Abstract
Using data from a primary survey of 524 domestic workers in the cities of Ahmedabad and Kolkata, this paper critically assesses the status of domestic workers. It includes analyses of various characteristics of the domestic workspace such as employer–employee relationships, wages and working conditions, institutional supports, aspirations and collective bargaining keeping the legal provisions of social securities and other labour rights in India. The characteristics of informality include the absence of a written contract, social security, conventional bargaining method of wage determination, presence of multiple household employers, very little government intervention, distressed livelihood option and lack of decent work environment. The inferences drawn in this paper reinstate the abysmal status of domestic workers in India. Findings from the data from these two cities do validate the vulnerability of domestic work as an occupation and the lack of legislative protection. Despite few dissimilarities, the basic findings are in conformity with the primary characteristics of domestic work in India.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Notes
Only 55 per cent is allowed to use separate toilets in Kolkata, whereas this figure is 20 per cent in Kolkata.
References
Anderson, Bridget. 2000. Just another job? Paying for domestic work. Gender and Development 9 (1): 25–33.
Deshingkar, P. (2005), ‘Maximizing the benefits of internal migration for development’, In IOM (Ed.) Migration, Development and Poverty Reduction in Asia. Geneva: International organization for Migration.
Fish. 2018. Domestic Workers of the World Unite! A Global Movement for Dignity and Human Rights, Sage.
Goyal, Yugank and Rakesh Kumar. 2019. The Informal domestic workers in India—A descriptive mapping of NSSO data. In Recognition of the rights of domestic workers in India: challenges and the way forward. Singapore: Springer, pp. 107–125.
Guha-Khasnobis, Basudeb, and Ravi Kanbur, eds. 2006. Linking the formal and informal economy: concepts and policies. OUP Oxford.
Hennekam, Sophie, and Dawn Bennett. 2017. Sexual harassment in the creative industries: tolerance, culture and the need for change. Gender, Work and Organization 24 (4): 417–434.
Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 2001. Doméstica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadows of affluence. UK: University of California Press.
ILO. 2013. Domestic workers across the world: Global and regional statistics and the extent of legal protection" International Labour Organization, Geneva. Box 2.2 p 14. accessed on 18.02.2019), “Child labour and domestic work”, http://www.ilo.org/ipec/areas/Childdomesticlabour/lang--en/index.html).
ILO. 2015. Indispensable yet unprotected: Working conditions of Indian domestic workers at home and abroad, Geneva, Switzerland, www.ilo.org.
ILO. 2012. Effective Protection for domestic workers: a guide to designing labour laws. Geneva: International Labour Office.
John, J. 2010. In Defence of the Rights of Domestic Workers”. Editorial. Labour File. Volume 8 No. 1–3, January–June 2010, pp. 1–5.
John, J. 2017. Antinomies of empowerment: observations on civil society, politics and urban governance in India. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (26): 2716–2724.
Kaur, Ravinder. 2006. Migrating For Work: Rewriting Gender Relations. In Sadhna Arya & Anupama Roy, eds. Poverty, Gender and migration: women migration in asia, Sage Publications, New Delhi.
Mehrotra, Surabhi, Tandon and Mewa Bharti. 2008. Rights and Dignity: Women Domestic Workers in Jaipur”. New Delhi: Jagori.
NSS 68th round. 2011–2012. Socio-economic survey on Employment and Unemployment in India”, Schedule 10, MOSPI, Government of India, New Delhi.
Palriwala, Rajni, and N. Neetha. 2011. The absence of state law: domestic workers in India. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23 (1): 97–120.
Ray, Raka. 2000. Masculinity, femininity, and servitude: Domestic workers in Calcutta in the late twentieth century. Feminist Studies 26 (3): 691–718.
Reghuram, Parvati. 2001. Caste and gender in the organisation of paid domestic work in India. Work Employment and Society 15 (3): 607–617.
Sen, Samita and Sengupta, Nilanjana. 2016. Domestic days: women, work, and politics in contemporary kolkata, Oxford Scholarship Online, p 52
Zelizer, V. 2000. The purchase of intimacy. Law and Social Inquiry 25 (3): 817–848.
Funding
No funding from any source/s is received to develop this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This paper is neither published nor under consideration for publication anywhere else.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghatak, A., Sarkar, K. Status of Domestic Workers in India: A Tale of Two Cities. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 65, 863–879 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00395-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-022-00395-5