Food Ethics

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 273–282 | Cite as

Reengaging Voices of Animal Suffering

  • André Krebber
Research Article


The paper discusses the potential for recognizing animals as autonomous individuals through a critique of the handling of suffering of terminally ill companion animals. To this end, it offers three distinct reflections on animal suffering through immanent readings of the painting The Death of the Stag (1786) by Benjamin West (1738–1820), a personal experience with caring for a dog dying from cancer, and a thought from Theodor W. Adorno’s Negative Dialectics (1966). Neither developing a coherent theory of animal suffering nor ethical or medical recommendations for the handling of terminally ill companion animals, an open dialectics between individualizing and reifying tendencies in suffering is drawn out by way of these reflections. As a consequence, the paper argues that the euthanizing of terminally ill companion animals as preemptive measure to avoid suffering undermines the individuality of animals and deprives humans of an experience of the animal as an autonomous other. By confronting these three instances with each other, the paper concludes that enabling animals to face up to a terminal illness, at least up to a certain point, rather than to prevent such struggle, recognizes them as autonomous individuals in their own rights. Thereby, finally, also a window opens up to realize our own semblance to animals.


Animal suffering Euthanasia Companion animals Painting Animal care Adorno 



I am grateful to Cecilia Novero for her comments on an earlier version of the essay and to the editors of this issue of Food Ethics for their openness towards its unconventional approach. The text is dedicated to the memory of Skylla.


  1. Aaltola, Elisa. 2012. Animal suffering: Philosophy and culture. The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, Theodor W. 1985. On the Question: "What Is German?" Trans. Thomas Y. Levin. New German Critique (36): 121–131.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, Theodor W. 1990. Negative Dialektik. In Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 6, ed. Rolf Tiedemann, 7–412. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  4. Adorno, Theodor W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Theory and History of Literature, vol. 88. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Adorno, Theodor W. 1999. Criteria of New Music. In Sound figures, 145–196. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Adorno, Theodor W. 2001. Negative Dialectics. Trans. Dennis Redmond. Accessed 15 July 2016.
  7. Clifford, Timothy, Michael Gallagher, Helen Smailes, Duncan Thomson, and National Galleries of Scotland. 2009. Benjamin West and the death of the stag: The story behind the painting and its conservation. Edinburgh: National Galleries of Scotland.Google Scholar
  8. Dawkins, Marian Stamp. 2008. The science of animal suffering. ETH Ethology 114 (10): 937–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fudge, Erica. 2006. Two Ethics: Killing animals in the past and the present. In Killing animals, ed. Animal Studies Group, 99–119. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Horkheimer, Max. 1993. Materialism and morality. In Between philosophy and social science: Selected early writings, ed. G.F. Hunter, 15–48. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Luy, Jörg. 2008. Ethische Aspekte der Tiertötung als ultima ratio veterinärmedizinischen Handelns. Kommentar zu einem oft verschwiegenen Aspekt tierärztlicher Berufstätigkeit. Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 3 (2): 123–126. doi: 10.1007/s00003-008-0327-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Morris, Patricia. 2012. Blue juice: Euthanasia in veterinary medicine. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  13. Myrone, Martin. 2005. Bodybuilding: Reforming masculinities in British art 1750-1810. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press for the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art.Google Scholar
  14. Palmer, Clare. 2006. Killing animals in animal shelters. In Killing animals, ed. Animal Studies Group, 170–187. Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  15. Reikerstorfer, Johann. 1998. Politische Theologie als "negative Theologie": Zum zeitlichen Sinn der Gottesrede. In Vom Wagnis der Nichtidentität: Johann Baptist Metz zu Ehren, ed. Johann Reikerstorfer, 11–49. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Rollin, Bernhard. 2005. Ethics of critical care. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care 15 (4): 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. van Herten, J. 2016. Killing of companion animals: To be avoided at all cost? In The end of animal life: A start for ethical debate: Ethical and societal considerations on killing animals, ed. Franck L.B. Meijboom and Elsbeth N. Stassen, 203–223. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Veatch, Robert M., Dan C. English, and Amy Haddad. 2015. Case studies in biomedical ethics: Decision-making, principles, and cases. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  19. von Erffa, Helmut, and Allen Staley. 1986. The paintings of Benjamin West. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KasselKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations