Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Poverty Gaps and Gaps in Theory: A Note on “Dynamising” Small Firms

  • Research Note
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present note concerns the macro-development perspective underlying new experimental research programme to study poverty. In the perspective, the focus on poverty relates to poverty gaps, an understanding that makes clear poverty is something to do with employment status that remains miles away from state-of-the-art employment status that comes with work technological choices embodied in advanced growth process. This understanding also says that narrowing the gap would add to innovations and growth that adds to profit augmentation—a powerful motive that guides market economies. The present note argues that this focus on solutions to poverty-related employment relates to a policy focus on possible dynamism of small firms and innovation nexus, and if so, there are alternative Keynesian macroeconomic perspective on the processes and innovations that paces advanced growth and how small firms can relate to them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow, K.J. 2000. Innovations in Large and Small Firms. In Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, ed. R. Swedberg. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, A.K. (ed.). 1999. Economy and Organization. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballandi, M., and L.D. Propris. 2015. Three Generations of Industrial Districts. Journal of Regional Research 32: 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, A., and A. Newman. 1993. Occupational Choice and the Process of Development. Journal of Political Economy 102 (2): 274–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. 1995. The Contribution of Endogenous Growth Theories to the Analysis of Development Problems: An Assessment. In Handbook of Development Economics, vol. III, ed. J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belussi, F., and K. Caldari. 2009. At the Origin of the Industrial District: Alfred Marshall and the Cambridge School. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33 (2): 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, R., and R. Sandilands. 2005. Does modern endogenous growth theory adequately represent Allyn Young? Cambridge Journal of Economics 29 (3): 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, K. (ed.). 2005. Indian Industrial Clusters. New Delhi: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1972. The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics. Economic Journal 82; Reprinted in 1989. The Essential Kaldor, ed. F. Targetti and A.P. Thirlwall. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co.

  • Krugman, P. 2013. New Growth Fizzle. https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/18/the-new-growth-fizzle/.

  • Mookherjee, D., and D. Ray. 2001. Reading in the Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1989. Industrialization and the Big Push. Journal of Political Economy 97 (5): 1003–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padhi, S.P. 2014. Human Capital Formation, Good Employment Opportunities & the Firm. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 50 (2): 526–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padhi, S.P. 2017. Regional Manufacturing Disparity in India and the Role of Investment: A Keynesian–Youngian–Kaldorian Note. Indian Economic Journal (Sage) 65 (1–4): 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padhi, S.P. 2018. Importance of Employment Growth: A Perspective on Technological Progress. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 61 (2): 401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padhi, S.P. 2019. Technological versus Pecuniary External Economies: The Former Rule the Roost. Journal of Economic Issues 53 (1): 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. 1997. The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and the Interest rate with Credit Rationing. Review of Economic Studies 64 (2): 173–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy (pp. 21–38). Harvard Business Review 57 (2): 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. 1986. Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): S71–S103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. 1991. Increasing Returns and New developments in Growth Theory. In Equilibrium Theory and Applications, ed. W.A. Barnett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. 2000. The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley. In Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, ed. R. Swedberg. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1975. Employment, Technology and Development. Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. 2000. Growth Theory: an Exposition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Prelude to a critique of economic theory. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. 1951. The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market. Journal of Political Economy 59 (3): 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchikawa, S. 2011. Small and Medium Enterprises in the Indian Auto-Component Industry. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (25): 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. 1928. Increasing Returns and Economic Progress. Economic Journal 38 (152): 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satya Prasad Padhi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Padhi, S.P. Poverty Gaps and Gaps in Theory: A Note on “Dynamising” Small Firms. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 63, 847–858 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00237-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-020-00237-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation