Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effort Level by Firm Size in a Developing Country

  • Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares effort levels of workers from small and medium/large firms. Generally, smaller firms pay lower wages, have higher turnover rate and offer less employment protection, aspects that can influence work effort. Therefore, through a data panel on the Brazilian labor market from 2005 to 2015, different econometric models (RE probit model and Mundlak–Chamberlain model) and using two proxies (sub-remuneration and absence) for measurement, we analyzed whether workers of small firms demonstrate higher working effort than workers of medium/large firms and whether such differences remained after job switch among firms. Results indicate that: (1) workers of small firms are more dedicated to work; (2) workers who switched jobs from a small to a medium/large firm experienced change in behavior, for variable sub-remuneration; (3) switching jobs did not alter working effort for variable absence, as workers remained on a superior level to those employed in small/large firms throughout the research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agell, J. 2004. Why are Small Firms Different? Managers' Views. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 106(3): 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbache, J.S. 2001. Wages differentials in Brazil: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Development Studies 38 (2): 109–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D.B., and M.C. Keilbach. 2004. Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies 38(8): 949–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmby, T.A., and G. Stephan. 2000. Worker absenteeism: Why firm size may matter. Manchester School 68(5): 568–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A.L., M. Francesconi, and F. Frank. 2002. Temporary Jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends? Economic Journal 112(480): 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and J.L. Medoff. 2003. Firm age and wages. Journal of Labor Economics 21(3): 677–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., and J. Medoff. 1989. The employer size-wage effect. Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 1027–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A. 1999. The impact of employee involvement on small firms’ financial performance. National Institute Economic Review 169(1): 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card, D., A.R. Cardoso, J. Heining, and P. Kline. 2018. Firms and labor market inequality: Evidence and some theory. Journal of Labour Economics 36(1): 13–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, G. 1980. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Review of Economic Studies 47(1): 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, C-k, and K.J. Choi. 2017. The impact of firm size on dynamic incentives and investment. RAND Journal of Economics 48(1): 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.J., P. Hanges, and E.A. Locke. 2004. The relationship of need for achievement to entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis. Human Performance 17: 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottini, E., T. Kato, and N. Westergaard-Nielsen. 2011. Adverse workplace conditions, high-involvement, work practices and labor turnover: evidence from Danish linked employer-employee data. Labour Economics. 18(6): 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contini, C., and C. Villosio. 2003. Worker mobility, job displacement and wage dynamics in Italy. LABORatorio R. Revelli. Working Paper 24.

  • Deshpande, S.P., and D.Y. Golhar. 1994. HRM practices in large and small manufacturing firms: A comparative study. Journal of Small Business Management 32(2): 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engellandt, A., and R.T. Riphahn. 2005. Temporary contracts and employee effort. Labour Economics 12(3): 281–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flabbi, L., and A. Ichino. 2001. Productivity, seniority, and wages: New evidence from personnel data. Labour Economics 8: 359–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Serrano, C. 2011. Does size matter? The influence of firm size on working conditions, job satisfaction and quit intentions. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 58(2): 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghignoni, E. 2009. Temporary contracts, employees’ effort and labour productivity: The evidence for Italy. Economia politica 26(2): 279–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneman, R.L., J.W. Tansky, and S.M. Camp. 2000. Human resource management practices in small and medium-sized enterprises: Unanswered questions and future research perspectives. Economia Politica 25(1): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. 2003. The hiring decisions and compensation structures of large firms. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56(4): 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichino, A., and R.T. Riphahn. 2005. The effect of employment protection on worker effort: Absenteeism during and after probation. Journal of the European Economic Association 3(1): 120–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idson, T.L., and D.J. Feaster. 1990. A selectivity model of employer-size wage differentials. Journal of Labor Economics 8(1): 99–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idson, T.L., and W.Y. Oi. 1999. Workers are more productive in large firms. The American Economic Review 89(2): 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimeno, J.F., and L.T. Cortes. 1996. Effort, absenteeism, and fixed term employment contracts. Revista Española de Economía 13(1): 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koike, K. 1987. Human resource development and labor-management relations. In The domestic transformation, vol. 1, ed. K. Yamamura and Y. Yasuba, 289–330. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazear, E.P. 2006. Productivity and Wages Investment in physical and human capital must be supported by incentives. Business Economics 41(4): 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H.L. 1911. Laws of wages: An Essay in statistical economics. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. 1978. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica 46: 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi, W., and J.L. Idson. 1999. Firm size and wages. In Handbook of labor economics, ed. O. Ashenfelter and D. Card, 2165–2214. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riphahn, R.T., and A. Thalmaier. 2001. Behavioral Effects of Probation Periods: An Analysis of Worker Absenteeism. Journal of Economics and Statistics 221 (2): 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarfati, G. 2013. Estágios de desenvolvimento econômico e políticas públicas de empreendedorismo e de micro, pequenas e médias empresas (MPMEs) em perspectiva comparada: os casos do Brasil, do Canadá, do Chile, da Irlanda e da Itália. Revista de Administração Pública 47(1): 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scoppa, V. 2014. Firm size and wages in Italy: Evidence from exogenous job displacements. The Manchester School 82(6): 677–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tansel, A., and S. Gazioglu. 2014. Management-employee relations, firm size and job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower 35(8): 1260–1275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Biesebroeck, J. 2005. Firm size matters: Growth and productivity growth in African manufacturing. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53(3): 545–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vroom, V.H. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stel, A., M. Carree, and R. Thurik. 2005. The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics 24(3): 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T.R., and S.G. Lazzarini. 2004. Compensating for innovation: Do small firms offer high-powered incentives that lure talent and motivate effort? Managerial and Decision Economics 25(6–7): 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Aguiar do Monte.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monte, P.A. Effort Level by Firm Size in a Developing Country. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 62, 73–87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00161-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-019-00161-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation