Topics in Current Chemistry

, 374:61 | Cite as

Sonochemical Reactors

  • Parag R. Gogate
  • Pankaj N. Patil
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sonochemistry: From basic principles to innovative applications


Sonochemical reactors are based on the generation of cavitational events using ultrasound and offer immense potential for the intensification of physical and chemical processing applications. The present work presents a critical analysis of the underlying mechanisms for intensification, available reactor configurations and overview of the different applications exploited successfully, though mostly at laboratory scales. Guidelines have also been presented for optimum selection of the important operating parameters (frequency and intensity of irradiation, temperature and liquid physicochemical properties) as well as the geometric parameters (type of reactor configuration and the number/position of the transducers) so as to maximize the process intensification benefits. The key areas for future work so as to transform the successful technique at laboratory/pilot scale into commercial technology have also been discussed. Overall, it has been established that there is immense potential for sonochemical reactors for process intensification leading to greener processing and economic benefits. Combined efforts from a wide range of disciplines such as material science, physics, chemistry and chemical engineers are required to harness the benefits at commercial scale operation.


Sonochemical reactors Design aspects Operating parameters Guidelines Process intensification Scale-up strategies 


  1. 1.
    Mason TJ (1992) Practical sonochemistry: users guide in chemistry and chemical engineering. Ellis Horwood series in organic chemistry. Ellis Horwood, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2004) Sonochemical reactors: scale up aspects. Ultrason Sonochem 11(3–4):105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanthale PM, Gogate PR, Pandit AB, Wilhelm AM (2003) Mapping of ultrasonic horn: link primary and secondary effects of ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 10:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lorimer JP, Mason TJ (1987) Sonochemistry. Part 1—the physical aspects. Chem Soc Rev 16:239–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindley J, Mason TJ (1987) Sonochemistry: part 2—synthetic applications. Chem Soc Rev 16:275–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mason TJ (1990) A survey of commercially available sources of ultrasound suitable for sonochemistry, in sonochemistry—uses of ultrasound in chemistry. Royal Society of Chemistry, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mason TJ (1999) Sonochemistry. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pandit AB, Moholkar VS (1996) Harness cavitation to improve processing. Chem Eng Prog 96:57–69Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vichare NP, Senthilkumar P, Moholkar VS, Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2000) Energy analysis in Acoustic cavitation. Ind Eng Chem Res 39:1480–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashokkumar M, Griezer F (1999) Ultrasound assisted chemical processes. Rev Chem Eng 15:41–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2000) Engineering design methods for cavitation reactors I: sonochemical reactors. AIChE J 46(2):372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gogate PR (2002) Cavitation: an auxiliary technique in wastewater treatment schemes. Adv Environ Res 6(3):335–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mason TJ, Lorimer JP (2002) Applied sonochemistry: uses of power ultrasound in chemistry and processing. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar Ajay, Gogate PR, Pandit AB, Delmas H, Wilhelm AM (2004) Gas liquid mass transfer studies in sonochemical reactors. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:1812–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gole VL, Gogate PR (2012) A review on intensification of synthesis of biodiesel from sustainable feed stock using sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng Process 53:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yusof NM, Bandar B, Yousef A, Mecit A, Jagannathan M, Ashokkumar M (2016) Physical and chemical effects of acoustic cavitation in selected ultrasonic cleaning applications. Ultrason Sonochem 29:568–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gogate PR (2008) Cavitational reactors for process intensification of chemical processing applications: a critical review. Chem Eng and process 47:515–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moholkar VS, Pandit AB (1997) Bubble behavior in hydrodynamic cavitation: effect of turbulence. AIChE J 43(6):1641–1648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naidu DV, Rajan R, Kumar R, Gandhi KS, Arakeri VH, Chandrasekaran S (1994) Modeling of a batch sono-chemical reactor. Chem Eng Sci 49(6):877–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vichare NP (1999) Studies in sonochemistry and cavitation phenomena. M Chem Eng Thesis Univ of Mumbai, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kidak R, Ince NH (2006) Ultrasonic destruction of phenol and substituted phenols: a review of current research. Ultrason Sonochem 13:195–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Flynn HG (1964) Physics of acoustic cavitation in liquids in physical acoustics. In: Mason WP (ed) Physical acoustics, vol 1, Part B. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Margulis MA (1981) Investigations of electrical phenomena connected with cavitation I On electrical theories of chemical and physiochemical actions of ultrasonics. Russ J Phy Chem 55:154–158Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noltingk BE, Neppiras EA (1950) Cavitation produced by ultrasonics. Proceed Phyl Soc (Lond) B63:674–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dahlem O, Demaiffe V, Halloin V, Reisse J (1998) Direct sonication system suitable for medium scale sonochemical reactors. AIChE J 44:2724–2730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thoma G, Swofford J, Popov V, Som M (1997) Sonochemical destruction of dichloromethane and o-dichlorobenzene in aqueous solution using a nearfield acoustic processor. Adv Environ Res 1:178–193Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gonze E, Gonthier Y, Boldo P, Bernis A (1998) Standing waves in a high frequency sonoreactor: visualisation and effects. Chem Eng Sci 53:523–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gogate PR, Mujumdar S, Pandit AB (2003) Large scale sonochemical reactors for process intensification: design and experimental validation. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78:685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gogate PR, Tatake PA, Kanthale PM, Pandit AB (2002) Mapping of sonochemical reactors: review. Analysis and experimental verification. AIChE J 48(7):1542–1560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2004) Sonophotocatalytic reactors for wastewater treatment: a critical review. AIChE J 50(5):1051–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mhetre AS, Gogate PR (2014) New design and mapping studies of sonochemical reactor operating at capacity of 72 L. Chem Eng J 258:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Son Y, Lim M, Khim J (2009) Investigation of acoustic cavitation energy in a large-scale sonoreactor. Ultrason Sonochem 16:552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asakura Y, Yasuda K, Kato D, Kojima Y, Koda S (2008) Development of a large sonochemical reactor at a high frequency. Chem Eng J 139:339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Palanisamy B, Paul B, Chang C-H (2015) The synthesis of cadmium sulfide nanoplatelets using a novel continuous flow sonochemical reactor. Ultrason Sonochem 26:452–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shirsath SR, Sonawane SH, Saini DR, Pandit AB (2015) Continuous precipitation of calcium carbonate using sonochemical reactor. Ultrason Sonochem 24:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jolhe PD, Bhanvase BA, Patil VS, Sonawane SH (2015) Sonochemical synthesis of peracetic acid in a continuous flow micro-structured reactor. Chem Eng J 276:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Entezari MH, Kruus P (1996) Effect of frequency onsonochemical reactions II: temperature and intensity effects. Ultrason Sonochem 3:19–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Auzay SR, Naffrechoux JBE (2010) Comparison of characterization methods in high frequency sonochemical reactors of differing configurations. Ultrason Sonochem 17:547–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seymore JD, Gupta RB (1997) Oxidation of aqueous pollutants using ultrasound—salt induced enhancement. Ind Eng Chem Res 36:3453–3457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Servant G, Laborde JL, Hita A, Caltagirone JP, Gerard A (2003) On the interaction between ultrasound waves and bubble clouds in mono- and dual-frequency sonoreactors. Ultrason Sonochem 10:347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tatake PA, Pandit AB (2002) Modelling and experimental investigation into cavity dynamics and cavitational yield: influence of dual frequency ultrasound sources. Chem Eng Sci 57:4987–4995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yotsumoto T, Morita T, Noiri Y, Kojima Y, Asakura Y, Koda S (2014) Influence of pressure and temperature on sonochemical reaction in a flow-type reactor equipped with a PZT transducer. Jpn J Appl Phys 53 (7 SPEC ISSUE):07KE09Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gogate PR, Shaha S, Csoka L (2015) Intensification of cavitational activity using gases in different types of sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng J 262:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gogate PR, Katekhaye SN (2012) A comparison of the degree of intensification due to the use of additives in ultrasonic horn and ultrasonic bath. Chem Eng Proc 61:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wei Z, Weavers LK (2016) Combining COMSOL modeling with acoustic pressure maps to design sono-reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 31:490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tudela I, Sáez V, Esclapez MD, Díez-García MI, Bonete P, González-García J (2014) Simulation of the spatial distribution of the acoustic pressure in sonochemical reactors with numerical methods: a review. Ultrason Sonochem 21(3):909–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sutkar VS, Gogate PR, Csoka L (2010) Theoretical prediction of cavitational activity distribution in sonochemical reactors. Chem Eng J 158:290–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Balasundaram B, Pandit AB (2001) Selective release of invertase by hydrodynamic cavitation. Biochem Eng J 8:251–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kurokawa M, King PM, Wu X, Joyce EM, Mason TJ, Yamamoto K (2016) Effect of sonication frequency on the disruption of algae. Ultrason Sonochem 31:157–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Phull SS, Newman AP, Lorimer JP, Pollet B, Mason TJ (1997) The development and evaluation of ultrasound in the biocidal treatment of water. Ultrason Sonochem 4:157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Piyasena P, Mohareb E, McKellar RC (2003) Inactivation of microbes using ultrasound:a review. Int J Food Microbiol 87:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Blume T, Neis U (2005) Improving chlorine disinfection of wastewater by ultrasound application. Water Sci Technol 52:139–144Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sangave PC, Pandit AB (2004) Ultrasound pre-treatment for enhanced biodegradability of the distillery wastewater. Ultrason Sonochem 11:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sangave PC, Gogate PR, Pandit AB (2007) Ultrasound and ozone assisted biological degradation of thermally pretreated and anaerobically pretreated distillery wastewater. Chemosphere 68:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nickel K, Neis U (2007) Ultrasonic disintegration of bio solids for improved biodegradation. Ultrason Sonochem 14:450–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chisti Y (2003) Sonobioreactors: using ultrasound for enhanced microbial productivity. Trends Biotechnol 21:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhang G, Zhang P, Gao J, Chen Y (2008) Using acoustic cavitation to improve thebio-activity of activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 99:1497–1502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cravatto G, Cintas P (2006) Power ultrasound in organic synthesis: moving cavitational chemistry from academia to innovative and large-scale applications. Chem Soc Rev 35:180–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nebois P, Bouaziz Z, Fillion H, Moeini L, Aurell Piquer MJ, Luche JL, Riera A, Moyano A, Pericas MA (1996) The Diels-Alder cycloaddition an intriguing problem in organic sonochemistry. Ultrason Sonochem 3:7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Luche JL, Einhorn C, Einhorn J, de Souza Barboza JC, Petrier C, Dupuy C, Delair P, Allavena C, Tuschl T (1990) Ultrasonic waves as promoters of radical processes in chemistry: the case of organometallic reactions. Ultrasonics 28(5):316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Luque de Castro MD, Priego-Capote F (2007) Ultrasound-assisted crystallization (sonocrystallization). Ultrason Sonochem 14:717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Amara N, Ratsimba B, Wilhelm AM, Delmas H (2001) Crystallization of potashalum: effect of power ultrasound. Ultrason Sonochem 8:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Li H, Li H, Guo Z, Liu Y (2006) The application of power ultrasound to reaction crystallization. Ultrason Sonochem 13:359–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Adewuyi YG (2001) Sonochemistry: environmental science and engineering applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:4681–4715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Adewuyi YG (2005) Sonochemistry in environmental remediation 2 heterogeneous sonophotocatalytic oxidation processes for the treatment of pollutants in water. Environ Sci Technol 39:8557–8570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Patil AL, Patil PN, Gogate PR (2014) Degradation of imidacloprid containing wastewaters using ultrasound based treatment strategies. Ultrason Sonochem 21:1778–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Shirsath SR, Sonawane SH, Gogate PR (2012) Intensification of extraction of natural products using ultrasonic irradiations—a review of current status. Chem Eng Proc 53:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vinatoru M (2001) An overview of the ultrasonically assisted extraction of bioactive principles from herbs. Ultrason Sonochem 8:303–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tata DB, Biglow J, Wu J, Tritton TR, Dunn F (1996) Ultrasound-enhanced hydroxyl radical production from two clinically employed anticancer drugs: adriamycin and mitomycin C. Ultrason Sonochem 3:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Supersaxo A, Kou JH (1995) Controlled delivery of pharmaceuticals from preformed porous polymeric microparticles. US Patent 5:470–582Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dalmoro A, Barba AA, Lamberti G, d’Amore M (2012) Intensifying the microencapsulation process: ultrasonic atomization as an innovative approach. Euro J Pharma Biopharma 80:471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Boukroufa M, Boutekedjiret C, Petigny L, Rakotomanoman N, Chemat F (2015) Bio-refinery of orange peels waste: a new concept based on integrated green and solvent free extraction processes using ultrasound and microwave techniques to obtain essential oil polyphenols and pectin. Ultrason Sonochem 24:72–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Gude VG (2015) Synergism of microwaves and ultrasound for advanced biorefineries. Resour Eff Tech 1:116–125Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Khokhawala IM, Gogate PR (2010) Degradation of phenol using a combination of ultrasonic and UV irradiations at pilot scale operation. Ultrason Sonochem 17:833–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tenster I, Matafonov G, Batoev V (2015) Combination of high-frequency ultrasound and UV radiation of excilamp for surface disinfection. Eng Life Sci 15:830–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Tezcanli-GiiUyer G, Ince NH (2004) Individual and combined effects of ultrasound ozone and UV irradiation: a case study with textile dyes. Ultrasonics 42:603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Franke M, Braeutigam P, Wu ZY, Ren Y, Ondruschka B (2011) Enhancement of chloroform degradation by the combination of hydrodynamic and acoustic cavitation. Ultrason Sonochem 18:888–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Franke M, Ondruschka B, Braeutigam P (2014) Hydrodynamic-acoustic-cavitation for biodiesel synthesis. In: 3rd international conference on environment chemistry and biology singapore IPCBEE 78.  doi: 10.7763/IPCBEE. 2014.V78.6
  79. 79.
    Braeutigam P, Franke M, Schneider RJ, Lehmann A, Stolle A, Ondruschka B (2012) Degradation of carbamazepine in environmentally relevant concentrations in water by Hydrodynamic-Acoustic -Cavitation (HAC). Water Res 46:2469–2477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gogate PR, McGuire D, Mededovic Thagard S, Cathey R, Blackmon J, Chapas G (2014) Hybrid advanced oxidation reactor technology: from concept to practical reality. Ultrason Sonochem 21:590–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentInstitute of Chemical TechnologyMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Chemical Engineering DepartmentGharda Institute of TechnologyTal. KhedIndia

Personalised recommendations