompatibility. INTECH. doi: 10.5772/56220 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang H, Grinstaff MW (2014) Recent advances in glycerol polymers: chemistry and biomedical applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 35:1906–1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lim L-Y, Khor E, Koo O (1998) γ irradiation of chitosan. J Appl Polym Sci 43:290–382Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Paulino AT, Simionato JI, Garcia JC, Nozaki J (2006) Characterization of chitosan and chitin produced from silkworm chrysalides. Carbohydr Polym 64:98–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yue W (2014) Prevention of browning of depolymerized chitosan obtained by gamma irradiation. Carbohydr Polym 101:857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ferreira LM, Leal JP, Casimiro MH, Cruz C, Lancastre JJH, Falcão NA (2014) Evidence of structural order recovery in LDPE based copolymers prepared by gamma irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem 94:31–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Huang Y, Onyeri S, Siewe M, Moshfeghian A, Madihally SV (2005) In vitro characterization of chitosan-gelatin scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 26:7616–7627CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares (C2TN), Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLouresPortugal
  2. 2.Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Ecologia, Evolução e Alterações Ambientais (cE3c)Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations