Skip to main content

Quant data science meets dexterous artistry

Abstract

Data science is a bridge discipline connecting fundamental science, applied disciplines, and the arts. The demand for novel data science methods is well established. However, there is much less agreement on the core aspects of representation, modeling, and analytics that involve huge and heterogeneous datasets. The scientific community needs to build consensus about data science education and training curricula, including the necessary entry matriculation prerequisites and the expected learning competency outcomes needed to tackle complex Big Data challenges. To meet the rapidly increasing demand for effective evidence-based practice and data analytic methods, research teams, funding agencies, academic institutions, politicians, and industry leaders should embrace innovation, promote high-risk projects, join forces to expand the technological capacity, and enhance the workforce skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Robinson, L.: Frank crossley: a man of mettle. JOM 68(7), 1743 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinberger, E.D.: Fourier and Taylor series on fitness landscapes. Biol. Cybern. 65(5), 321–330 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan, R.A.: Introduction to Tensor Products of Banach Spaces. Springer, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hey, T., Tansley, S., Tolle, K.M.: The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knuth, D.E.: Theory and practice. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 90(1), 1–15 (1991)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donoho, D.: 50 years of data science. In: Tukey Centennial Workshop, Princeton (2015)

  7. Cao, L.: Data science: a comprehensive overview. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 50(3), 43 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cao, L.: Data science: nature and pitfalls. IEEE Intell. Syst. 31(5), 66–75 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cao, L.: Data science: challenges and directions. Commun. ACM 60(8), 59–68 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz, M.S., Sadler, P.M., Sonnert, G., Tai, R.H.: Depth versus breadth: how content coverage in high school science courses relates to later success in college science coursework. Sci. Educ. 93(5), 798–826 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleveland, W.S.: Data science: an action plan for expanding the technical areas of the field of statistics. Int. Stat. Rev. 69(1), 21–26 (2001)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dinov, I.D.: Volume and value of big healthcare data. J. Med. Stat. Inf. 4(1), 1–7 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Papalexakis, E.E., Faloutsos, C.: Unsupervised tensor mining for big data practitioners. Big Data 4(3), 179–191 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hopcroft, J., Kannan, R.: Foundations of data science. Microsoft Research https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/foundations-of-data-science/ (2014)

  15. Dinov, I.: Data Science and Predictive Analytics: Biomedical and Health Applications using R, p. 800. Springer, Berlin (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevenson, D.K., et al.: Transdisciplinary translational science and the case of preterm birth. J. Perinatol. 33, 251 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3,160018-1–160018-9 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Marszalek, R.T., Flintoft, L.: Being open: our policy on source code. Genome Biol. 17(1), 172 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dinov, I.: Methodological challenges and analytic opportunities for modeling and interpreting big healthcare data. GigaSci. 5(12), 1–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, D., Agha, L.: Big names or big ideas: do peer-review panels select the best science proposals? Science 348(6233), 434–438 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Villani, E., Greco, L., Phillips, N.: Understanding value creation in public-private partnerships: a comparative case study. J. Manag. Stud. 54, 876–905 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin, C.L., Chun, M.: The BRAIN initiative: building, strengthening, and sustaining. Neuron 92(3), 570–573 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Brownson, R.C., Colditz, G.A., Proctor, E.K.: Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Newman, B.M., Newman, P.R.: Development Through Life: A Psychosocial Approach. Cengage Learning, Boston (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher, G.G., Chaffee, D.S., Tetrick, L.E., Davalos, D.B., Potter, G.G.: Cognitive functioning, aging, and work: a review and recommendations for research and practice. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 22(3), 314 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frégnac, Y.: Big data and the industrialization of neuroscience: a safe roadmap for understanding the brain? Science 358(6362), 470–477 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Einstein, A.: Lens-like action of a star by the deviation of light in the gravitational field. Science 84(2188), 506–507 (1936)

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivo D. Dinov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinov, I.D. Quant data science meets dexterous artistry. Int J Data Sci Anal 7, 81–86 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-018-0138-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-018-0138-6

Keywords

  • Data science
  • Predictive analytics
  • Artistry
  • Qualitative and quantitative skills
  • Big data